User talk:Lucky7jrk

Welcome!

Hello, Lucky7jrk, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Beep Bop, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:26, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Beep Bop

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Beep Bop requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:26, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sterling Shepard has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sterling Shepard was changed by Lucky7jrk (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862962 on 2017-02-03T01:06:13+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:06, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Woodie Shepard

Hello, Lucky7jrk. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Woodie Shepard, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

TonyBallioni (talk) 02:50, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Hello, I'm ScrapIronIV. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Grand Moff Tarkin have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Scr★pIron^IV 13:37, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ivan Tregear

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ivan Tregear requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Marvellous Spider-Man 15:05, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of C. J. Germany

Hello Lucky7jrk,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged C. J. Germany for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Sarah Canbel (talk) 00:15, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:-Users-Jaiman-Desktop-jaelen-strong.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:-Users-Jaiman-Desktop-jaelen-strong.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:30, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:-Users-Jaiman-Desktop-jaelen-strong.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:-Users-Jaiman-Desktop-jaelen-strong.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 00:23, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jeremiah McKinnon

The article Jeremiah McKinnon has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. JamesG5 (talk) 05:44, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding a source, I removed the BLPROD JamesG5 (talk) 14:06, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Jeremiah McKinnon

Hi, I'm JamesG5. Lucky7jrk, thanks for creating Jeremiah McKinnon!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Page is a stub, please flesh out with details & additional sources. Page also needs categories.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

JamesG5 (talk) 14:03, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Tracz moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Joe Tracz, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:00, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2+2-1

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, 2+2-1, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 00:26, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (B. J. Hill (American football)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating B. J. Hill (American football), Lucky7jrk!

Wikipedia editor Willsome429 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Clears notability as a draft pick, but expansion would be nice, especially on his college years.

To reply, leave a comment on Willsome429's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Willsome429 (talk) 18:03, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Joe Tracz concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Joe Tracz, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Joe Tracz

Hello, Lucky7jrk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Joe Tracz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 09:01, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Robert Martin (American football)

Thanks for creating Robert Martin (American football).

A New Page Patroller Willsome429 just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Martin currently does not meet the notability requirements for gridiron football, and without expansion to show proof of notablitiy, may be deleted.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 23:58, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve A. J. Howard

Hello, Lucky7jrk,

Thanks for creating A. J. Howard! I edit here too, under the username Willsome429 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add more sources about Howard that have significant coverage, not just a passign mention.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willsome429}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 15:28, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rock Ya-Sin

The article Rock Ya-Sin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSPORT notability guidelines (both WP:NGRIDIRON and WP:NCOLLATH)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jmertel23 (talk) 01:16, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Jake Ceresna) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Jake Ceresna.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

A source about Ceresna (not about a transaction involving him) would help improve the page but this is a good start.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willsome429}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 13:33, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HappyPoo6, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

BigDwiki (talk) 15:54, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of George Asafo-Adjei

The article George Asafo-Adjei has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. SSSB (talk) 21:42, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robert Martin (American football) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Martin (American football) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Martin (American football) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 22:29, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of C. J. Germany for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article C. J. Germany is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C. J. Germany until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 14:16, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Bo Nix

Hello, Lucky7jrk,

Thanks for creating Bo Nix! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add clear references to all articles you create, especially biographies if living people.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:36, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NFL Top 100 Players of 2019 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, NFL Top 100 Players of 2019, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:33, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Taulia Tagovailoa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Taulia Tagovailoa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taulia Tagovailoa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 23:22, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Spencer Rattler

The article Spencer Rattler has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

does not meet criteria at WP:NSPORTS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 21:01, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Spencer Rattler for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spencer Rattler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spencer Rattler until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 06:46, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andrew Berry (American football), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bel Air High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:50, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Lucky7jrk

Thank you for creating Kevin Davidson.

User:WikiAviator, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please substitute some sources with ones with credibility (e.g. Princeton University Athletics doesn't fulfill NPOV and independent of sources).

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|WikiAviator}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

WikiAviator (talk) 01:24, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Eli Manning

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Eli Manning you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 22:11, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@HickoryOughtShirt?4: Considering this user made all of five edits to the Eli Manning article (none of which are still included in the article), and likely doesn't know how user talk pages work [1], I'm not sure they will be able to address your concerns. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:41, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eagles247, you're probably right, I was AGF-ing here. Should I just delete the GA/2 or quick fail? HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 07:54, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@HickoryOughtShirt?4: I'd quick-fail it, no need to remove your comments in case someone wants to work on the article in the future. Eagles 24/7 (C) 13:57, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@HickoryOughtShirt?4: Please do not quick fail the article. I believe that it fits the criteria for a good article. Lucky7jrk (talk) 17:03, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky7jrk, please address the comments provided by HickoryOughtShirt?4 at Talk:Eli Manning/GA2 in order to proceed with the review. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:07, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Failure to address comments from the GA review will result in a failed nomination. I noticed you also attempted to nominate Kobe Bryant for FA and B. J. Hill (American football) for PR. These drive-by nominations with no attempt to follow through on improving the articles or taking the necessary steps with these reviews are not productive, and I strongly suggest you refrain from this behavior. Eagles 24/7 (C) 13:31, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Lucky7jrk, since you have not attended to any of my comments, I am going to quick fail the article. We are supposed to give editors 7 days but I even gave you more, to no avail. I am sorry Eagles247 for having your time wasted. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 20:50, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Eli Manning

The article Eli Manning you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Eli Manning for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HickoryOughtShirt?4 -- HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 21:02, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Myles Humphrey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Myles Humphrey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myles Humphrey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eagles 24/7 (C) 15:26, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mick Abel

Hello Lucky7jrk,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mick Abel for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JBL (talk) 17:03, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by GA and FA nominations

As explained above regarding your GA nomination of Eli Manning, drive-by nominations are generally not productive. Since you clearly were not interested in addressing comments from the Manning review, I have reverted your attempt to nominate Sam Bradford for GA. Please refrain from nominating articles for GA or FA unless you actually intend to work on them. Eagles 24/7 (C) 14:26, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I understand my past mistakes. I’ve taken the past few days to read up on the GA nomination process and I intend to actually work on the article this time. Lucky7jrk (talk) 14:38, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I have reverted my reversion. GAN is always very backlogged, so please do not waste another reviewer's time this go around. Eagles 24/7 (C) 15:21, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Players

Hey I see you make player Wiki pages would you want me to suggest a few for you to make? Bigmike2346 (talk) 17:41, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure I could give it a shot. Lucky7jrk (talk) 19:58, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Thurman Devin Ross Cedrick Lang are a few that I would start with Bigmike2346 (talk) 00:09, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want more let me know Bigmike2346 (talk) 00:09, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

? Bigmike2346 (talk) 01:58, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I created Nick Thurman and Devin Ross. However, Devin Ross was just flagged for deletion. I am going to refrain from creating Cedrick Lang until Devin Ross is sorted out. Could you please help with the deletion page because you wanted to create the article? Lucky7jrk (talk) 18:37, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What would I need to do? Bigmike2346 (talk) 20:28, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey do you know how to add pictures to a profile and could you help me fix up Burton Burns wiki page please Bigmike2346 (talk) 20:05, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I know of a few players on the Packers that need pages and if you know of any coaches that need ones let me know Bigmike2346 (talk) 18:12, 5 October 2020 (UTC) @Bigmike2346: Who are these players? Are you sure that these players are notable? Lucky7jrk (talk) 18:42, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

You need to add more sources to articles you create. A lot of these players are not notable unless you provide the coverage that suggests they pass WP:GNG.-- Yankees10 23:01, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Devin Ross for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Devin Ross is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devin Ross (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm (talk) 18:21, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Perry

Can you please make a page for the former Alabama safety and former nfl player who is now an analyst with Alabama please? Bigmike2346 (talk) 05:07, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

? Bigmike2346 (talk) 01:57, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not sure if he’s considered notable Lucky7jrk (talk) 02:03, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nick Thurman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nick Thurman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Thurman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm (talk) 21:48, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack Driscoll (American football) (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No references at all - requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jack Driscoll (American football) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jack Driscoll (American football), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:08, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lucky7jrk! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:08, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of A. J. Howard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A. J. Howard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. J. Howard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 01:33, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sam Bradford

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sam Bradford you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 07:20, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sam Bradford

The article Sam Bradford you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sam Bradford for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 07:40, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Spencer Rattler

Hello, Lucky7jrk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Spencer Rattler".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:04, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sam Bradford

The article Sam Bradford you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sam Bradford for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 16:22, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Joe Burrow

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Joe Burrow you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bait30 -- Bait30 (talk) 22:01, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Joe Burrow

The article Joe Burrow you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Joe Burrow for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bait30 -- Bait30 (talk) 04:41, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Joe Burrow

The article Joe Burrow you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Joe Burrow for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bait30 -- Bait30 (talk) 06:21, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Julian Edelman

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Julian Edelman you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Larry Hockett -- Larry Hockett (talk) 08:02, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Julian Edelman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Woodside High School.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:37, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Julian Edelman

The article Julian Edelman you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Julian Edelman for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Larry Hockett -- Larry Hockett (talk) 17:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Julian Edelman

Hello! Your submission of Julian Edelman at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 15:56, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Julian Edelman

On 15 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Julian Edelman, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Julian Edelman weighed less than 100 lb (45 kg) when he played varsity football in high school? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Julian Edelman. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Julian Edelman), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Saquon Barkley

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Saquon Barkley you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AlabamaFan101 -- AlabamaFan101 (talk) 01:41, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Saquon Barkley

The article Saquon Barkley you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Saquon Barkley for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AlabamaFan101 -- AlabamaFan101 (talk) 06:01, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Saquon Barkley/GA1

Sorry, but I had to delete that review: the reviewer was actually just a troll, a longterm vandal who knows more about irritating people than about article quality. Drmies (talk) 02:05, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. That stinks, but luckily I hadn't put too much work into it yet. Lucky7jrk (talk) 02:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Kyler Murray

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kyler Murray you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 12:41, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Saquon Barkley

The article Saquon Barkley you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Saquon Barkley for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kncny11 -- Kncny11 (talk) 23:22, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Kyler Murray

The article Kyler Murray you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Kyler Murray for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 10:22, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gary Brightwell

The article Gary Brightwell has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:29, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations \| March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]