User talk:Meteorological Person

July 2021

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Draft talk:Effects of Typhoon Mangkhut on the Philippines into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, WItalic textikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. I have fixed this, but please refrain from copying without attribution in the future. Sennecaster (What now?) 13:31, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 1997 Jarrell tornado into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. It appears you have done the same thing with the 1997 Jarrell tornado article. Please understand that we are legally required to properly attribute Wikipedia's text when we paste it into another article. Akber mamps 05:19, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Tropical Storm Cempaka (2021) into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. HurricaneEdgar 08:13, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Meteorological Person, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Meteorological Person! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1997 Jarrell tornado has been accepted

1997 Jarrell tornado, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:58, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1985 Bangladesh cyclone has been accepted

1985 Bangladesh cyclone, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Antan O 07:58, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:1985 Bangladesh cyclone

You have uploaded the track file in Commons for this Cyclone. However it existed existed already and I had to 1) replace it in your draft, 2) Ask for deletion of your upload as it constitute a duplicate. Please, in the future verify in Commons if the file exist before uploading a new one.

Pierre cb (talk) 00:27, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, 1985 Bangladesh Cyclone

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, 1985 Bangladesh Cyclone. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – [[:Draft:1985 Bangladesh cyclone]]. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at [[:Draft:1985 Bangladesh cyclone]]. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at [[Talk:Draft:1985 Bangladesh cyclone|the article's talk page]].

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 06:29, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Costa Verde (Peru)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Costa Verde (Peru), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.machutravelperu.com/blog/lima-costa-verde. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 07:19, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

I see that you have received four messages about copyright infringements, three referring to internal copying from Wikipedia pages, and one referring to external copying from another source. Please take such warnings seriously. Editors who persist in editing in unacceptable ways after being informed of the relevant issues may be blocked from editing by administrators. JBW (talk) 08:43, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since posting the above message I have found that you have similarly posted a substantial amount of copied material in at least one other page, after receiving messages warning you about doing so. JBW (talk) 08:49, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cempaka

Hi, i noticed you create Cempaka (2021), fist of all, there is already Draft here Draft:Tropical Storm Cempaka you are welcome to edit, improve, this draft. if the draft is now ready, then it will be move to mainspace (Article) thank you. HurricaneEdgar 11:35, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Block: Copyright

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently copying material without attribution. You have been warned about this several times, and eventually warned that continuing to do the same would be likely to result in being blocked from editing. Knowing that, you chose to continue. When the block is over please take care to edit in accordance with Wikipedia's policies, and, even more importantly, with copyright law. Failure to do so may result in being blocked from editing for a longer time. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. JBW (talk) 18:46, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of Deadliest Tropical Cyclones in the World moved to draftspace

I am aware this is "in progress" but if that means "entirely unsourced" (and that is what offering nothing but WP links amounts to) then the article has no business being in mainspace. Please get into some acceptable shape while in drfat, then move to mainspace. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:48, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About 2001 India cyclone

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give 2001 India cyclone a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into 2001 Gujarat cyclone. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Chlod (say hi!) 07:25, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for copying content of articles without attribution. Since you have previously been blocked for the same reason, and that block failed to persuade you to change your ways, this time the block is for a much longer time. If you continue to ignore Wikipedia policies you will eventually be blocked indefinitely. Almost all of us, when we start editing Wikipedia, know little or nothing about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, so nobody can be blamed for starting out doing things that are contrary to policies and guidelines that they don't know about. However, continuing to do the same things after being told about the relevant policies and guidelines is a different matter.JBW (talk) 17:15, 30 July 2021 (UTC). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.[reply]

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Meteorological Person (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will make useful contributions from now on Meteorological Person (talk) 06:07, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Great. To be unblocked before the block expires, you will need to tell us what you have done and how you will edit differently in the future. As this request does not do that, I am declining it. 331dot (talk) 06:39, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Meteorological Person (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I added WP links to a draft, thats why I got blocked. I will not do copyright stuff, i will make useful contributions from now on. Meteorological Person (talk) 14:27, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Adding WP links to a draft without anything else made it unsourced, which was bad for that draft, but was not the reason you were blocked. That was the non-attribution copyright issue, and you need to expand on that and show in your own words what you did wrong and how you would go about avoiding it in the future Nosebagbear (talk) 12:02, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Meteorological Person (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I copied content from articles without attribution, that's why I got blocked. From now I will take care and be cautious while editing.Meteorological Person (talk) 13:15, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No longer blocked. ST47 (talk) 17:39, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

August 2021

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Draft:Cyclone Felleng into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. You have been blocked twice for this and warned numerous times. You must provide attribution when copying content from wikipedia page to wikipedia page. Sennecaster (What now?) 17:12, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2017–18 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. HurricaneEdgar 03:20, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyclone Felleng has been accepted

Cyclone Felleng, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 17:37, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently copying material without attribution. I regret having to block you indefinitely for a problem which could so easily be avoided, but it seems nothing else works. You have twice been blocked for short periods for the same reason, you have been warned that continuing might lead to an indefinite block, the last time you were blocked you explicitly said that you would not continue to copy material without attribution, and since then you have received further talk page messages about the problem, yet none of those has deterred you from continuing in the same way.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. JBW (talk) 14:16, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

~TNT (she/they • talk) 19:02, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of Deadliest Tropical Cyclones in the World

Hello, Meteorological Person. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Deadliest Tropical Cyclones in the World, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of Deadliest Tropical Cyclones in the World

Hello, Meteorological Person. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Deadliest Tropical Cyclones in the World".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]