Jump to content

User talk:NeverTry4Me/Archive 100

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 95←Archive 98Archive 99Archive 100

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pallab Bhattacharyya (January 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scope creep was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
scope_creepTalk 10:23, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Pallab Bhattacharyya has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pallab Bhattacharyya. Thanks! scope_creepTalk 10:30, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
scope_creepTalk, I don't see any message or notice. --NeverTry4Me (talk) 10:42, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
@NeverTry4Me: You left a message on the talk page. scope_creepTalk 10:49, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
@Scope creep: Where is your reply? Link to your reply. Regardes --NeverTry4Me (talk) 10:51, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
@NeverTry4Me: You left a note on the draft talk page. I was drawing the reviewers attention to that note. Reviewer's don't usually read the talk page. scope_creepTalk 11:03, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
@Scope creep: I have made major edits on the Draft. Can you guide me checking the Draft whether I am going/doing in proper way or not? Regards --NeverTry4Me (talk) 07:23, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
(talk page watcher)NeverTry4Me: On your user page you say you are a Java Programmer, so with that you're probably aware of the need for precision to avoid flawed code/design causing a JVM to barf stackdumps all over webserver logs to the annoyance of system administrators. If you came to a code review meeting and simply tossed in a printout of some changed code and expected the meeting to go through it for you then you might be losing jacuzzi privileges. K.I.S.S.. Read WP:THREE. No volunteer has time to read through though a citebomb of references trying to work out which are key key notability points and which are supported by WP:RS, and BLP's will be particularly strict. Its also important in programming to be able to know where to get the right information, for Java accessing the information on the Oracle Website and support is essential for example. In this case for right direction its probably better to go to Wikipedia:AFC Help Desk for independent views. (that's no disrespect to Scope Creep). I would slightly offer different advice from Scope Creep in use of the talk page as putting the 3 best RS on the talk page may be helpful and that the AfC reviewer should at least scan it, and asking them about that on a declined review might not be unreasonable, but only if notability points are very clear and non-primary RS. You should also be aware that at some point you actions may be judged against WP:COMPETENCY/WP:DISRUPTIVE criteria if you are pulling in lots of volunteer effort. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:09, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
@Djm-leighpark: My apology that I was too novice in many a things. But user Worldbruce helped me to understand lots. I have already said that for me Wikipedia is my learning platform and I am/will-be always a learner. Can you please have a look at the Draft now (removed primary and added secondary, removed citations those are un-necessary & primary), so that I can know/learn whether I am going in right direction or not? About being a Java programmer, due to my job, I am no longer with Java, I am removing the category from my Userpage. Pardon and apology for every single mistakes by me (everything was in Good Faith) --NeverTry4Me (talk) 09:25, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
I've removed the image as there's little sign of you raising a valid WP:VRT image for it which is needed. Beyond that its helpdesk's you need. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:49, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
@Djm-leighpark:, Can you please have a look at the revised Draft (removed primary and added secondary, removed citations those are un-necessary & primary), so that I can know/learn whether I am going in right direction or not? --NeverTry4Me (talk) 10:31, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
To re-state what I'm trying to tell get over to you ... ask the helpdesks. I've really very little WP time today and I'm sorting off stuff round Newry, not to mention I'm sorry to say I'm minded the subject is likely to be judged below the AfC notability threshold; so even from a triage point of view its seemingly not a good choice for me to spend time on, A different matter with Sanjib Baruah, I reckoned he could be successfully defended at AfD/DRV if necessary. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 10:43, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
That's a better guidance now. Cheers. :) --NeverTry4Me (talk) 10:46, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pallab Bhattacharyya (February 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Worldbruce was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The degree of citation bombing has been reduced, and the number of references has fallen from 30 to 20. Examining 40% of them at random, however, the same fundamental problem remains. They are essentially all brief mentions in primary sources:
  • The team ... comprised ..., Special DGP (Special Branch) Assam, Pallab Bhattacharyya and ...
  • The team of officials comprised of ..., Special DGP(SB) Pallab Bhattacharya, ..., said an official release.
  • Pallab Bhattacharyya, IGP (Central & Western Range), who is also in charge of Guwahati City, has been transferred as IGP (Special Branch).
  • Retired IPS Officer Pallav Bhattacharya has been appointed as the new Chairman of Assam Public Service Commission ... Bhattacharya retired as Special DGP in 2019 ... Friday, the government appointed Bhattacharya [Google translation].
  • Shri Pallav Bhattacharya, IPS (Retd.) - Member
  • The members are ... Pallab Bhattacharya, IPS (retd); ...
  • ...; Shri Pallav Bhattacharyy, IPS (Rtd); ...
The closest to significant coverage and a secondary source is News Live, but it's only 45 words in 3 sentences. I see evidence of seniority, but that should not be confused with notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Worldbruce (talk) 14:37, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Raghunath Behura for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raghunath Behura is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raghunath Behura until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Djm-leighpark (talk) 22:31, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

@Djm-leighpark:, again? :) No issue. The Intelligence Bureau, RAW, NSG and State Intelligence are important/top Law enforcement agencies of India. The subject person was the ADG of the Intelligence Bureau at the time of his death. He had 5 more years of service, in which any IPS officer gets DG rank. :) --NeverTry4Me - TT Page 23:01, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
@NeverTry4Me: Have you not learned the discussion is not here? It is where it is at the link. If you feel I am harrassing you there is ANI, but be aware I am tracking a copyvio of an image on this article. Removing the notability tag by your own judgement has created the trigger point for an AfD. The article was to a degree protected for a while with that in place. The AfD will confirm whether or not you were correct in removing it. Add additional delsorts if you wish. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 23:09, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
@Djm-leighpark: I have replied already there. The reply here is just a friendly reply. :) --NeverTry4Me - TT Page 23:14, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pallab Bhattacharyya (IPS)

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

NeverTry4Me - TT Page 11:10, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Nominate for AfD check. --NeverTry4Me - TT Page 11:10, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Pallab Bhattacharyya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pallab Bhattacharyya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pallab Bhattacharyya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Djm-leighpark (talk) 12:35, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anya Lahiri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Disruptive editing and !vote interference

You're fully entitled to change your account but its important to change your signature and it probably important to just openly admit that in discussions your currently involved in. What is not acceptable is to interfere with another's !vote, as per this edit some two hours ago. Quite frankly with other problematic contributions you need to slow down. Quickly. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 13:17, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

@Djm-leighpark: fixed. --NeverTry4Me - TT Page 02:18, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Its still disrupted and you are still gaining an advantage. So fix it! But don't alter any of my entries in the process. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 02:23, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
@Djm-leighpark: If I delete old signature and use new one, it will also change the dates too. --NeverTry4Me - TT Page 02:30, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
@Djm-leighpark: I have fixed my signature in my all vote related pages. You can check and confirm now. Also please inform if I need to update my signature in delete discussion which are closed with result. Thank you. --NeverTry4Me - TT Page 04:00, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
If all else fails please read and it probably important to just openly admit that in discussions your currently involved in. You also seem happy to go around disrupting other's !vote. Suggest you ask at the WP:TEAHOUSE. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:07, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
My dear @Djm-leighpark:, nothing failed. Even so, I have done as per guidance in WP:TEAHOUSE. Thank you brother. --NeverTry4Me - TT Page 08:27, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Dear @Djm-leighpark:, I have done all the correction with my updated Username, and now no 'disrupting other's !vote' issue. I have addressed and fixed in my all VOTE related discussions. Please check my activity. --NeverTry4Me - TT Page 08:35, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is Draft:Sanjib Baruah. The discussion is about the topic Draft:Sanjib Baruah. Thank you. —Djm-leighpark (talk) 11:32, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Job Titles

I noticed you've been capitalizing job titles. Please note that MOS:JOBTITLES states the titles should be lower case with specific exceptions as noted in the guidelines. Thanks. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:49, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Teahouse

While being a Teahouse is not a requirement for replying to queries at Teahouse, please limit your responses to queries where you are sure that you know the correct answer. David notMD (talk) 02:58, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Relation with Times of Assam/Arunodoy Consultancy Services

I don't know if this has been asked, but since your earlier username is very similar to Arunodoy Consultancy Services and you've added a number of refs to Times of Assam (which is managed by ACS), can you clarify your relationship with those companies? Hemantha (talk) 10:51, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Dear @Hemantha:, the name "Arunodoy" is too common in India as you know (meaning sunrise, in Bihar, Maharastra, etc too). You can check this. I was a fan of Indian model Arunodoy Singh, and signed up as "Arunudoy" (as Arunodoy nick was not available). Rest about your query, I have been double accused already as Arunodoy Asom and the concern raised by you. Having a similar nick doesn't mean that I am affiliated with them. My Before, this has been used in many North-east Indian-related Wiki pages, even before my sign-up, hence I also inclined to take a few. --NeverTry4Me - TT Page 12:02, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
No, Times of Assam hasn't been used in many wiki pages. This search tells me that it's used in only 50 pages currently. But in your own creations, it is very frequent (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). From this list of your page creations, I think almost all recent mainspace articles from you reference that site.
I'm not accusing you of anything, I'm asking a simple question which I note you've not answered at all. Are you related to them in any way? It doesn't necessarily have to be in a paid sense. Hemantha (talk) 12:28, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Dear @@Hemantha:, as I said, "...I was a fan of Indian model Arunodoy Singh, and signed up as "Arunudoy" (as Arunodoy nick was not available)..", I guess that addresses your concern. Rest about the word/phrase Arunodoy/Arunoday and my previous username, which I have already addressed in ANI which was resolved a few days before. Mate, there have been lots of controversies about my username, I had to change my username. Thank you. --NeverTry4Me - TT Page 12:35, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
See this is simple. I'm not asking about anything else. Just answer this question - in yes or no only: Are you in any way related to Times of Assam? I note that you created an article for it. Hemantha (talk) 12:39, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
@Hemantha:Straight answer: NO. I don't belong to the Assamese community nor I understand their native language. --NeverTry4Me - TT Page 12:45, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
@Hemantha:, for simple logic, I have created a wiki page about former NSG chief Jayanta Narayan Choudhury which was nominated for deletion, and the result was KEEP, can you find any mention about him in the newspaper you claimed? No, you won't. Things are simple like that. We live in a world where we are unable to trust even our own shadow. Hope you will understand, friend. Thank you. --NeverTry4Me - TT Page 12:53, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

(moving comment inserted between my earlier comment. Hemantha (talk) 14:01, 12 February 2022 (UTC) )

Dear @@Hemantha:, please check the pages as per This search, and you will find no edit by me in more than 98% instead of link fixing as I am doing in other pages with other links too. Hope we are not misunderstood. Rest about (1, 2, 3, 4, 5), I could have used Books/Journals, but Wiki suggested me news, so what can I do? Please tell me. You are free to replace with other sources claiming the subject in a similar manner. --NeverTry4Me - TT Page 13:12, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

1. Don't change or insert your text into my comments. See WP:TPG 2. Indent your comments properly. And most importantly
3. Don't be disingenuous. There are 50 pages using "Times of Assam" references. Just from 1 page of your page creations, I find 5 of those to be yours. Wiki doesn't suggest anything, you chose to link to "Times of Assam". Hemantha (talk) 14:01, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
  • Dear @@Hemantha:, it's straight and simple- I simply went through Google search for the sources and whichever source gave more coverage, I used. Rest, about Wiki suggestion, I meant the "notability alert box" where Google search and News are the first two in the line, thus finding that Times of Assam(As I saw this media is used as a source of wiki context, I tried to create a wiki page for that, but got deleted. And yes, it is obvious that when a user creates a page here and gets nominated for deletion, the user tries to defend from deletion. Kindly note that I have made expanded edits to other media too.). Hope this clears now. Anything more I shall clarify? --NeverTry4Me - TT Page 21:40, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
  • @@Hemantha:, Also I have used The Indian Express citations in more than hundreds of my edits, and I am an Indian. Per your logic, am I related to the Indian Express? Also, I have used the Book 'Confronting the State: ULFA's Quest for Sovereignty' as a citation in most edits. Per your say, I should have COIN with that Book or its writer. So it? No. Again, I was earlier faced the same issue on the Wiki of Sanjib Baruah, who doesn't have even any coverage. What made you believe that I am related to your mentioned things? Only the Wiki nick's similarity with some subject?? Per your logic, do you have COIN any anyone here in Wiki whose name is "Hemanta" or "Hemant"? Come on, nick is nick, my bad is I did not pick any alien nick or 'no meaning' nick. For that, I shall not be forced to accept like "after having a cup of tea, forced to have pizza". Thank you. --NeverTry4Me - TT Page 00:32, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
  • Dear @Hemantha:, have I addressed your concerns, or yet there are more to be addressed? I am not sure why users are accusing me as 3 real persons (which is more than a joke). Kindly reply. --NeverTry4Me - TT Page 08:08, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
    Don't spam him with pings, if he wants to respond, he will. If I were take everything you have said above at face value, it still doesn't explain how you have ended up with such a disparity in cites to mainstream Assamese newspapers and the Times of Assam. Are you consciously trying to use Times of Assam more or trying to cite to certain outlets less? If so, why?
    There is per se nothing wrong with doing either, just that now that it has led to suspicions of COI on you, you need to be honest about it otherwise you'll just get into more trouble. If you like the news outlet or think it is more trustworthy than the others then that's okay, but if you have a conflict of interest then you need to disclose it. COI is not necessarily financial, it could be arise out of relations such as family members or friends at the news outlet. Tayi Arajakate Talk 03:32, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
  • Tayi Arajakate I am sorry for the excessive use of ping. Kindly try to understand my situation, where I am not affiliated but I am accused of being. For citation, like others, I used Google search about the subject and used citation that covers the subject. Regards --NeverTry4Me - TT Page 03:41, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
    How would I understand your situation if you don't even answer my question? See, here's the problem if you used Google search about Assamese subjects, your results would not be dominated by Times of Assam but by the mainstream Assamese news outlets like The Sentinel, The Assam Tribune, Guwahati Plus, etc (unless you added "times of assam" in the search query). So how have you ended citing more to that outlet in specific without a conscious effort to do so? Tayi Arajakate Talk 05:09, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Robin Hibu moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Robin Hibu, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 13:17, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

ANI response needed

Hi again. Look, I need for you to respond to my ANI query (diffs: [1] [2]) before you do anything else. So please do not continue editing while the matter remains outstanding. Thanks again. El_C 11:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Indefinite block

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. I'm sorry, NeverTry4Me, but not just you ignoring my above instruction, but also even a cursory glance at some of your recent contributions, all point to gross incompetence. At this point, you will need to provide sufficient assurances that you will correct these issues if your editing privileges are to be reinstated.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 11:56, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NeverTry4Me (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am surprised that @El C: haven't waited for my reply. Moreover, in here I was asked to stop commenting by scope_creep. Hence I was stuck at mid as "where to go, what to do". Regarding reply to your question, I was unable to use the "diff" to attach for a little technical reason. Otherwise, I wouldn't have reported the spam which Admin themselves acted on it quickly. Some of my edits are disputed, but not intended for violation of rules. I shall be allowed to address and edit as I have been volunteering for Wikipedia since 2014. Again, I tender my apology for my mistakes/wrongdoings and appeal to remove the block and allow me to continue in good faith. I shall follow with Competence and other Wiki rules. Regards NeverTry4Me - TT Page 21:34, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No point to leaving requist open after talk page access revocation. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:30, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am surprised that @El C: haven't waited for my reply — oh, I waited, but you just kept on editing. El_C 01:06, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
  • El_C, you just blocked me within 40 minutes, of "no-reply".
  • TheDragonFire300, in this diff he said "@NeverTry4Me: Can you please let folk talk about this ..." which I understood as to stop commenting and letting others comment. Next, Tthere was no outage, but I was unable to find the "diff" from history and was studying if Admin deleted it from the talk page or reverted it. --NeverTry4Me - TT Page 02:11, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
That's right, 40 minutes, during which you kept making multiple edits. Not sure why you are conflating a suggestion by a non-admin in a discussion at WP:COIN, with my instruction to you, both at WP:ANI and here, but all of it further illustrates to me that you lack the required competence to edit here at this time.
Look, NeverTry4Me, it isn't that complicated. This wasn't about just this one incident, but this was the final straw: you made a comment at WP:ANI#Please look out cross-wiki abuse and LTA User:米記123 sock DE and spam 3. It read: Sorry, I am not aware nor do I have any knowledge about this. I can't help you (diff). That baffled me. It continues to baffle me. You cannot explain yourself cogently, you cannot provide the evidence that would help explain yourself cogently, and frankly, it's a time sink, still. El_C 02:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Yet again, what does that ANI thread have to do with your talk page? I keep asking, but you're giving me nothing but obfuscation, it seems. It's bizarre. Also, you are not reading closely. I've written mere minutes ago about how This wasn't about just this one incident. And it wasn't. Because right before registering my puzzlement with that (diff), whatever that was, I warned you against casting aspersions in the thread you started titled WP:ANI#Single_purpose_account_of_User:GeezGod (diff).
Look, NeverTry4Me, there isn't jurisprudence that I know of anywhere in the world that allows for un-evidenced allegations. And when someone whom you accuse of something requests evidence, yet you respond with a belligerent you are not into discussion but into harass and personael attack. I am not going to reply as of now (diff), that's a major problem, doesn't matter the platform. Anyway, at this point, I'm probably gonna stop engaging, since I have very little confidence that it'll accomplish anything. El_C 03:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
  • Dear El_C, ANI is addressed in my talk page here. Next, GeezGod made personal attack against me and some Admin suppressed and reverted some of his edits after blocking him. As I see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/GeezGod, his logs are plausibly deleted by Admin, how can I now address harassment diffs? I can not, as I am a normal user.
  • About WP:ANI#Please look out cross-wiki abuse and LTA User:米記123 sock DE and spam 3, it looked like spam and, in good faith, I reported. If I would know reporting that is a violation, I wouldn't have done that. I was in Wikipedia for more than 7 years, and made no similar mistakes, except failing to cite properly in articles. And about "competence" failure, yes I admit that I failed to reply in a proper way. Whatever mistake I have done, I have admitted, but the COIN (which I am not) issue made me suffer a lot. (Per COIN allegation, if I accept I am involved in COIN, that would be a clear lie which I can not do). --NeverTry4Me - TT Page 03:12, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
TheDragonFire300, it's hopeless. I'm ready to revoke talk page access at this point. El_C 03:34, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
TheDragonFire300, who knows if the personal attack came from GeezGod. Who knows if there even was a personal attack to begin with. NeverTry4Me doesn't seem to be able to corroborate anything about anything. El_C 04:20, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
El C, regardless of NeverTry4Me's competency issues (which is probably largely due to lack off English proficiency), I think NeverTry4Me is talking about Special:Diff/1071758710 and Special:Diff/1071763686. This is a brand new account that joined the COIN thread, referred to a facebook group and said that NeverTry4Me is famous on Assamese wiki, when neither is there any discussion nor does either of them have any significant activity there. GeezGod also claim to be a Wikipedia newcomer even though their behavior indicates they are quite experienced. Scobserv (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) was another account that had joined the COIN thread and whose comments were revdelled for personal attacks and possible outing. NeverTry4Me may have confused the two but it also seems like the two are related through some off-wiki coordination. Tayi Arajakate Talk 06:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
@Tayi Arajakate: This seems credible that he'd confuse the two users. If you have any concerns about GeezGod being a sockpuppet, do file a WP:SPI. I doubt anything will come of it considering he was found not guilty of socking recently, but who knows. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions). 07:47, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
I don't know who they would be a sock of for me to file an SPI, though it does look obvious that they are not a new user. My point isn't even that but that there was harassment coordinated off wiki which got overlooked because of NeverTry4Me's inability to articulate it and the fact that GeezGod has gone scot free is a problem. Tayi Arajakate Talk 08:05, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Tayi Arajakate, I linked to WP:DIFF for them enough times. Look, we can't solve all the world's problems. One needs basic competence to edit here, which, for the English Wikipedia, also includes a reasonable command of the English language. There's a point when incompetence and trolling becomes indistinguishable. A time sink all the same.
And can you explain to me what in the WP:ARBIND is happening here? Which camps do these two users represent? Also, does the Assamese wiki calls diffs something else? These two users have wasted so much of so many users' time. A black hole of time wastage. El_C 09:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
I just realized NeverTry4Me actually used diffs before (yesterday, here). This is so bizarre. El_C 09:08, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
I'm not saying NeverTry4Me should be unblocked or anything, they clearly lack the competency to be able to edit here. Regarding the diff thing, they may not have realised that the link to a revision is called a diff. He doesn't have any significant contribution (4 edits) on Assamese Wikipedia, neither is there any discussion concerning or including him on there.
In this context, GeezGod commented on the COIN thread, "Yes, I'm a Wikipedia newcomer. In a Facebook group (অসমীয়া ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ সদস্য), there is a discussion regarding your dirty dealings on wikipedia..." and followed it up with "Too much courtesy, too much craft. You are already famous in Assamese wiki community. That's why first remark is obviously directed at you..." which reads like harassment directed from outside so they should be blocked as well. I can't really tell if there are any camps here other than a facebook group not liking NeverTry4Me irl. Tayi Arajakate Talk 09:54, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Tayi Arajakate, I already read those diffs, I'm asking what their dispute is about. Yes, GeezGod should be blocked as well. And they were, then unblocked. But they would have been blocked in a long-lasting way, had the evidence been presented at any point until... now. Also, on the project, offwiki harassment is the exclusive domain of the Arbitration Committee (there's also WP:T&S at the foundation level). A few years back, I've been cautioned by the Committee about that (gently, but still), so I'm wary of over-stepping there, especially after a block/unblock has already taken place. El_C 10:50, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
I don't think they have an on-wiki dispute (on their current account at least) so can't really tell. I suppose I'll send an email to ArbCom. Tayi Arajakate Talk 14:42, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
@Tayi Arajakate, before you spend more time on this account, see its previous name. I do not think the new accounts were harassing, they were ineptly trying to point out the extremely blatant COI edits. I can post more on-wiki diffs but since they'd requested name change, I'm not sure if I should do so. Hemantha (talk) 11:52, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
  • Again, I was getting alerts from COIN, ANI, TP, I was moving from here and there. And I haven't got any chance to check who is Admin and who is not. I stuck dealing with different notices that addressed me. --NeverTry4Me - TT Page 03:19, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
NeverTry4Me, except you're not the one who reported the spam. It was reported by MCC214 (diff). You just added a seemingly non sequitur comment in response (diff), the reason for which you still cannot explain, even now. Anyway... El_C 03:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
I'm revoking talk page access due to continued obfuscation. El_C 04:13, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
This is the weirdest case of WP:VEXBYSTERANG I've seen in quite a while now. Padgriffin Griffin's Nest 10:31, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Talk page access revoked

Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

El_C 04:13, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #54842

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:02, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rajen Sharma

Notice

The article Rajen Sharma has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nothing but passing mentions, not enough in-depth coverage to show that they meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 14:18, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Kamal Kumar Tanti

Hi, the edit summary you gave in this edit [3] states that you have a COI. I think it's likely you've misunderstood how WP:COI works - it's not a conflict of interest to vote on an AfD when you have taken part in the editing of the article - but if you do have a conflict of interest, you should probably stop editing this article entirely and make a COI declaration as described at WP:DISCLOSE. -- asilvering (talk) 17:55, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

@Asilvering I have declared COI (as per my mentor's assistance) in my user page. I have deleted my comments in AfD per rules so that it doesn't violate COI rules. Regards- NeverTry4Me - TT Page 18:09, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
@NeverTry4Me Thank you! You're welcome to keep looking for sources though, if you like - if you find anything else, you could ping me about it so I can add it, or you could drop it on the Talk page of the article? I think an argument can probably be made for keep, but I'd like to get some more sources before making the attempt on the AfD. -- asilvering (talk) 18:17, 19 March 2022 (UTC)



Are you heading to be re-blocked?

Your re-nomination of Gyanendra Pratap Singh at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gyanendra Pratap Singh (2nd nomination) less than the recommended 2 months after a no-consensus close as per Wikipedia:Renominating for deletion seems to be a failure of WP:BEFORE criteria B. 5 and is an indicator you do not have the WP:COMPETENCY to carry out an AfD nomination correctly and without causing trouble to the community. I suggest you withdraw that nomination. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 10:51, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

@Djm-leighpark nope dear friend. I have assessed the source table and found not SIGCOV. But, I am yet unable to add the table due to restriction/malfunction of the script. Kindly consider this as a Help to newbies like me who are having issues with restricted edits. Pardon me wherever I'm wrong. Rehards - NeverTry4Me - TT Page 10:59, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
I'm unsure what happened during Paromita Das AfD nomination, but this manual edit by you to the AfD page was misleading in that the AfD wasn't actually added to either India delsort or Author delsort as claimed in your edit. I have done so now. Hemantha (talk) 16:40, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Given Hemantha's statement above this interfereing edit of the AfD shows a complete lack of competency or trying to be disruptive. I'd ask Deepfriedokra to review the unblock and especially due to the copyright infringements mentioned above. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 00:22, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Dear Djm-leighpark, why so quick and angry? As Hemantha said, "he AfD page was misleading in that the AfD wasn't actually added to either India delsort or Author delsort as claimed in your edit" - I am afraid that if I do not remove with the manual revert, it would create a trouble for me. Hence I did. You, as a senior editor, should guide and help us. Please help, not block. --NeverTry4Me - TT Page 00:28, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
As soon as someone calls me "friend" online that immediately indicates that person is not to be trusted. You can't stay out of trouble. If you think I'm attacking you unjustly raise an ANI. Timewaster! Djm-leighpark (talk) 00:37, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
I won't go to ANI as I have no such issue with you or @Hemantha. Regards - NeverTry4Me - TT Page 00:39, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
No, you have done better taking in feedback from @Hemantha: and @Djm-leighpark: and I think you need to not nominate articles for deletion. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:09, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
I don't mentor. I'm not sharp enough. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:10, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Oh, no CSD's either. You need to focus on building the encylopedia. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:11, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
As of now, for not less than 6 months, I won't nominate articles for deletion. I promise that. About mentor, in my Special:Homepage ‪Valereee‬ is my mentor. I haven't asked anything yet as it will go to a mentor's talk page, which might lead to flooded with my questions. Sorry for that. NeverTry4Me - TT Page 01:14, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Yes, no CSD either. I'll be in citing and correcting spelling, grammars to increase my capacity. Regards- --NeverTry4Me - TT Page 01:16, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

You say you landed in the AfD of Paromita Das via suggestbot. Suggestbot suggests articles to improve, not nominate for deletion. Hopefully, that clears this up. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 05:44, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Facepalm Facepalm Please. No WP:ProD's either. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:01, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Yes. Sorry. :( I'll avoid WP:ProD too, as of now, for not less than six month. Am I allowed to vote in AfC, if I find rational and 'can-be-improved'? - NeverTry4Me - TT Page 06:34, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
I'm sorry, NeverTry4Me, I've been having IRL things. I do not know what you mean when you say I haven't asked anything yet as it will go to a mentor's talk page, which might lead to flooded with my questions.
Suggestbot is suggesting you help improve an article. If someone else has tagged it for something -- in the case of Paromita Das, for being a stub -- assume that person knew what they were doing. We tag an article as a stub because we believe it can be expanded.
Right now, you do not have enough experience to assume that, because you can't find sigcov, the article needs to be nominated for deletion. So yes, please stop nominating anything for deletion, whether that's AfD, PROD, or CSD. (And really at this point you should simply be reading those discussions, as you need to develop an understanding of what's going on there before you start participating in them.)
I'm not sure what you mean by vote in AfC, if I find rational and 'can-be-improved'? Can you clarify?
I am not readily available right now, but WP:Teahouse is a good place to ask questions. valereee (talk) 16:00, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
FWIW, NT4M, a really helpful way for very new editors to help using Suggestbot (and learn more about WP in the process) is to de-orphan articles. See WP:ORPHAN. There are multiple orphans in the recent Suggestbot lists you've received. valereee (talk) 16:08, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
@Valereee I am using Suggestbot and Special:Homepage suggestions to cite and fix things. About I'm not sure what you mean by vote in AfC, if I find rational and 'can-be-improved'? Can you clarify?, in some Suggestbot too old articles I have noticed they have been nominated for AfD but I find reasons to KEEP and expand with citations. I meant that. Vice-versa, some articles are created with wrong and fake citations and information, in that case after trying to cite, I wanted CSD or AfD. NeverTry4Me - TT Page 01:14, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
@Valereee: May I edit as per Suggestbot's suggestion, if someone of those lists is personally known to me? Few of such suggestion are personally known to me. I am bit confused here. Please assist me. - NeverTry4Me - TT Page 13:45, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
It's fine if you work on improving an article someone else has nominated for deletion. That can actually be a good way for you to learn how more experienced editors assess notability, which is the number one question at AfD.
If suggestbot suggests an article that has wrong and fake citations and you aren't able to fix it, ask at WP:Teahouse if someone else can take a look at it as a possible candidate for deletion. valereee (talk) 15:49, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NeverTry4Me/Archive_100&oldid=1087236290"