Talk:2008 Chinese Grand Prix/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Good job on producing a high-quality article that is well-referenced and has good pictures to illustrate itself, but some parts are still missing references.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- Information inside the Infobox, such as course and distance, need references.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Pretty stable
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Guideline not applicable. All are free images, no concern.
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Awaiting improvements. OhanaUnitedTalk page 17:39, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
Done, I often forget to do the infobox. The info about pole position and placings is covered in the sourced "Classification" section, fastest lap is covered in prose. Apterygial 23:02, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Well done. It's now GA. This beats the fastest lap in the time of on-hold articles =) OhanaUnitedTalk page 01:32, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- Yep. My computer is a $100m windtunnel :). Thanks for the review. Apterygial 01:40, 25 February 2009 (UTC)