User talk:MargaretRDonald/archive 1

Your submission at Articles for creation: Velleia paradoxa has been accepted

Velleia paradoxa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Drover's Wife (talk) 02:54, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Velleia paradoxa) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Velleia paradoxa, MargaretRDonald!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I've added sources for a vernacular name and linked to the Wikidata record on this species. Hope that's OK.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Blythwood (talk) 06:33, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Welcome

Here's some lamingtons to welcome you to WikiProject Australia!

G'day MargaretRDonald, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; they have helped improve Wikipedia and made it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions.

As a contributor to Australian articles, you may like to connect with other Australian Wikipedians through the Australian Wikipedians' notice board and take a look at the activities in WikiProject Australia and associated sub-projects. Wikimedia Australia your local chapter organises editor training workshops, meetups and other events. If you would like to know more, email help@wikimedia.org.au.

If you are living in Australia and want to subscribe to location based notices, you can add location userboxes to your userpage.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you have any questions, please see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, try the Wikipedia:Help desk, or ask me on my talk page. Or you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Some other resources to help new Wikipedians include:

How to edit a page

Editing tutorial

Picture tutorial

How to write a great article

Article titles

Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Thank you for signing up! Kerry (talk) 00:44, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bryan Alwyn Barlow

The article Bryan Alwyn Barlow has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Xylomelum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jussieu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 17 March 2018 (UTC) Thanks, now fixed MargaretRDonald (talk) 12:48, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Agelanthus kayseri) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Agelanthus kayseri, MargaretRDonald!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Could you disambiguate 'Salvadora', please, and I think you need to correct atrocoronatus. Is this taxon parastic like many others in the genus? If so, it would be nice to state that.

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 22:40, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Agelanthus microphyllus) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Agelanthus microphyllus, MargaretRDonald!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please indicate if this taxon is parasitic like others in its genus.

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 00:01, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Agelanthus igneus) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Agelanthus igneus, MargaretRDonald!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Article fails to indicate if this is a parasitic species (which I assume it is).

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 00:03, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Plant articles

Nice new plant articles! One general point is that references go after punctuation in the English Wikipedia; you tend to put them before it. Peter coxhead (talk) 14:03, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

It's also a good idea to put a template like {{WikiProject Plants|class=Stub|importance=Low|needs-photo=yes}} on the talk page of a new article (without the "needs-photo" of course if there is one). Peter coxhead (talk) 14:05, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Apologies if you already know this, but when you create an article, go to Wikidata (e.g here) and search for the scientific name of the plant. If you find it (like Agelanthus uhehensis (Q15380995) for example) then scroll down to the box near the bottom headed Wikipedia and use the edit button to add "en" + the plant name. You can then paste the Q number (e.g. Q15380995) as the value of |from1= in the taxonbar. If there's a Plants of the World Online article, you can add |powo= with the IPNI ID as the value. Sometimes the basionym will also be present in Wikidata; if so, it's useful to add its Q number as the value of |from2=. Peter coxhead (talk) 14:14, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Peter. Very helpful indeed (none of this I knew) MargaretRDonald (talk) 19:32, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

If I can help, please ask. You clearly know how to write a well sourced article, which is more important than all the detail in the Manual of Style – you can pick that up as you go. Do keep on with the good work! Peter coxhead (talk) 21:11, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Some great photos you've uploaded by the way! Peter coxhead (talk) 21:14, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

External site redirection

Just a suggestion, but instead of writing "a more detailed description can be found here (an external site)" or something of the like, try to just integrate the content into the page and reference it. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a website directory. Great job on creating these plant articles though! Keep it up :) Pagliaccious (talk) 14:18, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Pagliaccious. I'll try, but given the extremely terse & technical descriptions found at the various botanical sites, I find I am struggling not to plagiarise.... MargaretRDonald (talk) 17:22, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Loranthaceae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Muellerina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 1 April 2018 (UTC) Thanks. Fixed MargaretRDonald (talk) 00:38, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Help me!

Please help me with... showing hidden categories

I can see that this should be able to be modified using the preferences on my user page but just could not find the appropriate button/tick box MargaretRDonald (talk) 23:40, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Go to the appearance, scroll down most of the way. It's the first tickable box under the category "advanced options". —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 00:32, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Compassionate727 MargaretRDonald (talk) 00:35, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tristerix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diglossa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks

for creating new articles...

few small items - please always check that you are able to add categories - no matter how wide the scope at first and try to learn the habit of adding project tags on the talk page

not in the average to how to start - but these two items at least help stay off the nuisance new article issues

thanks JarrahTree 01:08, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Also although you do not specify your location - your photos suggest a connection - please note that Perth/WA has a good avenue to explore issues wikipedia wise at local meetups - such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Meetup/Perth/47 JarrahTree 01:15, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

However we have a problem with categories where they are parents of categories we use (sigh)... JarrahTree 01:21, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

BTW your article creation is astonishingly good and amazingly top quality - welcome to wikipedia - and hope we see a lot more of your work! JarrahTree 01:25, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Oh dear - heaps of apologies - the beard article gave the sense you might have been a west oz located editor, my apologies.

Meetups are very very informal - rarely records of any sort let alone minutes.

Sydney does have notable editors, over and above national average - namely User:Casliber and the assembled multitude who gather at the meetups JarrahTree 01:56, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

@JarrahTree: Daughter & family in WA.. Hence, the WA photos. Thanks again. I'll start adding some categories.. MargaretRDonald (talk) 03:22, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Haha I used to work in Sydney many many moons ago at fisher library at u of syd - get nostalgic about being paid to wander through the stack at fisher... JarrahTree 08:32, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi @JarrahTree: Could you show me how to add a project tags on the talk page. Just point me to an example, and I can follow your lead. Thanks, MargaretRDonald (talk) 05:59, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Easy - just check most of edits - (I tend to spend a lot of time adding them - for a specific western australian plant article - why not Eremophila maculata an interesting plant for some complex reasons - I am about to update/upgrade it as it is inadequately tagged -

however it is an extreme example - with an interesting coverage - but it gives you an idea what happens when on the article space - there are categories and text that assert the distribution - the tie in is to do the same in the project tag JarrahTree 06:24, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marcescence, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Phoenix, Attalea and Syagrus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Student edits

I appreciate your concern, but you should treat students like any other Wikipedians - feel free to edit their work and improve what they've done. Or remove work, if it isn't up to snuff. This is especially true for a class that has ended. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:46, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

@Ian (Wiki Ed): Thanks, Ian. I did leave stuff on the talk pages of the students concerned, but Jim Cohen, the person giving the course does not even have a talk page (which was disappointing of someone giving a course via Wikipedia (which gives him the wonderful benefit of a history of edits...) I'll wait for a bit and then take your advice and delete what I see fit. Cheers and thanks again. MargaretRDonald (talk) 21:19, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

North West and Pilbara

If you are having problems with pilbara - spare a thought for the problems of North_West_Australia - as convoluted as Southwest Australia JarrahTree 02:56, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

@JarrahTree: Just horrified. I started to write Pilbara (biogeographic region) and then found it hidden away in a mess of detail about everything... So I have now made a mess of Pilbara in an attempt to draw attention to the fact that it means different things in different contexts. Would you be able to delete my article Pilbara (biogeographic region) as I have now removed all my pointers to it? (Or point me to someone who can do this for me? Cheers MargaretRDonald (talk) 03:16, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

@JarrahTree: It is also driving me up the wall trying to correctly refer to Eremaean Province, which has changed its definition many times over (not that the article makes reference to that!), and I have been assuming (probably wrongly), that when Florabase refers to "Beard's provinces", these are not necessarily those of IBRA??? MargaretRDonald (talk) 03:21, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

The best of all the eds to work on this stuff has walked away from regular wp en editing and lives inside wikisource... sigh...

The cop outs of regions in Tasmania - and Western Australia - those which I know the best, is a good intro/overview like the main southwest, and northwest articles like they are index articles - that explains the multiple meanings of a term. I have not exhaustively re-visited regions of wa for a cleanup JarrahTree 04:51, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Whisperback

Hello. You have a new message at Kudpung's talk page. 23:14, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Uvariopsis korupensis

You only need to put the translation attrib on the article talk page. I've also copy edited the article and rephrased a bit to avoid a minor COPYVIO. Keep up the good work, this is the kind of thing we need, most of our articles on genera and species are very short stubs. If you are going to do more translations, don't hesitate to ask if you need help, French or German, I'm a native speaker of both. JarrahTree is a personal friend and is always willing to help on anything - especially Oz related stuff. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:46, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Kudpung: I did keep wondering where it kept disappearing to, and then I found it on the talk page...(Good to know) Thanks, MargaretRDonald (talk) 01:52, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Greek words

I saw you asked a question about Greek letters/words on another editor's talk page. Perhaps I can help you. There are two different ways of achieving this.

• One solution is to install a Greek keyboard on your computer. How to do this depends on what kind of computer you use, whether it is a full-fledged Mac or PC, a tablet, telephone... Then you just switch to the Greek keyboard while you are typing the Greek text.
• Another solution is to use a function inside Wikipedia. Perhaps not quite as elegant, but independent of platform. At the top of the editing window you will find the choice "Special characters". There you can choose "Greek" (or "Greek extended" if you need more sophisticated possibilities). Then you just point at the letters you need.

Happy editing στα Ελληνικά. --T*U (talk) 11:57, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

I see that T*U has answered your question. There is a third (maybe too obvious to mention!) way of adding Greek text, namely to copy and paste the text from some other online source. --Macrakis (talk) 23:02, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi @TU-nor: & @Macrakis:, Thank you both for your help (Very helpful) MargaretRDonald (talk) 02:58, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

ext links in text

Is strongly discouraged - with WP:MOS often quoted when being reverted - or turned into refs. viz Velleia_paradoxa - wherever possible it should be either made into a ref or footnote JarrahTree 12:42, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi@JarrahTree: Thanks for that. (Spent a couple of useful hours reading WP:MOS and then finally realised that your message contained everything. I think I have now pulled out the inline references, and made a collections map... MargaretRDonald (talk) 09:13, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Australasian Virtual Herbarium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of New England (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Sydney meetup

Hi Margaret. I'm contacting you because I understand you attended the most recent Sydney meetup in January. I'm a Wikimedian from Perth, and a member of the Perth meetup group. I will be visiting Sydney on the weekend of 26-27 May, and I'm interested in organising a meetup. Are you available to attend? I'm assuming that the preferred time would be the Saturday evening (26 May), but I could also make it earlier in the day, or on the Sunday during the day. If there's enough interest, I'll create a new page and ping a few other Sydney-based editors. Bahnfrend (talk) 12:40, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

@Bahnfrend: (I didn't manage to get to the Sydney meetup). My preference is always for midday. Evenings are just too difficult. So Saturday or Sunday midday somewhere (presumably in the heart of the city) would suit me well. MargaretRDonald (talk) 19:34, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phoradendron leucarpum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Reference segregator

Pleased to meet you today..... see User:PleaseStand/References segregator for the tool I spoke about. Regards, Ariconte (talk) 05:04, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

@Ariconte: Likewise, Richard.. (Thanks, for this. I had spotted it on your userpage and secreted in on mine for further exploration, before our meeting. (looks a handy tool). Regards, MargaretRDonald (talk) 05:14, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Terry Macfarlane et al

@MargaretRDonald:, I enjoyed our Sydney lunchtime meetup yesterday. I couldn't help looking for more to include on Terry Macfarlane and hope you approve. I will work through the entries on other botanists you've created articles about, using @Ariconte:'s references segregator, to see what else I can add! Regards, --Oronsay (talk) 20:26, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

@Oronsay: Thanks for that. Really helpful. (the only reason I've put stuff up about botanists is that it is irritating not knowing at least something about Bryan Alwyn Barlow, Tony Rodd and old-uncle-tom-cobley and all, when their names pop up continually as authors of species.) So I usually whack up some of the species they may have authored +- some of their published articles, just to get a minimal something going. MargaretRDonald (talk) 20:57, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Page stalker - please note that when you do start/upgrade botanists - please, try hauling out a good bibliographic treasure chest for each - seems some cannot cope with small sets of refs... JarrahTree 14:47, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi Margaret, I have also made you a reviewer so hopefully you won't need to have other folks review your articles. Reviews (as most people would understand the term) take place at WP:PR Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:32, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

@Casliber: Thanks for that...Now I have to learn what to do! (All good fun.) Regards MargaretRDonald (talk) 03:21, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Also, if you create or expand five-fold an article, it can be eligible for WP:DYK. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:54, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

@Casliber: Thanks for that. (Not sure, though, how a non-existent article can be increased five-fold...) Cheers, MargaretRDonald (talk) 22:10, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chellapilla Venkata Rao

Hello, MargaretRDonald. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Chellapilla Venkata Rao, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:57, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

well done

you appear to have been given a whole baggage of rights today - a well recognised user - well done - JarrahTree 14:26, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, @JarrahTree:. Now I need to start to learn how to use them... Currently no idea. MargaretRDonald (talk) 10:15, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cochlospermum fraseri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pine Creek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Chellapilla Venkata Rao for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chellapilla Venkata Rao is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chellapilla Venkata Rao until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:08, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

The correct link to the discussion is Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Chellapilla_Venkata_Rao--Oronsay (talk) 04:40, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Strange user page layout

Hi -

I removed * [[fr:Isaac Newton]] and * [[sv:Isaac Newton]] from your user page.

They were showing up in the left column as if they were different language versions of you user page..... I don't know why this was happening but don't think it was what you intended.

Regards, Ariconte (talk) 08:09, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Ariconte. Good move. I was experimenting with how to get foreign wikipedia pages. MargaretRDonald (talk) 09:01, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)@Ariconte: That's how they are meant to work, they are how you add interwiki links to a page. If you just want to link to one inline, use a colon - eg [[:fr:Isaac Newton]] gives the link fr:Isaac Newton. In fact adding a colon in front is the way to stop most kinds of special links from doing their special thing so that you can link to them, so for instance. [[Category:Flora]] would normally add this page to the category, whereas [[:Category:Flora]] gives you the clickable link Category:Flora. (and the <nowiki></nowiki> tags strip all cleverness away so you can display them as above) Le Deluge (talk) 13:01, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Le Deluge: Thanks for that. It's a question I have been asking myself for a while. MargaretRDonald (talk) 19:13, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Done. Thanks for the education ... I knew about the Catagory use but thought the :fr etc. was a interpretor defect. Regards, Ariconte (talk) 20:46, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crotalaria retusa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kimberley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Category:Electronic florae

A couple of comments about this edit where you added Category:Electronic Florae to State Herbarium of South Australia. For one thing, you should only add categories that describe that actual article - so in this case a herbarium is not a flora, even if it is involved in making one, you'd only add that category to an article about a flora. As a general comment, category names take sentence case, so the F should not be capitalised - see WP:Categorisation. Per WP:REDNOT you shouldn't add red-linked categories, either create the category or don't add it. And if you had created it and tried to categorise it you would have found that one parent category is Category:Florae (publication) so for consistency it ought to be Category:Electronic florae. But since we already have Category:Online botany databases I would have just used that - I know they're not quite the same thing as a flora, but they're close enough for these purposes. Sorry to bombard you with all this, hopefully it is helpful. Cheers. Le Deluge (talk) 12:54, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Le Deluge: Thanks for all that. I sort of think I have a glimmering of what you are saying.. (You'll probably need to keep monitoring me on this issue, until I finally get your drift..) Regards, and thanks, MargaretRDonald (talk) 19:10, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

regions always help

Acanthocarpus_canaliculatus - where at all possible viz our current biota parameters - flora/ibra/beard whatever - regions always give more credence... the map at https://florabase.dpaw.wa.gov.au/browse/profile/1205 gives us https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swan_Coastal_Plain - and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geraldton_Sandplains - just a thought, but helluva better than no specific - west oz is a bloody big place, at the best of times JarrahTree 09:26, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

@JarrahTree: I was just being lazy. (I did put in a link to the AVH distribution map, though) MargaretRDonald (talk) 09:30, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

no big deal - it is always worth the effort and keeps the flies away JarrahTree 09:32, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, it is also always a marvellous incentive for the IBRA red links to be fixed - they have been all too red for too long JarrahTree 12:06, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Psittacanthus, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Barlow and Killip (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Cochlospermum fraseri

On 22 June 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cochlospermum fraseri, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the indigenous people of northern Australia ate the flowers of the kapok bush? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cochlospermum fraseri. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Cochlospermum fraseri), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library

As discussed: Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library. —Sam Wilson 03:56, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Samwilson:. Thanks for this. (For some reason I didn't notice it yesterday and I was left wondering about it.) MargaretRDonald (talk) 21:48, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Psittacanthus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Feuer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Suggestion for avoiding dab links

You seem to get notifications frequently regarding links to dab pages you have added to articles. Personally, I've enabled a gadget that displays links to dab pages as orange instead of blue that you might like to consider trying. It makes it very easy to see them while viewing an article or preview. In your preferences, under the "Gadgets" tab, it's the fifth item from the bottom of the "Appearance" section. Hope this helps, and happy editing. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 22:44, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, (T That's very thoughtful of you. MargaretRDonald (talk) 22:49, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

12 years of not capturing the full scope

The biota material is usually project tagged by people who are neither.... oh dear one cannot say that on wiki... lots of tidying up put it that way.... JarrahTree 05:23, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

the totality of the challenge faces us like a bloody mastodon with bad breath -https://tools.wmflabs.org/enwp10/cgi-bin/list2.fcgi?run=yes&projecta=Australian_biota&importance=Unknown-Class JarrahTree 06:00, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Then all the proximity issues arise like a tibetan mastif with dental issues - all the adjacent projects have missing teeth everywhere JarrahTree 06:44, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Would you like to give an example so that I can start to understand what you mean here? I am not sure what the problem (of the "full scope") is... MargaretRDonald (talk) 21:41, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

ah others have struggled with my allusive tangential expressions, you are not the first...

Biota - the ideal scope/totality would be all plant/animal articles in the australian project to be captured by the scope of the biota project - but many eds in the old days only put 'australia' on the talk page (including self) - thus:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Australia_portals

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Australia

does not even go into the range of detail that would capture sub branches of knowledge

at least https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Australia-related_WikiProjects does

but then https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:WikiProject_Australian_biota_articles identifies over 16k

then to follow from that the assessment table identifies less than actual that number...

https://tools.wmflabs.org/enwp10/cgi-bin/table.fcgi?project=Australian_biota

but if we look to see whether anyone has the slightest interest - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Unknown-importance_Australian_biota_articles

indicates that 13k have not been assessed... in relation to the importance scale in the project assessment

and a norman gunston aka random sample test yesterday of less than 10 articles or categories that are linked

show that there is an unknown unknown of articles and categories that logically exist within the domain of the biota project that have not been caught by a tag on the talk page...

So in my rather mathematically challenged perception of the notion of scope - the biota project scope in numerical terms is there could well be a domain/territory of a probably 20k article/item project that is not yet developed in either assessment or claiming articles as being related.

Hope the further confusion re my comment is clarified sufficiently confusedly. JarrahTree 00:03, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification. However, I think it would be worthwhile to enlist the help of someone who is good with bots. I went to Category:Unknown-importance Australian biota articles the very first article of which (Talk:Abantiades albofasciatus ) has been rated of low importance in all(?) of the groupings with which it was associated. So there needs to be an automatic way of cleaning up Category:Unknown-importance Australian biota articles.... which should be relatively easy for those who write code which automatically assigns hidden categories to the articles I write: in particular, the moment the importance has been assigned, the above category should be removed!! (Surely if an article is categorised as project Australia}|biota=yes|importance=low then it has indeed been assessed and should not appear on this list.. See, e.g., Talk:Abantiades albofasciatus) MargaretRDonald (talk) 02:15, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

we both know that if we had a few eds regularly adding material about moths, trees and etc - that the 20k would be probably a very slight estimation and it could be bigger - the uncaught aspects of the biota field is the link you gave last - the moths - which leads to inadequately tagged items... it is endless... I am certain a concerted attempt to catch items not yet appropriately tagged simply improves the whole idea of the biota cleanup - there are items from the deep dark past that have not been included yet... JarrahTree 03:46, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

thanks

non verbal manner of thanks for the encouraging talk the other day... I have given up on barnstars now:

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

Hopefully self explanatory biota collection (maybe), I left Palmyra (Syria) out and left Vienna in, apparently the EC is about to destroy the internet as we knew it, it seems... JarrahTree 11:23, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks @JarrahTree: (Gallery much nicer. I find Barnstars singularly unattractive. MargaretRDonald (talk) 11:33, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

inspiring discussion - has my very divergent thinking even more divergent ! will probably draw on my resource of various photos of odd things as a way of saying thanks, gday and similar whatevers... JarrahTree 12:13, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Me too

Hello Margaret - thanks for the range maps on Calectasia species - they're great. Sorry I missed you at the last meetup. Gderrin (talk) 02:46, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

No worries. (I like a range map and they were nice articles...) MargaretRDonald (talk) 03:39, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Homestead

Not sure what the process is in that situation - not sure it's possible to formally use an email as a source in that way.

Still great to have it correct, though - better to be right and someone can come along and add a formal source later in my book. The Drover's Wife (talk) 06:49, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Billardia article

Hi, I’ve just checked the link again, and it seems correct - i.e. it is the RHS citation showing that the plant has indeed won the AGM. I’m at a loss to understand how the same link can be pointing you elsewhere! Obviously this plant is nothing but bad news for Australia, something it has in common with many alien species that have found their way on to Ozzie soil. I have no idea whether the plant is particularly troublesome in its native habitat. Regards Darorcilmir (talk) 09:05, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Darorcilmir: I'll try the link again... (And no there is no problem in WA. Just bad news in VIC & SA.) MargaretRDonald (talk) 09:27, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Finally spotted. (A tiny little symbol to the right of the name!!) MargaretRDonald (talk) 09:33, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

I think B. heterophylla will be tricky to improve given confusiion over names etc. Will take another look later. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:02, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

@Casliber: Agreed. Agreed (the taxonomy/phylogeny ssems to be a real mess) Thanks for thinking about it. MargaretRDonald (talk) 22:21, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Maireana eponymy

Hello MargaretRDonald, the genus Maireana was described by Moquin in 1840. So it cannot be named in honor of René Maire, who was born much later in 1878. It could be more probably named after the French botanist Charles Antoine Lemaire (1801–1871), who was working at Paris (=Lutetia) at the same time like Moquin, see Moquin's publication. --Thiotrix (talk) 12:41, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

In Plant genera named after people (1753-1853) by JOSE A. MARI MUT (2017), I found this: "Maireana: for Maire, botanist, had a large herbarium rich in Parisian (Lutetian) plants which, due to his advanced age, he donated in 1866 to Ernst Cosson. Source: original publication (Chenopodearum Monographica Enumeratio, p. 95. 1840). See also Actes du Congres International de Botanique term a Paris en Aout 1867... p. 235-336. 1867." Kind regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 15:55, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

@Thiotrix: Yes I found that too, (in the Latin of Moquin's original description) and didn't notice the date discrepancy!! So, do you think we can confidently describe it as honouring Lemaire? MargaretRDonald (talk) 22:09, 8 July 2018 (UTC) I see the article on Lemaire does indeed describe Maireana as being named in his honour. MargaretRDonald (talk) 22:14, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

@Thiotrix: Thanks for reading so carefully, Regards, MargaretRDonald (talk) 23:53, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

In FloraBase, Lemaire is given as the eponymy. But Lemaire was usually cited as "Lemaire", and not as "Maire". Additionally, Maireana is not mentioned as an eponym of Lemaire in "Taxonomic Literature". So José A. Mari Mut, p. 364 could be right, that "Maire" may refer to a different French botanist and collector. Kind regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 05:55, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

@Thiotrix: I think your first instinct was correct. The dates do not stack up. Lemaire's botanic abbreviation is Lem. (but I think a lot of this was mostly formalised well after 1840, and the Le is a particle which was often dropped (see the entry immediately after Maireana in Jose Mari Mut José A. Mari Mut, p. 364) I am inclined to take Florabase as the more reliable source. MargaretRDonald (talk) 22:33, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

This also raises questions about the unsourced comment in René Maire on the epithet mairei. MargaretRDonald (talk) 22:33, 9 July 2018 (UTC) Perhaps we should reference this discussion on René Maire and Charles Antoine Lemaire to open it to a wider mob? MargaretRDonald (talk) 22:36, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

You could ask directly at the Herbarium in Paris P. They may have archives of their collectors, and probably know for sure, if the collector Maire of Herb. Cosson is identical with Charles Antoine Lemaire. --Thiotrix (talk) 18:19, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Thiotrix:. Brilliant suggestion. Thanks very much. I will. Regards, MargaretRDonald (talk) 00:17, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

small favour

When I saw hakea spathulata was a red link, got tempted, but, 2014 it got changed by turner describing it into neospathulata - I have photographed it a few times - but seem to have lost where neospathulata flowering time and colour is - I am sure the current part of the article is very wrong - please - where did I lose a flowering and colour info but? any thoughts ? JarrahTree 00:44, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi @JarrahTree: http://www.anbg.gov.au/abrs/online-resources/flora/stddisplay.xsql?pnid=45924 has Hakea auriculata flowering from June-Novermber, bu when the subspecies (now species) flowers is not clear: As you would have seen Florabase gives no flowering times and the species was described too late for flora of Australia online. I am still farting around checking out the primary references so I may find an answer. In the meantime the flora of australia link would give a reasooable partial description, particularly if you feel tempted to use the key. Cheers, MargaretRDonald (talk) 22:58, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi @JarrahTree: The description by Barker allows a reasonable description of the plant but still no flowering times. (And not in Turner either) Perhaps Bentham might give them but I doubt it... So you may be out of luck on this but Barker should be useful. Links to Pdf are now given in the article. Cheers, MargaretRDonald (talk) 00:01, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

I am 90% sure I have pictures of the flower taken in the beelu national park either in my collection or commons - it is a red to maroon colour, and you addition of the Barker taxonomy part of the article is brilliant and much appreciated - thank you JarrahTree 00:03, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Now I am trying to get a handle on oz biota - there are categories that do not even include australia in category talk pages - even when they are endemic! arrgggghhh JarrahTree 00:44, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Appreciation

Great work. I really admire u. In today's fast pace life, no body is caring for correct usage of English. But u took care & made it proper. Hat'soff to u. Thank u very much Sri Harsha 12:59, 27 July 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MKS Harsha (talk • contribs)

Hi @MKS Harsha: No worries. (I find incorrect English difficult to read, and one of the nice things about Wikipedia is that I can fix some of the English while reading about things I want to know about.) I had passed the same statue of Arjuna that is featured in the article and wanted to know a little about him. MargaretRDonald (talk) 21:12, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Melbourne Girls Grammar

Please source the claim that it was previously known as Melbourne Church of England Girls' Grammar School. And if you do source and re-add it please don't just add the initialism without mentioning what the letters stand for,. "MCEGGS" is not self explanatory. Meters (talk) 22:50, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

your turn...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kensington_Bushland_Reserve - JarrahTree 10:19, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Only too happy, @JarrahTree: MargaretRDonald (talk) 21:13, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

thanks for that - it needs more text at some stage but no rush JarrahTree 23:50, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Better to go the other way around

try creating from the wikipedia side we now have two...

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q56192005

Will get someone to merge/delete mine at some point.

Create data links from the wikipedia side, if you need a walk through, can do that for you

Broun item has a good library level description (ie the trove entry) of research re the swan coastal plain and the gnangara mound as far as i could see from a very brief glimpse

Unlikely to get my hands on in the short term - Keighery B.J. and Trudgen, M.E. (1992). The Remnant Vegetation of the Eastern Side of the Swan Coastal Plain. Unpublished report to the Department of Conservation and Land Management for the National Estate Grants Program.

there might be likelihood of some sort of linkage with [1] and [2] - or not... JarrahTree 00:28, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

@JarrahTree: Why don't you just go ahead and delete the wikidata item for Kensington Bushland...? MargaretRDonald (talk) 00:41, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

neither an admin or tweaker on data - will ask my friends there - its a jungle in there - yours is a better entry JarrahTree 00:44, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Given that the article links to the wikidata item Kensington Bushland Reserve and takes its automatic mapping from there, my preference is to delete the wikidata item Kensington Bushland, but it really is not an issue, it can serve as an alias just as earlier species names still have wikidata entries, so it doesn't pose a problem. MargaretRDonald (talk) 00:48, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

granddaughter day - the weather is nice probably wont be near computer for rest of day - cheers JarrahTree 01:04, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

@JarrahTree: No worries. Have a great day. MargaretRDonald (talk) 01:18, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

hmm thats another challenge - the whole bush forever thing - another neglected aspect of reserves in the west oz articles JarrahTree 02:38, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

hope that

this is less cryptic or allusive or elusive than my explaining other things

what you have in your sandbox does link with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gingin_scarp, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eneabba_sandplain and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dandaragan_plateau in terms of geological explanation of the issues of north of the perth basin however the geological explanation and linkage was not higlighted when creating them - more a case of attaching minor plant issues... sigh JarrahTree 00:08, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

when I read on the north by a subsidiary fault running north-west from Bullsbrook - is how I make the connection with the above items JarrahTree 00:30, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

(I have a lot of paraphrasing,rewriting, etc before that article sees the light of day....) MargaretRDonald (talk) 09:31, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

went to the western side gate at the reserve after my voluntary work this afternoon - its just across the road from where my father used to meet up with his ag department vet surgeons friends and when jarrah road was a through road...JarrahTree 13:50, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/25017/20030327-0000/www.aciar.gov.au/publications/proceedings/104/PR104/paper14.html looks interesting

JarrahTree 16:20, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Some great resources there. Thanks very much. (I think it all probably should go into the Swan Coastal Plain, with internal references digging deep down.). Still need to write the damned thing, as opposed to collecting sources. It would be great to get a public domain map... MargaretRDonald (talk) 21:17, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

my problem - every time someone links a name of an australian plant - a quick check either not australia, or no biota, or biota-importance - its more than I can do in one lifetime I think - to catch up to square one... JarrahTree 23:31, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

got rid of the speedy delete item - msgs only on talk page never on main space even when it seems to make sense JarrahTree 00:46, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 29

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 29, June – July 2018

• New partners
  • Economic & Political Weekly–10 accounts
• Wikimania
• Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
• Global branches update
• Bytes in brief

Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:03, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Sydney meetup

There will be a meetup in Sydney on the 12 of September. More info at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/September 2018. Bidgee (talk) 10:00, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

There might be a glitch in the stuff - let bidgee know JarrahTree 00:38, 4 September 2018 (UTC) There is a wikipedia seminar at the State Library from 9:30 an-4:00 pm (with the afternoon session no longer available -too few places. I put in a bid to get the room shifted to something which might accommodate more people. At this point my plan is to to see what transpires. (And if I manage to get crammed into the afternoons session, then the timing of Bidgee's meetup is OK.) MargaretRDonald (talk) 00:51, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

wow

very impressed by your hard work - very impressed, the Australian biota field is being enriched and made so much better by your involvement! Thanks!!! JarrahTree 03:48, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, @JarrahTree: MargaretRDonald (talk) 06:02, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

OSM maps

Would you be able to hold off on doing these and have a discussion about them first? I totally see the usefulness of the map content, but cutting the map out of the infobox and replacing it with something roughly stuck on the bottom looks very ugly. It would be amazing if they could be integrated into the infobox - but mass-replacing them before asking that question isn't a good solution in my book - and IMO they're of dubious value if they can't be integrated. The Drover's Wife (talk) 05:03, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

@The Drover's Wife: Sorry, just finished when I got your note... They can be integrated into the infobox when the infobox is a park see e.g., Kings Park, Western Australia, or if the infobox is an Italian commune, (see Bolzano), but somehow the Sydney suburbs infobox doesn't allow the maplink parameter. Obviously it would be sensible to ask someone to work on the suburb infobox to allow them to be integrated. But in my opinion, being there is useful, 1) because it makes people see the need for action, and 2) because they are the more useful maps. (Those huge statewide maps with just a point, are in my opinion, pretty useless.) All of this just takes time. And even though you find them ugly (while I find them informative), I hope you will leave them, until a better solution is found. I am sorry you find them ugly. Perhaps you know someone who will be able to help? MargaretRDonald (talk) 05:17, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

See the conversation at the AWNB - there are at least two Australian editors who actually turn up to conversations on the talk page who would be qualified to explain the issues - JarrahTree 06:46, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Black Armada

Thanks for your edits on Black Armada—I just wanted to check if the quote you added is a passage from Rupert Lockwood's book (i.e. a quote from him) or someone else? If so, can you add the attribution in addition to the citation (I suggest using the Template:Quote template)? Cheers, --Canley (talk) 00:45, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

The quote template gives a splendid result. Thanks. MargaretRDonald (talk) 07:43, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

@Canley: Thanks (I find the whole story utterly rivetting). I'll try using the template you suggest in future. However, the quote has the reference given within the block quote section, so in my innocence I thought I had managed to attribute the quote quite unequivocally to Lockwood (Black Armada, 1975). IMargaretRDonald (talk) 00:55, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

So do I! I wrote the article after seeing the exhibition at the National Maritime Museum, and realising there was no mention of the incident on Wikipedia. In fact, there is quite a lack of content on the whole NEI government-in-exile in Australia, so I started a few other articles such as Netherlands Indies Government Information Service. I've added the context of the quote and the template, hope you don't mind. --Canley (talk) 03:34, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

@Canley: Very happy. I must have bought Black Armada (at an ALP conference) when it came out. I loved the book then, and still do... If you feel inclined to write Netherlands East Indies Government-in-exile, I would be delighted. Meanwhile, I am still fiddling. (It's a very frustrating book: once he has set a date at the beginning of a chapter, the best you get is that something happened on the "24 September", and so I completely got the dates wrong for the Tanah Merah prisoners arriving in Oz.. MargaretRDonald (talk) 03:43, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Facto Post – Issue 16 – 30 September 2018

Facto Post – Issue 16 – 30 September 2018 The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page. To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer. Back numbers are here. The science publishing landscape In an ideal world ... no, bear with your editor for just a minute ... there would be a format for scientific publishing online that was as much a standard as SI units are for the content. Likewise cataloguing publications would not be onerous, because part of the process would be to generate uniform metadata. Without claiming it could be the mythical free lunch, it might be reasonably be argued that sandwiches can be packaged much alike and have barcodes, whatever the fillings. The best on offer, to stretch the metaphor, is the meal kit option, in the form of XML. Where scientific papers are delivered as XML downloads, you get all the ingredients ready to cook. But have to prepare the actual meal of slow food yourself. See Scholarly HTML for a recent pass at heading off XML with HTML, in other words in the native language of the Web. The argument from real life is a traditional mixture of frictional forces, vested interests, and the classic irony of the principle of unripe time. On the other hand, discoverability actually diminishes with the prolific progress of science publishing. No, it really doesn't scale. Wikimedia as movement can do something in such cases. We know from open access, we grok the Web, we have our own horse in the HTML race, we have Wikidata and WikiJournal, and we have the chops to act. Links ImageGrid SPARQL query for the Art+Feminism focus list on Wikidata. Run and then scroll ... The TABernacle tool for Wikidata editing, by Magnus Manske, has been upgraded. Demo with the ScienceSource focus list and main subjects: with a WiDar login you can edit directly in the table cells. Enslaved: People of the Historic Slave Trade, Michigan State University project for a linked open data platform. Quote: "Disambiguating and merging individuals across multiple datasets is nearly impossible given their current, siloed nature." As the Linked Data for Production (LD4P) project finishes its initial two-year cycle and moves into LD4P2, a list of its BIBFRAME and other RDF tools. Machine Learning with and for Semantic Web Knowledge Graphs, detailed slide pack by Heiko Paulheim, University of Mannheim. In Europe, Scientists Need to Share Their Research for Free if They Want Government Funding, Futurism, by Kristin House, 5 September 2018. If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:57, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

the CSd set

CSD set - It can be in the pull down menu - and G7 looks as good as any JarrahTree 23:18, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

@JarrahTree: Thanks, Tom. (A bit more explanation would be helpful - I have no idea what you are talking about!!!) Cheers, MargaretRDonald (talk) 23:43, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

If you are in wA - a meetup over coffee and Ill show you all... JarrahTree 23:48, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

or if you are not - then https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Twinkle is worth enabling in your preferences - gadgets... JarrahTree 23:51, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

I have to drop off the girls at school & pick them up at 3pm. So morning would suit. Perhaps 11 am somewhere? The library? MargaretRDonald (talk) 23:53, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

done ie library coffee shop 11 amJarrahTree 23:55, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

See you there MargaretRDonald (talk) 00:19, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

more likely 11.30 at this stage due to a delaying issue JarrahTree 01:47, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Evad37/rater is well worth looking at JarrahTree 04:34, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

lead sentences should have specific location of distribution where ever possible - that then facilitates the project tagging on the talk page to a specific state or area... JarrahTree 03:14, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

as an example - from the text or the lead - in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribonanthes could be in a mexican desert for all we know JarrahTree 03:21, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

endangered

in my rather peripatetic wanderings in the mysteries of the plants project I have realised that most australian endangered species had been deemed low for everything - I have ventured, dare I say, to change that. Considering the relative small populations of some, they seem to, from the reading of the info, deserve more than low importance... please feel free to challenge my assertions at any of the said items. Thanks. JarrahTree 06:58, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

@JarrahTree: I am happy for you to do whatever you wish on this. Cheers, MargaretRDonald (talk) 21:14, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Books & Bytes, Issue 30

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 30, August – Septmeber 2018

• Library Card translation
• Spotlight: 1Lib1Ref spreads to the Southern Hemisphere and beyond
• Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
• Global branches update
• Bytes in brief

French version of Books & Bytes is now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:43, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Facto Post – Issue 17 – 29 October 2018

Facto Post – Issue 17 – 29 October 2018 The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page. To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer. Back numbers are here. Wikidata imaged Around 2.7 million Wikidata items have an illustrative image. These files, you might say, are Wikimedia's stock images, and if the number is large, it is still only 5% or so of items that have one. All such images are taken from Wikimedia Commons, which has 50 million media files. One key issue is how to expand the stock. Indeed, there is a tool. WD-FIST exploits the fact that each Wikipedia is differently illustrated, mostly with images from Commons but also with fair use images. An item that has sitelinks but no illustrative image can be tested to see if the linked wikis have a suitable one. This works well for a volunteer who wants to add images at a reasonable scale, and a small amount of SPARQL knowledge goes a long way in producing checklists. Gran Teatro, Cáceres, Spain, at night It should be noted, though, that there are currently 53 Wikidata properties that link to Commons, of which P18 for the basic image is just one. WD-FIST prompts the user to add signatures, plaques, pictures of graves and so on. There are a couple of hundred monograms, mostly of historical figures, and this query allows you to view all of them. commons:Category:Monograms and its subcategories provide rich scope for adding more. And so it is generally. The list of properties linking to Commons does contain a few that concern video and audio files, and rather more for maps. But it contains gems such as P3451 for "nighttime view". Over 1000 of those on Wikidata, but as for so much else, there could be yet more. Go on. Today is Wikidata's birthday. An illustrative image is always an acceptable gift, so why not add one? You can follow these easy steps: (i) log in at https://tools.wmflabs.org/widar/, (ii) paste the Petscan ID 6263583 into https://tools.wmflabs.org/fist/wdfist/ and click run, and (iii) just add cake. Birthday logo Links Now Wikidata is six, Signpost Special Report Find out how @TheContentMine are attempting to mine scientific and medical literature to improve the accuracy of Wikipedia., Wikimedia UK tweet and video ScienceSource and the Semantic Web sciencesource-pmc-licenses tool by Oravrattas to extract Creative Commons license information from PubMed Central pages, created at the Cambridge Wikidata Workshop Whizzy use of SPARQL to map the London Underground system, whizzed past on Twitter. Wikidata birthday events mapped by SPARQL, too d:Wikidata:Sixth Birthday/Message from dev team If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:01, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Help me!

I have seen (but can no longer find) the use in a species box of a link to an external image. I am hoping someone can help me with putting a link to an external image in the speciesbox. (Thanks)

MargaretRDonald (talk) 20:26, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

You can find the template code and the available parameters at Template:Speciesbox. I don't see a parameter that would be useful for this purpose, and if there were a link to an external image, the image wouldn't be displayed. The "External links" section at the bottom of the article seems a better place for a link to an external image, if that link should be added to the article at all. Huon (talk) 20:50, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

@Huon: I had found the template and like you could not find what I have seen in the past. I had already used the solution you have suggested, but would prefer the link to be in the speciesbox as it is here that the instantaneous species summary is found, while external links are often neither noticed nor read. MargaretRDonald (talk) 20:59, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

I rather don't think such a use of external links agrees with the relevant guideline WP:EL. The best solution would be to find (or create) a freely licensed image. Huon (talk) 10:15, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

@Huon: Thanks very much for the (internal) link. Very helpful. (And, sadly, the ideal solution is all too frequently not available - plants in other states/countries/threatened etc.) MargaretRDonald (talk) 20:03, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

There might be arboreta or botanical gardens that have a specimen. Or we could ask someone who has taken a photo to release that image under a free license; sometimes people are willing to do that. See WP:Requesting copyright permission. Huon (talk) 20:11, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Linking categories

If you want to link to a category (but not place a page in the category) precede it with a colon. [[:Category:Botany external link templates]] produces Category:Botany external link templates. Plantdrew (talk) 20:20, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, @Plantdrew: I did spot that I had failed and got around it by using the web address instead, but that solution is far far better of course. MargaretRDonald (talk) 20:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Patrick Burke

Hi. Editing an "article for deletion" has a somewhat tricky protocol. You may make as many comments, bring as many arguments and sources as you wish to a discussion. However, you need to give only one opinion. In this discussion you have made three comments using keep, should bedeleted and, a gain, keep. So, in a case where you thought, for example, keep, bu tsubsequent arguments, evidence made you change your mind, the thing to do is to strike the keep, and give your new opinion, which might be delete. You are free to change opinions as often as you wish, but always strike your previous opinion, so that we can all follow the argument. Cheers.E.M.Gregory (talk) 23:09, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

That is so weird, to have arguments about something like that - there has to be something going on there - about that other than the subject - weird weird, weird really weird. JarrahTree 00:17, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

@E.M.Gregory: Thanks I will do that in future.

@JarrahTree: The whole thing is not terrific: the two related articles The Wynnewood Institute & Thomas Patrick Burke were both paid for contributions by the same person. I think Burke probably qualifies as notable. However there is absolutely no evidence (despite its incorporation) that shows the institute consists of anything more than one man, giving lectures and arranging for lectures to be given. (In addition, its website shows no evidence of any lecture activity after 2011!!! And there are currently no upcoming events) I did quite a lot of editing on Burke, because the the article felt like an advertisement and it irritated me. But I do think it qualifies but not the The Wynnewood Institute..... MargaretRDonald (talk) 00:43, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

@E.M.Gregory:@JarrahTree: Pursuing the related issue of The Wynnewood Institute, Additional information given in this article is 1)that it is incorporated, and 2) it lists the lecturers (T.P. Burke and others). I don't know the how to put up this one for deletion, but believe that would be appropriate, as again, secondary sources are minimal. Any chance of either of you doing so?? Cheers, MargaretRDonald (talk) 01:01, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Paid editing sucks. period. JarrahTree 03:37, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Indeed. And she was paid by an advertising agency! MargaretRDonald (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Apologies for adolescent terminology from a geriatric such as self, but the general issue arouses some rather base sentiments JarrahTree 02:10, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

status in importance

I have tried to get a sense of importance for anything in endangered or higher as being mid importance, and anything verging on extinction as being high/top - any thoughts on classifications like that at all ? (there is probably an earlier discussion I havent checked higher up this page, but... cheers JarrahTree 23:12, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi,@JarrahTree: I've taken the view that in botany or zoology anything at the species level has low importance. And tend to prefer that view, particularly as the various categories of threatened species may change: For example in checking out the SPRAT entries for Acacia wardelii and Acacia ramiflora, I found both had been removed from the EPBC threatened lists. See Acacia wardellii, Species Profile and Threats Database, Department of the Environment and Heritage, Australia. and Acacia ramiflora, Species Profile and Threats Database, Department of the Environment and Heritage, Australia.. But I am easy with whichever decision you wish to make and will not change whatever you choose to do (although when I come to do it, at this stage, I will continue with my current practice unless I can be persuaded that it is vitally important that I change. (I find it hard enough keeping articles up-to-date without having to worry about the talk pages too!!) Cheers, MargaretRDonald (talk) 23:26, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

If you prefer, I'll leave out the importance parameter when I put in a review? MargaretRDonald (talk) 23:28, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Wow you bring up some very salient points - phew - best place for us to continue - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Australian_biota JarrahTree 00:03, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Good move. Cheers. MargaretRDonald (talk) 00:11, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, MargaretRDonald. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Facto Post – Issue 18 – 30 November 2018

Facto Post – Issue 18 – 30 November 2018 The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page. To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer. Back numbers are here. WikiCite issue GLAM ♥ data — what is a gallery, library, archive or museum without a catalogue? It follows that Wikidata must love librarians. Bibliography supports students and researchers in any topic, but open and machine-readable bibliographic data even more so, outside the silo. Cue the WikiCite initiative, which was meeting in conference this week, in the Bay Area of California. Wikidata training for librarians at WikiCite 2018 In fact there is a broad scope: "Open Knowledge Maps via SPARQL" and the "Sum of All Welsh Literature", identification of research outputs, Library.Link Network and Bibframe 2.0, OSCAR and LUCINDA (who they?), OCLC and Scholia, all these co-exist on the agenda. Certainly more library science is coming Wikidata's way. That poses the question about the other direction: is more Wikimedia technology advancing on libraries? Good point. Wikimedians generally are not aware of the tech background that can be assumed, unless they are close to current training for librarians. A baseline definition is useful here: "bash, git and OpenRefine". Compare and contrast with pywikibot, GitHub and mix'n'match. Translation: scripting for automation, version control, data set matching and wrangling in the large, are on the agenda also for contemporary library work. Certainly there is some possible common ground here. Time to understand rather more about the motivations that operate in the library sector. Links Wikidata and Libraries: Facilitating Open Knowledge, book chapter by Mairelys Lemus-Rojas, metadata librarian and Lydia Pintscher, Wikidata Product Manager, from Leveraging Wikipedia: Connecting Communities of Knowledge (2018) LD4P and WikiCite: Opportunities for collaboration, WikiCite 2018 program abstract, Christine Fernsebner Eslao of Harvard Library Information and Technical Services and Michelle Futornick, Linked Data for Production Program Manager at Stanford University Shell Lessons for Librarians, Library Carpentry lesson At-risk content on Flickr, blogpost 3 November 2018, Andrew Gray Toward an Abstract Wikipedia, recent white paper by Wikidata founder Denny Vrandečić (Google) Account creation is now open on the ScienceSource wiki, where you can see SPARQL visualisations of text mining. If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:20, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

distribution maps

excellent! brilliant! raising standard of the articles just like that, thank you! happy christmas! JarrahTree 23:13, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy Christmas, @JarrahTree:. It's immensely hard work: Having created the maps, I generally have to create a whole pile of categories in the commons to make things easily findable. I first created these maps on 22 November, and I have still only uploaded half of them! (Glad you are appreciating them.) MargaretRDonald (talk) 23:26, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

The visual amenity is something a lot of biota articles have like severe minus - to have a dist map is something I would bump up assessment of the article on the basis of the map alone, it takes us so much closer to what the herbarium sites have as basics. as for your hard work, it is much appreciated, and deserving of many thanks for raising the bar of quality JarrahTree 23:45, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

all that hard work - thanks so much for all the extra maps - I am sure people do not realise or understand the effort gone into that JarrahTree 09:43, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, @JarrahTree: I am working on a response on my commons page. See User:MargaretRDonald/sandbox/Problem with range map but I need some answers from WA herbarium (PERTH) and from various others before I put anything further up on my commons talk page. In the meantime, you can see a discussion of AVH data on Talk:Ficus coronata#Flora of the Northern Territory and the map which resulted from the discussion in Ficus coronata. In any case, occurrence data is always illuminating, so I shall continue... MargaretRDonald (talk) 19:45, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Books & Bytes, Issue 31

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 31, October – Novemeber 2018

• OAWiki
• Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
• Global branches update
• Bytes in brief

French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Facto Post – Issue 19 – 27 December 2018

Facto Post – Issue 19 – 27 December 2018 The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page. To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer. Back numbers are here. Learning from Zotero Zotero is free software for reference management by the Center for History and New Media: see Wikipedia:Citing sources with Zotero. It is also an active user community, and has broad-based language support. Zotero logo Besides the handiness of Zotero's warehousing of personal citation collections, the Zotero translator underlies the citoid service, at work behind the VisualEditor. Metadata from Wikidata can be imported into Zotero; and in the other direction the zotkat tool from the University of Mannheim allows Zotero bibliographies to be exported to Wikidata, by item creation. With an extra feature to add statements, that route could lead to much development of the focus list (P5008) tagging on Wikidata, by WikiProjects. Zotero demo video There is also a large-scale encyclopedic dimension here. The construction of Zotero translators is one facet of Web scraping that has a strong community and open source basis. In that it resembles the less formal mix'n'match import community, and growing networks around other approaches that can integrate datasets into Wikidata, such as the use of OpenRefine. Looking ahead, the thirtieth birthday of the World Wide Web falls in 2019, and yet the ambition to make webpages routinely readable by machines can still seem an ever-retreating mirage. Wikidata should not only be helping Wikimedia integrate its projects, an ongoing process represented by Structured Data on Commons and lexemes. It should also be acting as a catalyst to bring scraping in from the cold, with institutional strengths as well as resourceful code. Links Zotero Comes to Google Docs, Zotero blogpost by Dan Stillman, 19 October 2018. Category:Wikipedians who use Zotero T115158 Write a Zotero translator and document process for creating new Zotero translator and getting it live in production, long Phabricator thread 2015–17. Zotero Translators, documentation from zotero.org. Home page on GitHub for Zotero translator Javascript Example translator, for Wikisource. m:Structured Data on Commons/Newsletter/2018-12-07 Diversitech, the latest ContentMine grant application to the Wikimedia Foundation, is in its community review stage until January 2. If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:08, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Captions in January

The previous message from today says captions will be released in November in the text. January is the correct month. My apologies for the potential confusion. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:43, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Structured Data - file captions coming this week (January 2019)

My apologies if this is a duplicate message for you, it is being sent to multiple lists which you may be signed up for.

Hi all, following up on last month's announcement...

Multilingual file captions will be released this week, on either Wednesday, 9 January or Thursday, 10 January 2019. Captions are a feature to add short, translatable descriptions to files. Here's some links you might want to look follow before the release, if you haven't already:

1. Read over the help page for using captions - I wrote the page on mediawiki.org because captions are available for any MediaWiki user, feel free to host/modify a copy of the page here on Commons.
2. Test out using captions on Beta Commons.
3. Leave feedback about the test on the captions test talk page, if you have anything you'd like to say prior to release.

Additionally, there will be an IRC office hour on Thursday, 10 January with the Structured Data team to talk about file captions, as well as anything else the community may be interested in. Date/time conversion, as well as a link to join, are on Meta.

Thanks for your time, I look forward to seeing those who can make it to the IRC office hour on Thursday. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:09, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Macrozamia riedlei

On 8 January 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Macrozamia riedlei, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Macrozamia riedlei (pictured), a favoured food plant of southwest Australians, was responsible for the accidental poisoning of some early European explorers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Macrozamia riedlei. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Macrozamia riedlei), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

– Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

grasses of australia

is something that needs to happen - in very roundabout way am trying to extract from current unhelpful range of items that constitute what they are - inspired by the local items by Una [3] who as on the committee for a while some years back - any thoughts ideas or inspirations welcome, noting the other states dont seem to have much distinction from the absurd 'oceania' range JarrahTree 02:13, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi @JarrahTree: Could you spell out a little more what you are trying to say? (Not sure what it is you would like me - and others - to do.) Cheers, MargaretRDonald (talk) 19:23, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

apology for the enigmatic message - delayed - I used to be on a committee with una bell, and she has produced some very good material on perth area native grasses - I was contemplating playing with the whole oceania category as Australia isnt separated out from it - I was potentially looking for advice as to whether the kensington location had native grasses and if so how you got on with the material that you could locate... but it will be much more erratic as I had hoped as I have mislaid my materials... maybe it was as much whether you had done any articles on grasses and how you went - but even then it might be something I am unable to develop systematically for a while, not sure - case of wait and see... JarrahTree 10:33, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

If I had her book I might have a crack at the Kensington grasses, but the last time I was there, it was just too hard to climb the fence to get decent photographs, plus for grasses even when they are flowering you often need a microscope.... which I don't have when I am in Perth.. So I suspect grasses may well be among the last plants to have good articles on Wikipedia. MargaretRDonald (talk) 17:59, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

next time n perth remind me i have spare copies of hers - very big problem is cross national boundaries - there seem to be 'regional' spread of grasses which doesnt make things easier - after initial idea it has become very low priority after a closer look at things... JarrahTree 23:16, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks @JarrahTree:. That would be fantastic. (Now I just have to be able to climb the fence and take a sample and look as if that is entirely ok... ) PS I am still working through the plants of Kensington Bushland. MargaretRDonald (talk) 02:08, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

np - the main focus she has is on the scarp - and the other thing for the sw of wa is the destruction of riparine environments - the late luke pen did lots about the recovery of such - that is another possible wa of looking at grasses and similar species that are riverside items JarrahTree 02:20, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Facto Post – Issue 20 – 31 January 2019

Facto Post – Issue 20 – 31 January 2019 The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page. To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer. Back numbers are here. Everything flows (and certainly data does) Recently Jimmy Wales has made the point that computer home assistants take much of their data from Wikipedia, one way or another. So as well as getting Spotify to play Frosty the Snowman for you, they may be able to answer the question "is the Pope Catholic?" Possibly by asking for disambiguation (Coptic?). Amazon Echo device using the Amazon Alexa service in voice search showdown with the Google rival on an Android phone Headlines about data breaches are now familiar, but the unannounced circulation of information raises other issues. One of those is Gresham's law stated as "bad data drives out good". Wikipedia and now Wikidata have been criticised on related grounds: what if their content, unattributed, is taken to have a higher standing than Wikimedians themselves would grant it? See Wikiquote on a misattribution to Bismarck for the usual quip about "law and sausages", and why one shouldn't watch them in the making. Wikipedia has now turned 18, so should act like as adult, as well as being treated like one. The Web itself turns 30 some time between March and November this year, per Tim Berners-Lee. If the Knowledge Graph by Google exemplifies Heraclitean Web technology gaining authority, contra GIGO, Wikimedians still have a role in its critique. But not just with the teenage skill of detecting phoniness. There is more to beating Gresham than exposing the factoid and urban myth, where WP:V does do a great job. Placeholders must be detected, and working with Wikidata is a good way to understand how having one statement as data can blind us to replacing it by a more accurate one. An example that is important to open access is that, firstly, the term itself needs considerable unpacking, because just being able to read material online is a poor relation of "open"; and secondly, trying to get Creative Commons license information into Wikidata shows up issues with classes of license (such as CC-BY) standing for the actual license in major repositories. Detailed investigation shows that "everything flows" exacerbates the issue. But Wikidata can solve it. Links Wikipedia:Wikipedia Day for 18th birthday celebrations WMUK video page, with "fake news", Jimmy Wales, Wikidata and more (health warning for those with tune allergy) Why Wikipedia’s Medical Content Is Superior, Stephen Harrison, 28 January 2019, Slate Olivia Colman reveals struggle with Wikipedia over age, Naomi Gordon, 28 January 2019, harpersbazaar.com Making Wikidata visible, Martin Poulter blogpost, 24 January 2019, Bodleian Digital Library Inventory, Magnus Manske blogpost, 24 January 2019, on Wikidata tech support for an image donation by Cleveland Museum of Art If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Ficus coronulata

On 5 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ficus coronulata, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that indigenous peoples in the Northern Territory of Australia would toss fruit of the river fig into rivers to attract turtles? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ficus coronulata. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ficus coronulata), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

got there at last

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Unknown-importance_Australian_biota_articles - under 10k - please it would help if you create new biota articles if you could be please be kind enough to put biota-importance=low - which is the default - so we keep the number under 10 k - it would be much appreciated if you can help with this (keeping the number down that is) - thanks... JarrahTree 08:37, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Sorry @JarrahTree: to be so slack... PS thanks for noting the orphan status of McKee, (I started another article to reduce his orphan status) MargaretRDonald (talk) 08:45, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

nah no big deal it is all interesting to look at anyways - I would have tried to help re the orphan thing, but hey - it looked difficult! Back to India I say.... JarrahTree 08:51, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

important

as always australian biota gets walked over by mostly unheard eds... [4] - not that I can keep up with some of the more hyperbolic tangents... JarrahTree 06:08, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

@JarrahTree: plonked in my Oppose for what it is worth. MargaretRDonald (talk) 07:33, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

I honestly think when they are on a mission - editors actually involved get ignored...  :( JarrahTree 07:35, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Council of Heads of Australasian Herbaria

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://www.chah.gov.au/. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed and I paraphrased some. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:58, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

@Diannaa: Thanks for fixing it. (I got a bit careless, because the text was identical on several source sites...) MargaretRDonald (talk) 12:37, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Books & Bytes, Issue 32

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 32, January – February 2019

• #1Lib1Ref
• New and expanded partners
• Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
• Global branches update
• Bytes in brief

French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:30, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Facto Post – Issue 21 – 28 February 2019

Facto Post – Issue 21 – 28 February 2019 The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page. To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer. Back numbers are here. What is a systematic review? Systematic reviews are basic building blocks of evidence-based medicine, surveys of existing literature devoted typically to a definite question that aim to bring out scientific conclusions. They are principled in a way Wikipedians can appreciate, taking a critical view of their sources. PRISMA flow diagram for a systematic review Ben Goldacre in 2014 wrote (link below) "[...] : the "information architecture" of evidence based medicine (if you can tolerate such a phrase) is a chaotic, ad hoc, poorly connected ecosystem of legacy projects. In some respects the whole show is still run on paper, like it's the 19th century." Is there a Wikidatan in the house? Wouldn't some machine-readable content that is structured data help? File:Schittny, Facing East, 2011, Legacy Projects.jpg 2011 photograph by Bernard Schittny of the "Legacy Projects" group Most likely it would, but the arcana of systematic reviews and how they add value would still need formal handling. The PRISMA standard dates from 2009, with an update started in 2018. The concerns there include the corpus of papers used: how selected and filtered? Now that Wikidata has a 20.9 million item bibliography, one can at least pose questions. Each systematic review is a tagging opportunity for a bibliography. Could that tagging be reproduced by a query, in principle? Can it even be second-guessed by a query (i.e. simulated by a protocol which translates into SPARQL)? Homing in on the arcana, do the inclusion and filtering criteria translate into metadata? At some level they must, but are these metadata explicitly expressed in the articles themselves? The answer to that is surely "no" at this point, but can TDM find them? Again "no", right now. Automatic identification doesn't just happen. Actually these questions lack originality. It should be noted though that WP:MEDRS, the reliable sources guideline used here for health information, hinges on the assumption that the usefully systematic reviews of biomedical literature can be recognised. Its nutshell summary, normally the part of a guideline with the highest density of common sense, allows literature reviews in general validity, but WP:MEDASSESS qualifies that indication heavily. Process wonkery about systematic reviews definitely has merit. Links Evidence-Based Practice: Appraise, resources page from Duke University Medical Library & Archives. What should Cochrane do next?, Bad Science blogpost 5 November 2014, Ben Goldacre. Cambridge (UK) Science Festival event, How do scientific discoveries become clinical medicine?, ScienceSource workshop for ContentMine 23 March 2019, with systematic review process diagram. Also on Eventbrite for tickets, taking place in Makespace, 16 Mill Lane. PROSPERO database of PRISMA, for registration of systematic review protocols. Process wonkery thread, wikien-l mailing list, September 2006. Meta-Analysis, xkcd cartoon. If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:02, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Help me!

I have inserted an image (the top one) in Elizabeth Nodder. It shows in the preview but there is only an empty space in the published article. Can you help?

MargaretRDonald (talk) 22:47, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

The Naturalist's miscellany? I can see that image correctly. Maybe it's a cache issue? You could try reloading the page. Huon (talk) 22:54, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Great. I'll cease worrying. MargaretRDonald (talk) 23:02, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Images

Hello Margaret, I am sorry our paths have not crossed at meet-ups. I want to thank you personally for your fantastic maps on plant pages (and everything else as well). Also want you to know I only reverted your edit on the D. pulchellum talk page because there were already two requests for images there. ("Wikipedia requested images of plants" and "Wikipedia requested photographs in Australia".) Three seemed a bit much. I get your meaning though. Now there's just one. `Good thing is, it's prompted me to go looking for images myself when it's in flower - it grows not too far from where I live. (Also to expand the article.) Just need a bit of rain!! Gderrin (talk) 05:12, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Hopefully, we will catch up soon, and I hope despite the rain you have some luck in your image hunting. MargaretRDonald (talk) 12:41, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Wrong photo for Ursinia anthemoides

As a person who uses Wikipedia but does not write articles, I appreciate the work you do. I want to point out something that seems clearly incorrect: the photo on the page for Ursinia anthemoides appears to be something else altogether, certainly not the variety known as "Solar Fire."2601:644:200:85ED:6871:F66D:BE47:769A (talk) 19:46, 23 March 2019 (UTC) Bill Gretter

Dear Bill, thank you for this. For what it is worth, the photograph is of the seeds ("with their flower like wings" and not of the flower. MargaretRDonald (talk) 20:08, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

April 2019

April 2019, Volume 5, Issue 4, Numbers 107, 108, 114, 115, 116, 117 Hello and welcome to the April events of Women in Red! Please join us for these virtual events: New topics: Gender studies / United Nations / Dance Geofocus: Portuguese-speakers Continuing initiatives: Suffrage / #1day1woman Other ways you can participate: Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred Subscription options: Opt-in (EN-WP) / Opt-in (international) / Unsubscribe

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:00, 25 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

(Please excuse this post if it is a duplicate!)

Facto Post – Issue 22 – 28 March 2019

Facto Post – Issue 22 – 28 March 2019 The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page. To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer. Back numbers are here. When in the cloud, do as the APIs do Half a century ago, it was the era of the mainframe computer, with its air-conditioned room, twitching tape-drives, and appearance in the title of a spy novel Billion-Dollar Brain then made into a Hollywood film. Now we have the cloud, with server farms and the client–server model as quotidian: this text is being typed on a Chromebook. File:Cloud-API-Logo.svg Logo of Cloud API on Google Cloud Platform The term Applications Programming Interface or API is 50 years old, and refers to a type of software library as well as the interface to its use. While a compiler is what you need to get high-level code executed by a mainframe, an API out in the cloud somewhere offers a chance to perform operations on a remote server. For example, the multifarious bots active on Wikipedia have owners who exploit the MediaWiki API. APIs (called RESTful) that allow for the GET HTTP request are fundamental for what could colloquially be called "moving data around the Web"; from which Wikidata benefits 24/7. So the fact that the Wikidata SPARQL endpoint at query.wikidata.org has a RESTful API means that, in lay terms, Wikidata content can be GOT from it. The programming involved, besides the SPARQL language, could be in Python, younger by a few months than the Web. Magic words, such as occur in fantasy stories, are wishful (rather than RESTful) solutions to gaining access. You may need to be a linguist to enter Ali Baba's cave or the western door of Moria (French in the case of "Open Sesame", in fact, and Sindarin being the respective languages). Talking to an API requires a bigger toolkit, which first means you have to recognise the tools in terms of what they can do. On the way to the wikt:impactful or polymathic modern handling of facts, one must perhaps take only tactful notice of tech's endemic problem with documentation, and absorb the insightful point that the code in APIs does articulate the customary procedures now in place on the cloud for getting information. As Owl explained to Winnie-the-Pooh, it tells you The Thing to Do. Links Wikidata as a semantic framework for the Gene Wiki initiative, 2016 paper by Andrawaag and others, commenting inter alia on the role of the API on Wikidata Working With Wikibase From Go, Digital Flapjack blogpost 26 November 2018, Michael Dales, developer for ScienceSource using golang, with a software engineer's view on Wikibase and the MediaWiki API Dealing with the Rust, Magnus Manske blogpost 12 March 2019, on the Rust language and the MediaWiki API mw:API:RecentChanges, mediawiki.org page on the API for access to "recent changes" on a wiki wikitech:Analytics/AQS/Pageviews, wikitech.wikimedia.org for the Pageview API, giving Wikimedia traffic information xkcd cartoon, API Guide If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:45, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

A line

Your approach to contributing to articles is going to be raised at a notice board, it strongly discouraging to get metres of seemingly coherent but actually circular self justification for a minuscule contribution that looks like some who heard of wikipedia yesterday. Your recent contribution read like a talk page comment that somehow ended up in the article. I did hours of work on a high profile page and you inserted some historical data that I had already established was out of date, about two minutes effort maximum on your part and I did not dare touch it for the hours you could waste in discussing you and your contribution. A copy editor revised it your contribution the moment they saw, with a rude comment about the same and I hoped you would start up with them instead. I still work around your contributions if I go near any article you have added before, and avoided articles to avoid your exhausting self-vindication. If someone enjoyed wasting other peoples time this is an excellent way to go about it, but it is possible that you cannot be wrong, either way this is your last warning because I am prepared to invest time in demonstrating a net loss via your contributions. Your options are to accept that everyone else is slightly or very wrong and not waste their time where only you have convinced yourself that you are right to engage in the community in this demonstrably unproductive way. cygnis insignis 17:18, 6 April 2019 (UTC)