User talk:Mastodon554

Welcome!

Hi Mastodon554! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! 331dot (talk) 08:56, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brookhaven RP (July 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This must do more than say that the game exists, it must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage say about the game.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brookhaven RP and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Brookhaven RP, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 11:19, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mastodon554! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 331dot (talk) 11:19, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for some mistakes, its my 1st time editing an Article in wikipedia. Mastodon554 (talk) 11:37, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Successfully creating a new article is the most difficult task to perform on Wikipedia. Initial efforts can be disappointing, but you can be helped greatly by using the new user tutorial and gaining some experience and knowledge by editing existing articles first. You will greatly increase your chances of success in creating new articles that way. As I said, an article should not just tell us that the topic exists- it should summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage say about the topic, showing how it is notable as defined by Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 13:17, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Mastodon554! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 08:05, Thursday, July 14, 2022 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brookhaven RP (July 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at List of Roblox games#Brookhaven RP. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Insufficient content for a standalone article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brookhaven RP and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Brookhaven RP, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:27, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cebu Christian Institute International

The article Cebu Christian Institute International has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sign of notability; References are to the school's own webpage, and to a page that contains only a table with its basic data like address and phone number.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 07:57, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Glory To You, Arab Banner!

Hello. Seeing your request, I have nominated the article for deletion per Speedy Deletion criteria G7. If you wish to get the page undeleted, check out WP:REFUND.

Thanks, echidnaLives - talk - edits 05:03, 7 December 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Glory To You, Arab Banner moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Glory To You, Arab Banner, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:26, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Brookhaven RP

Hello, Mastodon554. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Brookhaven RP".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 13:27, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Glory To You, Arab Banner

Hello, Mastodon554. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Glory To You, Arab Banner, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:05, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Al Ghazala Intercontinental Tripoli moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Al Ghazala Intercontinental Tripoli, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 10:07, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about JW Marriott Panglao Island Resort & Spa

Hello Mastodon554, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, JW Marriott Panglao Island Resort & Spa, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JW Marriott Panglao Island Resort & Spa.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dclemens1971}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:30, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Al Ghazala Intercontinental Tripoli

Hello, Mastodon554. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Al Ghazala Intercontinental Tripoli".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:04, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Panglao Shores moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Panglao Shores. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and the article is about an upcoming thing that is not notable yet, but likely to become so in the near future. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. —Alalch E. 15:25, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello Mastodon554. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Panglao Shores, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mastodon554. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mastodon554|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Your persistence in creating pages of a certain type despite seeing them be deleted and your interest in development projects which are topics that few people would naturally gravitate to when choosing what to write about give an impression that you are paid to write about these topics. —Alalch E. 15:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, Alalch E. I want to thank you for noting this message in regards to the Panglao Shores article. I would like to disclose that conflict of interest (COI) or paid-contribution disclosure or paid advocacy were not intended to be mentioned in the subject or the article. I understand, again, that the edits that were observed from the article is suggested that there were conflict or interests or paid advocacy to create this article. Again, I did not understand or wasn't aware of the situation, and I apologize. And there were no intentions of including conflict of interest or paid contribution to the article and was only there to provide information or general information, and there were no endorsements or paid contributions from any endorsers or people to create the article.

I would like to instead request for a deletion to the article or the draft for the time being and reinstate the article if the time is necessary. Thank you! Mastodon554 (talk) 16:10, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]