User talk:Mohammed Ali K.

Welcome!

Hello, Mohammed Ali K., and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Abdul Kadar Khatri (Bagh Printers), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:45, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Abdul Kadar Khatri (Bagh Printers)

A tag has been placed on Abdul Kadar Khatri (Bagh Printers) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G4, and recreation of a salted article (under a different name) see: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=&user=&page=Abdul+Kadar+Khatri+&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=&hide_thanks_log=1&hide_tag_log=1&hide_review_log=1

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:45, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Umar Faruk Khatri (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unsatisfactory in our main policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Umar Faruk Khatri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 18:44, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Umar Faruk Khatri (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Umar Faruk Khatri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrStrauss talk 12:46, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Mohammed Ali K., I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DrStrauss talk 12:46, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Umar Faruk Khatri concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Umar Faruk Khatri, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Umar Faruk Khatri

Hello, Mohammed Ali K.. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Umar Faruk Khatri".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 08:01, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shaykh Saqib Shaami moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Shaykh Saqib Shaami, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 15:44, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nikhil Sharma (vlogger)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nikhil Sharma (vlogger) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GSS (talk|c|em) 14:59, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shaykh Saqib Shaami (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shaykh Saqib Shaami and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shaykh Saqib Shaami, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GSS (talk|c|em) 15:04, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Hello Mohammed Ali K.. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mohammed Ali K.. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mohammed Ali K.|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS (talk|c|em) 15:12, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@GSS: Someone does not pay to me to create an article. I have created articles of notable persons such as Nikhil Sharma aka Mumbiker Nikhil, one of the top vlogger of India and Shaykh Saqib Shaami, the world renowned Islamic scholar from England.

Copyright problem on Development Commissioner (Handicrafts)

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://handicrafts.nic.in/Page.aspx?MID=BOII5FUynjpl5RZJJ8nW1g%3D%3D, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:59, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:41, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Making a request for user unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohammed Ali K. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been editing on Wikipedia with my only account. Hzk12345, Tabtouch and me (Mohammed Ali K.), we three mates contribute on Wikipedia with one Wi-fi connection or IP address. We do not collaborate with each other to create an article in any way whether it is deleted article or draft. We keep our mutual Wikipedia information confined to ourselves; we do not contribute to any article by interacting with each other. I have read the information of Sock puppetry and I assure that I will not be editing on Wikipedia before reading the guidelines of Wikipedia and will not violate any guidelines of Wikipedia. I request Wikipedia administrators to unblock my (Mohammed Ali K.) and my mate’s accounts Hzk12345 and Tabtouch. I’m sorry for the inconvenience faced to any of Wikipedia administrators. Mohammed Ali K. (talk) 13:53, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Almost complete overlap in editing between this account and Hzk12345. This is a clear violation of WP:MEAT. Yamla (talk) 14:00, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohammed Ali K. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I and hzk12345, we both are contributing to Wikipedia. I don't know regarding the what hzk12345 made contribution to the articles created by me, we can not say it overlap. However, we both uses same computer to contribute So it may be possible that by mistake I've contributed by hzk12345's username. It is by mistake not intentionally. If further such types of mistakes or overlapping may be found then Wikipedia administrators should permanently block me. I assure Wikipedia that further I will not make such types of mistakes and before editing or creating article I will completely read and follow the Wikipedia guidelines. Once again I request to Wikipedia administrators to unblock my ID and IP address. Mohammed Ali K. (talk) 12:02, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Yeah, you also edit on the same IP as Indimpdd (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) who is Confirmed to hzk12345, and you conveniently forgot to mention them. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:55, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@TonyBallioni: You're getting such confusion because we use the same public IP address. We're not interlinked with each other in creating or editing articles. I've not referenced Indimpdd because I don't have any acquaintance with him.

Unblock request for account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohammed Ali K. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked because of confusion that I have multiple but I'm having only one account. The misunderstanding is only because other users are also using the same public IP address as I'm. I request Wikipedia administrators to unblock me and I will add the tag of using same IP on my user page. I'm not interlinked with other users for creating articles or editing on Wikipedia.Mohammed Ali K. (talk) 08:14, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You should also perhaps read and heed WP:PAID and WP:COI. Please see WP:UPE see boiler plate I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Deep fried okra 15:29, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

}}

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohammed Ali K. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I feel guilty for the problem created by me on Wikipedia. I will not cause any damage or disruption to Wikipedia articles and I will make significant edits on Wikipedia. I'm using the same public IP range as other users use in my area, this may be causing disruption on Wikipedia but I will add a tag of using the same IP address on my Wikipedia user page. I think the block is now no longer necessary because I assure you that I will make only significant contribution and will not create any disruption.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 15:25, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Draft:Shaykh Saqib Shaami concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Shaykh Saqib Shaami, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohammed Ali K. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm extremely sorry for the inconvenience caused by me on Wikipedia. There was confusion between two users me and User:Hzk12345 that these both accounts are of same person however we both are different users. We both are contributing on same articles continuously that's why the confusion have been generated. We both do not interlinked with each other in contributing on Wikipedia. I request Wikipedia to unblock me. Hereinafter I will make significant contribution on Wikipedia. Mohammed Ali K. (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohammed Ali K. (talk • contribs) 18:18, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 12:51, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What's your connection with Hamidkhatri (talk · contribs)? This editor just happens to be on the same IP address as you, and he writes very similarly to Hzk12345: Hamidkhatri/Hzk12345. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:43, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate: Literally, I don't know both of them. I'm interested in contributing articles related to Artists, Art & Crafts. As I can see that Hzk12345 (talk · contribs) is also contributing to articles related to art & crafts so that there may be confusion that we both are the same user however we both are different. Even I came across to him when I was blocked on Wikipedia. I've also mentioned earlier that I'm using public IP address so it is possible that other users who are using the same IP address as of me also would have been contributing on Wikipedia. Mohammed Ali K. (talk) 18:36, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Shaykh Saqib Shaami

Hello, Mohammed Ali K.. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shaykh Saqib Shaami".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 12:24, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohammed Ali K. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm having no connection with User:Hzk12345 as I also said you previously. It is possible that those articles I'm interested in contributing may be he is also contributing to the same. This does not prove that we're one user or interlinked with one another. I again request to Wikipedia adminsitrators to unblock me. Mohammed Ali K. (talk) 11:35, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per below. MER-C 19:30, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As you have previously explicitly acknowledged the connection with Hzk12345 ("we three mates", "we both uses same computer to contribute") and are now trying to mislead us ("I'm having no connection with User:Hzk12345"), I have revoked your talk page access to prevent you wasting any more of our time. --Yamla (talk) 13:44, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

38746 UTRS

UTRS appeal #38746 is declined. User is banned from UTRS.

At this time, the English Wikipedia unblock team is declining your unblock request and will not hear your case anymore. Your final avenue of appeal is to email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-en@wikimedia.org. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:37, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of City Convent Higher Secondary School, Bagh

The article City Convent Higher Secondary School, Bagh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:MILL institution. Fails WP:NSCHOOL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:28, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]