User talk:Noahpdoty

Welcome!

Hi Noahpdoty! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! 331dot (talk) 14:57, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Noahpdoty. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 14:57, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New message from 331dot

Hello, Noahpdoty. You have new messages at 331dot's talk page.
Message added 15:23, 9 July 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

331dot (talk) 15:23, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Developing Radio Partners, from its old location at User:Noahpdoty/sandbox/Developing Radio Partners. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 00:53, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Developing Radio Partners (September 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I am having difficulty spotting the notability here. This is a WP:ROTM business directory entry

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Developing Radio Partners and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Developing Radio Partners, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 16:16, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Noahpdoty! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 16:16, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Developing Radio Partners has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Developing Radio Partners. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:57, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing?

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Noahpdoty, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Noahpdoty|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 16:58, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm unpaid but am interning so I added the template you mentioned. Is that sufficient?Noahpdoty (talk) 17:09, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An intern is considered to be a paid editor. Theroadislong (talk) 17:11, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(ec) Unpaid interning counts as "paid" editing, as you are "paid" with the experience of the work. See WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 17:12, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, is the template mentioned above sufficient then? I added it to my page. I thought I only needed to add a COI message on the page, but I understand it must also be on my page, right?

I removed the coding that prevented the proper display of the notice, which satisfies the requirements. Thank you. You should also tell of your status on relevant article talk pages. 331dot (talk) 17:16, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you very much. I will keep this in mind.

AfC notification: Draft:Developing Radio Partners has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Developing Radio Partners. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:00, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at User talk:Theroadislong, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 18:33, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Developing Radio Partners has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Developing Radio Partners. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:44, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Developing Radio Partners (November 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Issues not fixed on sourcing concerns. Please address the comments of previous reviewers.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Developing Radio Partners and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Developing Radio Partners, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 04:59, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Checking if this is the right way to add to a talk page because I've forgotten

How did I forget????? Noahpdoty (talk) 18:26, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Developing Radio Partners (March 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still full of WP:PROMOTION.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Developing Radio Partners and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Developing Radio Partners, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Numberguy6 (talk) 17:00, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Developing Radio Partners

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Developing Radio Partners, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:27, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I would like to retrieve the deleted material so that I can edit it - is there some way that you can return it to my drafts?

Thanks. Noahpdoty (talk) 20:02, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Considering you were paid to create this and don't seem to be willing to go through the review process required, I would object to it being restored. PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:08, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, but I have not been paid by the organization at all. I thought that I had gone through the review process, but I may have done it wrong. If the article seems promotional, I would really like to fix it, as that was not my intention. I can do more research to attempt to go through the proper review process. I had been following youtube videos on how to go about the process, but if there is a better place to get information, I can refer to that. I didn't mean to waste your time. Noahpdoty (talk) 20:57, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]