User talk:Njinfo10109

This is Njinfo10109's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mahnaz Malik (November 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Also check out WP:BIBLIOGRAPHY.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mahnaz Malik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mahnaz Malik, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 08:03, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Njinfo10109! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curbon7 (talk) 08:03, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

="color:#800">Fiddle^Timtrent]] Faddle^Talk to me 07:34, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mahnaz_Malik

Hello

Thank you for reviewing my page. I don't understand what's wrong with the citation.

I have listed everything that needs to be cited by website and articles.

Mahnaz Malik is the youngest arbitrator as cited by articles and the website its own. I believe that would make the person notable.

She has published books googled simple online, does talks and is a award winning lawyer as cited.

She is a Pakistan based lawyer so of course the cited content would by based in Pakistan. I don't understand how you would not place that a notable content..

And as well cited in English sites.

 Njinfo10109 (talk) 16:30, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Njinfo10109 (talk) 11:40, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mahnaz Malik (May 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mahnaz Malik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mahnaz Malik, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:58, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Njinfo10109. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --- Possibly (talk) 18:33, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Of course, thank you. I am a student in westminister studying business. I have no affliction of the person. :Thank you.

What else would you recommend me to fix the draft? Njinfo10109 (talk) 18:45, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I am very confused.

Why have I been subjected to this. It's a contribution. What have I done wrong? Please explain in detail what's wrong with the draft. I am working now in citing it. Thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Njinfo10109 (talk • contribs)

@Njinfo10109: thank you for explaining that you do not have a COI. Regarding your draft, claims on Wikipedia need to be verifiable. So, anywhere there is a tag like this^{[citation needed]} that says citation needed, you need a citation. There are a lot of things in your draft that do not have reliable sources, so it will not be published until you have included those reliable sources. It is that simple: add a reliable source for each claim in the article. If you read the reviewer message, it says the same thing: "The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes." --- Possibly (talk) 19:13, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mahnaz Malik (June 20)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Hatchens was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Hatchens (talk) 16:28, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of M Malik

I see that you took a photo of Ms Malik and loaded it to commons... and the same photo is also used on her page at Bowen Law. This is unusual - that a picture you took as a student should be used on her Boden Law page. Could you reload the picture at a higher resolution as the picture loaded looks as if it came from a magazine or website. If Ms Malik would like to load her own selfie then that would be OK too but we need to know that we have the photographers permission as the relevant law if very complex (or we will need a barrister like Ms Malik to get us off a copyright claim). Cheers Victuallers (talk) 16:05, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So would I need to contact Ms Malik herself to ask for permission?

So would I need to contact Ms Malik herself to ask for permission? I have contacted Ms malil to ask for permission through her website and she said it was taken by her and I can use it.

I am a student 26 years old studying marketing, in Westminster. I am doing this for my project.

I am a new user so would I need to send an email or? I am very new to this. Njinfo10109 (talk) 22:23, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

DYK for Mahnaz Malik

On 21 July 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mahnaz Malik, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that barrister and arbitrator Mahnaz Malik worked with the Law Society of England and Wales to set up a programme to assist imprisoned children in Pakistan? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mahnaz Malik. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mahnaz Malik), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 00:02, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Mahnaz Malik Photo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Mahnaz Malik Photo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 21:22, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Njinfo10109! Your additions to Mahnaz Malik have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:36, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Devereux Court, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 20:56, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologise. Thank you for the note, will do better. Njinfo10109 (talk) 21:04, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

why was alot of information deleted? They weren't test edits? Njinfo10109 (talk) 21:06, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]