User talk:MartinVikene

This is MartinVikene's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Vikene (April 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Blaze Wolf were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is very clearly not finished. Please finish your draft before resubmitting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Martin Vikene and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:44, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MartinVikene! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:44, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself, at Draft:Martin Vikene. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:44, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I or another admin have deleted content from your user space, Martin Vikene .

General information about user pages and user talk pages.

User pages and User talk pages are intended only to assist collegiality among users. They are not to be used as a soapbox for writings not connected with the editorial process on Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and

not a free webhosting service ,
not a personal website,
not a blog
not a social media site

Nor are user pages intended to host articles, CV's/resumés or lengthy autobiographies. Wikipedia is not a promotional venue or a place to post ads.

More information on user pages is available at THIS PAGE.

For article creation,

please use WP:AfC and request help at the TEAHOUSE. You can also seek help via IRC chat.

As Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources which are unconnected with the subject and which provide verifiable information.

Thank you. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:47, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:47, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:MartinVikene

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:MartinVikene requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:45, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Vikene (April 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

IMDb has user-generated content and is therefore not considered reliable. If you wish to claim authorship of something like Twin Peaks, we really do need very reliable sources to corroborate that.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Martin Vikene and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:23, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

- Reliabke sources: Imdb.com should and could be a reliable source. This and several mean that it is as reliable as "Wikipedia".

I am the author of Twin Peaks, that is the truth and the fact, but meanwhile I can just include the credits as a sound assistant for the Twin Peaks tv series. As a screenwriter, I created a type of soundtrack for the TV series, a type of "theme". I co-composed this with Badalamenti.

We can then wait with the author information.

- Significant coverage: I think that cases related to Twin Peaks, and also the book "The history of the kings of Britain" by Geoffrey of Monmouth shoud be included in this.

- Checks and balances: It should`nt be like that one single person, or a case manager should/could stop a case. Should be an opportunity to be assessed by independent committees.

For the time being, I will only include information about sound assistance, as well as published translated book. Later I will add more information. Part of the point of Wikipedia is that you can constantly edit.

I actually try to contribute with the right kind of information, but as mentioned, I have to wait to share some of the information I have.

As mentioned, I am in reality an original author/screenwriter, thus also a type of reliable reference.

I will edit the draft, and send it to revising once more.

With regards from

Martin Vikene. MartinVikene (talk) 14:01, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Vikene (April 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Okay, so you've changed your claim from being a Twin Peaks scriptwriter to being a composer of the main theme tunes. My earlier point still applies — we need to see reliable sources to support such a claim, and you're citing none. Unless the sources are significantly improved before next submission, I'm starting to think this may be a hoax...

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Martin Vikene and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:28, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Vikene (April 11)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:56, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Martin Vikene has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Martin Vikene. Thanks! -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:57, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

I've reverted your edits at Talk:Twin Peaks; I've also noticed your comments at Draft talk:Martin Vikene. However, as has already been explained several times, your claims are completely unsupported by any evidence, and opening up discussions like that isn't going to get you anywhere. Besides, if you continue going around promoting yourself like this, you will sooner or later get sanctioned, and you don't want that. Please drop this now, and find something else to write about. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:39, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Very disappointing for me to be unrightful declined, but I will leave this topic for awhile here on wikipedia, but I am still the real original Twin Peaks author. That is the truth.

Evidence is out there, just have to find them.

I will reactivate the case when I got the aquired documents.

Regards

Martin Vikene. MartinVikene (talk) 20:49, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If only you could present a WP:RS to support that. And, no IMDB is not one. If your only purpose is to promote yourself, then you eventually be blocked from editing. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:52, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Martin Vikene

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Martin Vikene, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:53, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruption, lying, and cluelessness that is taking up significant volunteer time.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Floquenbeam (talk) 21:07, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This "I wrote Twin Peaks" idiocy isn't just a lark; it is wasting other people's time. This isn't a playground. Please go away. --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:08, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

per this discussion -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:22, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]