Jump to content

User talk:Nathan Obral/Archives/2020/February

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

DYK for KWKW

[edit]

On 4 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article KWKW, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1952, Los Angeles radio station KFAC boasted a recording library weighing 28 tons, enough to program the station for a year without repeating a selection? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/KWKW. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, KWKW), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WLKR-AM2.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WLKR-AM2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:02, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited KQV, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Watts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:01, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from WTAW (AM) into KZNE. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 13:49, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]