User talk:Ontheworks

Welcome!

Hello, Ontheworks, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:51, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

R.K. Kotnala

R.K. Kotnala seems to be most assuredly notable, and passes WP:BIO. Well done. Now it is in mainspace it does require work, some of which may involve your reworking some sections. That is normal. Please look at the banner at the head of the article for what is requested. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:53, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to do my best to improve it, i will ask a help if i want. thanks Ontheworks (talk) 06:57, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vipin Reshammiya (September 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vipin Reshammiya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 14:07, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ontheworks! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 14:07, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vipin Reshammiya (October 11)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Thilsebatti was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Thilsebatti (talk) 14:58, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Ontheworks. Thank you for your work on R.K. Kotnala. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Highly promo article with too many dubious statements

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 09:32, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]