User talk:Luisrafael7

Dolly Neely

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Dolly Neely, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.futurizmo.com/survivor/s9/cast/dolly.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 22:29, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia. To find out more about how to make useful contributions, take a look at the welcome page. To stay in Wikipedia, an article has to be about something notable, that is, of general interest. Click on notability for an explanation of what that means. Also, it must give independently verifiable sources. Articles that don't meet these requirements are deleted. Follow the links below to learn more:

To find out more about creating articles, read the introduction, tutorial, and the guide to creating your first article.
Do not write articles about yourself, your company, your band, or your best friend - that's a conflict of interest.
Do not copy text from other websites without a GFDL-compatible license. It will be deleted.
For experiments, please use the sandbox.

JohnCD 22:37, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Dolly Neely

A tag has been placed on Dolly Neely requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JohnCD 22:37, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't remove speedy-deletion tags

You are entitled to challenge the speedy deletion; if you want to do that, put {{hangon}} on the page immediately under the {{db}} tag, and put your reasons on the article's talk page. The administrators will read what you say before they decide. But you must not remove the speedy deletion tag. JohnCD 22:42, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Lacey Conner, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.laceyconner.com/bio.htm. As a copyright violation, Lacey Conner appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Lacey Conner has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Lacey Conner and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Lacey Conner with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Lacey Conner.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 16:09, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

I noticed that you have posted comments to the page Talk:List of Hannah Montana episodes in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. NrDg 20:31, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Daisy de la Hoya has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 22:20, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Destiney Sue Moore. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please do not remove an AFD template while discussion is still in progress. Plastikspork (talk) 22:33, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Megan

the issue is that you are claiming the picture is you own. Clearly it is not. anytime your place a picture on a page you have to say where you got it from..if you got it from a website it has to be cleared for free use on wiki.--EmperorofPeopleEverywhere (talk) 23:41, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Francisco "Chapu" Puelles

The article Francisco "Chapu" Puelles has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

No reliable sources

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. 216.93.213.191 (talk) 05:15, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Perla Isabel Estrada Hernández

The article Perla Isabel Estrada Hernández has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 08:23, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Laura Prieto

The article Laura Prieto has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 15:17, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Perla Isabel Estrada Hernández

The article Perla Isabel Estrada Hernández has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

What is asserted, though sourced, is not notable--just a 5th place finish on a show.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 03:39, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Contestants of Calle 7

The article Contestants of Calle 7 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

per WP:NOTTVGUIDE and WP:NOT#STATS, as well as being unreffed.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 21:42, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Luisrafael7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Edited using "incognito mode". I understand it's against the rules and won't do it again. Luisrafael7 (talk) 22:05, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You aren't directly blocked, however your underlying IP address is a proxy and has been blocked. PhilKnight (talk) 23:16, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You'll have to tell us what message you are getting. You don't seem to be directly blocked. Peridon (talk) 22:38, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be an open or anonymizing proxy. Yes, I was using Google Chrome's privacy mode and randomly edited in Wikipedia. But my IP adress is 186.88.174.106 and I'm currently editing in the regular mode, not using an open or anonymizing proxy.--Luisrafael7 (talk) 19:27, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Survivor: Cambodia

Hello, Luisrafael7. I am posting this to note that your comment to the talkpage of Survivor: Cambodia is 'damaged' due to the semicolon at the beginning of the reply. If you need to bold your comment, I would recommend using three apostrophes on each side of the comment if that was what was intended. --Super Goku V (talk) 00:35, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Luisrafael7/test5

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Luisrafael7/test5, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GILO A&E⇑ 21:30, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Luisrafael7. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Luisrafael7/40

User:Luisrafael7/40, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Luisrafael7/40 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Luisrafael7/40 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 19:31, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Luisrafael7. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Luisrafael7. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]