User talk:MoroccanEd
October 2022
[edit]
Hello, I'm FlightTime. I noticed that you recently removed content from Nigel Winterburn without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Special:Diff/1115241246 - FlightTime (open channel) 23:19, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Nour Eddine Tilsaghani
[edit]Hello MoroccanEd,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nour Eddine Tilsaghani for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Arthistorian1977 (talk) 17:46, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Nour Eddine Tilsaghani moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Nour Eddine Tilsaghani, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz Read! Talk! 02:32, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Fatima Hernadi moved to draftspace
[edit]It appears that you may have a conflict of interest with the subject of Fatima Hernadi, and as such you should submit this article to be published through the Articles for Creation process. Before editing the article further, please first disclose on your user page and on the article's Talk page whether you have received money to write this or other articles on Wikipedia, or if you have any other kind of conflict of interest concerning the subject. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. Before submitting, you should make sure that the article is fully compliant with Wikipedia’s neutrality and verifiability policies, as well as our notability guidelines. When you’re ready, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. This process is encouraged, but optional. If you choose not to participate in it, you can remove the AfC template and move the article back to mainspace. You should also consider reaching out to the Teahouse for additional feedback and aid from experienced editors. signed, Rosguill talk 02:13, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Abdelkader Kharraz moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Abdelkader Kharraz, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 TT me 12:57, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 8
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abdelkader Kharraz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Directorate General for National Security. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit (blether) 11:25, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
MoroccanEd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello Girth Summit, :I am writing to appeal the decision to block my account, MoroccanEd, on the Wikipedia page. In your message, you stated that I have been confirmed to be connected to Jebli18. However, I would like to clarify that I have no relation to this user, and I believe that Jebli18 is a sock puppet who has been using my name and abusing the Wikipedia page. :I have been an active contributor to Wikipedia for more than 8 months, and during this time, I have familiarized myself with all of Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. I have made a conscious effort to ensure that my contributions are always in compliance with these guidelines, and I have always acted in good faith with the best interests of the Wikipedia community in mind. :While it is true that I have edited some of the same articles as Jebli18, I can assure you that this was purely coincidental, as these articles are related to my area of expertise. I have never engaged in any inappropriate behavior, including LOUTSOCKing, and I have always strived to maintain a high standard of quality in my work. :Moreover, I have made numerous valuable contributions to Wikipedia, including several articles that have been featured on the main page. I have received positive feedback from other users, and I am proud of the work that I have done to contribute to the Wikipedia community. :In light of this information, I respectfully request that you review my contributions and reconsider your decision to block my account. I believe that there has been a misunderstanding regarding my connection to Jebli18, and I am confident that if you examine my contributions in detail, you will find that I have acted in good faith and with the best interests of the Wikipedia community in mind. :Thank you for your time and consideration. :Sincerely, :MoroccanEd (talk) 15:17, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
At this time you are globally locked, not just blocked on the English Wikipedia, but for cross platform spamming. I do not see any good reason to unblock you, as there was clear socking and promotional editing with your account. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:14, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Nomination of Abdelkader Kharraz for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdelkader Kharraz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Girth Summit (blether) 11:40, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your message regarding the promotional article that has been repeatedly draftified/declined at AfC. I appreciate your suggestion of an AfD discussion to establish a consensus on the article's notability.
- As the creator of the article, I understand that there have been concerns regarding its notability and potential promotional content. However, I believe that the article meets the Wikipedia guidelines on notability and is a valuable contribution to the community.
- That being said, I am open to the idea of an AfD discussion and am willing to participate in the conversation. I would appreciate any feedback or guidance on how to improve the article to better meet the community's standards.
- Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.
- Sincerely, MoroccanEd (talk) 15:33, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Unfairly Blocked Account Appeal: Request for Reconsideration
[edit]MoroccanEd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear Wikipedia administrators, I am writing to appeal the decision to globally lock my account on Wikipedia and to request that my account be unblocked so that I can continue to contribute constructively to the Wikipedia community. I received a response from the administration team informing me that my account was locked due to cross-platform spamming and clear socking and promotional editing. I would like to bring to your attention that I have not engaged in any inappropriate behavior on Wikipedia, nor have I ever been involved in cross-platform spamming or promotional editing. I believe that my previous contributions to Wikipedia demonstrate my commitment to the community and my desire to contribute to the collective knowledge base. I have created several articles, including Fartima Hernadi, Noureddine Bikr, Sidi Zouine, Nour Eddine Tilsaghani, Moga Festival, and Hassan Ben Badida, which have been well-received and have not been flagged for any policy violations. Additionally, I would like to draw your attention to the fact that my articles have been under attack by a user named AnaphoreJT, who has been repeatedly adding a delete;Cross-wiki spam, tag to my articles, resulting in the deletion of some of them. This user has also been blocked for this behavior. I believe that this harassment by @AnaphoreJT is the reason why I have been accused of cross-platform spamming and that this accusation is unfounded. In addition to the aforementioned points, I would like to emphasize that I have been a productive contributor to Wikipedia for the past 8 months, consistently abiding by the platform's policies and guidelines. Throughout this time, I have created several articles that have received positive feedback and have been well-received by the community. My contributions have been recognized by other users, and I have consistently strived to improve the quality of information on Wikipedia. It is important to note that my involvement with @User:Jebli18's article was a one-time occurrence, and it is unjust to conclude that it reflects my overall behavior on Wikipedia. I believe that my previous contributions and the positive reception they have received attest to my dedication to Wikipedia and my commitment to its guidelines. I remain steadfast in my belief that I have been wrongfully accused and unfairly blocked and I humbly request that my account be unblocked so that I can continue to contribute to the community in a positive and constructive manner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.189.30.44 (talk) 3:20 pm, Yesterday (UTC−4) I understand the importance of maintaining Wikipedia's integrity and quality, and I am committed to upholding Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I believe that my previous contributions demonstrate my commitment to the community, and I would like to request that my account be unblocked so that I can continue to contribute constructively. I respectfully request that you reconsider your decision to globally lock my account and provide me with a clear and concise reason for the decision. If there are any policy violations or issues that need to be addressed, I am more than willing to work with the Wikipedia community to resolve them. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter, and I look forward to a prompt response. Sincerely, MoroccanEd 91.189.30.44 (talk) 19:01, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.
As you are globally locked you will need to appeal via WP:UTRS. Each time you evade your block and global lock, you will be blocked. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:49, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- MoroccanEd, when I originally blocked your account, I wasn't certain about the connection between yourself and Jebli18. I'm still not sure about it one way or the other. There are a couple of things I am certain about however, because I can see them in the checkuser logs. You did edit a draft article while you were logged out, several times. That on its own is not too damning, but coupled with my suspicions about the use of other accounts, the promotional tone of your articles, my concerns about your apparent disregard for our copyright policies (you've tagged the photograph on Abdelkader Kharraz as your own work - it's obviously copied from YouTube or similar), I decided that a block was warranted. Now, what with all the disruption that whoever is behind the Jebli18 account has been causing, I decided to look at your IPs again to see whether I could convince myself that you should be unblocked, but instead I find that you have been evading the block as Dumbledore Albus1. So, no - we're not going to request an unlock of this account. Courtesy ping to Deepfriedokra, for context if any UTRS requests are forthcoming. Girth Summit (blether) 16:46, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Girth Summit: Many thanks!-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:48, 13 May 2023 (UTC)