Jump to content

User talk:MaybeitsMir/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Welcome!

Hi Maybeitsmir! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 09:03, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Sir what are you doing

Whilst I was in the process of adding a source for "sped-up" (which is a New York Times article) you reverted my edits. Here is the source: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/02/arts/music/tiktok-sped-up-remixes-nightcore.html. I would also like to notice that "sped-up" was already mentioned in the article before me, but without a source (see the last sentence in it, about the "non-descript term 'sped-up'". 178.121.12.167 (talk) 21:56, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Maybe (just maybe) the better term would be "sped-up remix" or "sped-up song", but in TikTok and on Youtube they are mostly labeled simply as "sped-up" 178.121.12.167 (talk) 22:01, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
There are actually other reliable sources (I've counted around a dozen already) which variously call it "sped-up music", "sped-up remix" and the like. It seems to me that only a few of them go in depth of investigating its history though, focusing more on how big labels try to monetize it 178.121.12.167 (talk) 22:05, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
It didn't have a source when I saw it, and I had never heard anyone refer to the genre as a whole as just "sped-up", so I just reverted, not knowing you were still working on it. I won't revert it again, though, if you've got a proper source. Have a nice day, sorry for the trouble! ^^ mir :3 22:10, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Oh not at all thanks for answering. But now I wonder how should it be put into words properly. I will edit it again rn and if you re-word it better later (if you wish to), I'd appreacite that 178.121.12.167 (talk) 22:17, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Sources:

and so on 178.121.12.167 (talk) 22:06, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

The good way to mention it in the lede would probably be: Nightcore (also known by the descriptive term sped-up) is a style of...". What do you think? 178.121.12.167 (talk) 22:14, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

That sounds good to me, but copyediting is my weak point so it may need some extra eyes on it there, haha mir :3 22:18, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

stop

I am speaking the truth about my former employer. You will not stop me. 2601:647:5F01:8090:58A9:90CE:B4FA:9C05 (talk) 01:52, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Unreferenced material does not belong on wikipedia. mir :3 01:53, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Steven Crowder

I linked sources on my edits to Steven Crowder’s page. In particular, I substantiated the claim of Crowder claiming to be bisexual with a video clip that showed Crowder himself stating as much. 2601:602:9000:D4B0:1984:9DBA:19E3:A579 (talk) 03:39, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello :)

My Grandmother died on May 3rd this year and I thought that I could honor her memory by putting her in Wikipedia's Thomasina and Olliffe JayJayJJ1 (talk) 00:28, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you for reaching out to me.
I'm very sorry for your loss, and it's very sweet of you to want to memorialize your grandmother.
Unfortunately, however, per Wikipedia's guidelines, Wikipedia is not a place to memorialize friends and family members. I'm sorry to have to turn you down like this, but this is an encyclopedia, and as such, there are certain guidelines regarding notability that have to be followed when adding content to articles.
I apologize for the disappointing response, and I offer my deepest condolences to you and your family. miranda :3 01:00, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Roper Addition to Mountain View, Arkansas

We fall under the same flag sister. He lives here, he unfortunately is more notable (outspoken and public) than Miss Irvin that is listed. Want to add a whole section on him, his group, and white supremacy so folks know what they're getting if they visit. 2605:59C8:41B1:1F00:686D:375D:3177:5540 (talk) 06:22, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Whoops, just spotted this. Sorry!
I definitely understand where you're coming from and why you want to add this info, but Wikipedia's guidelines on Notability are pretty strict. If enough reliable information and sources could be found about Mr. Roper to write an article about him, then he could be added to the list.
Keep in mind, however, that when it comes to living people, information has to be written very carefully and neutrally, no matter how rotten they may be. miranda :3 01:52, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

It was very quick reverting my edit

))

2600:4040:5789:8400:8C12:D210:686F:C4AE (talk) 05:12, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank you

Hi, thank you. I just find it frustrating and dispicable that someone would add blatantly false and disgusting misinformation

Thank you for helping to clear it up 180.219.118.110 (talk) 01:29, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Of course. Stuff like that normally gets caught pretty quickly, but sometimes it can slip through the cracks. Thank you for taking care of it! miranda :3 01:56, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello

This is ClairSSBlue here, is it okay that I can edit the rest of Super Dragon Ball Heroes Series?! ClairSSBlue (talk) 01:43, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello

Hello, there is a Wikipedia about me which you seems to have made (Charlie Birch), I would really appreciate if the page was able to be deleted.

thanks Charlie Charlie birch (talk) 01:33, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi! I didn't create the article, rather, I undid an edit where the article was blanked. Wikipedia is a group effort, so many people worked together to create the article.
Unfortunately, even if the subject asks me to, I can't just delete an article without any community consensus. I will, however, submit a proposal for deletion to see what other, more experienced users think.
I'll keep you updated! miranda :3 01:44, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Thankyou, for the mean time can some of the stuff be wiped. This page is about me and I do not want the information on the internet?! I hope this can work as a compromise.
Thanks
Charlie Charlie B7rch (talk) 01:49, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
The subject of an article has no control over the contents of the article. The article will remain as-is unless the sources are deemed unreliable or unverifiable, in which case the article will be removed. miranda :3 01:55, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Inappropriate usernames

Hi there. Just a note that when you come across usernames like this lovely example you can report them to usernames for administrator attention per WP:DISRUPTNAME. As I see you use Twinkle, you should be able to do this under the ARV tab, just select UAA from the dropdown list. Thanks for your antivandal efforts! Schminnte (talk • contribs) 02:25, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Oh, gotcha! Thank you! miranda :3 02:27, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Your sig

I noticed that your custom signature does not contain your username "Maybeitsmir" but instead contains "Miranda". I think that per WP:CUSTOMSIG/P you should include your user name spelled out in full in your signature. — Prodraxis {talk • contribs} (she/her) 18:01, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

An RfC here was closed with consensus that signatures didn't have to match usernames, and given that my username is derived from my nickname and I simply use my real first name as a signature, I figured it shouldn't be an issue. I've also seen several experienced users with signatures that don't match their usernames.
If it's really an issue, I can change it, but I'd prefer to keep it as it is just to try to alleviate misgendering while also keeping my signature short. miranda :3 18:13, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Citation

How do I get a citation?? Dannyboy1977 (talk) 03:35, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

First, be sure that the information you're trying to add meets Wikipedia's guidelines on Notability.
If you're sure that they do, read this for the policy on adding citations. miranda :3 03:44, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Redneck revolt

Hello, I did not make changes to the page. Thank you. 107.77.237.91 (talk) 03:04, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Someone on your IP address made the edit. Confirming that is trivial, as edit history on Wikipedia is publicly viewable. miranda :3 03:07, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: thanking me for my contribution :^)

I deserve this one >u< miranda :3 23:08, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Joseph Boyse

Information icon Hello, I'm Pocket Noodle. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Joseph Boyse have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Pocket Noodle (talk) 04:19, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi! As per WP:RVREASONS,

There are various reasons for removing content from an article. Regardless of the reason, it should be described in the edit summary.

Your edit summary was left completely blank, so that's why I reverted your edit. Thanks! miranda :3 04:28, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

For your anti-vandal work! You also have incredible tact in your responses to difficult questions. Keep it up!

Grumpylawnchair (talk) 03:37, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! That's something I worry about, so it's nice to hear that I'm doing alright! <3 miranda :3 04:00, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Why

Hello, I made a edit on Opportunity and you reverted my edit for "unreliable source." Here is prove that my edit should be un-reverted: https://www.nydailynews.com/2019/02/15/nasa-reveals-final-sad-message-sent-by-martian-rover-opportunity-before-dying/#:~:text=After%20more%20than%2015%20years,low%20and%20it's%20getting%20dark.%E2%80%9D MrHistoryH (talk) 01:22, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi! You did not actually include the source in your edit.
In addition, any fact-checking will show that “My battery is low and it’s getting dark” was not literally the final quote of the rover, but rather, a creative interpretation.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/opportunity-rovers-final-words/ miranda :3 01:30, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Oh, sorry about that. MrHistoryH (talk) 22:25, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Please add my stuff back

Sorry I forgot to add that I will next time sorry again just please add my stuff back Lategamer345 (talk) 04:57, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Per Wikipedia:BLPCRIME, no. Unless the suspect is proven guilty in a court of law, they cannot be added into an article like that. You knew this, because you deleted the notes in the article specifically telling you not to. miranda :3 05:03, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Signature

Hello, Miranda. Your signature appears to link to your old username, Maybeitsmir, as opposed to your new username, MaybeitsMir. Per WP:SIGLINK, please fix the link. Thanks! Queen of Hearts ❤️ (no relation) 05:31, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Oh, sure enough. Thanks for the heads up! miranda :3 05:33, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Guru Ghasidas

The resion is Guru Ghasidas is Dharmguru of Satnami caste in India , and he isn't belong to Chamar family.this 'chamar' word make people's as lower cast mentality . Atleast for reader , it will great if you publish it as "Satnami" in place of chamar ChetanBaghel12 (talk) 06:53, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

If you're going to object to the contents of the article, bring it up on the article's talk page, or provide a reliable source and change it yourself. You can't just remove reliably sourced content because you disagree with it. miranda :3 06:57, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

YGM

Hi there - I have emailed you, hope it reached you well. Best, Patient Zerotalk 03:51, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Fabelmans undo in 'Critical Response'

You removed this addendum from the Critical Response section:

"In the end, the critical response you have just read is all just intellectualizing about a story told in a film. The story, however much based on facts, is not the truth. The story in the film is not reality. It is just forms in light temporarily projected on a screen. The reality is this. Spielberg's story, Spielberg's film, is not an object to be objectified by critics, but an experience. Your response to that experience is the truth. And that truth is a very individual thing. The only way for you to discover that truth is to notice how you feel before you watch it. Remember that as your baseline. Watch the film. And then notice how you feel at the end of the movie. Any change you notice is what is real about the film for you. Any change that you notice has the potential to change you. That is also true of life. This is what Spielberg has revealed about his own life. And this is what he has revealed about Art."

The reason you related to me was that I had violated the Wikipedia manual of style, without telling me how. However, in the actual history page you said "commentary like this is not appropriate in an encyclopedia." You do not appear to have been fully honest with me, which makes me wonder about your true motivation. Is it that you just disagree with me ideologically, and are hiding that behind Wikipedia boiler plate? I wonder if you had considered that what I wrote was also critical response. In fact, everything in the Critical Response section is "commentary like this." It is all just repetition of personal opinions about the movie.

I think you are putting form over function in a rather rigid way. You have the editing power, I don't. So I won't try to convince you to replace my edit. Your decision may well be correct from the Wikipedia corporate viewpoint.

However, I think you might actually read again what I wrote and consider what meaning it has in your own life. Ask yourself whether it actually contains some wisdom you can learn from. Take the time to digest it.

Remember the tale of Diogenes, who wandered the streets in daylight with a lighted lantern. When asked why, he said he was looking for an honest man. When you look at American culture, it is remarkable how much of what we think is real is actually fantasy. Hollywood. Disneyland. Politics! The stock market? Much of it is superficially interesting, entertaining, but not real. What is real, is that we react to it. And our reactions to what we perceive eventually shape our reality - a reality not of beliefs and misperception, but of what we eventually become. "Feels Like" is not "Is", but "feels like" can result in behavior, and habitual behavior in a way of being. And a way of being in January 6th and the eventual failure of American democracy.

The truly valuable thing about Spielberg's movie is that he discloses this from the first scene. Two parents. Two ways of being. Two ways of explaining what a movie is. And a young boy whose future is molded not by their ideas and explanations, but by the direct experience of the movie itself. And the Auteur, a seventy-something who is the living evidence of what the movie suggests. And his 'Art', the use of the imagination to disclose something of potentially healing value, even though the vehicle itself is an artifice.

I have found in life that rigidity can come from prolonged exposure to chaos, and a pledge a child makes to oneself never to submit to chaos again. Most often, that chaos arose close to home, as it did in Spielberg's case. But one is so dependent on one's parents and close community that the Stockholm syndrome raises its ugly head. One cannot blame the real source, but one can look for a scapegoat somewhere else in society. Post-traumatic stress is turned against the world.

Or one can take Spielberg's path. Not to try to control, but to creatively contribute to the wisdom and stability of one's culture. This is not either-or. It is not all or nothing. We are complex beings, and post-traumatic stress can be triggered even in one who has chosen the path of healing. But a more positive direction can be set.

Any of us can have scars that may be triggered. When one of them is touched, it hurts. And the normal response is to try to avoid the pain: shove it down, push it aside. But when we do this it all piles up, like dirt swept under the same corner of the carpet. And eventually that uneven spot can trip us up and land us on our face.

The alternative is to face that pain, really look at it, and consider it with deep compassion. The things that affect us in a deeply positive way, when concentrated on, can develop a strength of heart which can be brought into that compassion when we are triggered. The trick is to remember that healing quality while we are focused on our pain.

This is not a magic bullet, but over time it helps. Spielberg is Jewish. I am Christian. But I deeply respect a Jewish spiritual practice of thanksgiving which can be of value in such cases. It is known as the Hundred Blessings, or Hundred Benedictions. It goes like this: "Baruch ata, Adonai, Melech ha-olam," [followed by something we have just noticed for which we might give thanks. For example "for the fresh green leaves of springtime."] The ideal is to find something to be thankful for and say this blessing or benediction a hundred times each day.

The Hebrew words mean "Blessed are You, oh Lord, ruler of the universe,". Now this is a paradox. Why would a being considered to be the creator of the universe need our blessing? The answer is this: by blessing anything or anyone, we open the gate of blessing in the perceptual field of the heart. And that gate operates in both directions. When blessing flows out, Blessing can also flow in. The Muslims say, "When you remember God, God remembers you." The Christian word for remembrance is based on a Greek verb cognate with another verb which suggests that one remembers with the expectation of the possibility that something will happen in return. "Remember me to one who lives there, for she once was a true love of mine."

You may not be religious, but this is not about religion. If one does not believe in a religious god, one can choose some aspect of the universe to which one can direct one's thanks. This is about a practice that educates the perceptual field of the heart, just as Spielberg's practice of his craft educated him about how to connect with a movie audience. It is an education of the spirit, not a doctrine of beliefs in opposition to other ideas. Everyone has this capacity, regardless of beliefs. Not everyone chooses to develop it. I have met a lawyer who is constantly and eagerly on the attack. You can see this in his face.

I have given you some clues. More words will not suffice. May you Bless and be Blessed. May you Thank and be Thanked. 50.100.148.64 (talk) 17:45, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

It has nothing to do with ideologies. I don't revert edits based on whether or not I agree with them, but on whether or not they follow Wikipedia's rules and guidelines. This is an encyclopedia, and so articles are meant to remain encyclopedic in tone, which your edit certainly was not. If I hadn't removed it, someone else would've, regardless of whether or not they agreed with you.
You are clearly passionate about the subject. If you need an outlet for thoughts like these, I suggest a social media site where it can remain for others to share and ponder, rather than an encyclopedia, where it will (rightfully) be removed for breaking guidelines.
I do hope you have a great day! miranda :3 18:16, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

DABKE

Hi there - Firstly, I would like to extend my appreciation to the writers for their efforts in shedding light on the cultural significance of the Dabke dance. It's commendable to see such attention given to a traditional art form that holds deep roots in our Lebanese society. Moreover, I must acknowledge that a substantial part of the content presented in the article is indeed accurate. However, it is important to acknowledge that while a considerable portion of the content is accurate, there are certain areas where the information lacks precision and needs correction for a more objective and honest portrayal of the topic.

My intervention was to correct some of the inaccurate information provided.

1- The report states that Dabke is a an arab traditional dance shared among Palestinians, Lebanese, and Syrians . However, to provide a more accurate account, it's essential to recognize that Dabke originates from Lebanon. Its origins trace back over 3000 years, with the earliest known practice among the Phoenicians. This historical fact is evidenced by artifacts preserved in the British Museum ( mentioned later on in your article ) , which are attributed to the Phoenicians, who originated from Lebanon and established colonies across the Mediterranean. The Lebanese have undoubtedly preserved it for over 3000 years, as evidenced by the Phoenician artifacts in the British Museum, which identify it as Phoenician without mentioning Palestinian, Syrian, Jordanian, Assyrian, Jewish, or Arab.

2- The Authenticity of Dabke: Exploring the Absence of Historical Evidence in Palestinian, Syrian, and Jordanian Archives In contrast, since the first appearance of radio and TV, the Lebanese archives boast a wealth of ancient recordings depicting ancestors practicing this traditional dance. Conversely, there is a notable absence of any evidence of this dance in the archives of Palestine, Syria, Jordan, or other national artistic collections, indicating that their practice of this dance is at least as old as the Lebanese recordings. Instead, contemporary recordings showcase groups of Palestinians and individuals from other nationalities in the Middle East performing Dabke. However, this does not grant these groups the right to claim it as a heritage of their respective countries; rather, THEY ARE ESSENTIALLY IMITATING THE LEBANESE TRADITIONAL DANCE .


3- The Reliance on Palestinian Sources and Claims of Canaanite Ancestry In the third section, it's crucial to acknowledge that the article heavily relies on articles and links provided by Palestinians as references, despite their unreliability. These sources play a certain maneuver by admitting that Dabke is a Canaanite ( rather than a Phoenician ) dance ritual, and then claim to be descendants of the Canaanites. This maneuver is an attempt to assert their right as owners of this cultural heritage, as they claim to be the first to practice this dance along with the Phoenician Canaanites.However. not even manuscripts identifying Palestinians as Canaanites . It is widely acknowledged by historians that Palestinians migrated and settled in the region of Canaan, but they are not its original inhabitants. Historical events also show that there is no connection between the Canaanites and the Palestinians. For example, the Palestinians were in constant war with the Hebrews, whereas the relationship between the Phoenician Canaanites and the Hebrews was close, to the extent that there was an alliance between the two peoples, culminating in the marriage of Queen Jezebel of Tyre and King Ahab, and she continued to rule the Jews after her husband's death. JEZEBEL, AS PROUD AS SHE WAS OF HER PHOENICIAN-CANAANITE HERITAGE, WOULD SHE TRULY ABSTAIN FROM PROTECTING THE PALESTINIANS IF THEY WERE INDEED HER CANAANITE RELATIVES?!!!.

in 346-345 BC when the Persian forces were driven out of .Phoenicia, the Phoenician king of Sidon -Tennes he himself, with five hundred men, marched out of the city, pretending that he was going to a common meeting with the Persian king while indeed he seeking safety and betrayed his people .Sidonians burned all their ships in an action of union to defend the persian army so that none of the townspeople should be able by sailing out secretly to gain safety for himself. Artaxerxes personally led an army of 330,000 men against Sidon and when the Phoenician Sidonians saw the city and the walls captured and swarming with many myriads of soldiers, they shut themselves, their children, and their women up in their houses and consumed them all in flames. After this disaster had befallen the Sidonians and the whole city together with its inhabitants had been obliterated by the fire, for as a result of the prosperity of the householders there was found a vast amount of silver and gold melted down by the fire. Palestinans who came in the city to steel its gold and silver were repulsed by the Phoenicians and kicked out of Sidon .. Indeed, this act serves as further evidence of the lack of connection between the Phoenicians and the Palestinians.


4- In terms of etymology, "dabke" is a widely used Arabic term in the Lebanese dialect, predominantly signifying the act of stomping. 

reports abound attributing the origin of Dabke to the fact that the Lebanese used to stomp their feet forcefully to pave the mud on their rooftops, which is a Lebanese characteristic due to Lebanon's mountainous nature, with more than two-thirds of its area being solid land and no desert like other surrounding countries. Dabke reflects the solidity of the Lebanese land, and houses in Lebanon were roofed with mud, as is well known.

5- It should also be highlighted that Lebanese folkloric songs possess a distinctive feature exclusive to Lebanese music and ABSENT IN THE TRADITIONAL SONGS OF THE NEIGHBORUIRNG COUNTRIES ( INCLUDING PALESTINIANS`) . the Dabke plays an additional element in Lebanese traditional songs. We hear the sound of feet accompanying the music and the performance of Lebanese singers, which enhances the beauty and richness of Lebanese traditional songs with the sound of dancers' footsteps following each beat .. At the end , I have to emphasize that Dabke is not an Arab traditional dance, as claimed by the report, because to this day, the spread of Dabke is limited to the countries adjacent to Lebanon in the eastern Mediterranean basin (Lebanon, then Palestine, Syria, Jordan, and with timid beginnings in Iraq).LebanonLegacy--LebanonLegacy (talk) 19:46, 6 May 2024 (UTC)--LebanonLegacy (talk) 19:46, 6 May 2024 (UTC)--LebanonLegacy (talk) 19:46, 6 May 2024 (UTC)--LebanonLegacy (talk) 19:46, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Provide reliable sources. You cannot add any information to any article on Wikipedia if you don't. That is a guideline, and your edits will simply be reverted if you don't. It doesn't matter if you're correct or not, reliable sources are a requirement. miranda :3 22:57, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Edits are not approving

Hey Dear,

Hope you are doing great. I am very worried that I fixed some grammatical mistakes in the article related to curtains and yesterday I read article somewhere about the types of curtains everyone should know I found that helpful and informative so I shared the link so that others may get benefit like me. But now the message I received is your edits have been removed. Kindly publish my edits and please in future If I make any edits or I shared someone's link it's because I found that helpful and its my hobby to share everything by which people will get benefit.

Anxiously waiting for my edits to be published,

Thank you

Best regards,

Attia Farooq. Attiafarooq (talk) 04:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

As I told you on your talk page, the issue with your edit was the inappropriate external link you added. There was also nothing wrong with the grammar in the article to begin with. miranda :3 04:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Signature

Hi, I think you should darken the color of your signature, or a dark background to it, since it is hard to see, especially for those with impaired vision. Accessibility test result. 👍 Ca talk to me! 05:46, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

This is something I've been worried about, but every time I'm at my computer I just totally forget about it. I have the day off tomorrow so I'll set a reminder and get it fixed. Thanks for the heads up! miranda :3 05:48, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
No worries! Ca talk to me! 07:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MaybeitsMir/Archive_1&oldid=1246873423"