User talk:Hzk12345

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maulana Shakir Ali Noori (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maulana Shakir Ali Noori and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Maulana Shakir Ali Noori, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GSS (talk|c|em) 07:27, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request for unblocking

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hzk12345 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked due to recreating account Emiway Bantai, i was just working it to make more better nothing else, i don't know someone by other name was also creating the article, i accept my mistake, i insure that i will not repeat the same mistake again and my work will be same as per wikipedia guidelines, so i request you to unblock me, Thank you Hzk12345 (talk) 06:18, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed to Mohammed Ali K. (talk · contribs) and Tabtouch (talk · contribs). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:42, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request for unblocking

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hzk12345 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Mohammed Ali K. (talk · contribs) and Tabtouch (talk · contribs) are same user but hzk12345 (talk · contribs) is another user, we both are brothers and works together with our own accounts, there are not multiple accounts, i have a single account and we work with same ip address, so i request you to unblock me, thank you.

Decline reason:

That is considered sockpuppetry; see WP:MEAT. Yamla (talk) 10:59, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to remove declined unblock requests for currently-active blocks. Please do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 14:07, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request for unblocking

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hzk12345 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I realize my mistake, i don't know before that running multiple accounts is strictly prohibited on wikipeida, i request you to unblock me, and i will never repeat same mistake again, thank you.

Decline reason:

Because of your apparent attempted deception of the Wikipedia community, I am declining your unblock request at this time. I recommend that, if you still seek to be unblocked, you see WP:SO for further information. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 06:39, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hzk12345 (talk) 14:30, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

At one point, you falsely claimed to be unrelated to the other accounts. When the relationship was established by NinjaRobotPirate, you acknowledged the relationship but claimed you weren't violating WP:SOCK. When we demonstrated you were indeed violating this, you now say you didn't know that running multiple accounts was prohibited. Your story keeps on changing. Please address this. --Yamla (talk) 14:37, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

we and my mate use wikipedia with same ip address, i have a single account Hzk12345, and my mate Mohammed Ali K. (talk · contribs) and Tabtouch (talk · contribs) use multiple account, we really don't know that using multiple account is prohibited, on behalf of him i have said it, so i request you to unblock me, after unblocking, i insure you that i will add ip address tag to our accounts and one account of my mate will be deleted, your's truely. Hzk12345 (talk) 13:39, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't address my point. You falsely claimed to be unrelated to the other accounts. Why did you try to mislead us? Why should we trust you now, given that you have attempted to mislead us in the past? --Yamla (talk) 13:41, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If i do so again you may block me permanently and i will leave editing wikipedia. Hzk12345 (talk) 15:17, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you are unwilling to answer, that's fine. But please say so explicitly. --Yamla (talk) 15:25, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

what you want me to explicitly, can you expain ? Hzk12345 (talk) 15:52, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why does your story keep on changing? Why did you attempt to mislead us? Why should we trust you now, given that you have attempted to mislead us in the past? --Yamla (talk) 15:56, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't mislead you, if you think so that i am extremely sorry for that as you asked "Why should we trust you now, given that you have attempted to mislead us in the past?", so i have already answered this question that,"If i do so again you may block me permanently and i will leave editing wikipedia" Hzk12345 (talk) 15:59, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You most certainly did try to mislead us: "i don't know someone by other name was also creating the article". --Yamla (talk) 16:05, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

yes, thats true that other user was also creating the article, but user Mohammed Ali K. (talk · contribs) and Tabtouch (talk · contribs), who is my mates doesn't edited the article. Hzk12345 (talk) 16:08, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shri Shantmanu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shri Shantmanu, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 16:01, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request for unblocking

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hzk12345 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i accept my all mistakes, please unblock me now, thank you. Hzk12345 (talk) 10:35, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This appeal fails to address the reasons for the block. As we are not going anywhere, I have withdrawn your ability to make further appeals. MER-C 08:13, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please read WP:GAB to understand how to craft an acceptable unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 17:55, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Maulana Shakir Ali Noori concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Maulana Shakir Ali Noori, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Maulana Shakir Ali Noori

Hello, Hzk12345. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Maulana Shakir Ali Noori".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 14:03, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]