User talk:Nalbarian/Archive 1

Nalbarian, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Nalbarian! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:02, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Abhijeet Bhattacharya has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Abhijeet Bhattacharya was changed by Nalbarian (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.876259 on 2017-05-24T13:29:38+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:29, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kutri has been accepted

Kutri, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:41, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Simron Upadhyay for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Simron Upadhyay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simron Upadhyay until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DMySon 07:13, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DMySon,

I am Nalbarian, creator of the page "Simron Upadhyay".

This is an article about a famous artist Simron Upadhyay. She is much popular for her roles in Belgali TV and Film in West Bengal, India and Bangladesh.

References for this articles are given from leading news papers of India. You are requested to consider this article. If any improvement needed, please advice. Nalbarian (talk) 07:32, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Her other notable works are:

She started her career in Dance Bangla Dance(2009-2010)

Other Works (TV): 1)Raage Anuraage

2)Bedini Moluyar kotha

3)Care korina

4)Thik jeno love story

5) Ki kore toke bolbo

6) Ke Apon ke por

Movies: 1) Suitcase

2) Classroom

3) Raja raani raaji

Award-Star paribar Jury award for Care Korina

Kindly give me a day to add these works, too. Nalbarian (talk) 08:43, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. If you want to save the article, email me at Special:EmailUser/Megha1408. --Megha1408 (talk) 12:32, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Hello, Nalbarian. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Nalbarian (talk) 13:14, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Preety Kongana

The article Preety Kongana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable actress. only a series 'Ardhangini' which is not enough to fulfill GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WorldNews89 (talk) 06:55, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, she predominantly works in Assamese Film Industry. She has acted in several TV series, Films and Music albums. Unfortunately, media coverage of Assam related happenings are very limited. Kindly advice to improve this article. This page is a "strong keep" based on her popularity, fan base and huge influence in Assam (a northeastern state of India). Nalbarian (talk) 07:02, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Audiences in Assam are huge fan of the show 'Ardhangini' for all its virtues including her strong acting. As Wikipedia is a popular platform, people may want to read about her in particular. That was the intention to create this article. Nalbarian (talk) 07:09, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Preety Kongana for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Preety Kongana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preety Kongana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS ^💬 12:15, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Short shot

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Short shot has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/moldflow-insight/learn-explore/caas/CloudHelp/cloudhelp/2018/ENU/MoldflowInsight/files/GUID-8E112178-5124-4049-B9BF-C4413A1EC44D-htm.html and http://de0qmbqba3hfm.cloudfront.net/attachments/45530/0. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review — Diannaa (talk) 13:16, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry for the inconvenience. I humbly accept your decision. Technical terms are quite constant. I will create this article with different wordings and will send for review. Nalbarian (talk) 15:00, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Himashree for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Himashree is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Himashree until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Leschnei (talk) 11:43, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I humbly accept your decision. Can we move this article to Category:Indian given names

Sorry for any inconvenience caused. Nalbarian (talk) 14:55, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pre-drying (injection moulding) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pre-drying (injection moulding) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pre-drying (injection moulding) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. // Timothy :: talk 08:48, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sink marks (injection moulding defect) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sink marks (injection moulding defect) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sink marks (injection moulding defect) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. // Timothy :: talk 08:52, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, my apologies for not leaving this note sooner. I was the editor that nominated the article for deletion. I genuinely hope you don't find this discouraging, although I know from experience this is hard to do. Please contribute to the discussion on the nomination page. It's certainly possible it will not be deleted if you make a good case for notability and others agree with you; I'm completely open to changing my mind if you convince me. Writing an article can be very difficult if you're new to Wikipedia and it often takes some time and experience before success. I'd be happy to request the article be moved to your draft space so you can continue to work on it; alternatively, you can post the sources on the nomination page or add them to the article for others to consider. If there is anything I can do to help, please let me know and I genuinely do hope you're not discouraged. Best wishes, // Timothy :: talk 02:36, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Biraj Lahkar moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Biraj Lahkar, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Fiddle Faddle 08:16, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was a simple choice:

Move this to Draft: space
Speedy deletion as an advert

I chose to move it to Draft: space and leave a comment on it Fiddle Faddle 08:19, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Biraj Lahkar has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Biraj Lahkar. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 08:17, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Biraj Lahkar (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Biraj Lahkar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Biraj Lahkar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:29, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Biraj Lahkar has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Biraj Lahkar. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 08:35, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Biraj Lahkar has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Biraj Lahkar. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 09:04, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Biraj Lahkar (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft is a single line with two rather poor sources, nothing to suggest any notability whatsoever.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Biraj Lahkar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Biraj Lahkar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:49, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

what we need is not File:News paper article on Biraj Lahkar.jpg

That file wil be deleted form Commons.

What we need is the:

Name of the paoper
Date of publication
Page of the publicaton
Author's first and last names if known
Title of the news artcile (in local language is fine)

I have to nominate the commons file for deletion since the copyright is owned by the paper Fiddle Faddle 13:52, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Fiddle Faddle Please find below:

Name of the paper: Dainik Agradoot
Date of publication: 04-Mar-2014
Page of the publicaton: Total 10 pages (Article is in poetry section)
Author's first and last names if known: Munmi Bora
Title of the news artcile (in local language is fine): ইন্টাৰনেটৰ পৃথিৱী ফেচবুক

Hope this will help. As you may know, online publications are very limited. Hope this will help.

If this is not sufficient, I afraid I've to surrender. {Nalbarian (talk)}

Ok, this is easy now.

Put <ref>{{cite news |last1=Bora |first1=Munmi |title=ইন্টাৰনেটৰ পৃথিৱী ফেচবুক |publisher=[[Dainik Agradoot]] |date=4 March 2014 |page=Poetry section}}</ref>into the text precisley at the point you want the reference. Just copy and paste the text I have highlighted in green Fiddle Faddle 14:38, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Fiddle Faddle You're a great mentor! Thank you. Reference has been added as suggested. Please review. {Nalbarian (talk)}

Anything else you can find of the same or better grade will help.

By the way, signing your post is done by typing ~~~~ which gets turned by magic into the signature, whcih I just forgot!Fiddle Faddle 14:50, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks you. Let me try once. Nalbarian (talk) 14:56, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Biraj Lahkar (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Nothing here to suggest that they pass the criteria at WP:GNG or WP:POET. You need to find multiple in-depth coverage of them, not mere links to their poetry as this [1] appears to be.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Biraj Lahkar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Biraj Lahkar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:47, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Barsha Phukan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Barsha Phukan, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 17:11, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of P B Lahkar Para High School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article P B Lahkar Para High School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P B Lahkar Para High School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. // Timothy :: talk 20:39, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome Nalbari boy !

Hello, warm welcome to Wikipedia ! I am editing Wikipedia for while, and my focus area was Kamrup (Western Assam), which includes Nalbari as well. As you are editor now, you can check articles in Kamrup and Kamrupi pages, we need more interested editors to improve articles covered under Wikipedia:WikiProject Lower Assam. Also check out my blog for WP:SOURCES. Once again, welcome and happy editing.भास्कर् Bhagawati संवाद 07:28, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi भास्कर् Bhagawati,

Thank you so much! I've already read your articles. You have a good head on your shoulders. Thanks a lot for your contribution. Looking forward to learn and support. Nalbarian (talk) 05:21, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barsha Phukan (August 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Thanks for creating this draft, however more evidence is needed of how she meets the criteria for notability on Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Barsha Phukan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Barsha Phukan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 09:54, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MurielMary, Thanks for reviewing the article. As of now, there is no such additional references. I'm afraid that I can't do more on this. You can take your final decision.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barsha Phukan (August 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:ANYBIO, requires significant coverage (not mentions in passing) in multiple independent reliable secondary sources. Interviews are considered primary sources and therefore not independent or reliable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Barsha Phukan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Barsha Phukan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:17, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dikhow River

Hello Nalbarian,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dikhow River for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 19:06, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for reviewing the article. The article has been modified to prevent copyright infringement. Kindly review again. Nalbarian (talk) 00:13, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Simron Upadhyay

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Simron Upadhyay requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simron Upadhyay. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ... discospinster _talk 19:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your prompt review. This page should not be speedily deleted because proper references have been added as per earlier suggestion & discussion. A Bengali editor/reviewer should review this article. Nalbarian (talk) 19:25, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Your addition to Adya Sharma has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 14:36, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Diannaa,

Hope you are doing well! Thanks for reviewing my article. I humbly accept your decision.

Best regards,

Nalbarian (talk) 18:22, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Simron Upadhyay

Hello, Nalbarian,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Simron Upadhyay, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 18:01, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @John B123:,

I humbly accept your decision. I will create a draft to send for review. Thank you & take care. Nalbarian (talk) 18:11, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Biraj Lahkar moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Biraj Lahkar, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 13:14, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]