User talk:Mgifford

Speedy deletion of OpenConcept Consulting Inc.

A tag has been placed on OpenConcept Consulting Inc., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cosmo0 (talk) 21:52, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Butler Elementary School (Arlington, Texas)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Butler Elementary School (Arlington, Texas), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 15:22, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Open web

A tag has been placed on Open web requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 19:14, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you.

If you attempt to re-instate this article you will need to provide plenty of references to show that the term has any sort of notability. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 17:53, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can contact RHaworth by clicking on the talk tag in his signature, but since it's been so long, there's no point; it was a routine deletion of an expired deletion proposal. Another admin has restored the article for the time being so you might be able to add references. Acroterion _(talk) 03:13, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Michael McKay (astronaut)

A tag has been placed on Michael McKay (astronaut) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 07:24, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Functional Accessibility Evaluator

A tag has been placed on Functional Accessibility Evaluator, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Maen. K. A. (talk) 13:58, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Web Accessibility Patterns

The article Web Accessibility Patterns has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, unable to establish notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WWGB (talk) 13:26, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Web Accessibility Patterns

A tag has been placed on Web Accessibility Patterns requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — Timneu22 · talk 13:28, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of George Lakey

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on George Lakey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Chzz ► 02:47, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mgifford/Open web

I have put your article in your userspace you you can develop it further before putting it back into the main article space. If you have any questions about this, feel free to ask me. LadyofShalott 03:14, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have also userfied another article for you at User:Mgifford/George Lakey. LadyofShalott 03:28, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Caroline Balderston Parry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Caroline Balderston Parry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Balderston Parry until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Hobit (talk) 02:53, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Launchballer/archive/2013

Messages go on my talk page, User talk:Launchballer and nowhere else.--Laun chba ller 08:19, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Canadian Auto Workers may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|people= [[Ken Lewenza, Sr.|Ken Lewenza]] (Pres.)]
Food, and Allied Workers]] and the Canadian Brotherhood of Railway Transport and General Workers (See [[CAW National Council 4000]]. The CAW also voiced strong opposition to the then-federal

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:38, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Community Contribution Companies

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Community Contribution Companies, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.fin.gov.bc.ca/prs/ccc/.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:59, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Benefit corporation has been nominated for discussion

Category:Benefit corporation, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Deli nk (talk) 15:59, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mgifford. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Truth Legal

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Truth Legal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kleuske (talk) 14:59, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mgifford. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ann Darbyshire

The article Ann Darbyshire has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 04:21, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ann Darbyshire

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ann Darbyshire requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 22:22, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As reviewing administrator, I did not delete the article. She might be notable, but it needs sources, references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements to show that she meets the conditions of WP:CREATIVE. I suggest you add them immediately,because the article is likely to be very soon listed for deletion by our regular process, AfD. DGG ( talk ) 02:26, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mgifford. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ann Darbyshire

The article Ann Darbyshire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced since creation. Fails WP:ARTIST.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Just Chilling (talk) 20:22, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Science Based Targets moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Science Based Targets, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 19:15, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AB 434: State Web accessibility moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, AB 434: State Web accessibility, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:34, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chief Accessibility Officer moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chief Accessibility Officer, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:32, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chief Accessibility Officer (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please connect the references to the article and indicate how this position was created. Is it specific to Canada?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chief Accessibility Officer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chief Accessibility Officer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:50, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mgifford! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:50, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chief Accessibility Officer has been accepted

Chief Accessibility Officer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:37, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chief accessibility officer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Branding (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:40, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Accessible Canada Act, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CIO (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:39, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge third anniversary

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada is approaching its third-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and have no unsourced claims.

You may use the above button to submit entries, or bookmark this link for convenience. For more information, please see WP:CAN10K. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 19:34, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Science Based Targets concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Science Based Targets, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge award

		The Red Maple Leaf Award
		This maple leaf is awarded to Mgifford for expanding the article Accessible Canada Act during the third year of The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 19:21, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:AB 434: State Web accessibility concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:AB 434: State Web accessibility, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:National AccessAbility Week

Hello, Mgifford. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "National AccessAbility Week".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 09:49, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Judy Brewer

Hello, Mgifford. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Judy Brewer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 09:55, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Donna Jodhan

Hello, Mgifford. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Donna Jodhan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 22:36, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Digital Accessibility Edlering Project

Please don't use random categories for collating your thoughts about a topic. I've moved the contents of Category:Digital Accessibility Edlering Project to your sandbox so you can work on it without disturbance, it didn't belong as a category. Best wishes. Le Deluge (talk) 14:49, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Le Deluge I really don't "get" wikipedia beyond the main content pages. Sorry if I am getting the Talk pages wrong. This isn't something that was just my 'sandbox' but something I was hoping that others who I am working with would join in on. This is part of a group that is trying to highlight people who have influenced advancements in digital accessibility. It would be beneficial if this page could be moved back at least until we move this group from using Word documents to create lists to actually working with Wikipedia. Mgifford (talk) 14:56, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's understandable, it can be pretty confusing at first. But categories are solely for organising existing articles, they're not the basis for the kind of collaboration you seem to be talking about. It's OK to invite others to use your own sandbox as a sketchpad for this kind of stuff - most importantly you can do whatever you like (within reason) on your own user pages, so you won't be disturbed too much for "doing it wrong". But you might want to consider taking it over to somewhere like Wikipedia:WikiProject Disability and setting it up as a taskforce there or of Wikipedia:WikiProject Computing - the WikiProjects are the main venue for talking about stuff and organising on Wikipedia. HTH Le Deluge (talk) 15:03, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok can we compromise and put the list of names into my sandbox (as you've done), leave the category there so that we can have folks who have been identified as elders, and maybe even put a link to my sandbox so we can help move people from an external w3c wiki have some place to discuss them within Wikipedia: https://www.w3.org/community/wai-engage/wiki/Digital_Accessibility_Updates_for_Wikipedia

I'm fine dropping the link once we have folks moved over. Mgifford (talk) 15:16, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I had moved the page to another title in your user space, and came here to tel you. However, having now read the discussion above, and seen that you are willing to accept the copy in your sandbox, there's no point in having two copies in your user space, so I'll delete the one I moved. However, articles, for readers of the encyclopaedia, should not be in administrative categories, for editing purposes. JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 00:11, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bit confused JBW What I thought I was proposing was to keep the Category:Digital Accessibility Edlering Project with the lists of users who have been identified as elders for digital accessibility. But more the sandbox list of proposed elders "people" to my sandbox for building on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mgifford/sandbox is that not doable? I'm not sure why the category I've proposed isn't good as it isn't just playing an editing function by any means. Mgifford (talk) 16:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll try to answer, but I may not give the right information, because I don't fully understand all of what you have said; for example, I don't know what you mean by "elders". So if I have misunderstood something please let me know. However, the situation is substantially as follows.

There are two parts to this: (1) an article category, and (2) a list of names, apparently of people you think should be subjects of articles. (Some already are, some aren't.)
Apart from a few special exceptional situations, an article category is part of the public face of the encyclopaedia, i.e. it is there to provide readers of the encyclopaedia with links to real life information related to the real life topics which are subjects of articles, not to information about editing the encyclopaedia. For example, the article Peter the Great belongs to Category:Russian tsars. Being a Russian tsar is a characteristic of real life people in the real world, and readers of the article are normally looking for information of that kind. By contrast, the page Wikipedia:Blocking policy belongs to Category:Wikipedia policies, which is about information related only to the internal workings of Wikipedia, for the use of people who edit and administer Wikipedia, not for people who are just reading the encyclopaedia. As far as I can see, "Digital Accessibility Edlering Project" appears to be a project created by Wikipedia editors for the purpose of coordinating creation of articles in a particular topic area. Initially I just assumed that was what the "Digital Accessibility Edlering Project" was, but to make sure I later searched online for information about "Digital Accessibility Edlering Project", and I found nothing at all that was not on Wikipedia, so my initial impression seems to have been correct. It conveys information relating to creating and editing Wikipedia articles, and should not be in articles.
However, even if I have misunderstood, and the "Digital Accessibility Edlering Project" is a project out in the real world, unrelated to Wikipedia, then my total failure to find any mention of it anywhere except Wikipedia makes it clear that it is not notable or significant enough to be mentioned in Wikipedia articles about people connected to it. Therefore, whether my understanding that teh "project" is purely part of Wikipedia is correct or incorrect, there is no justification for placing articles in a category of that name.
I also searched for just "Edlering Project", and for just "Digital Accessibility Edlering", with the same result, which tends to confirm that either there is no real world (not Wikipedia) project of that name or that it is not significant enough for inclusion in articles.
The list of names, apparently of people who may have articles written about them, likewise exists for use in relation to editing Wikipedia, and is for editors, not for readers, so readers should not be taken to it by clicking on an article category, just as readers of Peter the Great who click on "Russian tsars" in the list of categories should be taken to a list of pages about Russian tsars, not to a list of pages about creating Wikipedia articles about Russian tsars. The list of names is likely to be useful, and there is no problem with keeping it, but it certainly does not belong on an article category page.

As I said above, if I have misunderstood some details of the situation, please let me know, but if what I have said here is accurate then I can't see any justification for having the article category, and even more certainly tehre can be no justification for ahving the category and including information about the process of editing Wikipedia in the corresponding category page. JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 21:09, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The purpose of the category isn't for the sake of organizing the editing effort, but rather to highlight those people who have been recognized by the accessibility community as being leaders. Is there another category for digital accessibility leaders? I am not aware of one. Mgifford (talk) 23:24, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited California State University, Northridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inclusion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I fixed that. Although just for the record there are some errors in the links to "check to confirm" & "notify fix with Dab solver" Mgifford (talk) 14:44, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Karr O’Connor moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Joseph Karr O’Connor, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 02:08, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'm not sure what to do now. I probably should have started this in Draft. Anyways, there are more links/resources there now. Please let me know if it meets the requirements. Celestina007 Mgifford (talk) 02:16, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mgifford it isn’t proper to move undersourced BLP’s or BLP’s not sourced at all to Mainspace. You need to include at least three reliable sources to the article before moving submitting it through an AFC.Celestina007 (talk) 02:22, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Celestina007 I'm not a wikipedia expert. I don't know what BLP’s are. I admit I screwed up in not editing this a bit more in Draft before moving it over to publish. Sorry I screwed up and ended up on your alert page. I am confident that the Joseph Karr O’Connor page now has more than 3 reliable sources. Hope you are happy that this meets the minimum requirements now. Mgifford (talk) 02:50, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joseph Karr O’Connor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph Karr O’Connor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Karr O’Connor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 13:02, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Celestina007 I'm a bit confused now. I would like to know what policies & guidelines are of concern here. Yes, I screwed up by not starting this in Draft. I continued to edit the article I started & didn't notice that you had flagged concerns. The article is now much better and has been supported by a few other Wikipedia users. I am unclear why there still is concern. I will try to improve my process in the future and leverage Draft articles until they are of sufficient quality.

I am concerned as I have no idea what the present problem is with the content, nor how to be involved in the discussion around it. Mgifford (talk) 15:38, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I think I found it and responded. I wanted to add a link to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Joseph_Karr_O%E2%80%99Connor#Joseph_Karr_O%E2%80%99Connor Mgifford (talk) 15:57, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Celestina007 Not sure if you'll see the feedback or the additions to the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Joseph_Karr_O%E2%80%99Connor#Joseph_Karr_O%E2%80%99Connor wanting to point it out here. Mgifford (talk) 04:50, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Karr O'Connor

Yes, your big mistake here was in recreating an article after you were told it had been moved to draft space. I would suggest you agree to move it back before it gets deleted altogether (don't do it yourself, just say you want to do it) - because, once a deletion discussion has come to the conclusion that it should be deleted, it will be much harder for you to get it undeleted. In terms of a COI, this is a problem that often comes up, because a lot of new users don't realise that they are not supposed to write about a topic - usually a person or a company - where they may have a vested interest. And the guideline didn't always exist. In fact, if you only met this man once and didn't correspond with him or have any other dealings with him, you probably don't have a COI, but you need to be aware of the dangers of making it appear that you do. (Don't use first names in such circumstances in the future; that advice will get you a long way.) Look for some better references, and stay away from those external links! :-) Deb (talk) 10:49, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that might be the case, but that isn't what I did. I didn't start the article in Draft, but I practice the "save early, save often" approach to writing. I just hit save, then continued editing. Between 02:20 & 02:25 I hit save 3 times. It was moved to draft while I was editing the piece somewhere in the first 5 minutes. I should have started in Draft: as I've now said many times. But there was no moving of content from Draft, I was just continuing to edit the work I had started. MediaWiki is a very primitive editing tool.

Ok, good to know. I didn't realize that the appearance of COI might be a problem. Yes, there is no COI. I definitely will be less informal in the future. I will also work to see if I can find more references. With the external links, there is one there to what was his personal blog that I left. I assume that is ok, but maybe that should be somewhere else. External links seem like a common section to many if not most pages on Wikipedia. Have I been misunderstanding this? How should they be used?

Thanks for your time and this explanation. Mgifford (talk) 13:25, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links are okay in a section, but not in the main text. Deb (talk) 13:58, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I misunderstood. I just removed the two that were there. I thought it was a reasonable way to describe in the article, but understand that this is not a good pattern. Thanks. Mgifford (talk) 14:40, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Drupal / WordPress categorization

Hello,
I am not an expert of Drupal, WordPress or categorization. But I have seen that you added many articles into Category:Drupal and Category:WordPress. I think that many of your categorizations do not follow Wikipedia:Categorization, or Wikipedia:Defining. Category:Drupal (or Category:WordPress) should contain only articles closely related to Drupal (or WordPress).
For instance, I think that your categorizations of MySQL, Online rich-text editor, Tumblr, Digital Millennium Copyright Act, and Panama Papers are wrong.
Regards --NicoScribe (talk) 22:32, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry NicoScribe - I'll take a look at that and be more careful in the future. The categories do not seem to be well used in many tech products. Thanks for your message and suggestions. Mgifford (talk) 23:51, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Braille translator, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joseph Sullivan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Digital Accessibility Technologist moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Digital Accessibility Technologist, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. b uidhe 19:29, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

   That's fair. I've tried to add more to it. I'm not exactly sure what references there are for this. Mgifford (talk) 03:41, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mgifford. Thank you. N0nsensical.system^(err0r?)_(.log) 09:55, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Mgifford. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! ‐‐1997kB (talk) 14:13, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Digital Accessibility Technologist (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Digital Accessibility Technologist and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Digital Accessibility Technologist, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:39, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Karr O'Connor moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Joseph Karr O'Connor, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 14:19, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bit confused here. there are nearly 20 references. There is an official site listed in his Wikidata site https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q81461259

Your draft article, Draft:Judy Brewer

Hello, Mgifford. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Judy Brewer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:24, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Donna Jodhan

Hello, Mgifford. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Donna Jodhan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Majash2020 (talk) 06:11, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joseph Karr O'Connor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph Karr O'Connor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Karr O'Connor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Light2021 (talk) 11:08, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Donna Jodhan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Baker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Web Accessibility Directive

Hello, Mgifford,

Thank you for creating Web Accessibility Directive.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating this article. It's a good start, but has excessive External links (many of which would be better as references), and should be broken up into sections. I'm going to do some minor reorganizing but your help would be much appreciated.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Elliot321}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 23:48, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mgifford (talk) 13:00, 21 July 2020 (UTC) Thanks! I will work to improve it.[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:AB 434: State Web accessibility

Hello, Mgifford. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "AB 434: State Web accessibility".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! MDanielsBot (talk) 18:35, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Digital Accessibility Technologist concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Digital Accessibility Technologist, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:33, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ottawa-Gatineau Internet Exchange moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ottawa-Gatineau Internet Exchange, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:53, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Digital Accessibility Technologist

Hello, Mgifford. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Digital Accessibility Technologist".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:02, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Judy Brewer

Hello, Mgifford. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Judy Brewer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:53, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ottawa-Gatineau Internet Exchange

Hello, Mgifford. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ottawa-Gatineau Internet Exchange".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:48, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Judy Brewer

Hello, Mgifford. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Judy Brewer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:51, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mgifford (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 206.248.167.78. Proxies are much more normal these days. These need to be disabled for Wikipedia editing now?

Decline reason:

That IP is not currently blocked. If you are running into a proxy block, you will need to disable your proxy/VPN in order to edit. See WP:No Open Proxies / meta:No open proxies for more information. SQL ^{Query Me!} 00:51, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of EN 17161

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on EN 17161 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.universaldesign.ie/news-events/news/launch-of-a-new-standard-on-design-for-accessibility.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ––FormalDude talk 23:19, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:GreenPAC Endorsed 18 Candidate

A tag has been placed on Category:GreenPAC Endorsed 18 Candidate indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:33, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Was a mistake on my part. It shouldn't have included the 18 in the name. Thanks. Mgifford (talk) 18:13, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

GreenPAC

added links pointing to Malpeque, Paul Taylor, Matthew Green and Port Moody-Coquitlam

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This wasn't automated. I added each one individually after evaluating if they met the criteria for the category. Mgifford (talk) 18:12, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:GreenPAC Endorsed Candidate has been nominated for deletion

Category:GreenPAC Endorsed Candidate has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 03:24, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lainey Feingold (June 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

What she has written or said cannot be used to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lainey Feingold and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 15:11, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are 7 awards that she has received over two decades. How is this not sufficient for notability?

I am really baffled by this comment, as I do think it is clear that she is a notable person. Mgifford (talk) 17:14, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lainey Feingold

Hello, Mgifford. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lainey Feingold".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 00:27, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joseph Karr O'Connor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph Karr O'Connor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Karr O'Connor (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

– Teratix ₵ 16:35, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is disappointing that people who have built up notoriety in important digital communities can be deleted so easily. Not everything can be compared to Taylor Swift. Mgifford (talk) 20:37, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lainey Feingold (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lainey Feingold and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 13:56, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited CivicActions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UX.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]