User talk:MickelClark

April 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Naran (town), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 22:12, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yamaguchi先生 Hello Admin of Wikipedia, Yes I did edit the Naran article, I didn't know it was against the policy to edit original research. The things I have edited are of my personal experience. I have visited Naran 3 times since 2017.

Speedy deletion of User:MickelClark/sandbox

The page User:MickelClark/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spencer^T•C 23:44, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to YIFY. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 18:56, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello, I'm SP013. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, K.G.F: Chapter 2, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SP013 (talk) 18:09, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me what is a reliable source? the website I cited have emailed primevideo.com and built the content around it. MickelClark (talk) 19:34, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

History of the World: Part II moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, History of the World: Part II, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the Submit the draft for review! button atop the article. Also see WP:NFF Silikonz💬 17:57, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did the best I can do! MickelClark (talk) 16:54, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

^could MickelClark (talk) 16:55, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Great Pottery Throw Down (series 7) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to The Great Pottery Throw Down (series 7). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:11, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedbacks. This is the second time I have attempted to create a Wikipedia page and it looks like I have to learn a lot.

The reason I published this page

I thought other wiki editors would pitch in with more information.

The previous series "The Great Pottery Throw Down (series 6)" had only one source.

I will add more notable links to the page and submit it for a review. Looking forward to learn more from you. @Significa liberdade MickelClark (talk) 09:13, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Great Pottery Throw Down (series 7) (January 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Great Pottery Throw Down (series 7) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:08, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MickelClark! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 13:08, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight. These sources may express views that are widely acknowledged as pushing a particular point-of-view, sometimes even extremist, being promotional in nature, or relying heavily on rumors and personal opinions. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 12:36, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]