User talk:Obyno2020

Welcome

Hello, Obyno2020, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 18:22, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

This is Obyno2020's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Benneth Nwankwo (May 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asukite was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Benneth Nwankwo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Benneth Nwankwo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

A S U K I T E 13:41, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Obyno2020! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! A S U K I T E 13:41, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Benneth Nwankwo (July 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:REFBOMB and notability not established. See WP:THREE

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Benneth Nwankwo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Benneth Nwankwo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 11:27, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Benneth Nwankwo (August 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robertsky was:

no significant improvements made to the draft after the last review. do not resubmit without improvements made.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Benneth Nwankwo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Benneth Nwankwo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 12:20, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Breakout (2022 Nigerian TV series) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Breakout (2022 Nigerian TV series), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 05:21, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Slymshady moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Slymshady, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:41, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will edit and revert. Obyno2020 (talk) 19:46, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ugoccie moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ugoccie, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 14:24, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Chineme Ike moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Michael Chineme Ike, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 15:52, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good day,

Please kindly review my article again. The citations used are from reliable and independent sources mostly national newspapers in Nigeria. Obyno2020 (talk) 15:57, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Chineme Ike (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Star Mississippi was:

This was just moved to draftspace today. Please follow Praxidicae (talk · contribs)'s suggestion and work on it here. Courtesy ping Celestina007 for their input as well.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael Chineme Ike and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Michael Chineme Ike, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Star Mississippi 18:51, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Endorsing Praxidicae's draftifying. Star Mississippi, thank you for the ping. This has all the trappings of a COI(Possibly Paid) The article author themself appear to be a probable low to medium inexperienced UPE editor. A supermajority of the sources used in the article are unreliable. I have added them to my watchlist permanently. Celestina007 (talk) 19:04, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it is fair to accuse me of having a conflict of interest. I became a contributor in other to document change makers from my country, Nigeria, especially those who are unable to receive global recognition. Obyno2020 (talk) 19:20, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ugoccie (March 7)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Celestina007 were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: See WP:NOT, WP:RS, WP:PAYDISCLOSE & WP:COI

Celestina007 (talk) 18:56, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please would you search the subject's notablity outside Wikipedia? Obyno2020 (talk) 19:21, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ajibola Elizabeth moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ajibola Elizabeth, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:14, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

James Ngwu Eze moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, James Ngwu Eze, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 17:03, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, you’d note almost all articles you have created have been sent back To Draftspace due to diverse reasons ranging from notability, COI and generally meeting a criterion from WP:DRAFTIFY my thinking is you should go through WP:YFA or submitting via a process called WP:AFC, also optimize your rights by asking questions at the WP:TEAHOUSE until you are satisfied, I think you should take a step back from submitting straight to mainspace. Celestina007 (talk) 17:08, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback. Please would you reassign the article to another editor to improve on it as I do not think I would continue with it. It's my understanding that the subject meets Wikipedia's standard regarding notability and that the sources I cited are independent. Or, please can you give me 2 examples of an independent sources using two articles on a Nigerian subject (biography).

You know it is very exhausting spending hours writing and researching, only to have it rejected. More feedback from you would be very useful.

Finally, I don't have any conflict of interest with the subject - except having interest only on Nigerian subjects particularly south east Nigeria is an example of one. Obyno2020 (talk) 17:23, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:James Ngwu Eze has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:James Ngwu Eze. Thanks! Celestina007 (talk) 20:02, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Coal City Film Festival moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Coal City Film Festival, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 16:54, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for Continuing to create in appropriate articles in mainspace. You are welcome to continue using draft space.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 17:15, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As we have discussed, you're not yet familiar enough with the guidelines for article creation in mainspace. Until you are, I have blocked your access to mainspace. You can edit the drafts in draftspace and use the AfC function for review by other editors. As this is indefinite, we can review whether the block is needed in the future. Star Mississippi 17:17, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:James Ngwu Eze has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:James Ngwu Eze. Thanks! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:28, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Nomadicghumakkadi

The Lagos review is a credible source but I'm happy to provide more sources below

https://books.google.com.ng/books/about/Dispossessed.html?id=KqzGywEACAAJ&source=kp_book_description&redir_esc=y

https://lifestyle.thecable.ng/dispossessed-james-eze-metaphors-of-innocence-transgression-and-atonement/

https://www.sunnewsonline.com/as-james-eze-presents-dispossessed-in-awka/

https://guardian.ng/art/ezes-final-possession-of-his-dispossessed-poetry-a-biocritical-reflection/ Obyno2020 (talk) 05:45, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Ngwu Eze has been accepted

James Ngwu Eze, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 21:28, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GeoffreyT2000

Thank you so much. I have other articles which I will need your help for review. They have been moved to my draft space. Obyno2020 (talk) 21:39, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

please note that if you re-submit them without addressing the sourcing and other issues raised here and on my Talk, they will not likely be accepted regardless of who you ask for help. Star Mississippi 22:24, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware of that. I will edit and resubmit. Thank you so much Obyno2020 (talk) 22:28, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see this is now accepted. Congratulation! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 15:57, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Star Mississippi

@Nomadicghumakkad

Thank you. I am aware that I have been blocked by @Star MississippiFor editing articles in the mainspace, please can you all review that, too? Obyno2020 (talk) 05:12, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will leave it for another admin to review, but so far it seems you're still not familiar enough with notability guidelines to create articles without getting them approved through AfC. For any reviewing editor, I'll also flag this parallel conversation: User_talk:Star_Mississippi#Request_on_19:16:35,_7_March_2022_for_assistance_on_AfC_submission_by_Obyno2020.

If you want more visibility to your request, use the template linked above. Star Mississippi 14:43, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. I will take note of that. Obyno2020 (talk) 15:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Chinedu Nwadike has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Chinedu Nwadike. Thanks! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:03, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chinedu Nwadike (March 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chinedu Nwadike and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chinedu Nwadike, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 17:51, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Idoghor Melody

Please can you check the subject to know if it qualifies Wikipedia's not ability standard. The subject is well known in Nigeria especially amongst South Eastern Nigeria and started music evangelism when Internet was not easily accessible in Nigeria.

I'm happy to provide more sources below

https://henotace.org/prince-chinedu-nwadike-charges-singer-kcee-to-continue-with-gospel-songs-as-they-ministered-together-at-a-program-as-guest-artists-today/

https://music.amazon.com/artists/B0098RFRHW/prince-chinedu-nwadike

https://xclusiveloaded.com/you-donated-%E2%82%A61million-to-me-despite-the-fact-that-im-a-christian-nigerian-gospel-singer-chinedu-nwadike-thanks-traditional-cleric-for-donating-money-over-his-sickness/

https://www.ghanamma.com/ng/2022/03/13/to-god-be-the-glory-as-gospel-singer-chinedu-nwadike-undergoes-a-successful-kidney-transplant/ Obyno2020 (talk) 05:19, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anambra state broadcasting service (March 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://www.absradiotv.com/about-us/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

User:Obyno2020/Anambra state broadcasting service may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 10:32, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anambra state broadcasting service (March 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

Now the copyright violation has been removed I see no content that either asserts or verifies any notability. There is work to do here if this is to succeed.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Obyno2020/Anambra state broadcasting service and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Obyno2020/Anambra state broadcasting service, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:37, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Obyno2020/Anambra state broadcasting service has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Obyno2020/Anambra state broadcasting service. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:26, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anambra state broadcasting service (March 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has been resubmitted without any visible improvement, or with very little improvement. If you do not know what is needed to improve this draft, please ask for advice rather than making minor improvements and resubmitting.

You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the declining reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)

If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it is likely to be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a topic-ban may even be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.

You were already once advised that this draft does not contain enough information to be notable, and it still does not satisfy general notability. Please ask for advice at the Teahouse rather than having this draft Rejected and being further sanctioned.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anambra state broadcasting service and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anambra state broadcasting service, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:29, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Breakout (Nigerian TV series) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Breakout (Nigerian TV series), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

A press release that has been published in different newspapers is still only one source, and it does not show notability. bonadea contributions talk 08:00, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Breakout (Nigerian TV series) (2) (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Draftified because it was written like an advert and lacked independent and secondary sources, but contained multiple copies of the same press releases. The promotional writing hasn't been revised, nor have any of the duplicate sources been removed – but another press release has been added, three times, pretending to be three different sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Breakout (Nigerian TV series) (2) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Breakout (Nigerian TV series) (2), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 15:53, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Breakout (Nigerian TV series) (2) (April 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Of the six sources, the first one is a listing on the Radio Times website (trivial mention, not in-depth coverage, and not independent). The other five are all variants of the same press release; Onitsha GRA and thedailyvendor.com are exactly identical, while bouncenationkenya pretends to be different from Pulse Nigeria through blatant thesaurus abuse ("follows a group of dancers in a University as they find themselves thrust into a world where every move is a test" becomes "follows a gaggle of dancers in a University as they discover themselves thrust right into a world the place each transfer is a take a look at").

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Breakout (Nigerian TV series) (2) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Breakout (Nigerian TV series) (2), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 12:26, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Coal City Film Festival (June 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Coal City Film Festival and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Coal City Film Festival, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PRAXIDICAE🌈 16:34, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barnabas Emordi (June 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

IMDB is not a reliable source. Being nominated for an award is usually not a claim to notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Barnabas Emordi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Barnabas Emordi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 15:19, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chinedu Nwadike (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robertsky were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

best known for his hit song - improperly referenced. try expanding on the content, i.e. rise to popularity, popularity, etc. a search on google seems to indicate that the subject was popular, and there should be enough third party sources that can be used as references by now.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chinedu Nwadike and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chinedu Nwadike, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 17:12, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Breakout (Nigerian TV series)

Hello, Obyno2020. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Breakout (Nigerian TV series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James Ngwu Eze for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Ngwu Eze is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Ngwu Eze until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 02:19, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Best Friends In the World (web series)

The article Best Friends In the World (web series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Web series, no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Slywriter (talk) 23:29, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Best Friends in the world is a notable Web base teen centered high school miniseries in Nigeria. A search on Google will show that it is widely discussed in the Nigerian media space

https://www.bellanaija.com/2022/05/best-friends-in-the-world-senior-year-3/ Obyno2020 (talk) 09:41, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barnabas Emordi (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

IMDb is never a reliable source because it is user edited.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Barnabas Emordi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Barnabas Emordi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:43, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Breakout (Nigerian TV series)

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Breakout (Nigerian TV series) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://9newsng.com/nollywood-star-alvin-abayomi-arrives-awka-to-film-on-going-dance-drama-tv-series-breakout/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:23, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Breakout (Nigerian TV series) (2) (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Reading Beans was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more sources from reliable sources. Interviews from reliable sources cannot also be used to establish notability. Best, Reading Beans (talk) 09:41, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Breakout (Nigerian TV series) (2) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Reading Beans (talk) 09:41, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Anambra state broadcasting service

Hello, Obyno2020. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anambra state broadcasting service, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:03, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Michael Chineme Ike

Hello, Obyno2020. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Michael Chineme Ike".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:59, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Slymshady

Hello, Obyno2020. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Slymshady".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 02:04, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Coal City Film Festival

Hello, Obyno2020. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Coal City Film Festival, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ajibola Elizabeth

Hello, Obyno2020. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ajibola Elizabeth, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Chinedu Nwadike

Hello, Obyno2020. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chinedu Nwadike, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Coal City Film Festival

Hello, Obyno2020. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Coal City Film Festival".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:35, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Barnabas Emordi

Hello, Obyno2020. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Barnabas Emordi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ajibola Elizabeth

Hello, Obyno2020. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ajibola Elizabeth".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:19, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barnabas Emordi (December 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please do not resubmit without doing anything about the things that were pointed out to you by previous reviewers. All the imdb references are still there (and note that bellanaija also can't be used as sources).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Barnabas Emordi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 16:24, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Chinedu Nwadike

Hello, Obyno2020. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Chinedu Nwadike".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck███ 17:19, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Chinedu Nwadike

Hello, Obyno2020. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chinedu Nwadike".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:24, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Breakout (Nigerian TV series) (2)

Hello, Obyno2020. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Breakout (Nigerian TV series) (2), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Breakout (Nigerian TV series) (2)

Hello, Obyno2020. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Breakout".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:47, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barnabas Emordi (October 18)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Greenman was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No improvement in establishing notability since the previous decline, submitter has already been asked not to resubmit without addressing previous concerns.

Greenman (talk) 08:01, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Class of Secrets

Hello, Obyno2020. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Class of Secrets, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Class of Secrets

Hello, Obyno2020. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Class of Secrets".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:59, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]