User talk:Master Scott Hall

As a courtesy for other editors on Wikipedia, please sign your talk page and user talk page posts. By adding four tildes (~) at the end of your comments, your user name or IP address and the date will be automatically added.

Yes, and please follow your own advice! On the msg you left on my talk page, you just typed your name instead of signing with the four tildes. As a result, there was no link to your user page, which makes answering you more difficult. As to permissible/impermissible vs. included/excluded, I balk at calling any food "impermissible" except in a religious context (Kashrut etc.). That's why I went with permissible/excluded. Perhaps simply "Foods on the diet"/"Foods not on the diet"? --Angr (t·c) 18:59, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Late Welcome

Welcome!

Hello Master Scott Hall, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Khoikhoi 04:34, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Caucasus

Hi. Do you really think that the most common meaning of Caucasus isn't the region? I have to say that I disagree with you. --Khoikhoi 04:34, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? --Khoikhoi 03:23, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Khoikhoi, sorry for the delay. Yes, I think that the most common meaning is the region, but it's probably not overwhelming. From my experience, the mountain range is a very common meaning as well. And many people don't think of looking up "Caucasus Mountains", in the same way that people look up "Himilayas" instead of "Himilaya Mountains". While most other subjects with the word "Caucasus" are generally related to this region, they are not necessarily about the region itself. In cases where where one use of a word is greatly predominate over other uses, then yes, you're correct. I just don't agree that the region outweighs the other meanings by that much. --Master Scott Hall 19:34, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but you are aware that there is now a large number of pages linking to Caucasus (disambiguation), right? Not be be rude or anything. I have another question - Why is Caucasus (geographic region) not at Caucasus (region)? --Khoikhoi 00:35, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem, I'll make it a point to go in and change those links. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. No rudeness inferred, nor implied. Geographic region? I did research it a little and found things named both ways. The reason I chose 'geographic region' - because that's what it is - as opposed to a political, socio-political, cultural, historical, admistrative, etc. All of these are used in Wikipedia, and there are major differences between them. That's the kind of region it is. That being said, if there is a concerted effort going on to consolidate or otherwise make things more uniform, I am not opposed - just show me where to sign up.--Master Scott Hall 01:18, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, there isn't. You don't have to move it, it's ok. Would you like me to help you fix all the pages that link to Caucasus, by the way? --Khoikhoi 02:06, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, that'd be great. Where should I start?--Master Scott Hall 02:52, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm.... How about you start at the top of the list and I'll start at the bottom, ok? --Khoikhoi 03:02, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But actually, I have to do something else right now so I won't be doing it right now. --Khoikhoi 03:06, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Khoikhoi, I have found that a large number of links to 'Caucasus' come from articles with the 'Template:Region' in them. I changed the template to direct to 'Caucasus (geographic region)', which seems to have worked. The problem is that, even though the template has been changed and does work, on the 'Caucasus' page, the 'what links here' is still pulling up all of the pages that should have been effected by the changed template. I am no template expert - have I missed some sort of detail?--Master Scott Hall 22:33, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I think they are still on the "what links here" list because those pages haven't been edited since you changed the template. Once someone edits it, it will be changed. --Khoikhoi 01:47, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I have to say, upon fixing numerous dab links, virtually all of these pages are supposed to link to Caucasus (geographic region). I don't think the page move and creation of a dab page was such a good idea. --Khoikhoi 03:15, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I must concede. I think you may be right, but if you've gotten as many done as I have, we must be approaching half-way. I would just as soon finish it, but if you don't agree, I'd be happy to finish it solo. I think I'll chalk it up as one learned - and think twice next time.--Master Scott Hall 03:43, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, but I really think this should be moved back to how it was. --Khoikhoi 03:49, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's a good idea to fix any images like this, just so other people don't get the wrong idea on how to add images to articles. --Khoikhoi 03:54, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Now, how was that again? Delete the dab. Move Caucasus (geographic region) links to Caucasus. Change Template:Region back. What else?

On the image, is there a way to find the bot and change it so that we won't be going in circles?--Master Scott Hall 03:57, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For the first comment, I think that's pretty much it. For the second one, try asking on Wikipedia:Bot requests. --Khoikhoi 04:08, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Master Scott Hall, the move you made was really not helpful. Please read Talk:Caucasus (geographic region)#Bad move and don't make this situation worse than it is. I would also advise that you read up on what dabpages are intended for. In this case disambiguating XXX Mountains from XXX doesn't serve a purpose other than to make it more difficult to link directly to XXX.

Peter ^Isotalo 15:40, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Peter, as you can see from the discussion above, it has been pointed out, and I have accepted that this move was a mistake. It seemed like a good idea at the time. I do, however, appreciate your discussion regarding why it is bad to do this. I do plan on correcting it over the next couple of days. I have learned my first big lesson with Wikipedia. I am sure more will follow. --Master Scott Hall 17:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck in the future, then. :-)

Peter ^Isotalo 04:30, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll need it.--Master Scott Hall 04:33, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Homeschooling

Please see my response to your post on my talk page. — Frecklefoot | Talk 02:26, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Homeschooling

Welcome aboard. I agree with you that Wikipedia is spectacular for self-education at all levels. I sincerely hope your family chooses homeschooling if that is right for you. I know that in particular the homeschooling article could benefit from someone who is unbiasedly considering the subject. What we usually get instead is people who want to add links to their personal homeschooling page (which usually consists of nothing more than a list of children and a couple of "homeschooling is great" slogans). The challenge, of course, is to find the right balance between "being bold" and working within consensus. When in doubt, discuss a change on an article page. (And if anyone ever reverts anything you do, assume yourself to be in doubt and discuss on the article page.)

I've added your project to my watchlist, and I'll be looking in in the future to see how things go. Good luck. Jdavidb (talk • contribs) 15:03, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you. I hope to assemble a great team for this project. I know it won't be a perfect team, but I am striving for well-rounded at least. I am committed to NPOV, and will do my dangdest to assure that's what we get. Several of the Users that I have invited are veterans to the Homeschooling and realted articles, and seem well-versed in combatting POV. As I have said, I am a relative newbie when it comes to editting, but have a strong background in teamwork. I'm sure that my knowledge of WikiEtiquette will grow, as will my "boldness". I hope you will join our effort. Thanks, Master Scott Hall 23:46, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am not very confident on wikipedia yet, but I have created a few articles. I am currently being homeschooled, and I would like to know more about what you want people to do. I would like to help out in any way I can. Lolly 23:14, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No worry's, confidence comes with time. We are currently soliciting people who have recently completed, or are currently active in homeschooling, both as teachers and students. Please feel free to read the Homeschooling project page and the discussion page. Pay special attention to some of the previous conversations, as they help address some of the most obvious questions about the project. This may help you to evaluate whether you want to participate. If you have any specific questions of your own, please feel free to ask. I have started laying the ground work in developing the structure of the project, but we will need several more committed participants to get the project underway in earnest. Thanks for your interest, and I hope you find the project worthy of your help. Master Scott Hall 23:37, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Having read through what you suggested me to, I would be happy to help in any way I can. I'm not sure just how much use i'll be to you but I am more than willing to learn and help. Is there anything imparticular you need to know, and is this a project based in the USA? I am in the UK and I would also be happy to supply you with information about how it works in our nation too. Lolly 00:27, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We are currently just researching the existing articles related to homeschooling and other non-traditional education techniques. So far, most interested parties are in the US. But we do need international input. Most of the articles in this field are US geared, with a handful from the UK and Australia (perhaps a couple Canadian). Your perspective would be an asset to help this become more balanced, internationally speaking. If you could scan through the articles in the research page, and try to get a feel for what is missing, that would be great. In other words, what can be done to make them more world relevent, or at least add UK relevency. If you can, add a section to the Homeschooling article about the UK system. Remember, be bold, and be neutral. Also, if you know others that may be interested, send them this way. Thanks, Master Scott Hall 05:35, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't forget to add your new WikiProject to Wikipedia:List of WikiProjects#Education —Wahoofive (talk) 01:31, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First name

Is "Master" your first name? Or is that some sort of title? Jdavidb (talk • contribs) 15:21, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, no delusions of grandeur here. That's my honest-abe first name. You like? --Master Scott Hall 15:32, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Project updates

Thanks for what you're doing, but in the future I'd rather just check the status of the project when I feel like it and have time. Good luck, and I'm sure I'll be seeing you in the future! Jdavidb (talk • contribs) 15:05, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invite!

I would be proud to join you and your team to work on WikiProject Alternative education. I appreciate you taking it upon yourself to launch this very useful project and look forward to helping in any way that I can. Kidigus 04:26, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Project Questions

Thank you for your invitation to contribute to this homeschooling project. It is well known (I think) that I have an interest in alternative education. It is also well known that in this regard I have my concerns about Wikipedia as a resource for Homeschoolers. I am the father of 4 homeschooled children and have been homeschooling for 23 years.

NBSC (Not Back to School Camp) runs an "Unschooled" Wiki - you should certainly check with the kids there, perhaps rope in my son Zen Zenith (now 23) who has extensive experience with the community and is well known (by the kids) within it. Zen is now in College but I am sure you will find some good support if you can get their attention.

However, I am a little concerned - more for homeschool parents using Wikipedia as a resource, than the kids (who are very often capable of discerning for themselves). I can appreciate that a Wikipedia project to support homeschooling would be useful - I will appreciate it more if part of this project's goal is to help homeschoolers navigate the challenges that Wikipedia presents in terms of intregrity, reliability and content authority.

--Steven Zenith 00:12, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invitation; I would be happy to participate. I can continue to work on articles I've been trying to improve, such as Waldorf Education and Rudolf Steiner; also, I wrote my Master's Thesis on the evolution of the Philosophy of Education and would love to have time one day to bring this article a big step forward. This might be possible in a month or so. I'll look out for further areas to which I can contribute. It's a worthwhile project!! Hgilbert 10:56, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tulsa Riot

Is not it a politically correct article to show that whites were only culprits? What about blacks? After all, it was Dick Rowland who was involved in it. Sentences like "In the most generally accepted account, Rowland tripped upon entering the elevator and, in an effort to prevent himself from falling, grabbed the arm of Page, who subsequently let out a startled gasp or scream" or "In a less-accepted account, among others, it has been suggested that the two had had a lover's quarrel" or "The young men, having been at least momentarily assured of their friend's safety, agreed and left." or "By some accounts, a white man was killed by this bullet, though there is little evidence to support this claim." , author (?) just tries to paint blacks as saints and whites as devils. Agreed that Tulas riot was unhappy incidence, but viewing it with a prejudice only leads to distortion of the facts. This article needs to undergo an examination to remove pro-black bias. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by anonymous user 128.32.14.36 (talk • contribs).

I assure you that there is no bias intended here. As I have stated here, I pulled everything here from one reputable source. There is probably some political-correctness built into the source material, as it is a government report. I simply took out much of the legal ease. I am absolutely positive that there are many facts missing, and that both sides of the conflict were responsible in some way. I believe that both sides made irreversible mistakes which escalated the situation progressively further. However, finding verifiable sources on this subject is very difficult. Until an independent, neutral party conducts a thorough investigation (which we can not), many facts will remain a mystery. In fact, with only a handful of survivors (on either side) are still alive today, the complete truth may never be known. There were no witnesses to the elevator incident, so no one knows the truth. It may very well be that something completely different than either of these descriptions is what really happened. Much of the information available on the internet is either highly biased (both black and white), or highly redundant. There is very little new information to be found (at least very easily). I welcome other contributors to add verifiable content to this article. I have no affiliation with either side, therefore I have no POV to push.

That being said, your pattern of deleting and changing critical content of particularly sensitive articles, with no explanation, leaves me with the impression that you do have a POV to push. If you wish to be taken seriously, by me or anyone else here, then I would politely suggest you to change your editing habits and come to the table with serious neutral contribution. Vandals are not highly regarded. Another step toward general acceptance would be to identify yourself and sign your work. Thanks, Master Scott | Talk 14:44, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Scott, it appeared from the history page of the Tulsa Riot entry that you were the person that contributed the most detail to the article. Your comments here seem to confirm that. I don't know if it was true when 128.32.14.36 posted above, but that IP now belongs to berkeley.edu. My concern about the article isn't that it is unbalanced, but that it leaves out parts of the record that were found politically objectionable by one faction or another when the Oklahoma Commission to Study the Tulsa Race Riot of 1921 made the report that you used as reference. I've added the links for Greenwood in the article, and an external link to the Greenwood Cultural Center.

I've considered adding the oral history I learned from my father when I was in high school, but I'm unsure of how/where to add that to the article.

In the fall of 1926, my father was a first-year student at a Lutheran ministerial college in Winfield, KS. His roommate was from Tulsa, and related to my father what he had seen first-hand five years earlier. He said that two WWI machine guns were setup on a hill and the blacks fleeing the fires were shot. Over 100 were killed, maybe several hundred. BAlfson (talk) 21:30, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Templates

Hi there, well, it looks like well-intentioned, and very focussed work that Rfrisbie is doing, so s/he should definitely be encouraged, and welcomed. The Portal:Education now looks much better, though I think some categories (eg. Category:Education_by_subject) are a bit of a mess. But this is all a team effort, and we should all be able to critically appraise each other's work - we're all learning ourselves. I'll drop her/him a note now. Cormaggio ^@ 23:20, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me. I would still gently encourage a little more discussion, especially regarding things like templates. If they are not done right (and I am, by no means, an expert), then they tend to become bulky and counter-productive. Other than that, I'm all for boldness. Maybe we can spearhead a category cleanup effort sometime soon? Thanks, Master Scott | Talk 00:41, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category cleanups scare me - as David Gerard points out, they're like "crack" for people who tend towards OCD! But, more seriously, yes, I do think this would be helpful. Cheers. Cormaggio ^@ 12:05, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiversity

Hey there again. I just thought I'd stop by and tell you that Wikiversity is now up and running - I thought you might be interested. In any case, take care. Cormaggio ^{is learning} 13:06, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Waldorf education

Could you have a look at the Waldorf education page and give your opinion of what would be most helpful as an article about alternative education? In particular, do you feel that it is encyclopediac in style, or what could be done to make it more so? Thanks! Hgilbert 02:03, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

University of Saskatchewan

Noticed you were a member of Wikiproject Canada - Education.... Celebrate the Centennial University of Saskatchewan Anniversary in the year 2007. Would you please go to Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive and vote for this University of Saskatchewan article!!! Tell any and all other editors / U of S students you know who wiki to vote also please!!! Please help Celebrate the Anniversary of the U of S University of Saskatchewan Academics Talk Please help to bring the article to feature status !!!SriMesh | talk 03:02, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There ya go

Okay, I took off the noref template. Some people don't put the ref's, so I make sure to put that on and watchlist the article. That way I can check if it was fixed later. Sorry if I bothered you. Silver seren 02:43, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The New Pages thing helps it be quick. ^_^ Silver seren 02:45, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neosho

Do you have a refernce for the meaning of the word: Neosho? Thanks...IP4240207xx 03:38, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Tupperware Brands Corporation logo.svg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Tupperware Brands Corporation logo.svg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Alx 91 04:39, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Homeschooling

Hi. I noticed you comment on User:Homeschool Winner's talk page, and I just wanted to let you know that I have started a WikiProject exclusive to homeschooling, and we have already have several members interested in it. Please see WikiProject Homeschooling. You can also merge the info you have on your temporary project page into that one. Thanks! DiligentTerrier • talk |sign here 21:59, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update: The project is now fully active at Wikipedia:WikiProject Homeschooling. We have 12 members so far. Would you be interested in joining? Considering that your temporary WikiProject page is not active, is it ok if I redirect that page to the official Wikipedia:WikiProject Homeschooling? DiligentTerrier • talk |sign here 21:59, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Alternative education

There has been a proposal brought forward [1] regarding a merger of WikiProject Alternative Education, and as you are member of that project, I am notifying you. Thanks. Twenty Years 13:31, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Homeschooling May 2008 Newsletter

	The Homeschooling WikiProject News
Issue Four • May 2008 • About the Newsletter
News Recent Project News Collaboration of the Month nominations are currently open for WikiProject Homeschooling's Collaboration of the month. So far there have been two nominations. You can nominate and vote at May's Collaboration page (link). Project member count reaches 37 members! Invite others using our invitation templates. A new article, List of homeschooled individuals has been created. You can help the project by tagging the talk pages of articles with `{{WikiProject Homeschooling}}` We are working on getting the homeschooling article to GA status.
Archives • Newsroom
Newsletter written by Diligent Terrier (and friends). Newsletter delivered by Diligent Terrier Bot

The message above has been delivered by Diligent Terrier Bot, a bot operated by Diligent Terrier.

WikiProject Homeschooling newsletter for June 2008

	The Homeschooling WikiProject News
Issue Five • June 2008 • About the Newsletter
News Recent Project News User:Diligent Terrier has retired. Project member count reaches 37 members! Invite others using our invitation templates. You can help the project by tagging the talk pages of articles with `{{WikiProject Homeschooling}}` We are working on getting the homeschooling article to GA status.
Archives • Newsroom
Newsletter written by User:RC-0722. Newsletter delivered by User:RC-0722

Neosho work

Just wanted to drop a congratulations on the massive expansion of the Neosho article. Good job! ~ (The Rebel At) ~ 16:49, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Homeschooling Roll Call

Hello, Master Scott Hall! You are receiving this message because you are on WikiProject Homeschooling's list of members. WikiProject Homeschooling is holding a roll call to identify active members. All members will be listed under "Pending". Please move your name to "Active" or "Inactive" based on your ability or interest in contributing to the project. After two weeks all names still listed under "Pending" will be moved to "Inactive". If you are actively interested in participating, we are in the process of trying to revive the project and would welcome any help. Discussion can be found at the project talk page. Cheers! 21:00, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Neosho, Missouri Article Assessment Request

I noticed that you submitted an assessment request for the Neosho, Missouri article on the WikiProject Missouri request list back in December, 2008, and was wondering if you still believe the article should be re-assessed. --TommyBoy (talk) 20:11, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Doug Hall (painter)

The article Doug Hall (painter) has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Theroadislong (talk) 14:42, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Randall Goodgame

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Randall Goodgame requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Qxukhgiels (talk) 21:25, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Slugs & Bugs

The article Slugs & Bugs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This isn't a particularly remarkable or notable series of albums. I would suggest that we delete this page and simply reference the series on the Slugs & Bugs & Lullabies page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Noah (talk) 21:46, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your speedy review. Slugs & Bugs refers not only to the albums referenced, but also a live multimedia concert series, animated video series, original artwork collection, children's stories, merchandise, etc. It is more than a simple series of albums. I have plans to elaborate and add references over the next couple of days. Thanks --Master Scott Hall 22:46, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Master Scott Hall. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Master Scott Hall. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Doug Hall (painter) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Doug Hall (painter) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Hall (painter) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theroadislong (talk) 21:07, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Umbrella school

The article Umbrella school has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 🥒Greenish Pickle!🥒 (🔔) 12:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]