User talk:Orser67/Archive 3

Salmon P. Chase

Tnx for yr edit of a pretty obscure article. I'm not certain that Samuel Chase went unmentioned in Mr. Matlin's AP US History course in 1962-'63, but (unless I was distracted) that scholar (and I presume Morrisson and Commanger's textbook) softpedalled at least the earlier Chase. I had to look up which extravagant denomination of US currency Sam'n's face is on, but my opinion that the difference in given name was not the fault of my failing memory turns out to be pleasingly correct. (Whether my opinion was well founded is of course of no significance... .)
--Jerzy•t 05:25, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, yes, it is certainly easy to confuse the two Chases given their very similar names. Orser67 (talk) 05:30, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sad, tho, that the correct spellings are Morison and Commager. Oh, well...
--Jerzy•t 05:42, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited DeWitt Clinton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Further (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Steve Lund for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve Lund is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Lund until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:28, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sam Houston, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Constitutional Union Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States elections, 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Orser67. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

United States elections, 2018

Just wanted to give a quick thanks for your great work on this article! I was very pleased to find it fully fleshed out with an excellent description of all the elections and not just quick summaries of the related articles like most of these pages are. I hope you keep up the great work and have a happy Thanksgiving! Reywas92^Talk 08:20, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nathanael Greene, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greene County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An invitation to discussion

I kindly invite you to the discussion on Template talk:Infobox election#The Bolding issue to decide whether to bold the winner in the election infobox. Lmmnhn (talk) 19:17, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to the final vote on the bolding issue

Thank you for participating in the bolding issue of the election infobox earlier. We are now holding a final vote in order to reach a clear and final consensus. Please take a moment to review our discussion and vote in Template talk:Infobox election#Final voting. Lmmnhn (talk) 14:53, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

toggle ref check

Hello, just a note to say that User:Lingzhi2/reviewsourcecheck has been update to add the option to toggle it on or off.

The installed script will add a tab to the drop-down tab at the top, located between the 'watchlist star' and the search box (using the vector.js skin). The tab toggles between "Hide ref check" and "Show ref check" with displaying the errors as the default option. You may need to edit Special:MyPage/common.js and change User:Lingzhi/reviewsourcecheck to User:Lingzhi2/reviewsourcecheck (add the "2" after User:Lingzhi). Please do drop me a line if you have any problems or suggestions. Tks. ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 15:59, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good to know, and thanks for making this useful tool. Orser67 (talk) 23:09, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to bother you again. After the addition of a toggle option in the tab atop the page, one editor requested a revised version in which the toggle link appears in the "Tools" section of the page's left sidebar. So now there are two versions of this tool. If you prefer the links in the Toolbar section on the side, the slightly altered script is named User:Lingzhi2/reviewsourcecheck-sb.js (just add "-sb" before the ".js"). Finally, both versions should now also store the page state (whether reference errors/warnings are "hidden" or "shown"). The state persists between page loads and between the browser closing and reopening (unless cleared by the user, for example by deleting data in your browser's cache etc.). Huge thanks to User:Evad37 for much coding help. If you have any questions or problems, please drop me a line. Thanks again. ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 08:16, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Steve Lund

The article Steve Lund has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Slashme (talk) 09:03, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:New York statewide elected officials

A tag has been placed on Template:New York statewide elected officials requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:33, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:North Dakota statewide elected officials

A tag has been placed on Template:North Dakota statewide elected officials requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:38, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tracy Silna Zur for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tracy Silna Zur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tracy Silna Zur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 00:58, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! CBatteries (talk) 02:20, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Well done for creating such a brilliant article (History of the United States Whig Party) Willbb234 (talk) 11:03, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Hey, Orser67. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day! PATH SLOPU 11:28, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2022 United States Senate elections for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2022 United States Senate elections is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 United States Senate elections until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jaclar0529 (talk) 08:40, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I’m very grateful for your message. I have slowed just a bit since a minor stroke a couple years ago. I’m happy to assist as I can if you can’t get the help you need somewhere. I was recently surprised someone agreed to review a GA nom I made a year ago of an article about my family—Harrison family of Virginia. I’d be glad if you take a look. Happy Thanksgiving. I noticed your work on Pinckney...I crossed paths years ago with a lawyer by the same name; bound to be related. Cheers, pal. Hoppyh (talk) 15:48, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll definitely take a look at the article. Happy Thanksgiving to you as well! Orser67 (talk) 16:01, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Hi

I just wanted to say thanks for being cool with everything :)

If you haven;t already seen it, this is quite a good guide Wikipedia:How_to_create_and_manage_a_good_lead_section

I have found that in general the guidelines are just that. You will find many places where the guidelines are ignored, sometimes by whole groups of wikipedians, even those that have their own MoS can be quite ascerbic in not adhering to them, and don't hold back in rdefence of "their" articles and styles. One example is bold text. It is often used in TV show cast lists, but it should not be. When an article comes up to GA or FA, that sort of thing is removed. Until then, you wil find it al over the place, some changes will be left, some reverted, some battled over - it can get silly. THe last one I pointed out that their own MOS says "no", but they told me to go away - I have benn called a grammar Nazi, and in the example I just gave, I believe I was called "autistic" or "OCD" or something.

I look forwards to collaborating with you for the next few days on the article :) Chaosdruid (talk) 21:02, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peace Dove

Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, peoples rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension. Happy Holidays to you and yours. ―Buster7 ☎ 00:38, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of United States presidential candidate firsts for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of United States presidential candidate firsts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of United States presidential candidate firsts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:56, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John W. Childs

The article John W. Childs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seems to fail WP:NBIO/GNG (also some WP:BLP issues). Coverage is in passing, nothing in-depth, I am not seeing a single article about him. He is often mentioned as a major donor, but coverage in such cases ranges from one sentences to a generic paragraph bio-blurb likely submitted by his staff. There is some recent coverage about a solicitation charge, but it raises BLP issues, plus WP:ONEEVENT. No valid redirect/merge target. He seems to keep a relatively low media profile...

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:55, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John W. Childs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John W. Childs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John W. Childs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:43, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for creating 2020 United States state legislative elections!. KidAd (talk) 18:03, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sean Fieler

The article Sean Fieler has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Inadequate substantial references. Some don't mention him at all.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 12:15, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:31, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society

Dear Orser67/Archive 3,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more.

Best regards, Chris Troutman (talk) 21:43, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tipping Point State?

Why Is It Most Likely To Be Wisconsin? According To This It’s Pennsylvania. (https://electoral-vote.com/evp2020/Pres/tipping_point.html) — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiMakersOfOurTime (talk • contribs) 16:51, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you add up the states (plus NE and ME congressional districts) where Biden has at least a two-point margin, he has 249 EVs. The state where he has the next largest margin is PA (which he's currently winning by two points); add that he gets to 269. The state where he has the next largest margin is WI (where he's winning by ~0.6 points); add that and he gets over 270. Orser67 (talk) 17:14, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Presidency of Franklin D. Roosevelt into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 10:56, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seventh Party System is back

Hey, someone has gone in and rebuilt a Seventh Party System page, which to me still reads as pretty speculative and undecided. I'm not a serious editor & don't know much about the process for enforcing a deletion decision, but I saw you'd taken care of it back in 2016 so I figured I'd tag you.

Best, 71.105.66.228 (talk) 21:29, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like someone else took care of this, but thanks for keeping an eye out friendly IP editor Orser67 (talk) 20:26, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Burkhalter for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Burkhalter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Burkhalter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SailingInABathTub (talk) 17:47, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

question: how do you make your maps?

I'm trying to make some maps for some state and local government elections that don't have their maps on, and I saw your maps and they looked really good :). Lovin'Politics (talk) 03:08, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

James Longstreet FAC

Hello. Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/James Longstreet/archive1 is in need of additional reviewers. It requires a source review and would benefit from at least one additional general review. If you are interested, please feel free to leave a review of the article. Thank you. Display name 99 (talk) 00:12, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:40, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pete Festersen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pete Festersen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pete Festersen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ploni (talk) 21:41, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Featured Article Review: Andrew Jackson

I have nominated Andrew Jackson for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. FinnV3 (talk) 21:07, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Seventeenth First Edit Day!

Hey, Orser67. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 18:29, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Wyoming statewide elected officials

Template:Wyoming statewide elected officials has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:09, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John Ewing (Nebraska politician)

The article John Ewing (Nebraska politician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable local politician and losing political candidate. A WP:BEFORE search returned only routine election news and hyper-local coverage of his role in a county payroll controversy.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Curbon7 (talk) 05:38, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]