User talk:Marvinno47

This is Marvinno47's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Marvinno47/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:17, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've since added more citations and references. Could you review my updates before my next submission to avoid risking page deletion?

Thank you Marvinno47 (talk) 10:38, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Marvinno47! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:17, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peaceland University (July 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peaceland University and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:28, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your previous feedback regarding my draft submission for Peaceland University. I have carefully reviewed your comments and made the necessary revisions. Specifically, I have:

Added multiple published sources that are in-depth, reliable, secondary, and strictly independent of the subject.

Ensured the references meet all the criteria you outlined.

Rewritten the submission in a formal, encyclopedic tone, removing any promotional language and ensuring neutrality.

Could you kindly review the updated draft to ensure it now meets Wikipedia's requirements before I resubmit?

Thank you for your assistance. Marvinno47 (talk) 16:25, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peaceland University has been accepted

Peaceland University, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:33, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Thank you so much for the warm congratulations and for approving the Peaceland University article. I’m thrilled to have contributed to expanding the scope of Wikipedia and will continue to work on improving the quality of the content I provide.

I truly appreciate the assessment and the guidance on how to further develop the article. I’m eager to learn more about the grading scheme and work towards enhancing the article’s classification. I look forward to making more meaningful contributions to Wikipedia and supporting its mission to share knowledge freely.

Once again, thank you for the encouragement. I’m committed to contributing to making Wikipedia an even greater resource for everyone.

Thanks so much

John Marvinno47 (talk) 10:37, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]