User talk:Maxaxax

Welcome

Hello, Maxaxax, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! - ^theWOLFchild 13:51, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Maxaxax, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Maxaxax! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Soni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to History— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:56, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at History with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 19:58, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Most Viewed Porn Videos of All Time for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Most Viewed Porn Videos of All Time is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Most Viewed Porn Videos of All Time until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 05:02, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Most Viewed Porn Videos of All Time, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Charlie and Hillary Scott. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to List of most viewed YouTube videos with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 16:16, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Multiyear ranking of most viewed Wikipedia pages

The article Multiyear ranking of most viewed Wikipedia pages has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't belong here. Belongs in Wikipedia space or on Meta along with all the other stat pages.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 06:06, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In defense of Multiyear ranking of most viewed Wikipedia pages

Hello

The page is a notable superlative—a popular topic on Wikipedia. Category:Lists of Superlatives has hundreds of pages. Many more superlative pages are excludedin the Category, like all-time leaders in various leagues in sport. Wikipedia accepts superlatives like List of most viewed YouTube videos and List of most viewed Vevo videos; why should it delete its own most viewed pages?

Moreover, Wikipedia has pages of precisely the same kind:

User:West.andrew.g/Popular pages

Wikipedia:Most popular pages October 2001

Wikipedia:Popular pages 2003: Oct.

Wikipedia:Popular pages 2008: May

Wikipedia:Zeitgeist 2008-2013

Wikipedia:Most read articles in 2008

Wikipedia:Most read articles in 2009

Wikipedia:Most read articles in 2010

Besides statistics, these pages demonstrate human interests. The above-mentioned top-lists show views for short periods, indicating current interests; the present top-list shows views for much longer period, demonstrating more permanent interests.

Human interests is another encyclopedic subject and all-time most viewed Wikipedia pages would be one of the best indicators. Youtube ranking is dominated by music videos; Alexa Internet ranking by service webs; Amazon.com ranking demonstrates interests of book-readers who today represent a much smaller group than Wikipedia readers. For this reason the lack of all-time most viewed Wikipedia pages, in my opinion, is one of most regrettable omission of Internet in general and Wikipedia in particular. This page partly fills this gap in knowledge.

Max

Nomination of Wikipedia:Multiyear ranking of most viewed pages for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wikipedia:Multiyear ranking of most viewed pages is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multiyear ranking of most viewed Wikipedia pages until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bgwhite (talk) 00:07, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Maxaxax. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Baking Soda (talk) 12:59, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:World order.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:World order.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Orders of magnitude (speed), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andromeda. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:35, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Polarity (international relations), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neorealism. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Robert Kaplan, Richard Betts and Ernest May. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Lebensraum

added links pointing to Colin Gray, Michael Heffernan and David Atkinson

Fin de siècle

added links pointing to Michael Heffernan and David Atkinson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:Mutual assured destruction, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:55, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Maxaxax. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas S. Power

Hello Maxaxax - you recently added some text to the article Thomas S. Power that includes the following, "Professor William Kaufmann from the RAND Corporation, losing his patience, noted: “Well, you’d better make sure that they a man and a woman.”" Unfortunately, there appears to be a word or two missing from Prof. Kaufmann's quote. Can you please check into this and correct the issue? Thanks in advance!, PK T(alk) 12:44, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. The quote in the reference was "make sure that they're a man and a woman", not "they". I fixed it for you. Cheers! PK T(alk) 22:36, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Herblock.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Herblock.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:30, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:"Massive Retaliatory Power" map in Fortune magazine, (May 1954).jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:"Massive Retaliatory Power" map in Fortune magazine, (May 1954).jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Train2104 (t • c) 03:08, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{PD-Pre1964}}: for images published in the United States prior to 1964 for which copyright was not renewed within 28 years of the date of publication.

Some of the material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0260210509008316. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. I added some block quote mark-up to make it clear that one section is a quotation. Also, when copying from one Wikipedia article to another requires attribution. Please see WP:copying within Wikipedia for more information on this topic. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:42, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Your addition to American imperialism has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:21, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ave Bush.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ave Bush.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Hello, I'm Jd22292. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2018 FIFA World Cup qualification (CONCACAF–AFC play-off), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. This edit also violates WP:CRYSTAL. Wikipedia is not a place to predict the future if an event happens. Thank you. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 03:50, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to List of topics characterized as pseudoscience. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. —Paleo Neonate – 02:11, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Maxaxax. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:100,000,000 view pages has been nominated for discussion

Category:100,000,000 view pages, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ~ GB fan 15:10, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of most-viewed YouTube videos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dark Horse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2034 FIFA World Cup for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2034 FIFA World Cup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2034 FIFA World Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:32, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Herblock.gif listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Herblock.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:15, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vladimir the Great. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 22:15, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Caution for adding Vladimir the Great, an article about a historical person who lived more than a thousand years ago, and is venerated as a saint in the Russian Orthodox Church, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, the Roman Catholic Church and multiple other churches, to a category ({{Category:Russian rapists}}) that is populated with modern-day Russian serial killers and rapists. If your judgement is that bad, you should stick to just making simple spelling corrections... - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 14:24, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think this person is getting a bit tendentious, posting messages like this on people's talk pages in relation to a legitimate content dispute. However it would help if we could improve the sourcing on this issue. PatGallacher (talk) 01:17, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Maxaxax. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vase Europa and the bull.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vase Europa and the bull.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ‑ Iridescent 2 00:15, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vase Europa and the bull.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vase Europa and the bull.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Elsa Jean XBIZ 2018.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Elsa Jean XBIZ 2018.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:34, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Elsa Jean at the 2019 XBIZ Award.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Elsa Jean at the 2019 XBIZ Award.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:35, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Elsa Jean

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Elsa Jean, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ozar77 (talk) 15:15, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:The remnants of Wolfschanze, Hitler headquarters for Operation Barbarossa Jpg.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:The remnants of Wolfschanze, Hitler headquarters for Operation Barbarossa Jpg.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 00:39, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Soviet Foreign Minister Vyacheslav Molotov signs the Non-Aggression Pact.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Soviet Foreign Minister Vyacheslav Molotov signs the Non-Aggression Pact.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 01:01, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Magic Geography Haushofer Panregions.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Magic Geography Haushofer Panregions.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Soviet Foreign Minister Vyacheslav Molotov signs the Non-Aggression Pact.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Soviet Foreign Minister Vyacheslav Molotov signs the Non-Aggression Pact.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Multiyear ranking of most viewed pages

Wikipedia:Multiyear ranking of most viewed pages, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for userfication (not deletion). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Multiyear ranking of most viewed pages and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Multiyear ranking of most viewed pages during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — Goszei (talk) 02:29, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How did you proceed to get the correct data?

Wikipedia:Multiyear ranking of most viewed pages; How could someone edit a list on this page and get the necessary information to fill it up? For example, to not only show 30, but the 100 most viewed Singers? I'm new to Wikipedia and don't know everything. I would appreciate a few explanations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Editor19892701 (talk • contribs) 19:45, 8 October 2021 (UTC) In chapter "Sources" there are engines which calculate views. You take categories and launch into these sources[reply]

Question about Wikipedia:Multiyear ranking of most viewed pages

Sorry, I need to ask again. Where do I find the chapter "Sources"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Editor19892701 (talk • contribs) 20:20, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In the content of the same page. Maxaxax (talk) 20:42, 8 October 2021 (UTC) Thank you, I got it now![reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template note

While you're updating Wikipedia:Popular pages, would you be able to add the Template:All time pageviews to talkpages of articles that newly enter the top 100 list? I'd do it after you're finished, but I might forget. This message also serves as a reminder for me if you don't want to add the template. Kingsif (talk) 09:59, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think I added the template to Manchester United.--Maxaxax (talk) 13:06, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abiogenesis is BEFORE "biological evolution"

Hi, I have reverted your (accidentally?) twice-made change to the categories of the Abiogenesis article. This is because abiogenesis is by definition BEFORE biological evolution, so it is NOT an event IN that process but ends just as evolution becomes ready to take off.

It may help (if you're not familiar with the topic?) to know that "A-" means "Not", "bio" means "life", and "genesis" means "origin". This can be read as "the origin of life from not-life", which (by definition, again) cannot be a process of "biological evolution".

I do hope this is clear. If you have beliefs or reasons to the contrary, I'm quite happy to discuss them, though for the reasons I have just given, it seems rather clear that they must be mistaken; as is the attempt to change a very recently-reviewed article against consensus. Many thanks for your attention. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:20, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agree Maxaxax (talk) 17:24, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Neolithic proto-civilizations has been nominated for deletion

Category:Neolithic proto-civilizations has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Joe (talk) 10:26, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Medieval civilizations has been nominated for deletion

Category:Medieval civilizations has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:40, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

The Anarchical Society

added a link pointing to Balance of power

Universal monarchy

added a link pointing to Benjamin Schwartz

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done for both.--Maxaxa (talk) 01:28, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. Woodroar (talk) 12:09, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to United States v Iran (2022 FIFA World Cup) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:57, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Universal monarchy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Odes.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done Maxaxa (talk) 06:29, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Universal monarchy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ashur.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Iran v United States (2022 FIFA World Cup) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iran v United States (2022 FIFA World Cup) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iran v United States (2022 FIFA World Cup) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:33, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don't get discourage by Iran v United States (2022 FIFA World Cup)

I just wanted to leave a not to say even if the page gets deleted, don't get discourage from contributing to wikipedia. You've got a lot of qualities of a good editor. I've created a number of pages that have gone on to be deleted. It's all part of the process. Just wanted to leave a note here because I know that AfD and associated processes can be a lot. TartarTorte 21:51, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that, I am used to deletions. Deletion is the summary of my CV, not only on Wikipedia. I am deleted by the world 😀 Maxaxa (talk) 07:12, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Universal monarchy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fiona Hill.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians who served prison term has been nominated for discussion

Category:Wikipedians who served prison term has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 22:56, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Arbitration request

Hello Maxaxax,

In response to your request for arbitration, the Arbitration Committee has agreed that arbitration is not required at this stage. Arbitration on Wikipedia is a lengthy, complicated process that involves the unilateral adjudication of a dispute by an elected committee. Although the Committee's decisions can be useful to certain disputes, in many cases the actual process of arbitration is unenjoyable and time-consuming. Moreover, for most disputes the community maintains an effective set of mechanisms for reaching a compromise or resolving a grievance.

Disputes among editors regarding the content of an article should use structured discussion on the talk page between the disputing editors. However, requests for comment, third opinions and other venues are available if discussion alone does not yield a consensus. The dispute resolution noticeboard also exists as a method of resolving content disputes that aren't easily resolved with talk page discussion.

In all cases, you should review Wikipedia:Dispute resolution to learn more about resolving disputes on Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia community has many venues for resolving disputes and grievances, and it is important to explore them instead of requesting arbitration in the first instance. For more information on the process of arbitration, please see the Arbitration Policy and the Guide to Arbitration. I hope this advice is useful, and please do not hesitate to contact me or a member of the community if you have more questions.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:59, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the initiative comes from higher authorities, probably higher than Wikipedia, who also supervise social media sites. They forced Wikipedia to recruit a team of best experts on deletion Wikipedia could find to eliminate active porn actors from Wikipedia. It happened synchronously with Instagram launching its mass deletion of porn actors' accounts.^[1] I am old enough to remember how the Soviet censor worked, it helped me to suppose what happens. Maxaxa (talk) 17:21, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-50222380.amp

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hegemonic stability theory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neorealism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Revolutionary War.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Generalrelative (talk) 00:35, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It took me a while to understand what happens: Wikipedia:Topics where reliable sources should be banned from Wikipedia indefinitely Maxaxa (talk) 14:39, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:European civilizations has been nominated for deletion

Category:European civilizations has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 16:11, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted your edit

Hi, I've reverted your edit to BBC (sexual slang) (not an article I ever thought I would edit.)

Please familiarize yourself with WP:COPYVIO: you copy-pasted text without making any changes. This is copyright violation.
Do look into the authors of works before using them. In your case, Richard Lynn is not a reliable or neutral source on the topic.
Think critically: does something existing in fiction like "One Thousand and One Nights" mean it reflects reality?

Homeworks done

Critical thought is not allowed on Wikipedia. Anything critical I edited was reverted as original research.
"One Thousand and One Nights" does not reflect reality. It reflects popular perception. The image of Mandingo does not reflect more reality but it is in the article because encyclopedias describe notable perceptions and images.
Regarding the rest, I did my homeworks. I replaced the irreliable Richard Lynn by professional historians. For good. The pre-modern history of BBC is much richer than Lynn cared to research.--Maxaxa (talk) 01:16, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fresh, J's, just left l new York city, uss is oNN

Bangz- Left Citiesx 166.194.147.79 (talk) 07:30, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 15

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HansVonStuttgart (talk) 07:58, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Topics where reliable sources should be banned from Wikipedia indefinitely. Giant Snowman 08:01, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for using the Wikipedia namespace to promote racist pseudoscience and engage in race-based sexualization, as you did at Wikipedia:Topics where reliable sources should be banned from Wikipedia indefinitely.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 08:10, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Perhaps you pronounce this sentence against me with greater fear than I receive it"--Maxaxa (talk) 22:32, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedia essays about controversial topics has been nominated for discussion

Category:Wikipedia essays about controversial topics has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. 192.76.8.82 (talk) 10:57, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Events by definitions has been nominated for deletion

Category:Events by definitions has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 06:36, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise Category:Social gatherings; see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 8#Category:Social gatherings. – Fayenatic London 21:15, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Terms in science and technology has been nominated for deletion

Category:Terms in science and technology has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:31, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Spontaneous events

A tag has been placed on Category:Spontaneous events indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-50222380.amp

[1]