Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 June 9
June 9
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. North America1000 05:28, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
- Template:Miss Gabon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Not enough targets to justify a navigation template. This can be solved by normal wikilinking. The Banner talk 19:59, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Too few entries to justify a navbox. cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 01:40, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. A navbox with only one article to navigate. Two of the three links have been redirected or marked for merge to the main pageant article. • Gene93k (talk) 13:05, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:26, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Redundant to {{Infobox storm}}. |date=
corresponds to |event=
; the remaining parameters are identical. Alakzi (talk) 11:38, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:23, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:30, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused. All links redundant to Template:Prince William, Duke of Cambridge and Template:Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge. DrKiernan (talk) 09:28, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Redundant and unused template. • Gene93k (talk) 13:07, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Relisted at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 June 17#Template:Party games. Alakzi (talk) 01:33, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:32, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Redundant to {{Documentation}}, which it duplicates on all of the pages it's currently used. Alakzi (talk) 13:04, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:56, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:24, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.