User talk:Omni Flames/Archive 9
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Omni Flames. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | → | Archive 15 |
Santa Claus is a fictional character; It was obviously added as a defacement. Please refrain from reverting changes that you clearly haven't looked at.
Hi,
You recently messaged me about reverting the following change:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=North%20Pole,%20Alaska&diff=724858520
If you research Santa Claus, you'll see that it is a fictional character. This means that it cannot be a notable resident of a town. Furthermore, Santa Claus is purported to live on the *actual* north magnetic pole of the earth, rather than in North Pole, which is named after the former. So even if a fictional character should be listed under Notable Residents, it would be incorrect to place him in North Pole, AK.
Look back at the change in which Santa Claus was introduced to the article as a notable resident, and you can see that it was an obvious defacement of the article which added another resident of North Pole that clearly was not notable, likely made by the person themselves or an acquaintance of them.
What I have to wonder is why you reverted this. If you had looked at the change even superficially, you would have noticed all of this and left it alone.
I don't mean to be such a buzzkill-- I can appreciate the humour and magic in harmless jokes. But at the same time-- no, I really can't. Wikipedia is serious business and the sanctity of the North Pole, Alaska wikipedia page should be upheld. I went out of my way to do so, and I am annoyed that you went out of your way to undo my work.
// only half joking. ;)
- Plus, I think Santa is a resident of North Pole, not North Pole, Alaska. He is mentioned at North Pole#Cultural associations. If he were a resident at North Pole, Alaska, he could me mentioned in this fashion:
- Santa Claus, fictional
- or
- Santa Claus (fictional)
- There are probably articles out there that do this where a Cultural associations section does not exist. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:01, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Anna Frodesiak: Yeah, looking back on it, that was a really stupid revert and I'm not sure why I made it. I guess I wasn't fully awake at the time
. My apologies. Omni Flames (talk) 22:40, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Anna Frodesiak: Yeah, looking back on it, that was a really stupid revert and I'm not sure why I made it. I guess I wasn't fully awake at the time
- Don't worry a bit. We all make mistakes. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:07, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 24, 2016)
 A cubic zirconia crystal made by the Shelby Gem Factory
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Hilton Hotels & Resorts • Photodetector Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:07, 13 June 2016 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
|---|
No subject
This is confusing. I'm not sure if I'm sending this to the right place. I did intended to make that edit last night because I math person the WiKi post is about and do not want incorrect information on the page.
Many thanks...
J... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.169.73.226 (talk) 01:33, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
- Hi there. The reason why I reverted your edit is because multiple sources, such as [1] state that Josh Klinghoffer is in fact Jewish. See WP:NOR. Thanks, Omni Flames (talk) 03:52, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Rojava
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rojava. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
June 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hallowell, Maine may have broken the syntax by modifying 16 "()"s and 6 "{}"s and 2 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
|---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:40, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
10:05:18, 14 June 2016 review of submission by Ex-paparazzi
- Ex-paparazzi (talk · contribs)
Hi! Thank you for your review. I've already been through a few cycles of edits with another moderator and don't know what else can be improved... I already have 23 references to all sorts of sources. Can you please help me by pointing out the problematic parts? I would really appreciate your assistance because I'm really desperate here. Thank you in advance! --Ex-paparazzi (talk) 10:05, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Ex-paparazzi: My decline of the draft had nothing to do with the references. It was because the page seemed highly promotional in my opinion. Just read the first paragraph! It reads more like an advertisement than an encyclopedic article. Omni Flames (talk) 10:18, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
In Special:Diff/725189731, you hid the reference to the replacement so that users can't see why the file fails WP:NFCC#1. Why did you do this? And why did you move the file? It just creates extra trouble by requiring users to update the link in the article when/if the file is moved and then change it back when the file is deleted.
Additionally, it seems that the file on Commons has been nominated for deletion, meaning that it's unnecessary and inappropriate to move the local file for that reason too. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:14, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- In that diff, all I did was remove the {{ShadowsCommons}} because it no longer shadows Commons. I moved the file for the same reason, to de-shadow Commons.
- And I didn't see that the Commons file was going to be deleted, that's my mistake. Omni Flames (talk) 11:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- If a file has been nominated for deletion on one or both projects (or if it should be nominated for deletion), then it's typically not a good idea to move the file per WP:FNC#9. Instead, consider waiting until the deletion process has ended and then revisit the file and check if it still shadows Commons at that point. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- Ah, okay. Omni Flames (talk) 22:36, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- If a file has been nominated for deletion on one or both projects (or if it should be nominated for deletion), then it's typically not a good idea to move the file per WP:FNC#9. Instead, consider waiting until the deletion process has ended and then revisit the file and check if it still shadows Commons at that point. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Thanks...
...for fixing my error in archiving the thread to the AN archive reather than the AN/I archive. I appreciate it. BMK (talk) 17:41, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Beyond My Ken: No problem! Omni Flames (talk) 22:36, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Dalit Stauber
Hello, Can you please review this? all you asked was fixed... Thanks Moriaed (talk) 18:52, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- I can take a look... Omni Flames (talk) 22:45, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Giraffe
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Giraffe. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 15 June 2016
- News and notes: Clarifications on status and compensation of outgoing executive directors Sue Gardner and Lila Tretikov
- Special report: Wikiversity Journal—A new user group
- Featured content: From the crème de la crème
- In the media: Biography disputes; Craig Newmark donation; PR editing
- Traffic report: Another one with sports; Knockout, brief candle
description
You described the RfA of Anarchyte as brutal, - which description would you then choose for that of PumpkinSky? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:30, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: Well it wouldn't have been much fun for the candidate, that's for sure... Omni Flames (talk) 22:10, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- He left. Takes some resilience to survive "... there are the myriad levels of deception and rampant socking, and the repeated refusal to even accept he did anything problematic ...". --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:18, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Chargemaster PLC
Hi Omni Flames
You kindly reviewed my submission for Draft:Chargemaster_Plc last month and declined it saying that there were not enough sources to show notability.
Currently, it has ten sources to about 350 words - I wondered if the issue is that there genuinely aren't enough references, or whether the references aren't adequate? Typically, how may references should there be to a submission of this length?
Many thanks
Hburgess36
Hburgess36 (talk) 11:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Hburgess36: A few more sources would certainly be nice. The sources you've got already are fine, it's just that there's simply not enough of them. Omni Flames (talk) 22:23, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
No subject
Earsed it since I wasnt loggen in. Opened a new section.
- Replied below. Omni Flames (talk) 22:24, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Disagreement with deletion notice
Hello, Omni Flames. You have put a deletion notice on Garay Asadov that I disagree with. The article creator is a new user who seems to have limited Computer and English skills. He doesn't know how to create categories, talk pages and inter-language wiki links. I have put categories and a talk page on that page for his benefit. His pages are closely related to ones created by Kges1901. Since he is a new user, we should give him a period of time to improve his articles. Zee money (talk) 11:20, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Zee money: If you disagree with the deletion nomination, then all you have to do is remove the template. That is, after all, how PROD works. The fact that someone is a new user doesn't mean that we should be any more lenient in reviewing their pages, although it does mean we should be careful not to bite them. Omni Flames (talk) 11:22, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Minor thing
But when you're doing round-robin moves, please try and keep an eye out to keep talk page redirects. That actually sounds a bit vague, but what I mean is when you're switching A to B and B doesn't have a talk page you'll actually end up leaving the old talk page of A as a redlink when it will probably have incoming links. Talk:HMS Merganser is an example; I'd suggest just checking after each move to see if you need to create a new redirect for the old talk page location. Hope that makes sense and I appreciate the work you're doing. Cheers, Jenks24 (talk) 12:11, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Jenks24: Ah, I see what you mean. I'll try to remember to do that in the future. Thanks, Omni Flames (talk) 21:46, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Pulse (nightclub)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Pulse (nightclub). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Fried chicken
Hello! Your submission of Fried chicken at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 14:42, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
For mentoring me in counter-vandalism! You are a great teacher, and I've enjoyed the CVUA training, just the final test is left!
ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 18:02, 17 June 2016 (UTC) |
- @ThePlatypusofDoom: Thanks! I must say that you've been a great student. By the way, I've added the final test on your academy page. Omni Flames (talk) 23:59, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
You forgot to move it
Hi, just notifying you of a page move you forgot to do. You closed the discussion on Talk:Borys Hmyria as "moved", but never did the move. I've since moved the page for you. Regards, Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:06, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Anarchyte: Oh, thanks! Not sure what happened there, thanks for cleaning up after me. Omni Flames (talk) 07:57, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:52, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Restore Mukim kala Article
Hi. Mukim kala article content was removed despite its multiple high quality cited sources. I tried to restore mukim kala article which is cited with fully high quality resources. I was not able to restore due to some error. So I request you to kindly restore the article Mukim Kala. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.82.222.177 (talk) 17:19, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- Hi there. I'm not an admin, so if you want your page back, you'll have to go to WP:REFUND. Omni Flames (talk) 00:34, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 19 June 2016 (UTC)