User talk:MOTORAL1987

Nomination of 2014 FIFA World Cup Third Place Play-Off for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2014 FIFA World Cup Third Place Play-Off is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 FIFA World Cup Third Place Play-Off until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Raymond "Giggs" Ko 06:19, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Waitrose may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[File:Waitrose, Peterborough (Station Entrance (2014).jpg|thumb|right|The Waitrose branch in [[Peterborough, Cambridgeshire|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:48, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2008 Summer Olympics closing ceremony flag bearers

Please don't create and abandon articles like 2008 Summer Olympics closing ceremony flag bearers ever again. The completely incorrect information you added there has been on Wikipedia for more than two years now and been seen by thousands of people. If you don't have the correct information, or don't have the time to add it, then don't create the page or leave the information out. Knowingly including false information is vandalism. Fram (talk) 10:03, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1975 referendum: errors in numbers of YES votes

The numbers of yes votes were originally shown as: Wales 869135; All UK 17378581: and the numbers tally.

However at some stage you changed these figures to: Wales 865139; All UK 17378851; and the numbers no longer tally.

Will you correct these in both articles?----Ehrenkater (talk) 16:10, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Of course I will correct it as it not a intentional change I just copied it down wrong. (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 12:43, 2 June 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Your contributed article, Accession of the United Kingdom to the European Economic Community

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Accession of the United Kingdom to the European Economic Community. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Enlargement of the European Union. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Enlargement of the European Union – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. 331dot (talk) 13:38, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please note: Per request on my talk page, this article has been restored and the deletion discussion has been re-opened. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 14:07, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello MOTORAL1987. All or some of your addition(s) to Results of the United Kingdom European Communities membership referendum, 1975 has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:10, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello, I'm KNHaw. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events have been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KNHaw ^(talk) 21:19, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of British political crisis, 2016

The article British political crisis, 2016 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This appears to be a largely factually accurate account of somewhat related major political events but their portrayal as one recognised phenomenon and characterisation as a crisis seems to be unsupported, novel and POV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mutt Lunker (talk) 11:14, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 22 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Results of the United Kingdom Alternative Vote referendum, 2011 page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, MOTORAL1987. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Brexit referendum

For some reason that I don't understand, I'm not being given the option to give an edit note on my reversion of your addition of a flag to Template:Brexit referendum, so see Template talk:Brexit referendum. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 18:26, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

European Economic Area Act 1993

The dates & locations given in the text and in the infobox do not agree. Cabayi (talk) 11:11, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill 2017

Hello, I'm 87.102.116.36. Your recent edit to the page European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill 2017 appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The Bill is actually not extended to Gibraltar, and nowhere in the Bill actually says so (mentions Gibraltar). Foreign and external affairs and relations of Gibraltar are already officially handled by the UK (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland; of England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland) and HM Government [in the UK] (the UK (Home)) Government) anyway. This is absolute, patent British (and Gibraltar) constitutional nonsense! -- 87.102.116.36 (talk) 21:20, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying licensed material requires proper attribution

Hi. I see in a recent addition to European Union (Finance) Act 2015 you included material from a webpage that is available under an Open Parliament Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this legal requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:50, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cricket World Cups

I've reverted all the page moves, as "YYYY Cricket World Cup" is correct as per WP:UCN. Please see discussions here and here and request a move if you disagree. Spike 'em (talk) 10:34, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On a similar note, regarding your recent move of Grenfell Tower fire, it might be better if you were to raise potential moves at WP:RM rather than moving pages. I've known editors end up at WP:ANI over problematic page moving, with the result that they are either restricted from moving pages at all, or end up blocked. Would rather not see that happen if at all possible. Mjroots (talk) 12:40, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Point taken look I am sorry for not consultanting the talk page first and I apologise but I don't like some of the personal stuff that has been thrown at me in response, I just have a slightly different view of things but all on the same boat and I think it's really sad that my slight different views can't be quite taken into account what's the difference between using the word fire or disaster? (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 12:44, 24 June 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Fire is less "tabloid", but if anyone searches for "Grenfell Tower disaster", the redirect will get them to the article. Have asked at Grenfell Tower fire talk page for people to back off a bit. Mjroots (talk) 12:47, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve European Communities (Amendment) Act 2002

Hi, I'm Boleyn. MOTORAL1987, thanks for creating European Communities (Amendment) Act 2002!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 19:53, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve European Union (Approval of Treaty Amendment Decision) Act 2012

Hi, I'm Boleyn. MOTORAL1987, thanks for creating European Union (Approval of Treaty Amendment Decision) Act 2012!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. All articles should have sources. The WP:BURDEN is on the creator to add these when they add the information.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 19:54, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Proposed second United Kingdom European Union membership / final deal referendum

The article Proposed second United Kingdom European Union membership / final deal referendum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources are given

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 05:47, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

West Indies cricket team

I've undone your page move and started discussion at WT:CRIC. WP:COMMONNAME holds here. Spike 'em (talk) 14:12, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Proposed second United Kingdom European Union membership / final deal referendum for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Proposed second United Kingdom European Union membership / final deal referendum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proposed second United Kingdom European Union membership / final deal referendum until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 14:40, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nibiru

Can you do me a favor and revert the nibiru prediction again on the list of predicted apocalypses? Someone added it again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ROBDude (talk • contribs) 17:17, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, MOTORAL1987. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note

I think you've been editing {{2018 Winter Olympics Calendar}} whilst logged out. Primefac (talk) 18:43, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Hello. You've just broken WP:3RR on the referendum articles. Please self-revert or I'm afraid I'll be requesting your account be blocked. Cheers, Number 5 7 19:03, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted as I was not aware of this rule I apologies I am just very frustrated at this problem. (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 19:08, 30 March 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Thank you. I'm sorry you're frustrated, but we have a referendum template for a reason – to ensure consistency. When people start making up their own templates, we lose that consistency, and it can then become a problem on other articles when editors see a table in one article and start making arguments along the lines of "if it's ok there, why can't we use it here" etc. Number 5 7 19:09, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is been no problem until today with the template for the EU referendum, in fact I have built on the template and used it in other articles as I think it’s much clearer to see and also it has a nice professional quality to it and I am really upset that it’s no longer accepted when it’s been on the article for about a year. (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 19:13, 30 March 2018 (UTC))[reply]

It doesn't matter that something hasn't been identified as a problem for a certain amount of time – some issues on Wikipedia are not corrected for many years. And it was creating problems because people were occasionally trying to copy the format into other articles. Again, I'm sorry that you're upset, but really you should never have created a non-standard table in the first place when we already had an existing one. I think the template also violates WP:MOSICON as there is no reason for the flag to be included. Number 5 7 19:17, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well good luck with all the reverting as virtually all UK referendum articles carry this version of the template and I am very proud of my work regardless of weither it has broken rules or not. (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 19:24, 30 March 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Just to let you know, if you revert across any of the articles again, then I'm going to be requesting that your main account is blocked. If you then continue to edit through IPs, all your edits will be immediately reverted and the block on your main account will be extended significantly. Number 5 7 11:36, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited European Union (Referendum) Bill 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page European Communities Act 1972 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (European Union Withdrawal Agreement (Public Vote) Bill 2017-19) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating European Union Withdrawal Agreement (Public Vote) Bill 2017-19, MOTORAL1987!

Wikipedia editor Kudpung just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please correct the grammar and spelling

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:31, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Drought Act 1976

Hi, I'm Boleyn. MOTORAL1987, thanks for creating Drought Act 1976!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 20:36, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is going to be much more differcult than I expected as the Act is not available on UK legislation and also there are hardly any links which provide information about the Act itself, what I used and thought was correct was wrong. (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 20:51, 5 July 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Ah, don't worry. I'll move it from mainspace to draftspace and then you can work on it there and move it back when/if you find a good source. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 06:20, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give First Minister and deputy First Minister (Northern Ireland) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 18:13, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

First of all I do sincerely apologise for this outcome, I made a missive mistake when I capitalise the deputy first Minister when I titled it as “First Minister and Depty First Minister of Northern Ireland and I am trying to change it to to “First Minister and depty first Minister of Northern Ireland” however my efforts have lost the talk page as a result, please can you help so we can have a correct and proper title for this article along with its talk page. (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 18:18, 15 August 2018 (UTC))[reply]

I don't have the right permissions to do what you need. I would ask at requested moves. I would expect it to be an uncontroversial move. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 19:19, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Politics of the British Indian Ocean Territory moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Politics of the British Indian Ocean Territory, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 19:50, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there i am aware however I have accidentally made a botch up, there is a full template however I have moved the template several times all the links to each other have been loads can you go in, find and link them all back up and so we can just have one template under the title Poitics of the British Indian Ocean Territory. (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 19:52, 10 October 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Politics of the British Indian Ocean Territory (October 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Politics of the British Indian Ocean Territory and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Politics of the British Indian Ocean Territory, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:10, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MOTORAL1987! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:10, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve The European Union Referendum (Conduct) Regulations 2016

Hi, I'm Boleyn.

Thanks for creating The European Union Referendum (Conduct) Regulations 2016.

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix.

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 06:30, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve The European Union Referendum (Date of Referendum etc.) Regulations 2016

Thanks for creating The European Union Referendum (Date of Referendum etc.) Regulations 2016.

A New Page Patroller Boleyn just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Please add references to all your creations.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 08:13, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, MOTORAL1987. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Olympic Calendars.

I personally like the Olympic Calendars for each Olympic games being interactive. Just wondering why you removed this feature. M0ntenegro (talk) 19:50, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t understand what you mean, please explain more so I can understand? (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 18:28, 8 February 2019 (UTC))[reply]

2019 Melrose Sevens moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2019 Melrose Sevens, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption and post it should the event actually go ahead. In both this and the 2018 article, can I ask what form of unique tense is meant by repeated use of "was be"?. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Nick Moyes (talk) 00:13, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Politics of the British Indian Ocean Territory

Hello, MOTORAL1987. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Politics of the British Indian Ocean Territory".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Phospheros (talk) 17:50, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Drought Act 1976

Hello, MOTORAL1987. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Drought Act 1976".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 16:09, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong Act 1985 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hong Kong Act 1985, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:31, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:2019 Melrose Sevens

Hello, MOTORAL1987. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:2019 Melrose Sevens.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:20, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brexit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liberal Democrats (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How to denote a signatory to a treaty who subsequently withdrew from it

Just a note to assure you that I recognise your good faith in trying to find a way to denote a signatory to a treaty who subsequently withdrew from it. It is a very important issue, with widespread implications. For example, what if a signatory withdrew unilaterally? Or signed it and then ignored it anyway? Yes, we need some way to indicate such things but I really believe that it is too important for a WP:BEBOLD. It needs raising at wikipedia talk:Manual of Style first. As you identified the issue first, then you should be the one to raise it: I will definitely support your doing so if you do a reply here or leave a note on my talk page. I can easily see a consensus around your proposal (I don't have a better one other than using a footnote like in a book, maybe we can be cleverer than that). --Red King (talk) 17:10, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for messaging me, I will raise this issue with them immediately as we need to find a way forward on this. (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 17:51, 2 February 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Edits of April 2020

Hi @MOTORAL1987:. I have reverted your edits to the Children (Abolition of Defence of Reasonable Punishment) (Wales) Act 2020 and Senedd and Elections (Wales) Act 2020. Acts of the National Assembly for Wales are simply known as Welsh Acts for short and this is the name used on the Infobox UK Legislation template. Llemiles (talk) 20:53, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Brexit topics template: bye-elections

If you look at the recent history of that template, you will see that I reverted the addition of four bye-elections in 2016 and 2017, because no reason was given and it seemed to me to be just more clutter. You have just added a couple more but not those ones. I'm walking away now but maybe you should either add those four or else add a comment to explain the criteria for inclusion. There is no doubt, for example, that Goldsmith lost the Richmond Park bye-election because of being a hard brexiteer in a strongly remain constituency. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 14:55, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited European Communities Act 1972 (Repeal) Bills, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page European Communities Act 1972 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:21, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for that, my mistake entirely it is now fixed (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 21:09, 8 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Draft:Hong Kong Act 1985 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Hong Kong Act 1985, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Partnership Council

Thanks!!! Good move in putting the side box--Carrasco (talk) 12:42, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 12:45, 29 December 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hong Kong Act 1985 has been accepted

Hong Kong Act 1985, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:43, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox European Union membership

Template:Infobox European Union membership has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 17:13, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:2018 Winter Olympics Participating National Olympic Committees

Template:2018 Winter Olympics Participating National Olympic Committees has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 15:00, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:2019 Cricket World Cup tournament progress

Template:2019 Cricket World Cup tournament progress has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 14:34, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moving a page

Hello, just a quick message to say that when moving a page, it can't be done by copying and pasting, WP:RM#CM has instructions on how to request that a page be moved.

Best wishes NemesisAT (talk) 15:27, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that I was wanting to kinda bring the article into line with the Irish article. I don’t know why the UK article has to be classed as a “list” but in light of what you have said I have reverted all changes to before I started making changes, sorry. (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 15:33, 10 March 2022 (UTC))[reply]

No problem. If you want to propose a move I reccommend using WP:TWINKLE and once you have that installed, in the "TW" dropdown that appears in the desktop skin you can select "XFD" and then "Requested Moves" in the drop down that appears. Hope this helps NemesisAT (talk) 15:37, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Sports at the 2022 Commonwealth Games, you may be blocked from editing. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:56, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:2022 Commonwealth Games calendar

Template:2022 Commonwealth Games calendar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 01:43, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Member states of the European Union sidebar

Template:Member states of the European Union sidebar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. DrKay (talk) 20:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retained EU law (UK law) moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating Retained EU law (UK law). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can add citations to reliable sources to support the information in the article.

You can see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page or leave me a message on my talk page. House Blaster^talk 22:36, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aftermath of the 2016 United Kingdom European Union membership referendum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lincoln.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:37, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category suppression needed at User:MOTORAL1987

Hi. Just a friendly reminder about user page categorization.

I've noticed your user page (linked above) is appearing in regular content categories. See Category:United Kingdom politics sidebar templates under R. This is discouraged. See WP:DRAFTNOCAT and WP:USERNOCAT for additional information.

Usually the situation is remedied by placing a leading colon at the beginning of each category declaration like so:

[[:Category:United Kingdom politics sidebar templates]]

or, by bracketing any category declaration(s) with Template:Draft categories like this:

{{Draft categories|
[[Category:United Kingdom politics sidebar templates]]
}}

Either method will disable the category function. Thank you. Cheers! --DB1729^talk 13:24, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for bringing this to my attention, what is it I might have inadvertently done as specifically to which article or sidebar? (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 17:03, 2 May 2023 (UTC))[reply]

You categorized your user page. See User:MOTORAL1987. Would you prefer that I fix the problem on your behalf? I would be more than happy to take care of it. DB1729^talk 17:13, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah I understand now, yes please feel free to sort this out on my behalf and thank you I was working on a article and I must have forgotten to remove the link in question, have a great evening. (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 17:17, 2 May 2023 (UTC))[reply]

Done[1]. Have a great rest of your day:) DB1729^talk 17:20, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:1896 Summer Olympics calendar

Template:1896 Summer Olympics calendar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:18, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:1952 Winter Olympics calendar

Template:1952 Winter Olympics calendar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:18, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:1960 Winter Olympics calendar

Template:1960 Winter Olympics calendar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:19, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:1964 Summer Olympics calendar

Template:1964 Summer Olympics calendar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:19, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:1968 Summer Olympics calendar

Template:1968 Summer Olympics calendar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:19, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:1972 Summer Olympics calendar

Template:1972 Summer Olympics calendar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:20, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:1984 Winter Olympics calendar

Template:1984 Winter Olympics calendar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:20, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:1988 Winter Olympics calendar

Template:1988 Winter Olympics calendar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:20, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:1992 Summer Olympics calendar

Template:1992 Summer Olympics calendar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:20, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:1996 Summer Olympics calendar

Template:1996 Summer Olympics calendar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:20, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:1998 Winter Olympics calendar

Template:1998 Winter Olympics calendar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:20, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:2000 Summer Olympics calendar

Template:2000 Summer Olympics calendar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:20, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:UKEU2016ResultsNoMaps

Template:UKEU2016ResultsNoMaps has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:54, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2021 Rugby League World Cups

Hello, MOTORAL1987. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2021 Rugby League World Cups, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Retained EU law (UK law)

Hello, MOTORAL1987. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Retained EU law (UK law), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2021 Rugby League World Cups

Hello, MOTORAL1987. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2021 Rugby League World Cups".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:37, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Retained EU law (UK law)

Hello, MOTORAL1987. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Retained EU law".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:45, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited European Communities Act 1972 (Repeal) Bills, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page European Communities Act 1972.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My apologises I have corrected the mistake and the link now goes to the correct article. (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 06:16, 18 November 2023 (UTC))[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your Request

Hi, you have a request here which I'm currently working on. To be able to get further I need your feedback on some questions I have there, thanks for your support. --always ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 12:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Risegate a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good Evening @User:Crouch, Swale I do apologise I was simply trying to move the Risegate article into “Gosberton Risegate as it had already been created as the villege is officially called “Gosberton Risegate” not “Risegate”. (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 17:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Wikiproject invitation

@MOTORAL1987:, I would like to invite you to Draft:WikiProject food and drink industry in England, if you would like to be a part of the wikiproject please add you name to the list of participants.ChefBear01 (talk) 08:55, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lincolnshire Wolds, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lincoln.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah sorry my mistake I will correct that right now (2A02:C7C:6A52:CF00:9A3:86E5:E7C6:91FC (talk) 19:56, 25 October 2024 (UTC))[reply]