User talk:MrHistoryH

October 2023

Hello, I'm Novo Tape. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Kevin Baugh seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sincerely, Novo Tape (She/Her)^{My Talk Page} 21:34, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How can I repeal MrHistoryH (talk) 21:35, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have to show that the individual is notable by Wikipedia's criteria. ... discospinster _talk 21:36, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. MrHistoryH (talk) 21:41, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with discospinster. To elaborate, I would recommend first creating a draft and following the instructions here on writing articles. Once you feel the draft establishes notability, you could copy-paste the content of the draft to the page Kevin Baugh. Sincerely, Novo Tape (She/Her)^{My Talk Page} 21:44, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You could also use this forum to ask specific questions you may have about any step of the editing process. Sincerely, Novo Tape (She/Her)^{My Talk Page} 21:45, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kevin Baugh. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kevin Baugh was changed by MrHistoryH (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2023-10-13T21:35:13+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:35, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Maybeitsmir. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Opportunity (rover), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. miranda ^:3 01:16, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It actually has been proved true by NASA MrHistoryH (talk) 01:17, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at City View Charter School, you may be blocked from editing. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁＝☁＝✈) 06:45, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You guys call everything un sourced 😐 MrHistoryH (talk) 16:19, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Update

I made the article "Kevin Baugh" to a neutral point of view MrHistoryH (talk) 21:43, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 50.45.180.190 (Vandalism Bandit)

The article 50.45.180.190 (Vandalism Bandit) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A 'joke article' should not be in mainspace; not appropriate for an encyclopaedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:56, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 50.45.180.190 (Vandalism Bandit)

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, the introduction of inappropriate pages, such as 50.45.180.190 (Vandalism Bandit), is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:01, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 50.45.180.190 (Vandalism Bandit) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 50.45.180.190 (Vandalism Bandit) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/50.45.180.190 (Vandalism Bandit) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:10, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 50.45.180.190 (Vandalism Bandit)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 50.45.180.190 (Vandalism Bandit), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:31, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Yamla (talk) 19:45, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MrHistoryH (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Alright campers, who blocked my Wikipedia user? Not cool. MrHistoryH (talk) 18:09, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 19:50, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MrHistoryH (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made a severe and continuous lapse in my judgement, and I don’t expect to be forgiven. I’m simply here to apologise.

Decline reason:

I'm not going to post the same decline message as above, but since this unblock request does not address the reason for your block it is being declined for the same reasons as the first request. Aoidh (talk) 08:43, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

MrHistoryH (talk) 23:55, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MrHistoryH (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

MrHistoryH

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:22, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.