Jump to content

User talk:Matt723star

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Matt723star, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! SwisterTwister talk 06:34, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

[edit]

If you wish to change an article's title, contact me at my talk page.

SwisterTwister talk 06:27, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 

Hello, Matt723star. You have new messages at SwisterTwister's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

hi!

[edit]
Teahouse logo
Hello! Matt723star, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse, an awesome place to meet people, ask questions, and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Rosiestep (talk) 02:00, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Uncle Dolan

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:Uncle Dolan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Article draft in template namespace. Duplicate of an earlier revision of the creator's sandbox. Possible case of WP:CSD A7 if this were an article.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. SuperMarioMan 20:52, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The article The Most Popular Girls in School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No notability established. Zero reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nymf talk to me 09:21, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Most Popular Girls in School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Most Popular Girls in School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Nymf talk to me 19:20, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Title card from the first episode of The Most Popular Girls in school.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Most Popular Girls in School, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Nymf talk to me 08:53, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:The Most Popular Girls in School requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Nymf talk to me 09:36, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article's author Go ahead and delete this, this was a test because at the time I didn't know how to formulate a page. Sorry. --Matt723star (talk) 21:31, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:23, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Most Popular Girls in School, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Nymf talk to me 16:29, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Block warning

[edit]

Any more recreations of anything with a title that resembles "The Most Popular Girl in School" will result in you being blocked from editing. The article was deleted. Constantly recreating it, blanking it, and moving it to inappropriate places will not bring it back.—Kww(talk) 05:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's not fair at all. Not at all. It has credibility, notability, and everything else in order to have a Wikipedia page. This is bullying, seriously. --Matt723star (talk) 05:48, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's not bullying. I'm sorry you take it that way. You won't be blocked if you create it in your user space, leave it there, and improve it with sources. Once you have a set of reliable sources that talk about it, then we can talk about restoring it. But constantly recreating it, moving it all over, and then requesting deletion just pisses everyone off.—Kww(talk) 06:11, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
How do I do that then? Where is the user space? I always try to put it in my sandbox or whatever but then I can never get the name changed so that's why I move it because it gives me the option to change the name. --Matt723star (talk) 18:16, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's the renaming without anyone agreeing to the restoration that causes the problem. Create it in your sandbox and leave it there. Fix it there. When you think it's fixed, leave a message at User talk:Kww and, if I agree it's ready, I'll help you with the process of getting people to agree that it should be an article again.
Alright it's back up in my user space. Now I need help. --Matt723star (talk) 02:11, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, never mind. I've decided to delete this profile and use my other name "barbiesarelegit". --Matt723star (talk) 02:20, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how to delete this page just yet, but I will, so if anyone wants to help me make a legit page for TMPGiS please go to barbiesarelegit and finally it can become a successful legit page! --Matt723star (talk) 02:25, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[edit]

The syntax glitches are easy to fix, but the sources are still pretty dubious. You need to find a couple of sources that are normally considered important: Entertainment Weekly, a couple of major newspapers, something like that.—Kww(talk) 22:55, 10 February 2013 (UTC) I'll get on that but could you help with the glitches? --Matt723star (talk) 23:47, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Matt723star. You have new messages at Status's talk page.
Message added 02:30, 21 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Status 02:30, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
The Most Popular Girls in School (2), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Basket Feudalist 16:30, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Most Popular Girls in School, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Nymf talk to me 15:00, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop.

[edit]

This is a warning. You are what we term a single-purpose account: you appear to have no interest here other than promoting a single project which you have been shown does not meet our criteria for inclusion. If you do this again, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further warnings. Guy (Help!) 15:13, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

- Oh really? What gave you the idea that I was a singular purpose? You mustn't have seen my contributions to other pages that I've included in the past few weeks waiting for my page to be created. You know what though, at this point I don't care, I followed the rules, I created a page and it got accepted, and now it's gone. I gave it references, I had the creators look at it and they even approved of what I did. --Matt723star (talk) 15:19, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions. These are outweighed hundreds to one by your edits to the deleted article. Did you tell the AfC people it was a previously deleted article? I see no evidence of this. Guy (Help!) 15:23, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I emailed someone from the Contact Us, and I said that it got deleted before and that I was afraid it would be again because I wanted to move it because in the title there was a random 2 that didn't belong there, and they said it should be fine. --Matt723star (talk) 15:29, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
In other words, you didn't tell the AfC people it had already been deleted. OTRS email volunteers make no judgment on content, we just tell you how to raise it on wiki. An email is never approval. I know this because I am also an email response volunteer. Guy (Help!) 16:13, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I messaged you on your page because I thought you were gone. How can I get it back then? --Matt723star (talk) 16:14, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Step 1: spend a while making significant edits to other subjects, to show that you're not only interested in promoting this. Step 2: Go to deletion review and explain what has changed to make the subject notable in the period since January. Oh, and bring better sources. Much better. Really much much better. Guy (Help!) 16:18, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I would also like to point out that talk page posts (which is where the user seems to be editing almost exclusively) is not really contributing. Nymf talk to me 18:27, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Are all Wikipedia heads as rude as you? --Matt723star (talk) 18:41, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not my intention to be rude. I was just making sure that you understood what significant edits really meant. Nymf talk to me 19:00, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Be honest with me for a moment, Nymf, did you delete my page because it didn't have the rightful resources, or because I had to move it due to there being a two in the title? Because I followed all regulations in creating my first page, yet it was deleted when I moved it, even with all the sourcing I did, and even had the creators of the show backing me up. --Matt723star (talk) 19:29, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! SL93 (talk) 11:05, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:19, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! RadioFan (talk) 00:43, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Most Popular Girls in School, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. RadioFan (talk) 00:45, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mitchell Ryan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gothic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:09, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A Song of Ass and Fire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A- (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See recent Talk at

[edit]

...Hyperbole and a Half article. 71.239.87.100 (talk) 16:54, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Matt723star, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to The Most Popular Girls in School has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — TAnthonyTalk 00:07, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please also see my response to you at Talk:The Most Popular Girls in School. Wikipedia is a much more controlled environment than other wikis, which may explain why you had trouble previously with the deleted MPGIS article. As you can see, I recently recreated the article within WP's format and content guidelines, and added citations, which are essential. I'd be happy to guide you moving forward with editing this article and others. Thanks.— TAnthonyTalk 00:13, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zola Story (October 31)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 01:32, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zola Story (November 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 03:18, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Zola Story has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Zola Story. Thanks! Flat Out (talk) 03:34, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of West Coast (song)

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article West Coast (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Matt723star -- Matt723star (talk) 22:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:West Coast (song)/GA1

[edit]

Matt723star, I'm afraid we have a problem here. It seems clear that you haven't read the GA nomination instructions, because you just started a review of your own nomination, and self-reviews are absolutely forbidden. Nominators and significant contributors to nominated articles are not eligible to review those articles. This is not an uncommon mistake for new GA participants to make, unfortunately; they sometimes think that they need to open the review to get it started, but that isn't the case at all.

I'm also troubled by the other review you started today, Talk:Keeping Up with the Kardashians/GA1. All GA reviews are supposed to be conducted based on the GA criteria, which are very specific in their nature and requirements. Your single sentence—there is more coming, I trust—while nice, does not address the criteria in any meaningful way. If all you meant was to make that one comment, please let me know.

I'm going to tag your West Coast review for deletion, since it cannot proceed. Besides, your nomination can't find a valid reviewer who can work on your nomination as long as your review page is there; I'll get it back in the nominations pool with its seniority intact. Best of luck going forward. And, if I may make a suggestion, start slow in the GA space until you learn the ropes. It helps avoid the sorts of issues that have hung you up today. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oops I'm sorry. It's true I didn't quite study up on the criteria, I assumed it was like a discussion page where you write something and it build's off of there. My apologies, I didn't mean to cause any foul ups, but if it's all the same I do believe West Coast to be a great candidate for being a FA. --Matt723star (talk) 05:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, now that you know. Someone will be along in due course to start a review; please be sure you're ready when that happens so that when issues arise during the review—there's always something—you'll be available to do any necessary fixes. Should I also undo your creation of the Kardashian review, since it does need someone to do the complete review? You're always welcome to add a comment once a new reviewer comes along and starts a new review page. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes please, the Kardashian review was done in the same vein. Please and thank you for understanding. --Matt723star (talk) 04:42, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Cloverfield

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cloverfield you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 19:41, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are you there? FunkMonk (talk) 16:29, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Born to Die (Lana Del Rey album)

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Born to Die (Lana Del Rey album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 11:21, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Cloverfield

[edit]

The article Cloverfield you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Cloverfield for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 18:22, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Born to Die (Lana Del Rey album)

[edit]

The article Born to Die (Lana Del Rey album) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Born to Die (Lana Del Rey album) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 19:01, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of West Coast (song)

[edit]

The article West Coast (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:West Coast (song) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 05:21, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of West Coast (song)

[edit]

The article West Coast (song) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:West Coast (song) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 01:01, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zola Story

[edit]

Hello, Matt723star. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Zola Story".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:25, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't want that deleted! I wanted to keep it! --Matt723star (talk) 04:39, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:The Private Life of a Cat, from its old location at User:Matt723star/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:46, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Private Life of a Cat has been accepted

[edit]
The Private Life of a Cat, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Mduvekot (talk) 14:19, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Matt723star. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film#"Lists" vs. prose about lists

[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film#"Lists" vs. prose about lists. Pyxis Solitary (talk) 11:17, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(Notification per WP:CAN.)

Your GA nomination of Sylvia Plath

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sylvia Plath you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sagecandor -- Sagecandor (talk) 01:40, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sylvia Plath

[edit]

The article Sylvia Plath you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sylvia Plath for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sagecandor -- Sagecandor (talk) 01:42, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Witch (2015 film)

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Witch (2015 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 19:01, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Witch (2015 film)

[edit]

The article The Witch (2015 film) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:The Witch (2015 film) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 17:02, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Carol (film) for FA

[edit]

I don't know what's going to happen, but articles nominated by editors who have little or no editing history in the article are normally rejected. This is what happened when Carol was first nominated for GA. I was going to nominate it for FA but you beat me to the punch by one hour. However, I added the comment I wrote for nomination.

P.S. You forgot to follow all the procedures for nominating an article, therefore I added it to the nominations list and added the FAC template in its talk page. Pyxis Solitary talk 05:30, 24 October 2017 (UTC); edited 12:14, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Matt723star. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Matt723star. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Matt723star&oldid=1164378204"