User talk:M.k.m2003/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, M.k.m2003, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Asre jadid, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ryzensai (talk) 20:01, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Asre jadid

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Asre jadid requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ryzensai (talk) 20:01, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Atashghah castle moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Atashghah castle, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 20:26, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

Hello, I'm Mikenorton. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Rock (geology) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Mikenorton (talk) 14:30, 6 June 2019 (UTC) Mikenorton Hello, this is my picture

Ways to improve Atashgah castle

Hello, M.k.m2003,

Thanks for creating Atashgah castle! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This has been tagged for 3 issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 11:18, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Avengement moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Avengement, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 13:37, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Asmongold

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Asmongold requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  GILO   A&E⇑  19:19, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Tomb of Hassan Modarres moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tomb of Hassan Modarres, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 09:39, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Rig castle moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rig castle, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:37, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rig castle (June 18)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by JalenFolf was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Jalen D. Folf (talk) 17:13, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, M.k.m2003! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jalen D. Folf (talk) 17:13, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Kashmar carpet moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kashmar carpet, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 17:17, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Atashgah castle moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Atashgah castle, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 17:20, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Asre jadid (new era) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Asre jadid (new era), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 17:21, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Ehsan Alikhani moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ehsan Alikhani, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 17:30, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Kashmar in castle

A tag has been placed on Category:Kashmar in castle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:51, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Kashmar carpet for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kashmar carpet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kashmar carpet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Masum Reza^📞 22:39, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Kashmar Carpet. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Masum Reza^📞 09:57, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Tomb of Hassan Modarres

Hello, M.k.m2003,

Thanks for creating Tomb of Hassan Modarres! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This has been tagged for 2 issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 18:33, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

I noticed that you have posted comments to the page User talk:Mardetanha in a language other than English. At the English-language Wikipedia, we try to use English for all comments. Posting all comments in English makes it easier for other editors to join the conversation and help you. If you cannot avoid using another language, then please provide a translation into English, if you can. If you cannot provide a translation, please go to the list of Wikipedias, look in the list for a Wikipedia that is in your language, and edit there instead of here. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 15:57, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello User:JalenFolf Good User talk:Mardetanha M.k.m2003 (talk) 16:07, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Omid Sharifi Dana

Hello M.k.m2003,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Omid Sharifi Dana for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bensci54 (talk) 16:57, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. - LouisAragon (talk) 22:03, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Asre jadid (new era) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Asre jadid (new era), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 02:16, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

independent , reliable sources are needed

Hello M.K2003, Greetings. Many of your articles have move to draft space and the message indicated to you is that the content claimed in the articles needs significant coverage (at least 3) independent , reliable sources where by the sources talk about the subject in length and in dept and not merely passing mentioned. If you move mainspace it will either be moved back to draft space or be nominated for delete as the articles do not meet the notability requirements. The articles which do not meet the requirement will be nominated for deletion no matter how long it has in Wikipedia mainspace. Do note the editor who input/change the content need to provide the source to prove the content is derived from independent, reliable sources - see WP:PROVEIT. Sources from official website, user generated site, press releases, sites associated with the subject and etc can NOT be used to contribute/demonstrate notability requirements. Sources from major newspapers, books, reliable journals are good sources. Pl provide inline citation (sources) (at least 3) then submit for review, and pls see referencing for info and instruction. For web sources you can use Template:Cite Web "horizontal" format. Pls also read WP:Your First Article and Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything. Click on all the blue highlighted texts for more info. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 02:27, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully on the page Ali Khamenei, but because it appeared to be irrelevant to the article or violated the image use policy, it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Benyamin-ln (talk) 11:28, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Old Bazaar of Kermanshah moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Old Bazaar of Kermanshah, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 08:02, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Mena Massoud. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:09, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Also see this. He has the right to define the correct spelling of his own name and WP:COMMONNAME defines how Wikipedia titles articles. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:41, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Karimabad, Pulwama, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 20:36, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

User:Geraldo Perez okay thanks M.k.m2003 (talk) 09:28, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Jameh Mosque of Lar

Hello, M.k.m2003,

Thanks for creating Jameh Mosque of Lar! I edit here too, under the username Saff V. and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Thanks to contribution but more RSes is needed to confirm Notability

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Saff V.}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Saff V. (talk) 12:59, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Chahar Suq And Hajj Muhammad Husayn Mosque

Hello, M.k.m2003,

Thanks for creating Chahar Suq And Hajj Muhammad Husayn Mosque! I edit here too, under the username Bensci54 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This one is worded such that it seems its claim to notability is being across from a certain Seminary.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bensci54}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bensci54 (talk) 19:46, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Imamzadeh Hamzeh, Kashmar) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Imamzadeh Hamzeh, Kashmar.

User:Masum Ibn Musa while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thanks for the creating this article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Masum Ibn Musa}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

— Masum Ibn Musa  ^Conversation 06:33, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Thanks for creating Farahabad Mosque.

User:Masum Ibn Musa while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thanks for the creating the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Masum Ibn Musa}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

— Masum Ibn Musa  ^Conversation 13:50, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Thanks for creating Malek al-Abbas Mosque.

User:TheLongTone while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

What a gorgeous looking building

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

TheLongTone (talk) 14:26, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heydar Yaghma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

When you don't know where to go in the future

Hi there,

Editors were a little snappy for your mis-posting on the Administrators' Noticeboard.

If there's a situation where you don't know where to post (there's so many pages), the best place to ask is TEAHOUSE. They don't assume any knowledge and are pretty rapid at answering. Nosebagbear (talk) 09:50, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

The administrators' noticeboards (WP:AN and WP:AN/I) are not for settling content disputes between editors, or for requesting alphabetization, or for anything except solving problems involving the behavior of editors - so only post there when there is a problem with another editor's behavior that is not a simple dispute about the content of a page. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:12, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Asmongold listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Asmongold. Since you had some involvement with the Asmongold redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. – Thjarkur (talk) 15:53, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

WP:RS

Consider page Jameh Mosque of Dezful, for example. First ref is to "Encyclopedia of History of Iranshahr Architecture". Clicking to the link leads to a .zip file. This should never happen. This should be something easily readable and verifiable. Please see WP:RS. Note that for a book (e.g. Encyclopedia of History of Iranshahr Architecture) one should provide pages for in-line citation, ISBN number, year and the place of publication, and authors/editors. My very best wishes (talk) 16:26, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Wine Container

Hello, M.k.m2003,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Finngall and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, List of Wine Container, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Finngall}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

--Finngall ^talk 16:43, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Community topic ban from article creation

As per this discussion, the community has banned you from creating articles. That means, you are not allowed to create articles, in any namespace. If you do, you will be blocked from editing. Sandstein 18:07, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Comment

M.k.m2003, you still can improve existing pages and upload images if they are consistent with copyright. When your English improves (and it will be evident from your editing!), you can ask to lift your ban on the ANI. But I doubt you can do it any time soon. My very best wishes (talk) 20:04, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

File source problem with File:سد شاهی.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:سد شاهی.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 13:13, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Yamla Hi, how can I add information؟؟ M.k.m2003 (talk) 13:23, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Yamla Downloaded from this News Agency! https://www.mizanonline.com/fa/news/166332/%D8%B3%D8%AF-%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%AE%DB%8C-%D8%B4%D8%A7%D9%87%DB%8C-%DA%A9%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%B2-%D8%AF%D8%B1-%DA%A9%D9%88%D9%87%D8%B3%D8%B1%D8%AE-%D8%AE%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%B1%D8%B6%D9%88%DB%8C-%D8%AA%D8%B5%D8%A7%D9%88%DB%8C%D8%B1 M.k.m2003 (talk) 13:29, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

If you downloaded it from the news agency, please immediately delete it. WP:FAIRUSE prohibits the use of copyrighted images in such cases; what you've done is violate copyright, and that's pretty serious. In general, the information you are asking about is linked in the notice I provided you. For example, there's lots of information at WP:IMAGEPOL. If you have specific questions, I'm happy to point you in the right direction. But please read WP:IMAGEPOL and all associated information, first! Thanks. :) --Yamla (talk) 13:30, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

…Or an administrator will speedily delete it. (I just did.) —C.Fred (talk) 13:50, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Encyclopaedia of the Iranian Architectural History.png

Thank you for uploading File:Encyclopaedia of the Iranian Architectural History.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 13:38, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

• I have done you the courtesy of adding the necessary tags to describe the source of the image and how it is being used. If you upload any further non-free works, please make sure you add similar templates as appropriate. —C.Fred (talk) 14:03, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Blocked

You are aware you are under a WP:TOPICBAN and are not permitted to create pages. You have violated this with Lady and the Tramp (disambiguation) and with Talk:Lady and the Tramp (disambiguation). As such, I have blocked you for 48 hours. Please note that blocks for violating topic bans escalate very quickly. If you are caught violating the topic ban again, you may find yourself blocked for a substantially prolonged time, or perhaps indefinitely. --Yamla (talk) 22:01, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Yamla Hi, does it include disambiguation? I did not know! Sorry! M.k.m2003 (talk) 22:07, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

It does. And no problem! You are free to continue editing once the block expires. And you are free to continue improving the articles you have already created! You just can't create any new articles, not even as drafts. --Yamla (talk) 22:32, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Yet again, you have violated your topic ban by creating Showqabad (disambiguation). This time, you are blocked for three months. Note this is probably your final chance; if you continue creating pages once this block expires, you should expect to be blocked indefinitely next time. --Yamla (talk) 12:23, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

!

Yamla Hi why are you blocking me again? M.k.m2003 (talk) 12:27, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

YamlaShowqabad (disambiguation) !!!Why!!!!! I didn't create that page!!!

You most certainly did. I have deleted it now, but you most certainly did create it. For those with the ability to review deleted pages, see Special:Undelete/Showqabad_(disambiguation). M.k.m2003 created it on 2019-08-12 at 11:57:05 UTC. Even without the ability to view deleted pages, it shows up at Special:Log/M.k.m2003. Note that M.k.m2003 specifically asked about creating redirects, above, and was told that was covered by the ban. --Yamla (talk) 13:10, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Yamla okay thanks. M.k.m2003 (talk) 13:13, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

I am against this behavior of managers

Sandstein Hi, I was blocked due to By community consensus but why should this happen? . When I was blocked, I thought it was okay to disambiguation But I was blocked for 3 days, but I didn't know that I shouldn't disambiguation .OK it was wrong of me!! I created Showqabad (disambiguation) because of the link to this page I didn't create the page at all, I just needed it to edit.OK .Practically, I didn't do this, so why would Yamla block me for 3 months?. Please open the menu .Because I haven't been told this.OK Virtually I create the page just for the the transfer. M.k.m2003 (talk) 21:33, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

You are forbidden from creating pages. Do not create pages. Then you will not be blocked. Sandstein 21:35, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Sandstein I did not create a page why I should be blocked M.k.m2003 (talk) 21:45, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

You asked about creating disambiguation pages, and you were specifically told that you may not create them. That's what got you blocked on 7 August. You were blocked on 12 August for creating a redirect. On the one hand, it's not strictly an article. On the other, your topic ban is for creating articles, broadly construed. In other words, as Sandstein said, you should not create any page (or at least, not one that isn't a talk page). And you certainly don't help your case when you admit to "creat[ing] the page just for the transfer"—in other words, you knew you were creating a page, which you aren't supposed to be doing. —C.Fred (talk) 21:47, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

C.Fred Okay I know, but I created the disambiguation first, but the second time I linked! M.k.m2003 (talk) 21:50, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

C.Fred And Sandstein, I was totally blocked because of the pages for people to read. Why should I be blocked for a disambiguation? I really can't understand it. M.k.m2003 (talk) 22:04, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

• Question to admins: Is he banned from creating file pages too? I mean when someone uploads a new file, it automatically creates a page for it. But this doesn't happen when overwriting existing files. Masum Reza^📞 22:11, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

"That means, you are not allowed to create articles, in any namespace". WP:BROADLY applies here. So I would say yes, it includes files, because files are part of "any namespace" and because WP:BROADLY applies. However, this is something the user is welcome to seek clarity on, as they did with disambiguation pages (though they then immediately violated that prohibition). Of the two uploaded files, one was unambiguously a copyright violation. Note that the prohibition does not apply to Commons, only to en.wiki, though I'd strongly urge this user to be cautious, to make sure they understand Wikipedia's policies and guidelines around image uploads. --Yamla (talk) 23:41, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

 Note: As of 23:49, 13 August 2019 (UTC), this user is blocked on three wikis. Indefinitely on two of them, including their homewiki. They are blocked on Commons, so I don't think they will be able to upload files there. Masum Reza^📞 23:49, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

M.k.m2003, it's possible the first time you violated your topic ban, it was accidental. That's why you got a short block. It's to make sure you understand. And you did understand! You specifically asked if disambiguation pages were included in your topic ban. I told you they were included in your topic ban. If you didn't understand, you were obligated to stop and ask for clarification. So, either you didn't understand, in which case we should frankly extend the block indefinitely because we need you to understand our rules and policies. Or you did understand and broke the topic ban anyway, in which case we should extend the block indefinitely. Or you did understand but made a mistake, in which case the block is appropriate. You are free to argue that disambiguation pages shouldn't be included in your topic ban, but not for six months. You'll have more success if you demonstrate a history of productive edits in that time. I'm reluctant to shorten or lift your block because, quite frankly, I don't believe you'll avoid further violations at this time and if you violate your topic ban again, there's really no other option than for us to block you indefinitely. You've been extremely problematic here and on two other wikis. We've worked hard to avoid an indefinite block here, but I fear that is the path you are heading toward. --Yamla (talk) 23:53, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Yamla Okay, as always I have to be blocked because am I only wikipedia for 3 months on wiki? And I don't know the rules well and try to understand but I can't get it because I'm blocked in 3 wikipedia! Je te comprends .OK But I really don't understand how to apply the rules And I can tell you thank you for being a manager and I'm your student M.k.m2003 (talk) 07:05, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

applying for ...

Yamla Is it possible to give discount on blocking?. Thank you M.k.m2003 (talk) 23:29, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

If you can clearly demonstrate you understand your topic ban and can convince us you won't ever violate it in the future. Note that any further violations will almost certainly result in an indefinite block. --Yamla (talk) 11:04, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Yamla I think I can M.k.m2003 (talk) 12:56, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

So far, you've demonstrated you can not. You previously even asked about whether creating disambiguation pages was a violation. You then immediately went and violated your ban by creating a new one. You need to convince us your future behaviour would be totally different from your past behaviour. --Yamla (talk) 13:11, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Can you give me one more chance?

Yamla Hi, I made this request, I said it might be different again, Of course I don't want to do much editing, I think you'll agree with that، You know the reason for my blocking after my limitation, Just 2 small mistakes!! That I know will not be repeated. Please give me a chance once .Thank You M.k.m2003 (talk) 17:17, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

This was not just two small mistakes. This was a prolonged series of mistakes that were significant enough for the community to decide to enact a topic ban. Which you then blatantly ignored and deliberately and repeatedly violated. Make an unblock request or don't. I don't think you are getting the point, so I won't be lifting your current block. --Yamla (talk) 17:54, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Yamla I disagree with you، About my mistakes, I admit the first mistake, But the second you know it was a lot. Please believe it will not be repeated again, Give me this opportunity,If repeated, block me endlessly. Please reconsider M.k.m2003 (talk) 18:13, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Yamla I created more than 1000 pages on Arabic Wikipedia, e you think of me as a lawbreaker,If not, trust me.

https://xtools.wmflabs.org/pages/ar.wikipedia.org/m.k.m2003 M.k.m2003 (talk) 18:26, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

I will not lift this block. You are welcome to request an unblock and I would not object if you are able to convince another administrator. --Yamla (talk) 18:59, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Can my account be opened after three requests?

TheSandDoctor Hi my account is due to lack of Sufficient resources Blocked In creating the article, But I closed my account because of a lot of funny mistakes, At first I thought it was okay to Disambiguation, My account was blocked for 1 week, The second mistake I'm still opposed to, I didn't create any pages, I just linked one page to another, I wanted to open my account three times, But he disagreed every three times, My English is not good And I want to do a little activity there ,If you can help me get my account open .Thank you M.k.m2003 (talk) 14:03, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Yamla is in a far better position to assist as they were the one who blocked you after you apparently continued to violate a topic ban. I am not in a position where I could "overrule" any party nor am I familiar enough with this case to comment. My apologies. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 14:10, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Just re-read the above. Stand by. Will aid with further instructions on requesting unblock. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 14:11, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Before you request an unblock, it is important to understand the full reasons for your block. Put all the relevant information into the unblock request. Do not include anything else. Please keep your mind calm and assume good faith on the part of our experienced administrators. If your appeal is rejected, please do not make a new one until you fully understand the reasons that it was declined.

To have your unblock reviewed, I would recommend pasting the following onto your talk page (probably below this message - be sure to replace "your reason here" with why you believe that you should be unblocked).

{{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}

Once you have posted that, I or another admin will review. If you have any questions, please let me know.--TheSandDoctor ^Talk 14:20, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

TheSandDoctor Thank you M.k.m2003 (talk) 14:32, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Fix blocking

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

M.k.m2003 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi I applied for it 3 times but it was rejected, think it's wrong to block me, I presented my reasons But it was not accepted! I only want you one thing:trust me, only this .Thank you M.k.m2003 (talk) 17:21, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

From your conversation with C.Fred below, it appears that not only do you not understand the scope of your topic ban, but you also do not understand what actions actually cause a page to be created. This does not give me any confidence that the topic ban will not be breached again in the future, so I am declining this appeal. Yunshui ^雲_水 07:16, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Before I act on this request, two questions for you. 1) Explain, in your own words, what your topic ban prohibits you from doing. 2) What types of edits would you make if you were unblocked? —C.Fred (talk) 18:27, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

C.Fred I have a question for you too، Am I blocked for my edits? For First answer You: I don't create an article Second answer: I do limited editing. M.k.m2003 (talk) 18:36, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

You are blocked because you violated your topic ban. Since you had to edit the encyclopedia to create pages...yes, you're blocked for your edits. What did you think you were blocked for? —C.Fred (talk) 18:49, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

C.Fred I just created a disambiguation I transferred it To the home screen, So if you notice I didn't create OK! I realized my mistake And I'm sorry, Just give me a chance M.k.m2003 (talk) 18:57, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

If you do not understand that creating a disambiguation is a violation of your topic ban against creating articles, then you do not understand your ban. I agree with Yunshui: you may not be unblocked at this time. —C.Fred (talk) 14:37, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Please give me a chance

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

M.k.m2003 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi I've been blocked for 3 months And I made many requests But all was opposed, I have said many times that I will have little activity And course I do not create articles, I don't know why he disagreed every time But this time I think it's different, Only trust once I'll do my best. Thank You M.k.m2003 (talk) 20:02, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Unfortunately time and time again you post messages which make it clear that you just don't understand what is being said to you. Your latest message, below, in answer to Yamla, confirms that yet again: you seem to think you have answered the points that he mentioned, but in fact you haven't. In view of your persistent inability to understand the points that editors painstakingly try to explain to you, it seems highly likely that you will make similar mistakes again if you are unblocked. JBW (talk) Formerly known as JamesBWatson 21:23, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

C.Fred I totally understand, I made a lot of mistakes But the most important was the creation of the article, I just mentioned it, Can you explain more what I should do? Thank you

I'm going to roll back my decline to let another admin review it. —C.Fred (talk) 21:03, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

M.k.m2003, you have previously demonstrated by your actions that you are incapable of sticking to your topic ban. What has changed from August until today, so we can be sure that although you couldn't follow your topic ban in August, you now can follow your topic ban? I mean that honestly. All you have to do is explain what's changed from August until today. C.Fred tried to prompt you this way, by asking, "1) Explain, in your own words, what your topic ban prohibits you from doing. 2) What types of edits would you make if you were unblocked?" But so far, you have refused to answer C.Fred's questions. And all you've done is make statements like, "I didn't create OK". Statements like that are deeply, deeply concerning. It makes people think you don't understand what you did wrong. If you don't understand what you did wrong, you'll certainly do it again. And your next block is going to be indefinite. We don't want to block you indefinitely. We want you to be able to edit without violating your topic ban, but you've shown over and over again that you can't. So, you have to convince us. Once you convince us, we'll lift the block. --Yamla (talk) 21:15, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Yamla Hi I totally understood, thank you for explaining, I think to get your point chose the wrong way I chose the wrong way, In my opinion, this request is different from other requests Because I learned a lot, As you said if you were making previous requests Maybe I was making other mistakes, But you were opposed every time You taught me a lot And thank you M.k.m2003 (talk) 08:42, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Atashghah Castle concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Atashghah Castle, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Avengement concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Avengement, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Rig castle concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Rig castle, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Atashghah Castle

Hello, M.k.m2003. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Atashghah Castle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Avengement

Hello, M.k.m2003. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Avengement".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 13:01, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Old Bazaar of Kermanshah concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Old Bazaar of Kermanshah, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Asre jadid (new era) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Asre jadid (new era), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rig castle

Hello, M.k.m2003. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rig castle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 09:48, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Ehsan Alikhani

Hello, M.k.m2003. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ehsan Alikhani".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 09:48, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Languages

Hey, if you need help communicating with other users in Persian, i can help you to do so. I read, write and speak Persian (mother tongue), French and English. Best.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:40, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

پس فارسی برایتان مینویسم، واقعا لطف میکنید حتما به کمکتان نیاز دازم. ممنون M.k.m2003 (talk) 15:44, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Moving articles

Please stop mass-moving articles without creating any form of discussion first. This is not the first time you've been told that. --HistoryofIran (talk) 15:02, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Blocked

You know perfectly well you have been blocked from creating articles, having been blocked for doing so twice before. A quick check of Special:Log/M.k.m2003 shows no fewer than 70 violations since your previous block. As you have repeatedly demonstrated an absolute refusal to abide by your topic ban, I have blocked you indefinitely. --Yamla (talk) 15:09, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Yamla you are wrong، I moved an article But I regretted reverting to the previous one، This time the page was created by moving، I didn't create، I hope you understand what I mean! M.k.m2003 (talk) 15:17, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Wikaviani سلام برادر میشه کمکم کنید یک اشتباهی رخ داده نیاز به کمک دارم M.k.m2003 (talk) 15:19, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Yamla Is it a violation of Category and Template؟ (Special:Log/M.k.m2003) I think the problem is just Fire Temple of Azar Goshasp، That's a misunderstanding M.k.m2003 (talk) 15:35, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

You have no fewer than 70 separate violations since your previous block expired. This is the end of the line for you, as far as I can see. At no point have you shown the slightest willingness to abide by your topic ban. You've had two previous opportunities which you ignored. You are free to make an unblock request, but I will strongly oppose it. --15:38, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Yamla I will do all I can to eliminate the misunderstanding that has taken place, With respect M.k.m2003 (talk) 15:41, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

M.k.m2003 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi I'm sure there was a misunderstanding,I am not forbidden to create Template and Category So I didn't violate didn't seventy articles, The problem is Fire Temple of Azar Goshasp, That is a misunderstanding، The thing is:I moved an article But I regretted it, I went back to the first By transferring not by creating an article, I am not prohibited from transfer, So this is just a strange misunderstanding, I should have explained before that I didn't, Thank you M.k.m2003 (talk) 15:57, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Deepfriedokra 18:12, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comment M.k.m2003 asked me for help, but i'm not here because of their request, i'm here because i proposed them to help them to communicate with other users (see my above comment). Yamla maybe we could give this user a last chance with some coaching in order to make them better undestand how the processes of moving/creating articles work ?---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:18, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Wikaviani I meant helping managers communicate, not anything else, I didn't ask you to open,Can you write Persian so that I can communicate with you? Thank you M.k.m2003 (talk) 16:27, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

بله ، زبان مادری من است ، من می توانم صحبت کنم ، بخوانم و بنویسم ، اما مشکل اینجاست که این ویکی پدیا انگلیسی است ، بنابراین باید بتوانیم انگلیسی صحبت کنیم.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:42, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

خب برادر من اخیرا در ویکی عربی هم مسدود شدم با کمک یک ایرانی با زبان ایرانی توانستم باز بشم میتونید برید یک نگاهی کنید مدیران هم استقبال کردند چون موجب ارتباط شد M.k.m2003 (talk) 16:56, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

به نظر من ، شما در درک روند تولید مقاله به کمک نیاز دارید—، زیرا چندین بار در بالا مورد انتقاد قرار گرفته اید. شما باید خطاهای گذشته خود را بشناسید تا فرصتی برای موفقیت درخواست خود پیدا کنید---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:12, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Wikaviani صد در صد حق با شماست، ولی من علاقه دارم الگو و رده ایجاد کنم، چون از ایجاد مقاله منع هستم و آشنایی دارم با الگو و رذه و انتقال هم منع نبودم ولی مطمئنم آخرین انتقالم یک سوء تفاهم بود که متوجش شدم، یکم برام عجیبه چطور مسدود شدم بدلیل 70 بار نقض ایجاد مقاله! آیا میتونید برام توضیح بدهید مدیر گرامی چطور چنین اتهامی زدند؟ چون الگو و رده جزء محدودیت من نبود. لطفا منو ببخشید انقدر صریح میگم M.k.m2003 (talk) 17:24, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

.نشان می دهد که شما 149 مقاله ایجاد کرده اید ، بدون شک برخی از این مقاله ها طبق گفته مدیران مشکل ساز هستند xtools.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:06, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Wikaviani برادر من، این 149 مقاله قضیه 3 ماهه پیشه که از ایجاد مقاله منع شدم ولی 2 بار بدلیل ندونستن چند مورد مهم 3 ماه مسدود شدم!، متاسفانه من در حال حاظر دقیق نمیدونم چرا مسدود شدم بخاطر ایجاد الگو یا رده یا انقال که هر 3 منع نبودم شایدم یک دلیل دیگه داره که من متوجه نشدم و ممنون میشم یک توضیح کوتاهی بدید، ممنون M.k.m2003 (talk) 08:52, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

من کسی نیستم که بتوانم این را برای شما توضیح دهم ، این مدیر که شما را مسدود کرده است که باید این کار را انجام دهد.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:02, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi Deepfriedokra Yeah, my English is awful So I can't get enough reason But I'm sure you're wrong, Don't you think yam blocking me is wrong? How I created seventy articles? And how to add new reasons when my limitation is just creating the article? Don't you think he hates me? And haven't I been helpful so far? How do you find me ineffective? I recently requested a user to help me get in touch with you, I wish you had waited for us to resolve the misunderstanding with him, I can apologize or thank you And please don't be one-sided ,I am really sorry M.k.m2003 (talk) 18:35, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi Yamla Can you give a brief explanation of the block? I was not prohibited from creating Template and Category How did you count against my ban? The problem is not the Fire Temple of Azar Goshasp? That I explained!Maybe it's another problem I don't know! Thanks for explaining M.k.m2003 (talk) 18:20, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

You are blocked from creating pages "in any namespace". You know this perfectly well. We literally had a discussion on this, back in August. Both C.Fred and I discussed this with you. As did Sandstein, who said, and I quote, "You are forbidden from creating pages. Do not create pages." You yourself indicated, back in August, that you understood all of this. I made clear at that time that I did not believe you did understand, despite your repeated claims that you did. This is all visible in User talk:M.k.m2003/Archive 1. The problem is all of the pages you created. --Yamla (talk) 18:44, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Please note that I will be largely off-line for the next few days and will be unable to respond to any further questions. I am not trying to ignore you, I will not be online. --Yamla (talk) 18:45, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Yamla You sure! I think you're joking! It has never been so It was just about creating any kind of articles Including disambiguation, You never made such a request to me That I can't create Template and Category, And it wasn't important your request, Rather, the consensus of managers was important That was not the case M.k.m2003 (talk) 19:00, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

I am sure. Note that I directly quoted from what other people said, and from what you said you understood, over at User talk:M.k.m2003/Archive 1. --Yamla (talk) 19:04, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

You didn't say that And I don't approve Maybe our eyes are different But I'm sure M.k.m2003 (talk) 19:10, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

"you are not allowed to create articles, in any namespace." Sandstein, 6 August 2019. "You are aware you are under a WP:TOPICBAN and are not permitted to create pages.", me, 7 August 2019. "you have violated your topic ban by creating Showqabad (disambiguation)." me, 12 August 2019. "You are forbidden from creating pages. Do not create pages." Sandstein, 13 August 2019. "You asked about creating disambiguation pages, and you were specifically told that you may not create them. That's what got you blocked on 7 August. You were blocked on 12 August for creating a redirect. On the one hand, it's not strictly an article. On the other, your topic ban is for creating articles, broadly construed. In other words, as Sandstein said, you should not create any page (or at least, not one that isn't a talk page)." C.Fred, 13 August 2019. If you truly believe what you are saying, we are done here. WP:CIR would apply and we'll have to leave you blocked because we simply cannot trust you ever, ever, ever, ever, ever to abide by your topic ban. --Yamla (talk) 19:18, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Yamla I've been working on the English wiki for almost a month, Since opening, And good worm activity(Create castle templates) How to block activity after a month, Or I was a fantasy, Or you're incompetent, You do not have the right to manage Because I committed a violation for a month, If you disagree you will get back Unless you have to admit that you are incompetent Or remove me from the block M.k.m2003 (talk) 19:29, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

I can't understand what you are saying. But you are free to make an unblock request and another admin will review your case. --Yamla (talk) 19:39, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Yamla Well that's it, No I can understand you, not you, So we need Wikaviani's help, are you agree? (And that's what I'm saying:How I made an article violation for 1 month But I didn't block) M.k.m2003 (talk) 19:47, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

I can't understand what you are asking. Wikaviani is free to help out. Note that I will not be responding further until Monday. I'm away until Monday, I'm not ignoring you. --Yamla (talk) 19:49, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Yamla My Brother, Wikaviani can help with communication Because he is fluent in both languages, I want to go back now it takes 1 month, It's OK, Thank you M.k.m2003 (talk) 19:58, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Comment @Yamla and M.k.m2003: If my help is requested, i'll be glad to help out. Best.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:26, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Wikaviani لطف میکنید بحث زیر را ترجمه کنید، سپاسگذارم برادر عزیز:Translation request

Yamla: سلام یاملا عزیز، شما در بحث اخیر اشاره کردید که در بایگانی از من خواستید هیچ گونه صحفه ای ایجاد نکنم! از جمله الگو و من تعهد دادم،اول که من از مترجم گوگل استفاده میکنم و گوگل دقیق ترجمه نمیکنه پس اگرم گفته باشید من متوجه نشدم دوم که من تقریبا یک ماه در حال ایجاد الگو بودم چطور تازه فهمدید؟ من فکر میکنم مشکل اصلی آن آتشکده بود که انتقال داده بودم و پشیمان شدم برگشتم به حالت اول چون اشتباه بود، که توضیح هم دادم که چی شد! و از انتقال هم منع نبودم که بخواد کامل منو ببندید، اگرم مشکل چیز دیگریه بهم توضیح بدید، ممنون M.k.m2003 (talk) 16:25, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

@Yamla: M.k.m2003 asked me to translate their message, here it is :

"Hi dear Yamla, you mentioned in a recent discussion that you asked me to create nothing in the archive! including the template and i made the commitment, first, that I use Google translator and Google does not translate precisely so if you said that, i didn't realize and Second, that i was creating the template for almost a month, how do you know? I think the main problem was the fireplace i had relocated, i regretted that and reverted back to the previous version because it was a mistake, explaining what happened! And i was not completely banned from doing anything. If you think that the issue is elsewhere, then please explain me. Thanks."

IMHO, there seems to be a misunderstanding, maybe you can consider their request and unblock them, in order to give this user another chance to prove that they can be useful for the project. If you think that i could help, please let me know. Best.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:22, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

@Wikaviani: Thank you for your help here. I am concerned this user lacks sufficient competence in the English language to properly understand directions, which mean en.wiki is the wrong place for them. However, I'm willing to extend one final chance. The condition would be as follows. Looking at Special:Log/M.k.m2003, their actions must result in zero "created page" entries and zero "moved page" entries, from now on. You can see in the log, there are a lot of those entries. It doesn't matter if the result is a "Template" or a "Category" or a regular article. Zero, from now on. It is M.k.m2003's responsibility to know, ahead of time, what actions will result in a "created page" or a "moved page" entry. If any of their actions result in a "created page" or a "moved page" entry, M.k.m2003 will be reblocked indefinitely, and I want a promise they won't contest the block. They are free to contest any other block, but must promise not to contest a block if their actions result in a "created page" or a "moved page" entry. This is a huge amount of time and effort, so if I am to consider unblocking them, I want this to be very, very clear and with no possibility that this will result in yet another round of discussion. Note that WP:SO would still be open to them; this promise isn't meant to prevent M.k.m2003 applying for WP:SO six months after any future block. I'm happy to answer questions about this, from Wikaviani or from M.k.m2003. I want everything to be absolutely clear. --Yamla (talk) 23:40, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

@Wikaviani: لطف میکنید بحث بالا را ترجمه کنید البته بدلیل بزرگ بودن خلاصش کنید که زیاد درگیر نشوید، ممنون:Translation request M.k.m2003 (talk) 07:33, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Yamla:, If I don't create the pattern and the category I will be completely unemployed But it would be in my interest to get out of the block, I promise not to create any kind of page And will the transfer also be part of my restriction? Either way I'll make a commitment. I hope to be trusted, Thank you M.k.m2003 (talk) 17:13, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Please explain what you mean by "completely unemployed". Are you getting paid for editing Wikipedia? Who is paying you and what exactly are you getting paid to do? I'll warn you, if you are getting paid to edit Wikipedia, WP:PAID and WP:COI would apply and this is a very, very serious problem. --Yamla (talk) 17:57, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

@Yamla: you are kidding! I meant activity M.k.m2003 (talk) 18:02, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Okay, I'll take you at your word that you are not employed to edit Wikipedia. Please explicitly state that you are agreeing to all of the unblock conditions. These conditions are: (1) Looking at Special:Log/M.k.m2003, your actions must result in zero "created page" entries and zero "moved page" entries, from now on. And (2) if any of your actions result in a "created page" or a "moved page" entry, you will be reblocked indefinitely. (3) If reblocked for any action resulting in a "created page" or a "moved page" entry, you promise you won't contest the block. WP:SO would still be open to you. Be careful! If you are at all unclear, now is the time to ask for clarification. Once you agree, there's no going back. --Yamla (talk) 18:07, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

@Yamla: Can you explain the third condition? I didn't understand sorry! And will your terms be removed if the previous pages are standard? M.k.m2003 (talk) 18:18, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Let me explain the third condition. If you are unblocked and any of your actions result in "created page" or a "moved page" showing up in your log, you are going to be reblocked. And this time, you promise you won't object. You won't ask to be unblocked. You will accept that you messed up and the block is legitimate. Compare that to your current block and your previous block. You've been complaining about the block for weeks now. The third condition basically says, if you are blocked because any of your actions result in "created page" or a "moved page" showing up in your log, you won't complain, you won't ask to be unblocked, you will just accept that you messed up. "And will your terms be removed if the previous pages are standard?" this doesn't make sense. If you mean, "What if I am blocked for some other reason?" then yes, you could contest that block. If you mean, "Can I create other pages?" the answer is, none of your actions may result in "created page" or a "moved page" showing up in your log. No excuses. If you do something and it results in that showing up in your log, you will be reblocked and you won't complain. --Yamla (talk) 18:26, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

@Yamla: I mean exactly your second answer, This is great And I agree, Thank you M.k.m2003 (talk) 18:36, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

As you have agreed to those conditions, I have lifted your block. Welcome back! --Yamla (talk) 18:39, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Comment My apologies for my belated answer, was busy with real life matters... @Yamla: Thanks for your time and the job you did here. @M.k.m2003: If you need any further help, please let me know and i'll do my best to help you. Welcome back and happy editing. Best.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:47, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Asre jadid (new era)

Hello, M.k.m2003. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Asre jadid".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 21:27, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Block

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 14:44, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

M.k.m2003 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

How was such a decision made? He also insults me, I warned and defended myself, The complainant is the servant, not him, Look what he wrote:Not gonna lie I've not read everything in this topic, so there might be some mistakes or something I've missed, anyways, here's my two cents: Sources by the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI) are obviously not reliable, and is indeed propaganda. Mind you, this is a country that doesn't allow basic rights, and violently supresses its people (yes, violently, 2019–20 Iranian protests), and calls the Iranian protestors for "American and Israeli spies" (look up Khamenei's twitter, there are loads of these accusations). I thought this was a no brainer. "The majority of Iranians loving Soleimani" is obviously not true, there were loads of sources that testified to that. Yet, it was removed, because.. it was POV? Lol. It's more POV now. It's a pretty normal custom for authoritarian governments to stage such huge funerals in a desperate bid for legitimacy. M.k.m2003 (talk) 14:54, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your refusal to withdraw your legal threat leaves no way for you to be unblocked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 15:14, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Do you withdraw this threat to sue and agree to make no future threats of lawsuits or legal action against Wikipedia or its editors? —C.Fred (talk) 14:57, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

This is an insult to me And also to my country, He should apologize, I'm really sorry that such a person exists on Wikipedia And I didn't threaten But I did warn M.k.m2003 (talk) 15:03, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

@Jpgordon: I did not refuse I just need an apology And I'll pledge not to interfere with any discussion M.k.m2003 (talk) 15:20, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

@Jpgordon: But what if someone insults you and your country? You will be 100% hit M.k.m2003 (talk) 15:23, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

@C.Fred: This person must be accountable for his speech, Not in justice, but in the politics of wiki, Don't get me wrong M.k.m2003 (talk) 15:30, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

@C.Fred: If the law on the wiki is not against this person, Tell me to take back my word, Because you can't sue the judge in court, Is this the judge? M.k.m2003 (talk) 15:46, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

So no one will answer me? Because you do not have the necessary competence, You completely violate Wiki's policy of unilateralism, When do you want to remove this unilateralism from the wiki? If this person is not accountable, others must be accountable, This person has insulted Iran if it doesn't want to be accountable Wikipedia must be accountable, Please provide your comments M.k.m2003 (talk) 16:23, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

You are free to seek legal redress, but you can't do that and edit Wikipedia at the same time, per WP:NLT. El_C 16:27, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

@El C: You don't even understand what I'm saying, I have no legal complaints, I would like to know how this person was allowed to say such a thing, Insulting a system? This is a serious matter! Wikipedia must be able to prevent such insults M.k.m2003 (talk) 16:36, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Indeed, I don't understand. If you withdraw the threat of legal action, you may be unblocked. El_C 16:37, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

@El C: I didn't make such a threat at all, It was a normal warning, If I want to retrieve this usual warning, You should also warn To stop saying such a thing M.k.m2003 (talk) 16:43, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

It certainly looked like you made such a threat. No warning is necessary when it comes to threats of legal action. Also, you have yet to outright said that you, unequivocally, withdraw all threats (or warnings) of legal action. El_C 16:47, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

@El C: I'm not talking about the threat Or alert Because I said many times it won't be, I am explaining the insult that has been made on Iran That you should warn And to be honest, I didn't mean a legal threat Only the type of writing I did was wrong I'm sorry M.k.m2003 (talk) 16:57, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you mean "insult that has been made on Iran," but fair enough — you have been unblocked. Please pursue dispute resolution (and accompanying requests) to resolve your dispute. El_C 17:01, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

@El C: Not gonna lie I've not read everything in this topic, so there might be some mistakes or something I've missed, anyways, here's my two cents: Sources by the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI) are obviously not reliable, and is indeed propaganda. Mind you, this is a country that doesn't allow basic rights, and violently supresses its people (yes, violently, 2019–20 Iranian protests), and calls the Iranian protestors for "American and Israeli spies" (look up Khamenei's twitter, there are loads of these accusations). I thought this was a no brainer. "The majority of Iranians loving Soleimani" is obviously not true, there were loads of sources that testified to that. Yet, it was removed, because.. it was POV? Lol. It's more POV now. It's a pretty normal custom for authoritarian governments to stage such huge funerals (and government rallies for that matter) in a desperate bid for legitimacy. --HistoryofIran (talk) 11:44, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Aren't these insults?: Iranian media are not credible - The Iranian government severely represses the Iranian people - What is the basis of such words? M.k.m2003 (talk) 17:11, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

The basis for it are reliable sources, that assert this to be so. El_C 17:13, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

@El C: I can also provide credible sources for submission Or against other countries But is Wikipedia such a place? M.k.m2003 (talk) 17:15, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Again, if you disagree with an edit or a set of edits, discuss it on the article talk page or pursue dispute resolution otherwise. But offending national pride is not something that's prohibited on Wikipedia when it is taken to be so in the course of normal editing. El_C 17:21, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

@El C: it seems like It's been my problem And I'm sorry And I try to keep up with it, Thank you for your help M.k.m2003 (talk) 17:32, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

HistoryofIran

M.k.m2003, I think it would be in everyone's best interest if you gave HistoryofIran some space. Thank in advance. El_C 18:58, 19 January 2020 (UTC)