User talk:Oddbodz/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Oddbodz. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
I'm having trouble understanding your speedy deletion request for White Cat (book). There is a speedy request on the same editor's Red Glove (book) as a possible copyvio. However, your nom is for "a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content". Wrong category, perhaps? - SummerPhD (talk) 16:58, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
- I've taken the liberty of changing this to a g12, as it is an apparent copyvio. If this is not what you intended, feel free to revert. Thanks. - SummerPhD (talk) 17:03, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
Phew! That's some impressive WP:OVERTAGGING, but you didn't add any notes to the talk page to describe what you have concerns about and User talk:Wytrzeszcz1 (the article creator) is still a red link. Talking to the article creator and making notes on the talk page might get better results than leaving umpteen tags. Fences&Windows 10:31, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Wikify Discussion Invitation
Hi there! You are receiving this message because you are a participant of WikiProject Wikify. After the retirements of our first two executive coordinators, Mono and Guoguo12, WikiProject Wikify is undergoing a period of transition. We are currently holding a discussion to create a plan for the future, find volunteers to help fill our many administrative positions, collect any feedback about what has happened in the last six months, propose some new guidelines, and see if there are any creative ideas to increase participation. We appreciate your input! |
Sumsum2010·T·C 23:30, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Template:Not on Wikibreak has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 13:40, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For reverting the blanking of the page User talk:Wikieditor1997 Omkar1234 Space ShuttleOmkar1234! 15:41, 9 July 2011 (UTC) |
- I think you maybe need to pick a better example for which to give out a barnstar. Editors are permitted to blank warnings from their own talk page, see WP:BLANKING. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 00:09, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
- Do you want me to remove the barnstar then? Oddbodz (talk) 08:40, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
- No, I'm sure it will be fine :-) --Demiurge1000 (talk) 09:24, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks. I'll make sure I don't revert edits to user talk pages again unless it's actual vandalism. Oddbodz (talk) 09:27, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
- No, I'm sure it will be fine :-) --Demiurge1000 (talk) 09:24, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
- Do you want me to remove the barnstar then? Oddbodz (talk) 08:40, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
August 2011 Wikification Drive
Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's August Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 1,000 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions! If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks! Nolelover Talk·Contribs 17:04, 28 July 2011 (UTC) Note: The drive starts August 1, but you can still sign up! |
Mediation cabal
In connection with the mediation, do the additional sources I have cited justify a reversion? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Robert_Zoellick&action=historysubmit&diff=439205483&oldid=439152551Currency1 (talk) 10:40, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
- If the sources you had added in revision 439152551 are what you meen, then yes. At least two of these are government sources. I think this is enough to justify a reversion. If you do go ahead with a reversion. Please be aware that users have made edits un-related to this mediation since yor edit and it should be ensured that these are not removed. I hope this has settled the debate. If you and Demiurge1000 are happy with this could I ask that you both let me know on my talk page so that I can close the mediation. If you are not happy then also let me know and I'll see what I can do. Oddbodz (talk) 11:34, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
If both users agree, please put your signature (4 tildes) in the list below.
If you do not agree, please give your reasons below.
- Demiurge, having agreed to mediation, apparently has no justification for his reverts of my edits.Currency1 (talk) 10:55, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
As noted above, User:Currency1 does not agree.
I do not agree either;:I disagree with the proposed resolution, for the following reasons;
- User:Currency1 was advised by uninvolved editor User:DGG as follows; "If you are actively engaged in a controversy involving the subject of the article, you must not edit the article itself; it would be an out-and-and violation of WP:COI. As you describe your situation, almost nobody in such a situation would be able to write objectively. The only way to keep yourself safe from being blocked for COI is to avoid the subject entirely, or..." (in this archive.) It is clear (and undisputed) that User:Currency1 is indeed actively engaged in a controversy involving the subject of the article.
- User:Currency1 stated in the same archive (linked above) that "I have been commenting about Robert Zoellick's lawlessness at the World Bank in the media". Being involved in a media campaign against a living person, is a clearly justifiable reason for not being involved in editing the biography of that living person on Wikipedia. WP:NPOV would be impossible.
- User:Currency1 was advised by uninvolved editor User:Off2riorob as follows; "we report on what secondary sources have asserted is notable and have as such independently reported on. Your desired addition above and its external support falls well outside of that remit". (Again, at the same link given above).
- Material being a "government source" does not make it a reliable independent source for Wikipedia. Government sources may report and state all manner of things, but Wikipedia has a policy of adhering to the best possible sources on WP:BLP articles, which at the least would mean a third party source such as the New York Times or similar. Thus far, no evidence has been given to indicate that reliable third party sources consider the facts in question to be relevant to Zoellick's life or career.
- This edit, expresses User:Currency1's viewpoint that the two facts that she wishes to add to the biography, "indict Robert Zoellick's Presidency at the World Bank." That is a very strong statement to make, or to attempt to make through adding a chosen combination of facts - it is really not acceptable to use a Wikipedia article to express Currency1's viewpoint in this way.
I do have more concerns, but I think that will do as an initial summary. Oddbodz1, I'm sorry to saddle you with these difficult issues, but I'm sure that you will be able to help us come up with a reasonable compromise, reached through mediation. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:30, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
Before submitting this to the new Dispute Resolution section I wanted to get your comments: Dispute overview Can you give us a quick explanation of what is going on? What is the issue you are bringing here? Demiurge1000 reverted edits. Mediator from Mediation Cabal agreed that independent reliable sources justified reversion. Demiurge disagreed with mediator and mediator was removed from serving as mediator for Mediation Cabal. Users involved Who is involved in the dispute? Currency1 (talk · contribs) Demiurge1000 (talk · contribs) Oddbodz (talk · contribs) Have you informed all the editors mentioned above that you have posted this dispute? (If not, once you have informed them come back and replace the text "Not yet" with "Yes".) Not yet. N.B. To inform the other users you may place the text Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Zoellick Bio". Thank you. --Currency1 (talk) 13:10, 11 September 2011 (UTC) on each user's talk page. Resolving the dispute Have you tried to resolve this dispute already? If so, what steps have you taken? Both users agreed to submit our dispute concerning content on Zoellick bio to Mediation Cabal. Mediation Cabal's mediator was removed from Mediation Cabal after having given a reasoned decision and the issue remains unresolved. How do you think we can help? either revert the edits, or determine that the independent reliable sources are not independent reliable sources. Currency1 (talk) 13:03, 11 September 2011 (UTC) Zoellick Bio discussion Discussion about the issues listed above take place here. Remember to keep discussions calm, brief, and focused on the issues at hand.Currency1 (talk) 13:10, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Could you tell us why you are no longer part of Mediation Cabal?
- Incidentally, I don't know if Oddbodz was removed from the Mediation Cabal, as you suggest, or simply left it. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 14:17, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
I had only just joined the Cabal when I started with your case. I took yours an another case up to try out the post. Turns out it was a lot harder than I first predicted and with school, I really don't have the time for it. I therefore decided to leave of my own accord. I am sorry for and problems this may have caused but as you may know, the cabal is not official authorised by Wikipedia and there are many official policy pages which state that your must put school before Wikipedia. I have therefore chosen to take part it activities such as Vandalism removal which will help Wikipedia as a whole it the little time I have to edit the site. Once again, I am sorry for the inconvenience. Oddbodz (talk) 19:38, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Wikify's August Newsletter
|
Calvary Chapel
It looks like Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2011-07-18/Calvary Chapel just got closed as "stale". The issue remains unresolved — see article talk page. Can it be reinstated? Mojoworker (talk) 23:03, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sorry but I'm no longer part of the mediation Cabal. It looks like another mediator has joined the mediation. It may be worth seeing what he can do. Sorry about this. Oddbodz (talk) 14:54, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for your efforts in resolving the Zoellick bio censorship, and for taking the position that might does not make right. Do you know who replaced you as mediator? If so, could you ask them to let me know? I was not aware that the issue needed to be reinstated because it is certainly not stale, but so relevant that we are on the brink of a currency war.Currency1 (talk) 08:10, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
You're right that school takes priority over Wikipedia cabals, so don't worry about it, and remember that your contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, even in less time-consuming areas. Thanks again for your help. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 13:22, 16 September 2011 (UTC) |
October 2011 Wikification drive
Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's October Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 1,000 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions, including a brand new one for the single largest wikified article! If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks! Note: The drive starts October 1, but you can still sign up! |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 16:45, 25 September 2011 (UTC).
WikiProject Wikify's October Newsletter
|
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 16:05, 3 October 2011 (UTC).
New Page Patrol survey
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Oddbodz! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:38, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |
Abuse Response
Well, thanks for reporting. It will be accepted. I would like to ask you to fill out the rest of the page, as the block log table. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) talk
Contribs 09:59, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- Ooops, missed that bit. I'll fill it in now. Oddbodz (talk) 10:16, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- I've just gone to do it. Is there a quick way to get the info or do I need to check every edit the user has made. I would look at the deleted contributions but I don't have sufficient user rights. If you could let me know what to do that would be apreciated (It's the first user I've reported so I'm new to the whole thing) Oddbodz (talk) 10:24, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- There are none unfortunately. We don't look at deleted contribs anyways. I am a non-admin member and I have no problems with AbRep. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) talk
Contribs 10:28, 27 October 2011 (UTC)- Ok, I'll get it done now Oddbodz (talk) 10:30, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- There are none unfortunately. We don't look at deleted contribs anyways. I am a non-admin member and I have no problems with AbRep. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) talk
- I've just gone to do it. Is there a quick way to get the info or do I need to check every edit the user has made. I would look at the deleted contributions but I don't have sufficient user rights. If you could let me know what to do that would be apreciated (It's the first user I've reported so I'm new to the whole thing) Oddbodz (talk) 10:24, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Reverting
I hope this was accidently :/.--♫GoP♫TCN 13:08, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, I have alredy explained it on the IP's talk page. Thanks Oddbodz (talk) 13:42, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 23:06, 28 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
~~Ebe123~~ (+) talk
Contribs 23:06, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
The article mentioned has three reliable references. I have seen dozens of articles with less references, so I only expect the same treatment as other articles and users with the same or less information and sources. Regards.--HCPUNXKID (talk) 19:14, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- That's why I removed the tag almost imediatly after removing it. I have replaced it with a ref imporve tag. I would give other articles the same treatment. Sorry for adding the PROD tag but as you can see, it was removed. Could I also remind you of WP:OWN. Thanks for lettimg me know of your consern and I hope this solves any problems you may have. Oddbodz (talk) 20:10, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For your work against vandalism! Thank you and happy editing! pluma Ø 21:03, 5 November 2011 (UTC) |
Thanks, I've sent you a cupcake as a sign of my appreciation. Oddbodz (talk) 21:11, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 7 November2011
- Special report: A post-mortem on the Indian Education Program pilot
- Discussion report: Special report on the ArbCom Elections steering RfC
- WikiProject report: Booting up with WikiProject Computer Science
- Featured content: Slow week for Featured content
- Arbitration report: Δ saga returns to arbitration, while the Abortion case stalls for another week
The Signpost: 14 November 2011
- News and notes: ArbCom nominations open, participation grants finalized, survey results on perceptions on Wikipedia released
- WikiProject report: Having a Conference with WikiProject India
- Arbitration report: Abortion and Betacommand 3 in evidence phase, three case requests outstanding
WikiProject Barnstar Awarding News
- Welcome to all our new members who have joined since we stopped being a WikiProject and became a team. Oddbodz (talk) 19:57, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Talk back
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
--Sp33dyphil © • © 04:51, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Barnstar Awarding
Hi Oddbodz. Please remember that old discussions should be archived rather than deleted. In the case of Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Barnstar Awarding, there's no need to even do any of that given that there's a total of 10 lines of discussion. You're also placing yourself in an odd position by blanking criticism of your pet project. Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 21:34, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry about that, I thought it was ok as the conversation was still available through the edit history. On a side note, what do you think of the project now the competitive side has been removed? Oddbodz (talk) 21:47, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
- It's not as bad but to be honest, I don't think I'll ever be happy with something called WikiProject Barnstar Awarding since it's contrary to my ideas about the point of WikiProjects and Barsnstars. Pichpich (talk) 22:02, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
- Well, each to their own I suppose. If at any point the project starts to breach policy, please let me know. Thanks for your opinion. Happy editing Oddbodz (talk) 22:04, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
- I don't intend to monitor the project and my concerns have never been that it would breach policy. I definitely wish you and the project all the best. Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 22:29, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
- Well, each to their own I suppose. If at any point the project starts to breach policy, please let me know. Thanks for your opinion. Happy editing Oddbodz (talk) 22:04, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
- It's not as bad but to be honest, I don't think I'll ever be happy with something called WikiProject Barnstar Awarding since it's contrary to my ideas about the point of WikiProjects and Barsnstars. Pichpich (talk) 22:02, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Barnstar Awarding
Wikipedia:WikiProject Barnstar Awarding, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Barnstar Awarding and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Barnstar Awarding during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Guerillero | My Talk 20:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstar
Much appreciated, thanks! Michaelmas1957 (talk) 16:51, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
talkback
Hello. You have a new message at ErikHaugen's talk page. Message added 21:14, 19 November 2011 (UTC).
Speedy deletion nomination of Five essentials of sailing
A tag has been placed on Five essentials of sailing, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Oddbodz (talk) 21:23, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 November 2011
- Discussion report: Much ado about censorship
- WikiProject report: Working on a term paper with WikiProject Academic Journals
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: End in sight for Abortion case, nominations in 2011 elections
- Technology report: Mumbai and Brighton hacked; horizontal lists have got class
Always a good time for "cute"
Random Cute Image | |
The cute isn't entirely random. He's actually one of my favorite little guys on Commons. Something about small, fluffy and about to eat.... :D I'm sure his appearance on your page is a bit unexpected, though. Hope you enjoy! Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:44, 22 November 2011 (UTC) |
Thanks, Oddbodz (talk) 21:14, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 November 2011
- News and notes: Arb's resignation sparks lightning RfC, Fundraiser 2011 off to a strong start, GLAM in Qatar
- In the news: The closed, unfriendly world of Wikipedia, fundraiser fun and games, and chemists vs pornstars
- Recent research: Quantifying quality collaboration patterns, systemic bias, POV pushing, the impact of news events, and editors' reputation
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Bugle
- Featured content: The best of the week
Invitation to the December Wikification Drive
Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's December Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 1,000 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions, including a brand new one for the single largest wikified article! All you have to do is put an asterisk next to the largest article you've wikified, and coordinators will check its wordcount after the drive ends. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks! Note: The drive starts December 1, and you can sign up today! |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 01:31, 2 December 2011 (UTC).
Talkback
Message added 16:48, 2 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Calabe1992 16:48, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
I've restored the anonymous editor's version in preference to your last revert, as I think it is genuinely a better version of the original painting. Hope you can agree on reconsideration. Regards. Tim riley (talk) 21:10, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, the reason for my revert was that the start of the file name was completely diffrent and because I was using Huggle (therefore only seeing the file name) I assumed it was vandalism. I should have checked the article but what with ClueBot NG being down and only about 2 editors being on Huggle at the time, I was rushing through to get rid of all the vandalism. Thanks for letting me know about this, Oddbodz (talk) 22:06, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
- Splendid! Glad we are agreed. Tim riley (talk) 22:09, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Paranoia
I'm sorry about this - I undid it almost immediately [1]
It was just an overlap; both of us trying to remove the vandalism at the same time.
Apologies. I just hope you're not paranoid :-)
Cheers, Chzz ► 23:20, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
- No problems. I've done the same thing. It looks like a vandal with a dynamic IP. Oddbodz (talk) 23:21, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your reports. I have semi-protected this page for 7 days to allow things to calm down. TerriersFan (talk) 00:06, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Your vandalism
I spend quite a bit of time doing a page which is along the lines of any other of the thousands of pages about films (a number of which I have done in the past) in the wikipedia and you without any explanation just delete it, so no chance to appeal against your mindless vandalism. But you are a standard moderator here because you people are the greatest enemy the wikipedia has because generally none of you have much of a clue so often ruin the work of well meaning contributors.(Cyberia3 (talk) 19:57, 4 December 2011 (UTC))
- First of all, I was not the one who deleted the article. I tagged it for deletion but it was deleted by Fastily who is an admin (Admins make the final desision to delete articles). If you have a problem with the deletion I sugest you contact him. Secondly, I do not check every article and if I found another article like yours I would give it the same tretment. Finaly, when articles are tagged for CSD you are sent a message and before it is deleted, you have the chance to appeal. If you didn't take this chance then that is your problem, not mine. Thanks for letting me know how you feel about the deletion of the article. Is sugest you contact Fastily if you wish to apeal the deletion and see if he will restore it - as I am not an admin there is nothing I can do. Regards, Oddbodz (talk) 20:47, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
- I did the article in the evening and when I looked next morning, it had gone. It was the same as any other film page I have done so I don't know why it should have been deleted? With so any articles added each day I doubt that Fastily checks and just relies on you mods knowing what you are doing. Which many don't. I often see signs complaining about a lack of references on articles when even a little child can see that the articles are based on films or TV and that the information was gained simply by watching them. You might wish to get a spellcheck to cover for your misspelling. Firefox has one.(Cyberia3 (talk) 07:34, 5 December 2011 (UTC)}
- Just a note that "before it is deleted, you have the chance to appeal" is not correct. Otherwise, the recommendation to contact Fastily about the deletion seems sensible. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:01, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
- I probably didn't explain that bit very clearly. On the CSD template, there is a button which you can click to leave a message on the talk page of the article which the deleting admin should probably read. Again, that was probably my fault for not explaining myself properly. Oddbodz (talk) 21:54, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
- Just a note that "before it is deleted, you have the chance to appeal" is not correct. Otherwise, the recommendation to contact Fastily about the deletion seems sensible. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:01, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
Just letting you know that the article failed its GAN due to its lack of referencing and coverage of the game (like Development). GAN review. GamerPro64 23:31, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
A brownie for you!
Thanks for your help with anti-vandalism brought on by the recent cluebot outage. Have a brownie. RandomAct(talk to me) 18:29, 6 December 2011 (UTC) |
- Yum, thanks. Oddbodz (talk) 18:30, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 December 2011
- News and notes: Amsterdam gets the GLAM treatment, fundraising marches on, and a flourish of new admins
- In the news: A Wikistream of real time edits, a call for COI reform, and cracks in the ivory tower of knowledge
- Discussion report: Trial proposed for tool apprenticeship
- WikiProject report: This article is about WikiProject Disambiguation. For other uses...
- Featured content: This week's Signpost is for the birds!
== December 2011 ==
This is your last and only warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Bing. Caltas (talk) 20:17, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry for this, I did not mean to warn you! --Caltas (talk) 20:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- No problems, what with ClueBot being down its prity hectic at the momment. Oddbodz (talk) 20:19, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
Hello Oddbodz, I hope you enjoy this cookie as an amicable greeting from a fellow vandal fighter and Wikipedian. SwisterTwister talk 20:42, 6 December 2011 (UTC) |
- Yum yum, thank you. Oddbodz (talk) 20:58, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Please be more careful
Oddbodz, what were you doing here? Look through the edit history, and look at what the editor was trying to do--and you come in and without any explanation whatsoever you undo her work. She's freaked out and thinks she did something wrong, but all you had to offer her was some standard template. She responded, but you haven't been back there. I urge you a. to be MUCH more careful and b. to go back to the lady and apologize for having reverted her. I'm being serious--if you don't rectify the situation I'm taking rollback away from you, which you used in that edit completely incorrectly. Thank you very much. Drmies (talk) 21:04, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- I've restored the article: now I have to go back in and restore the positive edits by hand. Drmies (talk) 21:05, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- I saw your note. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 21:08, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- As I say, I am very sorry and can only make sure this will never happen again. There's so much vandalism lately with ClueBot being down and I guess I need to pay more attention to what I'm doing instead of worrying about the larger than normal amount of vandalism. Thank you for letting me know, Oddbodz (talk) 21:12, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Request for tool apprenticeship
Hi, I saw that you added Wikipedia:Requests for tool apprenticeship/User:Oddbodz (December 2011) to WP:Requests for tool apprenticeship. I've removed the request, because the process of tool apprenticeship is still being discussed. If the proposal is accepted, you're free to restore your request. →Στc. 23:49, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 12 December 2011
- Opinion essay: Wikipedia in Academe – and vice versa
- News and notes: Research project banner ads run afoul of community
- In the news: Bell Pottinger investigation, Gardner on gender gap, and another plagiarist caught red-handed
- WikiProject report: Spanning Nine Time Zones with WikiProject Russia
- Featured content: Wehwalt gives his fifty cents; spies, ambushes, sieges, and Entombment
Image tagging for File:Nurofen wordmark.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Nurofen wordmark.gif. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:07, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Image tagging for File:Nurofen Circle.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Nurofen Circle.gif. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:08, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In Nurofen, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Bath (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 December 2011
- News and notes: Anti-piracy act has Wikimedians on the defensive, WMF annual report released, and Indic language dynamics
- In the news: To save the wiki: strike first, then makeover?
- Discussion report: Polls, templates, and other December discussions
- WikiProject report: A dalliance with the dismal scientists of WikiProject Economics
- Featured content: Panoramas with Farwestern and a good week for featured content
- Arbitration report: The community elects eight arbitrators
The Signpost: 26 December 2011
- Recent research: Psychiatrists: Wikipedia better than Britannica; spell-checking Wikipedia; Wikipedians smart but fun; structured biological data
- News and notes: Fundraiser passes 2010 watermark, brief news
- WikiProject report: The Tree of Life
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, one set for acceptance, arbitrators formally appointed by Jimmy Wales
- Technology report: Wikimedia in Go Daddy boycott, and why you should 'Join the Swarm'
The Signpost: 02 January 2012
- Interview: The Gardner interview
- News and notes: Things bubbling along as Wikimedians enjoy their holidays
- WikiProject report: Where are they now? Part III
- Featured content: Ghosts of featured content past, present, and future
- Arbitration report: New case accepted, four open cases, terms begin for new arbitrators
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Honduras at the 2008 Summer Olympics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to David Álvarez
- Otter Creek (Vermont) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Native Americans
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
2006 Norwegian Football Cup
Hi there. Yesterday you edited 2006 Norwegian Football Cup, and I'm not defending the previous state of the article, but your edit removed one of two "references" in that article. Even though that was not a right way to put a reference, I would rather fix the reference then completely remove it. I have found a better place for that reference in the article, but next time the url with vital info that you remove will disappear in the article-history where noone will come look for it :) Have a good night. Mentoz86 (talk) 22:16, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- Ooops, sorry about that. Thanks for letting me know - I'll be more careful next time. Oddbodz (talk) 16:41, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- No worries :) Mentoz86 (talk) 21:32, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 09 January 2012
- Technological roadmap: 2011's technological achievements in review, and what 2012 may hold
- News and notes: Fundraiser 2011 ends with a bang
- WikiProject report: From Traditional to Experimental: WikiProject Jazz
- Featured content: Contentious FAC debate: a week in review
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Betacommand 3
The Signpost: 16 January 2012
- Special report: English Wikipedia to go dark on January 18
- Sister projects: What are our sisters up to now?
- News and notes: WMF on the looming SOPA blackout, Wikipedia turns 11, and Commons passes 12 million files
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Beer
- Featured content: Lecen on systemic bias in featured content
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, Betacommand case deadlocked, Muhammad images close near
You've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
SarahStierch (talk) 23:20, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 January 2012
- News and notes: SOPA blackout, Orange partnership
- WikiProject report: The Golden Horseshoe: WikiProject Toronto
- Featured content: Interview with Muhammad Mahdi Karim and the best of the week
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Muhammad images, AUSC call for applications
- Technology report: Looking ahead to MediaWiki 1.19 and related issues
User:Thearccaterham
Thanks for the report, but that sort of promotional editing isn't really vandalism, unless persisted in after warnings. The place to report a username like that which is an obvious role account is WP:UAA. That sort of fairly innocent one gets a not-too-WP:BITEy block notice {{softerblock}}, though I usually add to it links to WP:SPAM and WP:SOAP. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 12:36, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 January 2012
- In the news: Zambian wiki-assassins, Foundation über alles, editor engagement and the innovation plateau
- Recent research: Language analyses examine power structure and political slant; Wikipedia compared to commercial databases
- WikiProject report: Digging Up WikiProject Palaeontology
- Featured content: Featured content soaring this week
- Arbitration report: Five open cases, voting on proposed decisions in two cases
- Technology report: Why "Lua" is on everybody's lips, and when to expect MediaWiki 1.19
EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review
This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 8 February 2012 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding <!--noautoarchive-->
to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:47, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 06 February 2012
- News and notes: The Foundation visits Tunisia, analyzes donors
- In the news: Leading scholar hails Wikipedia, historians urged to contribute while PR pros remain shunned
- Discussion report: Discussion swarms around Templates for deletion and returning editors of colourful pasts
- WikiProject report: The Eye of the Storm: WikiProject Tropical Cyclones
- Featured content: Talking architecture with MrPanyGoff
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, final decision in Muhammad images, Betacommand 3 near closure
The Signpost: 13 February 2012
- Special report: Fundraising proposals spark a furore among the chapters
- News and notes: Foundation launches Legal and Community Advocacy department
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Stub Sorting
- Featured content: The best of the week
The Signpost: 20 February 2012
- Special report: The plight of the new page patrollers
- News and notes: Fundraiser row continues, new director of engineering
- Discussion report: Discussion on copyrighted files from non-US relation states
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Poland
- Featured content: The best of the week
The Signpost: 27 February 2012
- News and notes: Finance meeting fallout, Gardner recommendations forthcoming
- Recent research: Gender gap and conflict aversion; collaboration on breaking news; effects of leadership on participation; legacy of Public Policy Initiative
- Discussion report: Focus on admin conduct and editor retention
- WikiProject report: Just don't call it "sci-fi": WikiProject Science Fiction
- Arbitration report: Final decision in TimidGuy ban appeal, one case remains open
- Technology report: 1.19 deployment stress, Meta debates whether to enforce SUL
I fail to see how WP:CSD A1 applies to Tyrida in any way. I wrote a note on the talk page. Would you please kindly explain the reasoning behind this? Thanks --Codrin.B (talk) 21:19, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 March 2012
- News and notes: Chapter-selected Board seats, an invite to the Teahouse, patrol becomes triage, and this week in history
- In the news: Heights reached in search rankings, privacy and mental health info; clouds remain over content policing
- Discussion report: COI and NOTCENSORED: policies under discussion
- WikiProject report: We don't bite: WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles
- Featured content: Best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC appointments announced, one case remains open
The Signpost: 12 March 2012
- Interview: Liaising with the Education Program
- Women and Wikipedia: Women's history, what we're missing, and why it matters
- Arbitration analysis: A look at new arbitrators
- Discussion report: Nothing changes as long discussions continue
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Women's History
- Featured content: Extinct humans, birds, and Birdman
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision in 'Article titles', only one open case
- Education report: Diverse approaches to Wikipedia in Education
Happy First Edit Day
The Signpost: 19 March 2012
- News and notes: Chapters Council proposals take form as research applications invited for Wikipedia Academy and HighBeam accounts
- Discussion report: Article Rescue Squadron in need of rescue yet again
- WikiProject report: Lessons from another Wikipedia: Czech WikiProject Protected Areas
- Featured content: Featured content on the upswing!
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence 'review' opened, Article titles at voting
The Signpost: 26 March 2012
- News and notes: Controversial content saga continues, while the Foundation tries to engage editors with merchandising and restructuring
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Rock Music
- Featured content: Malfunctioning sharks, toothcombs and a famous mother: featured content for the week
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review at evidence, article titles closed
- Recent research: Predicting admin elections; studying flagged revision debates; classifying editor interactions; and collecting the Wikipedia literature
- Education report: Universities unite for GLAM; and High Schools get their due.
Invitation to the April Wikification Drive
Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's April Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 1,300 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions, including a brand new one for the single largest wikified article! All you have to do is put an asterisk next to the largest article you've wikified, and coordinators will check its wordcount after the drive ends. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks! Note: The drive started April 1, and you can sign up anytime! |
The Signpost: 02 April 2012
- Interview: An introduction to movement roles
- Arbitration analysis: Case review: TimidGuy ban appeal
- News and notes: Berlin reforms to movement structures, Wikidata launches with fanfare, and Wikipedia's day of mischief
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
- Featured content: Snakes, misnamed chapels, and emptiness: featured content this week
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review in third week, one open case
The Signpost: 09 April 2012
- News and notes: Projects launched in Brazil and the Middle East as advisors sought for funds committee
- WikiProject report: The Land of Steady Habits: WikiProject Connecticut
- Featured content: Assassination, genocide, internment, murder, and crucifixion: the bloodiest of the week
- Arbitration report: Arbitration evidence-limit motions, two open cases
Possibly unfree File:O Canada (Bilingual).ogg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:O Canada (Bilingual).ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:11, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Virgin A330 incident LGW
Please review the criteria for inclusion of an accident / incident on an airport or airline page (I gave the links in my edit summary). It states (here) that:
Accidents or incidents should only be included if:
- The event was fatal to either aircraft occupants or persons on the ground;
- The event involved hull loss or serious damage to the aircraft or airport;
- The event resulted in changes to procedures, regulations or processes affecting airports, airlines or the aircraft industry.
I'm sure you will agree there are no indications whatsoever that this incident fulfils any of the above criteria. If you consider that it does, please start a discussion on the article talk page before reverting again. Thanks. SempreVolando (talk) 13:58, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
- That is the criteria for the accident to have its own article. However, crashes that do not meet this criteria can still be included on the airport/airlines article. This incident has been mentioned on BBC News and should therefore be included in the airport's article. Oddbodz (talk) 14:04, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
- Incorrect, that is the criteria for inclusion on an airport or airline article. Read WP:AIRPORTS - page content. Please read the criteria they were developed for a reason. Wikipedia is not a news service. SempreVolando (talk) 14:07, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
- Ooops, missed that one! Thanks for letting me know Oddbodz (talk) 14:16, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
- Incorrect, that is the criteria for inclusion on an airport or airline article. Read WP:AIRPORTS - page content. Please read the criteria they were developed for a reason. Wikipedia is not a news service. SempreVolando (talk) 14:07, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 April 2012
- Arbitration analysis: Inside the Arbitration Committee Mailing List
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Facilitator: Silver seren
- Discussion report: The future of pending changes
- WikiProject report: The Butterflies and Moths of WikiProject Lepidoptera
- Featured content: A few good sports: association football, rugby league, and the Olympics vie for medals
The Signpost: 23 April 2012
- Investigative report: Spin doctors spin Jimmy's "bright line"
- WikiProject report: Skeptics and Believers: WikiProject The X-Files
- Featured content: A mirror (or seventeen) on this week's featured content
- Arbitration report: Evidence submissions close in Rich Farmbrough case, vote on proposed decision in R&I Review
- Technology report: Wikimedia Labs: soon to be at the cutting edge of MediaWiki development?
The Signpost: 30 April 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Consultant: Pete Forsyth
- Discussion report: 'ReferenceTooltips' by default
- WikiProject report: The Cartographers of WikiProject Maps
- Featured content: Featured content spreads its wings
- Arbitration report: R&I Review remains in voting, two open cases
The Signpost: 07 May 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Communicator: Phil Gomes
- News and notes: Hong Kong to host Wikimania 2013
- WikiProject report: Say What?: WikiProject Languages
- Featured content: This week at featured content: How much wood would a Wood Duck chuck if a Wood Duck could chuck wood?
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision in Rich Farmbrough, two open cases
- Technology report: Search gets faster, GSoC gets more detail and 1.20wmf2 gets deployed
The Signpost: 14 May 2012
- WikiProject report: Welcome to Wikipedia with a cup of tea and all your questions answered - at the Teahouse
- Featured content: Featured content is red hot this week
- Arbitration report: R&I Review closed, Rich Farmbrough near closure
The Signpost: 21 May 2012
- From the editor: New editor-in-chief
- WikiProject report: Trouble in a Galaxy Far, Far Away....
- Featured content: Lemurbaby moves it with Madagascar: Featured content for the week
- Arbitration report: No open arbitration cases pending
- Technology report: On the indestructibility of Wikimedia content
Rename request on en.wb
Hi, can you confirm that this request is from you please? Thanks QU TalkQu 17:20, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hi there, yes that request is from me. Oddbodz (talk) 20:53, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, all done. You will need to visit Special:Mergeaccount to unify the SUL again. QU TalkQu 20:57, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 May 2012
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation endorses open-access petition to the White House; pending changes RfC ends
- Recent research: Supporting interlanguage collaboration; detecting reverts; Wikipedia's discourse, semantic and leadership networks, and Google's Knowledge Graph
- WikiProject report: Experts and enthusiasts at WikiProject Geology
- Featured content: Featured content cuts the cheese
- Arbitration report: Fæ and GoodDay requests for arbitration, changes to evidence word limits
- Technology report: Developer divide wrangles; plus Wikimedia Zero, MediaWiki 1.20wmf4, and IPv6
Orphaned non-free image File:Lilo (Lilo and Stitch).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lilo (Lilo and Stitch).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have questions, please post them here.
- I will automatically remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please ask an admin to turn it off here.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 13:59, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 June 2012
- Special report: WikiWomenCamp: From women, for women
- Discussion report: Watching Wikipedia change
- WikiProject report: Views of WikiProject Visual Arts
- Featured content: On the lochs
- Arbitration report: Two motions for procedural reform, three open cases, Rich Farmbrough risks block and ban
- Technology report: Report from the Berlin Hackathon
Wikipedia:Wikiproject Surrey
Hi,
I've refounded Wikipedia:Wikiproject Surrey and I saw you were a member of Wikipedia:Wikiproject Surrey. I was wondering, as you are a on the Participants List weather on not you would like to help improve more Surrey articles and make Wikipedia:Wikiproject Surrey and active Wikiproject again.
I hope you will come and help make Wikipedia: Wikiproject Surrey an active Wikiproject again.
Thanks, pbl1998--Pbl1998 (talk) 14:16, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
P.S. Either reply or Wikipedia:Wikiproject Surrey on my talk page.
Needing Wiki contribution assistance!
Greetings Oddbodz,
I am looking for an experienced Wikipedian to contribute an article for our band Mr. Meeble. I have checked and we meet the Wikipedia "notability" guidelines for a band. We have a very basic Wikipedia article written already, but I know that someone like yourself may be able to point out our formatting errors and critical omissions. You can hear our music and see our videos here:
http://youtube.com/mrmeeble
http://soundcloud.com/meeble
Let me know if you would be willing to help!
Regards,
Devin
mm @ meeble.com
Devbot (talk) 05:11, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 June 2012
- News and notes: Foundation finance reformers wrestle with CoI
- WikiProject report: Counter-Vandalism Unit
- Featured content: The cake is a pi
- Arbitration report: Procedural reform enacted, Rich Farmbrough blocked, three open cases
The Signpost: 18 June 2012
- Investigative report: Is the requests for adminship process 'broken'?
- News and notes: Ground shifts while chapters dither over new Association
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: The Punks of Wikipedia
- Featured content: Taken with a pinch of "salt"
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, GoodDay case closed
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News