User talk:Lucywrites

Dress2kill moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dress2kill, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. KartikeyaS (talk) 19:12, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments. I just wondered if you could provide any more guidance on this please? I have cited 30 references which I believed to be reliable sources. Are there any that stand out as being not credible? Or any statements specifically that do not appear to be backed up? Many thanks.

Lucywrites (talk) 20:27, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Dress2kill has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dress2kill. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:42, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, this is really useful! I'll try my best to rectify it now Lucywrites (talk) 16:47, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dress2kill (March 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dress2kill and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dress2kill, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:42, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lucywrites! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 16:42, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dress2kill (March 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still promotional. Also includes awards or recognition for the founder which is not relevant to the company draft. Can you also disclose your affiliation with the brand per WP:COI and WP:PAID?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dress2kill and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dress2kill, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 06:35, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Dress2kill has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dress2kill. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:42, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Lucywrites. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:Dress2kill, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Sulfurboy (talk) 16:51, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your comments. I'm aware of the company as my family member once bought a suit from them. I'm not a customer myself.Lucywrites (talk) 17:32, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Very few people decide to write Wikipedia pages after a family member told them about a company they purchased from. While I want to WP:AGF, it still seems like there is a conflict of interest that isn't being disclosed. There is nothing wrong with having a conflict of interest but editors, such as myself, who review these drafts on a daily basis need to be made aware so that we can ensure the neutrality of the draft. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:42, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, well to explain it more, I'm from London originally and have an interest in retail/fashion. I'm keen to see local businesses represented on Wikipedia so I did some research and thought the history of this company was worthy of a page, especially as many other similar bespoke London suitmakers are on here. I've made edits to make it as neutral as possible so I hope the page may be approved. Thanks! Lucywrites (talk) 20:56, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So if you were told that the topic doesn't meet guidelines and cannot be created in Wikipedia, what would be your response?--CNMall41 (talk) 04:44, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My response would be to accept it obviously but I would also want to know why it doesn't meet the guidelines, so I can improve in future. I'm new to Wikipedia and trying to educate myself as much as I can, but it can certainly be confusing! Lucywrites (talk) 11:50, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dress2kill has been accepted

Dress2kill, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Bilorv (talk) 12:12, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A non-automated comment

Hi Lucy! Just wanted to say something non-automated. I accepted your draft on the following grounds:

Some sources do not contain substantial coverage of Dress2kill (e.g. the Fashion Practice study) and some are not reliable (e.g. Yell). However, there is non-trivial secondary coverage in Drapers, MoneyWeek, The Times, Financial Times and Campaign. I have suspicions that a couple of the articles may have been paid for by the company, but Hibbert and the deal with Virgin Atlantic have received secondary coverage. I believe this article has at least a 50% chance of surviving a deletion discussion, which is our threshold for accepting a draft.

I've made an edit tidying up the article a little—section headings should be short and infrequent, punctuation goes before references, and titles of newspapers go in italics. If you have any questions, please do feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks! — Bilorv (talk) 12:18, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for explaining that some more! That's really useful to know, I'll get in touch with any questions on your Talk page. Many thanksLucywrites (talk) 12:39, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]