User talk:Lwansamulenga

Welcome

Hello, Lwansamulenga, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Lwansamulenga, good luck, and have fun. PamD 18:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PamD 18:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

Hello Lwansamulenga, and thanks for your interest in editing Wikipedia. I refer to your edit here: [1]. Please read Wikipedia:Copyright violations. You cannot copy and paste text from a website and then place it onto Wikipedia, unless you frame it as a direct quote, and even then there are limits to how much you can quote. Also we only put the articles title in bold the first time it is mentioned. There's a lot of things to learn when getting started on Wikipedia, so don't feel discouraged. You may wish to check out Wikipedia:Teahouse if you have any questions about editing. Have a nice day. Damien Linnane (talk) 09:05, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Lwansamulenga

A tag has been placed on User:Lwansamulenga requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:01, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Library Bibliotherapy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Library Bibliotherapy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:03, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Lwansamulenga (talk) 12:13, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ZNBC Library (Product Development Cycle)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ZNBC Library (Product Development Cycle) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dewritech (talk) 12:40, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Opening Prayers (for meetings)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Opening Prayers (for meetings) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://connectusfund.org/15-best-opening-prayers-for-meetings-church-worship-and-bible-study. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:02, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Lwansamulenga! Your additions to Opening Prayers (for meetings) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:06, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Two Books Given to Man

A tag has been placed on Two Books Given to Man requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Redirect to an empty target

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – NJD-DE (talk) 14:00, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nature and Bible

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Nature and Bible requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – NJD-DE (talk) 14:02, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nature and Bible

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nature and Bible, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:22, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Nature and Bible, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:23, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lwansamulenga. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Lusaka Apex Medical University ‎, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Lwansamulenga. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Lwansamulenga|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. – NJD-DE (talk) 17:15, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Types of Knowledge and the techniques on each Knowledge, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. – NJD-DE (talk) 14:00, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Urban park, did not appear constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. FULBERT (talk) 10:59, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to engage in subtle vandalism by making unexplained changes to information, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 15:37, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accessing the use of Digital Resources moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Accessing the use of Digital Resources, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:03, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Accessing the use of Digital Resources (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Accessing the use of Digital Resources and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Accessing the use of Digital Resources, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:50, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lwansamulenga! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 18:50, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Amazing Papers moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Amazing Papers, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheWikiholic (talk) 12:48, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Amazing Papers

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Amazing Papers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – NJD-DE (talk) 13:03, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Lusaka Apex Medical University Library

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Lusaka Apex Medical University Library requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://lamu.edu.zm/library. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – NJD-DE (talk) 13:10, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Types of Knowledge and the techniques on each Knowledge moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Types of Knowledge and the techniques on each Knowledge, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – NJD-DE (talk) 13:57, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Avoiding copyright issues

Hello Lwansamulenga, you have been advised before about copyright violations. This message should highlight this again: Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Most texts you find offline or online are copyrighted and it's not allowed to paste them anywhere on Wikipedia (articles, drafts, user page, etc.). In the rare case that content is released in the public domain or has a compatible license you must attribute this! Please see WP:FREECOPYING to learn more about this, and then take the appropriate steps for your drafts and your user page. The latter appears to contain content from https://oer.unn.edu.ng/read/marketing-library-and-information-services-in-academic-libraries-in-niger-state-1/file.doc. If you have questions about this, you are welcome to reach out to other experienced editors at the teahouse. – NJD-DE (talk) 21:37, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mirrors, serious errors

Thanks for contributing to the article Armstrong, Indiana. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 23:09, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lwansamulenga, you seem to have completely ignored the message above, and have now added really blatant mirrors, or sites that clearly cite wikipedia as a source to a dozen more articles: Whizziwig, John Moreno, Beautiful Garbage, November 1937, Golsinda basicornis, Chilakamarti Lakshmi Narasimham, Bandrowski, Urban park, Stares and Whispers (song),2015–16 Lech Poznań season, Saint Peter and Paul Cathedral, Lutsk,Kevin Dunn, Zang Shiyi, and Niki Nikolic. You have also used scrapers that pull in junk from unreliable sources and fail to credit material at Melody (Japanese singer), John Waller (fight director), and Ottawa Sooners. Of more concern, many times you have added sources that have absolutely nothing to do with the subject, or do not cover the claim. This is a serious problem: please stop editing until you have acknowledged this problem and can outline steps on how you will evaluate your sources in the future. I realize that you have some kind of contest going on, but you'll need to drop out of that for the time being - you seem to be making rushed edits that are not helpful, and I'm having to spend a lot of time cleaning up. Kuru (talk) 15:31, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I have disabled this account until you respond. In this edit, you added an astounding 17 links to mirrors and one to a junk scrpaer site that I previously pointed out is not acceptable. You added other very clearly identified mirror links at Harold L. Stuart, Western bean cutworm, and Thomas Henry (patron of the arts). It is clear you are not evaluating the sources you are adding; this is wasting the time of other editors. Kuru (talk) 11:53, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

i agree and apology for the disruptive edits i have been making lately and after going through the wikipedia policy i do hereby agree and conclude that i wasnt fully mentored on how to cite on wikipedia and how to track reliable sources. If given an opportunity again i promise to seek feather guidance from experts before making edits.

your consideration is highly appreciated Lwansamulenga (talk) 12:26, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Will you please review the two sources you added below just a few hours ago? How did you evaluate the references? Why do you feel they support the material on the page?

Here - added "http://dx.doi.org/10.15255/cabeq.2013.1904"
Here - added "https://www.wikizero.com/en/Arkwright"

Thanks. Kuru (talk) 13:29, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Kuru once more for granting me the opportunity to clarify on the two references listed above. To start with reference numbered two (2) "https://www.wikizero.com/en/Arkwright" i felt the information on the link is as exactly as the information on the site on wikipedia hence it was my thought that it could be the reliable source of the information that is on the wikipedia article, the reference also refer to http://forebears.co.uk/surnames/arkwright as another reliable reference. Coming to reference numbered one (1) "http://dx.doi.org/10.15255/cabeq.2013.1904" i feel this isnt a reliable source for the article Brad Moss. Lwansamulenga (talk) 07:19, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, is there anything else about the Wikizero source that should be taken into consideration before adding it as a reference? On the Brad Moss example, your answer of "i feel this isnt a reliable source" did not answer the questions I asked - how did you evaluate this before adding it to that article? Why did you add it at all? Kuru (talk) 10:57, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Amazing Papers

Hello, Lwansamulenga. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Amazing Papers, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Types of Knowledge and the techniques on each Knowledge

Hello, Lwansamulenga. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Types of Knowledge and the techniques on each Knowledge, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Live Pix

Hello, Lwansamulenga. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Live Pix, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Types of Knowledge and the techniques on each Knowledge

Hello, Lwansamulenga. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Types of Knowledge and the techniques on each Knowledge".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:17, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Live Pix

Hello, Lwansamulenga. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Live Pix".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:02, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Lwansamulenga

A tag has been placed on User:Lwansamulenga requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:57, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Accessing the use of Digital Resources

Hello, Lwansamulenga. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Accessing the use of Digital Resources, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Accessing the use of Digital Resources

Hello, Lwansamulenga. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Accessing the use of Digital Resources".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:13, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]