User talk:Onghai1929

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! — Preceding unsigned comment added by CorenSearchBot (talk • contribs) 03:24, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

42nd G7 summit

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 42nd G7 summit, and it appears to include material copied directly from https://en.wiki2.org/wiki/41st_G7_summit.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:24, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Prince George of Cambridge

Template:Prince George of Cambridge has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DrKiernan (talk) 09:30, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Onghai1929. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 G-20 Germany summit.
Message added 04:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

smileguy91^{talk - contribs} 04:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Timeline of the presidency of Bill Clinton

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Timeline of the presidency of Bill Clinton. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Presidency of Bill Clinton. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Presidency of Bill Clinton – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. --Nevé –selbert 12:09, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

44th G8 summit

If you want the redirect to be deleted (i.e. not show up in the search bar), please nominate it at WP:RfD, but I don't think it will be deleted. ansh 666 01:11, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Great job on creating Bush Clinton Tsunami Fund! Meatsgains (talk) 02:33, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Bush Clinton Tsunami Fund

Hi, I'm Meatsgains. Onghai1929, thanks for creating Bush Clinton Tsunami Fund!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Meatsgains (talk) 02:34, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Also, please discuss before making changes to templates where there are comments left that say "don't change before discussion". Corky ^{Buzz by the Hornet's Nest} 18:24, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Onghai1929, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:08, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Onghai1929. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Elizabeth II. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 22:27, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

45th G7 summit moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 45th G7 summit, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:38, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Thirteenth East Asia Summit

Hi, I'm SkyGazer 512. Onghai1929, thanks for creating Thirteenth East Asia Summit!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. It would be appreciated if you could add reliable sources to the article, so that the information can be verified.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 19:46, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2018 ASEAN Summits moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2018 ASEAN Summits, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 16:23, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Onghai1929. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Hello, I'm Thegooduser. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 03:53, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of international trips made by the United States Secretary of State into List of international trips made by Colin Powell as United States Secretary of State. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:34, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Hello, I'm DerbyCountyinNZ. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of longest-living state leaders have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks.

Helsinki Summit (1990) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Helsinki Summit (1990), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:47, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of the Bill Clinton presidency (2000) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Timeline of the Bill Clinton presidency (2000), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:37, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of the Bill Clinton presidency (2001) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Timeline of the Bill Clinton presidency (2001), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:37, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of the George H. W. Bush presidency (1993) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Timeline of the George H. W. Bush presidency (1993), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:15, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018 inter-Korean summit listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect December 2018 inter-Korean summit. Since you had some involvement with the December 2018 inter-Korean summit redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. B dash (talk) 02:20, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of the Ronald Reagan presidency

Please discuss your bold edit to Timeline of the Ronald Reagan presidency before implementing it (again). Same goes for Timeline of the Richard Nixon presidency. Thanks, MrClog (talk) 15:15, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you add a small summary under every section, linking to the main article (you created) by using {{main}}. --MrClog (talk) 15:18, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please respond here? --MrClog (talk) 20:14, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Presidential timelines

Hi Onghai1929,

What you're doing on the presidential timelines is fine by me, but please try to be less brash about it (for example, don't do edit summaries with all capital letters). Thank you! Enjoy your day :) Ethanbas ^(talk) 19:20, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When copying or moving material from one Wikipedia article to another, you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. The way this is done is by saying in an edit summary at the destination as to where you got the content. Here is an example of how to do it. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying within Wikipedia in the future. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:54, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2018 ASEAN Summits

Hello, Onghai1929. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2018 ASEAN Summits".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 09:47, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of presidential trips made by Donald Trump (2019), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Monroe Regional Airport (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:27, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Republican Party (United States) has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Elizium23 (talk) 03:33, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Joe Biden 2020 presidential campaign, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 13:41, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Washington Summit (1990) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Washington Summit (1990), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 18:08, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moscow Summit (1991) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Moscow Summit (1991), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 18:08, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Trump/Joe Biden

You've been here five years, so I'm not going to leave you a templated warning, but you really ought to know better than to add claims such as this one without a source supporting them. Vanamonde (Talk) 20:20, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Washington Summit (1990)

Hello, Onghai1929. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Washington Summit".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:31, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Moscow Summit (1991)

Hello, Onghai1929. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Moscow Summit".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:26, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

American politics DS alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

― Tartan357 ^Talk 04:12, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! ― Tartan357 ^Talk 16:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

I wanted to share some information with you, about the “money” that you stated America gives to Israel for Military guns. The US doesn’t give money to Israel at all. What it gives is credit to buy military supplies. So basically it subsidizes the US arms supplies and gun manufacturers. It’s actually quite terrible for Israel, because it destroyed jobs here in the industry and also keeps Israel dependent on the US. They’re US guns, They’re not made in Israel for the most part. It’s like the US aide to Israel (and most foreign aid) isn’t giving cash, its giving a gift card that can only be used to purchase from the US weapons industry. Basically the only thing made in the US these days is weapons. Israel in my opinion would be better off without so much US influence BECAUSE think about it, if Israel is forced to buy weapons from the US, then why would America want peace here? War and insecurity makes them more money. If Israel is “less secure” than the American military industry is profiting. It’s a vicious cycle. I’ve been really interested in the “peace process” for a long time and more so now. Also alllll the equipment that used to be produced here in Israel for the military, is now being made in the US. This is bad for jobs in Israel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1005:B06C:1198:9DA9:E421:5F35:B047 (talk) 14:16, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Presidency of Joe Biden, you may be blocked from editing. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:05, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2020 United States presidential election. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 05:50, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Thank you for your contributions to List of presidential trips made by Joe Biden (2021). But next time you will add new information, please do not forget to cite a reliable source. Thanks. PatTag2659 (talk) 04:28, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Hi, I have blocked your account for disruptive editing because I noticed that you've been engaging in slow edit wars while refusing to use edit summaries. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, and you will need to start collaborating better with your fellow editors. ~Awilley (talk) 17:34, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Onghai1929 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

won't make any false edits in the future

Decline reason:

Not what you were blocked for, per the text immediately above this request. — Daniel Case (talk) 03:33, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'd be happy to unblock if you agree to use full and accurate WP:Edit summaries in the future. ~Awilley (talk) 16:49, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Awilley:, might be worth noting that there's warnings above for several other issues besides the one you blocked for, that haven't been addressed. I suspect that without an explicit recognition of those issues, we're going to be back here very soon. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:20, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:2020 United States presidential election. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 19:25, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

I was going to just add the edit summary template here via twinkle, but as another editor pointed out above, you've been here for over five years, and have enough edits/experience to know better. On top of that, part of the reason you were just blocked a couple weeks ago by Awilley was due to your refusal to leave edit summaries. Since your block expired, you have made (as of this posting) 211 edits, of which you have left only 4 edit summaries (that's an abysmal 1.8%). I am strongly encouraging you to leave an edit summary with every edit you make going forward. This does not have be burdensome, ie: you don't need to leave edit summaries for talk page posts, because the posts speak for themselves (imo), and for all other edits, there are numerous abbreviations you can use (see WP:ESL & WP:ABC) and very quickly leaving edit summaries can become second nature. - wolf 04:33, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Moscow Summit (1991)

Hello, Onghai1929. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Moscow Summit".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:10, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Kamala Harris. Binksternet (talk) 06:55, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for long-term unconstructive editing. Over the years your editing has persistently included deliberate vandalism and misinformation, posting your own opinions, wishes, and speculations into articles, posting unsourced content (frequently highly questionable and at times blatantly false) and other kinds of problematic editing, documented above. You also never respond to messages expressing concerns about your editing, and you continue to ignore repeated reminders of the need for edit summaries. Considering the extent and persistence of your uncooperative and unconstructive editing, it is remarkable that you have so far been blocked from editing only once, and that time only briefly. If you continue in the same way after this block you may well be blocked for a considerably longer time. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. JBW (talk) 11:44, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at 2020 United States presidential election, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. OhKayeSierra (talk) 22:16, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hello, can you please explain why you reverted my reverts like you did here? The tag was added in March 2021, so the date shouldn't be updated. Unless you have a reason would you please self-revert? Thanks. Elli (talk | contribs) 04:43, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Hello, I'm Spiffy sperry. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2024 United States presidential election have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks.

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of presidents of the United States, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You've already been blocked for this. Please stop. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 01:31, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, this is for this edit. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 02:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I came here for the same reason. I can't imagine what you were thinking when you made that edit, but clearly you're not here to build an encyclopaedia. I'm pinging the admin that just blocked you for this type of nonsense (JBW), they should be aware that their last action had little effect. - wolf 02:11, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Onghai1929 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Won't make any false edits in the future

Decline reason:

You literally made this exact same promise back in March. You've demonstrated you have no intention of keeping your word and have destroyed our trust in you. Yamla (talk) 16:03, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Onghai1929 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please give me one more chance. I won't make any false edits in the future. I was making a joke that Hillary would be the 45th president if she didn't lose the electoral vote to Trump despite winning the popular vote.

Decline reason:

I'm afraid that your only possible pathway back to editing at this point is the Standard Offer. 331dot (talk) 23:30, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.