Jump to content

User talk:NapHit/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 9

Liverpool FC at "FAC"

Hi NapHit; I spotted Liverpool F.C. on the FA Candidates list. I can't claim to be a master copyeditor, but I am willing to help wherever possible in tweaking and improving the prose and making other necessary changes. As I have said at the FAC page, I haven't previously read the article, so I'm coming to it fresh, but I'm very familiar with the club, its achievements and its wider context within English football. Just drop me a note at my talk page if you want to discuss anything or whatever, and I'll keep the FAC page on watch to ensure I don't miss any comments from others. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 22:37, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

WikiCup notice

The 2009 WikiCup will begin on January 1, 2009. The first round will run through March 31, 2009. For more information on this tournament, read the "about" section on the main WikiCup page.

This year, we have a different system in calculating points. At User:Garden/WikiCup/Submissions, you will find information about submitting your article (and other) work to earn points. Each contestant will have their own individual subpage for submitting completed work to us.

This year, User:ST47 will also be running one of his bots to calculate mainspace edits and read your submission subpages to calculate the point values you receive based on our scoring chart.

Questions or comment? Ask at the talk page or go directly to Garden or IMatthew's talk page. Good luck and Happy Holidays! -- ayematthew and Garden. 14:01, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

The Red Side

Do Evertonians not refer to Liverpool as 'the red side'? Fry2000 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fry2000 (talkcontribs) 19:45, 23 December 2008 (UTC) I only added it once —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fry2000 (talkcontribs) 22:01, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I just peer reviewed List of Spanish football champions, which has been sitting on the peer review list for what seems like ages. If you have any questions about my review, don't hesitate to drop me a line! DARTH PANDAduel 01:24, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (December)

Cs-wolves(talk) 04:17, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Real Madrid C.F.

Hi NapHit! I solved the problems you identified in the firsts sections of the article. Could you check/review the rest of the article (stadiums, statistics and records, supporters and rivalries and Finances sections), to find out some more problems that can be solved?

Delivered by neuro(talk) for Garden and ayematthew at 20:49, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

May I ask why you remove information and functionality from the above article? Your edits to the 1991- table have changed the sorting function so that there is now a difference with the other tables. Also I do not understand why you have removed the image. Please remember that it is always wise to discuss removal of informationfrom an article before actually doing it. Madcynic (talk) 16:12, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I disagree that your edits to this table are worthwhile. I suggest you put it up for discussion either at the Talk page or at the WP:FOOTY talkpage, so that more than just our two opinions may be heard. Madcynic (talk) 16:18, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
I agree with Madcynic. Actually I did a lot of the work which brought the article to the point where it was before your edits. Most of my edits have been requested in the FA review and the Peer Review. I wonder why you felt obliged to remove functionality from the article, made it a lot uglier, changed team names to more or less random names most Germans won't even recognize, and replaced valid information with invalid information. Please excuse my harsh words, but I find it really upsetting see such an "update" without any previous discussion by a seasoned Wikipedian. Regards, OdinFK (talk) 13:18, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
What's the matter with you, kid? Two other Wikipedians ask you why you think your edits are worthwhile and instead of explaining anything you just continue hacking away at the article? You think you are not in the need of explaining anything or what? Pls do some thorough explaining on Talk:German football champions. Also the team names you use are incomprehensible. For example what is "Dresdner" supposed to mean. It just doesn't make any sense. If you use any names different from the names of the club article you should explain yourself. Further the Bundesliga has 18 members not 20. How can you presume to make informed edits about Bundesliga team names if you apparently don't even know the very basics about this league? OdinFK (talk) 22:57, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

CL Finals

please do not revert my edits for the champions league finals. 2007 UEFA Champions League Final is a featured article; 2005, 2006 and 2008 should be in a common format with this, plus they have a lot of unnecessary trivia and cruft in them. this is not an article on the FA cup final, which has a different format. please use the talk page before reverting edits in future Jw2035 (talk) 14:21, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

rubbish! you did not solely write the 2007 article - get real! the 2007 article is, and remains, a featured article thus should be used as a template. i'm sure you've workeed hard, but methinks just a little too hard adding trivia and cruft not relevant to the subject in question Jw2035 (talk) 14:27, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

besides '(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail' is the reason 2005 has failed GA repeatedly! Jw2035 (talk) 14:30, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

2007 is a featured artilce and remains so. thus, it is a good template. and it's not sock puppetry if you detail your previous username repeatedly on your user page! Jw2035 (talk) 14:33, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

now now, i've only ever used one account at a time and give reasons on my prev page - try reading. its a shame you'd rather make personal attacks than discuss what exactly is wrong with the articles in question, but i'll just keep on reverting until you decide to be civil. Jw2035 (talk) 14:39, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

if you bother to check, very few of my edits to 2006 UEFA Champions League Final actually conflict with the GA recomendations when it was rejected on the talk page; in fact, i've done you a favour in several places by acting on the reviewers comments. plus, the reviewer himself reccomends using aspects of the 2007 article. perhaps discussing this on the talk page would be better than edit warring? Jw2035 (talk) 14:59, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

it was rejected, else it would be GA by now. i'm addressing the reviewers comments on the talk page, if you wish to contribute. otherwise, stop reverting Jw2035 (talk) 15:05, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

ok, if it passes GA i'll accept your layout for the 2006 final. if it fails, i'll revert your edits and submit as GA as I've modified it. please leave 2008, 2005 and 2007 alone Jw2035 (talk) 17:23, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

fine Jw2035 (talk) 19:51, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

I'd like to request your input at an attempt to moderate this dispute. Oldelpaso (talk) 18:00, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2005 UEFA Champions League Final. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --Ged UK (talk) 19:57, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 24, 2008 through January 3, 2009

Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.


The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 45 24 November 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor: 200th issue 
ArbCom elections: Candidate profiles News and notes: Fundraiser, milestones 
Wikipedia in the news Dispatches: Featured article writers — the inside view 
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Volume 4, Issue 46 1 December 2008 About the Signpost

ArbCom elections: Elections open Wikipedia in the news 
WikiProject Report: WikiProject Solar System Features and admins 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 5, Issue 1 3 January 2009 About the Signpost

From the editor: Getting back on track 
ArbCom elections: 10 arbitrators appointed Virgin Killer page blocked, unblocked in UK 
Editing statistics show decline in participation Wikipedia drug coverage compared to Medscape, found wanting 
News and notes: Fundraising success and other developments Dispatches: Featured list writers 
Wikipedia in the news WikiProject Report: WikiProject Ice Hockey 
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

German Football Champions

I just feel that the lead doesn't really work. It starts off talking about the Bundesliga, but then says "The league was cancelled between 1915 and 1919, and from 1945 to 1947 due to the First World War and Second World War respectively." - not the Bundesliga, not even a league (it continues to say league after this). The line "It is contested by 18 teams, with the three lowest placed teams relegated to the 2. Bundesliga and replaced by the top three teams in that division." relates more to the Bundesliga (which has its own article) than to the Championship History, so isn't appropriate for the first paragraph. East Germany's re-introduction is mentioned, but is never introduced because the initial split is not mentioned. I feel that my lead gives an overview, and is in a more chronological order, which is needed for something like this, with a changing history. I agree it needs work, but I think it's an improvement on what you've reverted back to. ArtVandelay13 (talk) 20:11, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

2006 UEFA Champions League Final‎

Thanks for the quick response to the review. I'll look through it again to make sure everything's okay. In addition, because of the edit war, I will have to wait for a couple of days to ensure that the article is stable before promoting it. GaryColemanFan (talk) 23:52, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

The other user seems to have moved on, so I took another look at this article. There are two remaining points that I believe should be addressed, so I have left further comments on the review page. Thanks, GaryColemanFan (talk) 05:07, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick replies to my comments in the review. I have promoted the article. GaryColemanFan (talk) 21:49, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

Delivered by The Helpful One for Garden and iMatthew at 00:02, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 10, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 5, Issue 2 10 January 2009 About the Signpost

News and notes:Flagged Revisions and permissions proposals, hoax, milestones Wikipedia in the news 
Dispatches: December themed Main Page Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)§hepBot (Disable) 19:59, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 17, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 5, Issue 3 17 January 2009 About the Signpost

News and notes: New board members, changes at ArbCom Wikipedia in the news 
Dispatches: Featured article writers—the 2008 leaders WikiProject Report: WikiProject Pharmacology 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 23:57, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

Wikipedia Signpost, January 24, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 5, Issue 4 24 January 2009 About the Signpost

Jimbo requests that developers turn on Flagged Revisions Report on accessing Wikipedia via mobile devices 
News and notes: New chapters, new jobs, new knight and more Wikipedia in the news: Britannica, Kennedy, Byrd not dead yet 
Dispatches: Reviewing featured picture candidates Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Delivered at 04:38, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot (Disable)

WikiCup Newsletter

17:33, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 31, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 5, Issue 5 31 January 2009 About the Signpost

Large portion of articles are orphans News and notes: Ogg support, Wikipedia Loves Art, Jimbo honored 
Wikipedia in the news: Flagged Revisions, Internet Explorer add-on Dispatches: In the news 
WikiProject Report: Motto of the Day Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 21:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (January)

Cs-wolves(talk) 16:18, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

20:35, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by J Milburn, on behalf of the judges. 20:35, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, February 8, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 5, Issue 6 8 February 2009 About the Signpost

News and notes: Elections, licensing update, and more Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's future, WikiDashboard, and "wiki-snobs" 
Dispatches: April Fools 2009 mainpage WikiProject Report: WikiProject Music 
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:31, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

23:18, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — February 16, 2009

The Signpost
Volume 5, Issue 7
Weekly Delivery
2009-02-16

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist.
If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 07:13, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

21:48, 22 February 2009 (UTC) The Helpful Bot 21:48, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — February 23, 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:

The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 16:42, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

17:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC) The Helpful Bot 17:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — 2 March 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:27, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (February)

Cs-wolves(talk) 09:46, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 00:14, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

16:54, 15 March 2009 (UTC) The Helpful Bot 16:54, 15 March 2009 (UTC)


The Wikipedia Signpost  — 16 March 2009

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:22, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Liverpool FC FAC

What do you feel about copyediting the article and pushing it towards FAC once more? If we can get it featured by April 15th, we might be able to get it run on the main page. Sceptre (talk) 10:40, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 23 March 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:17, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 30 March 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:18, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

20:43, 31 March 2009 (UTC)


Delivered for the WikiCup by  GARDEN  at 20:43, 31 March 2009 (UTC). Queries to my talk.

WikiCup Newsletter XI

Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 21:33, 5 April 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 April 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:25, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (March)

Cs-wolves(talk) 12:20, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 13 April 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 16:37, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter XII

Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 17:03, 13 April 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.

WikiCup Newsletter XIII

Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 09:36, 20 April 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 20 April 2009

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 18:58, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter XIV

Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 14:30, 26 April 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 April 2009

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:33, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter XV

Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 08:36, 4 May 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.

April Newsletter

Chubbennaitor 19:44, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 11 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:08, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter XVI

Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 09:13, 18 May 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.

WikiCup Newsletter XVII

Delivered for the WikiCup by The Helpful Bot at 20:05, 23 May 2009 (UTC). To report errors leave at message here.

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 25 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:53, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup newsletter XVII.V

This is just a quick reminder that the round ends this Friday, May 29, 2009. I wanted to let you guys know the current standings. If you are very close, but not close enough, work as hard as possible these next two days. Pool leaders are listed as usual, and under the 10 wildcards, are competitors that are still fighting for a spot. Also, if you currently have any un-reviewed GAN's up and you'd like them to be reviewed and counted for this round, you must place them on the appropriate thread of the WikiCup talk page.

Pool A
  1. Wales Shoemaker's Holiday (647)
Pool B
  1. Colombia ThinkBlue (247)
Pool C
  1. Sweden Theleftorium (455)
Pool D
  1. Denmark Candlewicke (539)
Pool E
  1. Mexico Durova (479)
Pool F
  1. Switzerland Sasata (961)
Current Wildcards
  1. United States Useight (393)
  2. Iceland Scorpion0422 (372)
  3. Thailand Rlevse (329)
  4. Japan Wrestlinglover (307)
  5. Cambodia Paxse (285)
  6. Maryland Ottava Rima (248)
  7. Mitchazenia (226)
  8. Republic of Ireland Juliancolton (181)
  9. Michigan the_ed17 (179)
  10. Isle of Man J Milburn (168)
  11. Confederate States of America Bedford (156)
  12. Toronto Gary King (147)
  13. New South Wales 97198 (142)
  14. Luxembourg Ceranthor (111)
  15. India Tinucherian (106)
  16. Vanuatu Matthewedwards (98)

 GARDEN ,  iMatthew :  Chat  , and The Helpful One The Helpful Bot 00:51, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter XVIII

Delivered for the WikiCup by The Helpful Bot at 14:39, 31 May 2009 (UTC). To report errors leave at message here.

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 1 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:44, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (May)

Cs-wolves(talk) 01:53, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Template:European Cup 1955–56 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jameboy (talk) 21:46, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter XIX and XX

Delivered by The Helpful Bot at 21:59, 13 June 2009 (UTC) for the WikiCup. To report errors, please leave a message on the talk page.

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 15 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 11:54, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter XXI

Delivered by The Helpful Bot at 22:31, 22 June 2009 (UTC) for the WikiCup. To report errors, please leave a message on the talk page.

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 22 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:06, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter XXII

Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 21:51, 28 June 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 29 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:13, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter XXIII

Delivered by –Juliancolton | Talk 16:33, 5 July 2009 (UTC).

WPF1 Newsletter (June)

--Midgrid(talk) 15:37, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 July 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:08, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter XXIV

WikiCup participates in the Wikipedia:The Great Wikipedia Dramaout

Hello all, iMatthew here. I just wanted to let you know about "The Great Wikipedia Dramaout" which starts this Saturday. The goal of the Dramaout is to spend five days working on improving articles and abstaining from any of Wikipedia's drama. I don't think that any of you will have a problem focusing on articles for five days, because of course, any work you get done during the Dramaout will count towards your score in the WikiCup. Details are on the page; hope to see you all signing up! :) iMatthew talk at 00:27, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Your talk page

Hi. Could you please consider archiving your talk page more often? It's extremely hard to navigate and edit, and it often crashes my newsletter delivery bot. Thanks. –Juliancolton | Talk 16:53, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Please respond if you get a chance. Cheers. –Juliancolton | Talk 23:46, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 9