User talk:Mr. Juicyfun

This is Mr. Juicyfun's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

August 2019

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Template:Revisionmonthname a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:50, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have no autoconfirmed or confirmed account. Mr. Juicyfun ^{(Obliterator time!)} 07:47, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Juicyfun, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Mr. Juicyfun! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:07, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi there!

Hi Mr. Juicyfun, I have unfortunately had to suppress some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages! TonyBallioni (talk) 19:46, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! Mr. Juicyfun ^{(Obliterator time!)} 23:26, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. Also, have you ever had any other accounts. You can email me instead if you prefer not to answer in public. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:32, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I had no other account. Mr. Juicyfun ^{(Obliterator time!)} 00:16, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. I just removed the information that you posted on your userpage. Please do not restore it or any other information about yourself that we don't already know there. I don't want to block you, but I might have to if you keep posting it for your own safety. We have these rules for a reason. It might not be fun, but it is good. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:34, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay! Thank you! I am sorry. Mr. Juicyfun ^{(Obliterator time!)} 02:35, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:ChamithN/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:ChamithN/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 04:00, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rik Tinory (August 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by I dream of horses were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Lacks any sourcing whatsoever, speedily deleted in the past by Ks0stm, and poorly formatted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rik Tinory and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rik Tinory, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 05:01, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Page mover/Editnotice

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Wikipedia:Page mover/Editnotice, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 14:54, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But I didn’t create this page. Mr. Juicyfun ^{(Obliterator time!)} 17:54, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, it was an edit notice. Mr. Juicyfun ^{(Obliterator time!)} 17:54, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the creation log, with your name on it. It wasn't an edit notice: if it had been, it would have been named Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia:Page mover. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:42, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:02, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, a quick look through your contributions shows you disrupting multiple technical pages, messing around inappropriately in AFC, making edit requests to people’s user spaces, and any number of other issues. I also highly suspect that you are not a new account. I unfortunately think this block is needed to prevent disruption to the encyclopedia going forward. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:05, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! You forgot to set an expiry. Mr. Juicyfun ^{(Obliterator time!)} 03:49, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please set an expiry. Mr. Juicyfun ^{(Obliterator time!)} 03:51, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not indefinitely! Mr. Juicyfun ^{(Obliterator time!)} 03:51, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mr. Juicyfun (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I promise not to make any disruption that’s identified as harmful by other users. Mr. Juicyfun ^{(Obliterator time!)} 16:31, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That doesn't appear to be a promise you can keep. I'm not sure if you don't know why your edits are inappropriate, or if you are deliberately setting out to harm Wikipedia. Either way, this unblock request is insufficient. Yamla (talk) 16:46, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please do not abuse that template. --Yamla (talk) 14:13, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:CURRENTBANNERCOLOR

A tag has been placed on Template:CURRENTBANNERCOLOR requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Hardcoded instance of "white" (T3 / G2)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DannyS712 (talk) 05:25, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rik Tinory

Hello, Mr. Juicyfun. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rik Tinory".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 21:40, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Mr. Juicyfun/styles.css

User:Mr. Juicyfun/styles.css, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mr. Juicyfun/styles.css and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Mr. Juicyfun/styles.css during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Thepenguin9 (talk) 01:18, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]