User talk:LowSelfEstidle

Howard Stern

I've tried for awhile just to get that one, and I just did a quick search and there's still nothing recent that I could see that was quality. There were a few from 2005/6 that I saw, but they had poor poses. The best bet is to try and contact his show or agent to see if they are willing to release an image. Otherwise, keep searching Flickr for new images. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:22, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Howard Stern Show fine history

Glad my peer review of The Howard Stern Show fine history was helpful. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 03:10, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

+1 barnstar

		The Editor's Barnstar
		For all your work on Howard Stern related articles, I award you this barnstar. AaronY (talk) 22:10, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Howard Stern

I'm copy-editing FCC fines of The Howard Stern Show. Please check I didn't change the meaning of anything. AaronY (talk) 06:08, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's great! I have some more to add and changes to make with the notes and sources, etc. We could use the discussion page for more talk if you want to discuss anything about it. :) LowSelfEstidle (talk) 11:31, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Citing sources

In general you can use it for quotes or for how the person is feeling, but its best to use secondary sources instead. You can find info there and then look to see if you can find a secondary source for it on the web, then use that internet source instead. Googles News Archives are great; make sure you search for articles with no price as that will give you freely accessible articles. Also The New York Times archives are currently free back to 1987. Here's a search for articles mentioning Howard Stern sorted by oldest first:[1] Those would be good to look through regardless imho. Also here is an unbelievably awesome site that I sometimes browse through which doesn't meet WP:RS but is useful as a directory since it cites articles:[2] Its dead now but you can browse it via the internet archive like this. If you scroll to the bottom there are links to articles on the history of Stern's show and its broadcast history with tons of affiliates. If you scroll to the bottom of the info for one city there is usually a link to more info from that city. All the info is cited with sources. Don't cite that website, cite the sources, there are links and bibliographic info provided. AaronY (talk) 21:46, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you can enable your email that would be great. You would do that in the preferences interface in the top right. Message me when you have done that. AaronY (talk) 21:56, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, email sent. AaronY (talk) 21:11, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Howard Stern

Very nice of you to say! --Tenebrae (talk) 23:06, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fantasia

Hey there. Thanks in large part to your work, Fantasia (film) has shaped up into a very good article, I think. Have you given any thought to submitting it for peer review to see whether it might be close to or ready for a GA or FA status? Just a thought. Markhh (talk) 07:32, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I think you have been confused by a comments that user "Visokor" sent me under the same heading as yours. I understood what you were talking about and agree. As soon as I have time I'd enjoy listening to the commentaries and taking some notes for use here. Cheers Markhh (talk) 23:03, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot that would be really great! LowSelfEstidle (talk) 23:07, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your message. I hope you don't mind my tweaks to your latest edits which I think are terrific. (In the Digital Fantasia of the 80s I don't think Taylor appeared at all. There were just brief title cards for each section with the new voiceover comments.) Your research has really brought this article to an excellent place. I agree that its about ready for review. Let me take a closer look this weekend when I have time and see what else might need to be done. Best, Markhh (talk) 06:42, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've just started to go through the article carefully line by line. I made a few edits just to establish themes and clarify things a little. Here are a few thoughts for you. More to come if you want them.

Opening section 2nd paragraph: would “Surround Sound” be appropriate to add to Sterophonic sound”? i.e. “in Sterophonic sound and surround sound.”
Prior to the last sentence of the opening, it feels like it needs another sentence to establish that it became popular over time. something like “Over time, Fantasia connected with audiences and became a popular hit.” I had added a sentence like this way back but it was deleted as being unsourced. Maybe you have the source for such a statement at your fingertips.
Is there any source for how much it has earned in home video sales?
In the last paragraph of “Origins” it’s a little confusing that Disney is pursuing Stokowski, but when he contacts Taylor, he is too busy to work on the film. Can this either be fleshed out a little, or maybe just eliminated? Maybe it’s too much detail for this section?

Overall it looks very good. Your last edits really improved things. Best, Markhh (talk) 04:41, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note that at the beginning of "Origins" I changed the date Disney first thought of the film to 1936 because that is what is in the source from the LA Times. If this is wrong please correct it. Thanks, Markhh (talk) 05:33, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jumping ahead to Home media - Audio: The LP record was not introduced until 1948. If Disney proposed a record release in 1940 it would have been a multi-disc 78rpm record album. But the whole soundtrack would have taken an album of many 78 records, at least 12 or so. That would have been very expensive at the time, although some classical works, like operas were released as very big albums with many records. Best, Markhh (talk) 06:08, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Sorry I haven't had time to respond to your other comments, but here's my guess about Fantasia in digital stereo. I would bet that the 1982 version, while recorded digitally was exhibited in analog dolby stereo on prints with standard magnetic audio tracks - like magnetic audio tape only on the edge of the film. The digital master would have been converted to an analog soundtrack on the release prints. Probably no theaters were equipped for digital playback back then. So 1985 was probably the first time it was exhibited with a true digital soundtrack - and even then there were probably not many theatres equipped for that. That's just a guess, but I bet that's the answer. I had never thought about that before. Also re the records, the source about the Phila Orch just says that Disney had considered releasing "records" of the music in 1940, i.e. 78's, before actually releasing the 3-LP set in the late 50s. Makes sense that they would wait till home stereo was a reality to make a home version. More later, best, Markhh (talk) 02:53, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Yes-related edits

Why are you moving all the lede prose into the article body itself? And why just the Yes album articles? I don't understand your reasoning and I don't think you understand how Wikipedia articles are meant to be structured. All articles must have a lede which act as a summary of the entire article. Please stop with these edits. LowSelfEstidle (talk) 17:25, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? I don't think either you understand how Wikipedia articles are meant to be structured. OK! All articles should have a lede, but a short one! In fact, the "Overview" section acts as a lede to me... Don't you think? Please stop undoing my edits which I think are relevant... HurluGumene (talk) 19:11, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do you really think your edits were relevant? And besides, how can you make such changes without discussing it on their talk pages? Surely some sort of consensus needs to be agreed upon, no? LowSelfEstidle (talk) 21:11, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Q1: yes!

Q2: very easily!

Q3: are you serious? A consensus for such trivial changes!? Which planet or galaxy are you from?!

HurluGumene (talk) 23:30, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HurluGumene, Wikipedia does have a manual of style that includes guidance on the WP:lead section of articles. I have reviewed that guidance and it does not appear to me to support your approach of shorter leads and the use of an "Overview" section. Clearly several other editors oppose these edits as well. I suggest the time has come for you to accept these changes are not appropriate. Bondegezou (talk) 09:25, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Elmer Plummer

This animator does not appear to be notable. The Imdb page is not a reliable source. Bearian (talk) 20:10, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ritchie333

Hey, good to see somebody else digging out their old Genesis albums and trying to improve some of our articles. I've just done a bit on A Trick of the Tail and Duke, but I haven't done anything on Wind and Wuthering as you seem to have got that fairly well covered, so I'll leave it in your capable hands. Selling England by the Pound is now a good article, and with a bit of work, hopefully some others will be. The main problem I've got is that the only really good source I have is Bowler and Dray's book, while you seem to have back issues of Sounds and various other magazines. Are these old copies stored in the loft, or do you have an online subscription? Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:57, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copy Editing

Hai, this Indian film article Loham needs copy editing for grammer and writting style. See Talk:Loham. I invite you to help a hand on it. --Charles Turing (talk) 11:26, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just started copy editing this article and no sooner than I tweaked a paragraph you reverted it. Would you be so kind as to explain why you would revert it to the poorly written version with mixed tense and poor syntax? Thx --Atsme^📞📧 13:59, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Enya

Thanks for the edits made in the pages of Enya. Felipeedit (talk) 21:10, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Mellotron for you!

	The "'Tron of Honour" award
	...for your sterling work on making Rick Wakeman's article much better than the last time I glanced at it. Please don't take it out into the middle of a field and set fire to it. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TWL Questia check-in

Hello!

You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thanks! 20:24, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

TWL HighBeam check-in

Hello Wikipedia Library Users,

You are receiving this message because the Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to HighBeam. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

Make sure that you can still log in to your HighBeam account; if you are having trouble feel free to contact me for more information. When your access expires you can reapply at WP:HighBeam.
Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed. For more information about citing this source, see Wikipedia:HighBeam/Citations
Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, let us know and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thank you. 20:36, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Games Done Quick

Did you mean to remove the section on CGDQ (the first Games Done Quick marathon) when revising the page? Lord Nightmare (talk) 20:22, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invention of Knowledge

Hi,

I assessed the article a C, while is pretty good, it lack a couple of thing to be a B:

More categories, a music sample and perhaps a couple more images, that will set it on the way to GA. Zidane tribal (talk) 16:46, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Anderson

Great work getting the citations added and copywriting. Thanks! Karst (talk) 12:06, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, no problem, @Karst:! I got too fed up with it being such a mess. I'm still looking for some good sources to use. Thank you sir. LowSelfEstidle (talk) 21:23, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Let me know what you need and I'll check some of my Record Collector archives. Hopefully we can remove the tag soon. Karst (talk) 12:06, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2016 Steglitz shooting for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2016 Steglitz shooting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 Steglitz shooting until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 18:34, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, LowSelfEstidle. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Greg Lake

On 9 December 2016, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Greg Lake, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Mjroots (talk) 07:14, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For giving Greg Lake the send-off he deserves with a much better article. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:26, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Onfido for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Onfido is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onfido until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — kashmiri ^TALK 11:07, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Onfido logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Onfido logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:57, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Enya and thanks

Hi! Thank you for all your editions on Enya related articles, her articles were very poor before you edit. Sources for the country chart positions for The Memory of Trees were added. Felipeedit (talk) 13:53, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fragile (Yes album)

About the edit I did on that article was reverted, there is a source I found that would support the edit. However, according to the source, it has a different release date which is on January 4, 1972. Perhaps it was released in either the UK or US on that date, but I'm not entirely sure. So I need your help finding a reliable source to it the edit you reverted. Kevinmuniz115 (talk) 20:31, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

undoing FY info

I curate Forgotten Yesterdays. Care to explain why you summarily decided to remove my research into Tales setlists, on the basis that 'FY is unreliable, sorry!"

Krabapple (talk) 02:58, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A brownie for you!

Thank you for your updates on The Joe Rogan Experience! Happy to work with you on this one if you plan to update. ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 23:54, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:History of howard stern act 2 poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:History of howard stern act 2 poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:History of howard stern act 3 poster 2009.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:History of howard stern act 3 poster 2009.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The history of howard stern act one 2007.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The history of howard stern act one 2007.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rayman gameplay.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rayman gameplay.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:52, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Wonderous Stories

On 15 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wonderous Stories, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "Wonderous Stories" by the progressive rock band Yes remains their highest charting UK single with a peak at number 7 in 1977? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wonderous Stories. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Wonderous Stories), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

So Why 12:03, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Dennis Falcone

Hello, LowSelfEstidle,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Dennis Falcone should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dennis Falcone .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Nerd1a4i (talk) 19:47, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Yanni

I've noticed the large number of changes you've recently made to the Yanni article. Since none of your edits have an edit summary (see Always provide an edit summary), and your individual edits often contain large numbers of unrelated changes, it is extremely difficult for other editors to understand the changes you have made and how they impact the article. It's largely too late now, but in the future please make each edit specific even if it means more edits, and provide a specific edit summary for each. If there is a more general reason you are making a series of edits, please explain on the article's talk page (or here, if appropriate). Thanks. —RCraig09 (talk) 15:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:LowSelfEstidle Please stop making major changes to articles without providing specific edit summaries. You can also discuss generally here, or specifically on specific articles' talk pages. —RCraig09 (talk) 01:49, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:LowSelfEstidle And STOP deleting the archive links from footnotes! These constitute destructive edits of dozens and dozens of footnotes! −RCraig09 (talk) 03:43, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note on my talk page, but I was already in the process of reverting your September changes--for reasons discussed on Talk:Yanni#Edits_by_LowSelfEstidle. Lack of edit summaries and removing archive links, are just the beginning. Reliability issues, with respect to an autobiography (see WP:SPS), are also a big problem. We will have to go forward from that earlier (August 22) version, in the event you have any reliable content to add. —RCraig09 (talk) 17:02, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Red (band)

Thanks for your recent copy editing to the Red (band) article. However, you failed to explain any edits. Instead of tagging you, I'll point you to {{uw-editsummary}} and let you read that. Also, you changed the established MOS:NUMERO format, the date format (but only in references) and used an incorrect heading format. I have fixed those issues. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:00, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see someone has asked you to make edit summaries in the past. Do you see a theme here? Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Yes - topographic drama cover.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Yes - topographic drama cover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Rick Wakeman - Piano Portraits cover.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Rick Wakeman - Piano Portraits cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:58, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, LowSelfEstidle. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Genesis mini-project

Did I mention I've set up a mini-project page at User:Ritchie333/Genesis - basically just get every album (though I might stop short of the first and last) to GA status. Shouldn't take too long. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 22:10, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Prodigy - No Tourists cover.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 19:31, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Piano odyssey cover.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 20:01, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Night Mail

You have done some nice work on this article. I've reassessed it as a C-class maybe it should even be a B now. Thanks ww2censor (talk) 08:55, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Eight images have now been uploaded to c:Category:Night Mail if you would like to include some of them. ww2censor (talk) 09:34, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ww2censor: Many thanks for your nice words and reassessment. Great work! LowSelfEstidle (talk) 09:46, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I just added the poster to the infobox and move the existing train image down to the Crewe paragraph but add or move them if you have a better idea. ww2censor (talk) 09:56, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ronnie O'Sullivan Career prize money

Hi can you add that £10 million BBC source to Ronnie's Infobox on his Wikipedia page. His career earnings are unsourced at the moment. I don't know how to add it OK?. Regards 92.251.195.40 (talk) 15:54, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wonderous Stories cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wonderous Stories cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:38, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anthony Phillips - Slow Waves Soft Stars cover.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:31, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Private Parts and Pieces VI, Ivory Moon cover.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:19, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Privatepartspieces8 cover.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 21:06, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:At the edge of light cover.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 21:11, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, LowSelfEstidle. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Private Parts & Pieces VII: Slow Waves, Soft Stars

Hello LowSelfEstidle I have added projects Albums, England, to your article. You may wish to join them, check their to-do, and meet new people with interest in these topics. Cheers, --Gryllida (talk) 21:21, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vangelis - Nocturne.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:06, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Howard Stern Comes Again cover.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:09, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Onfido logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Onfido logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:40, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:1000 Hands cover.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Utopia Strong

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Utopia Strong, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Postcard Cathy (talk) 17:11, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Declaration (Red album).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Declaration (Red album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:34, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Genesis

Hi, sorry about the revert - I was trying to co-ordinate about 6-7 people adding the same thing at once and tripped and reverted the wrong thing. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:35, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Calling All Stations

Since you did a really great job with the articles on other Genesis albums, would it be possible for you to bring this one up to snuff as well? There's a good amount of sources available on the making of this album, such as the Genesis: Chapter and Verse book, as well as this interview with Tony Banks: http://www.twronline.net/issues/twr35/twr35_tb01.htm.--CherokeeJack1 (talk) 21:59, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello, I'm 122.60.171.248. I noticed that you recently removed content from Heaven & Earth (Yes album) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 122.60.171.248 (talk) 10:03, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Friends and Relatives Vol. 2

Hello LowSelfEstidle. I am currently disagreeing with User:Laser brain, who has reverted my removal of your adding Yes, Friends and Relatives (Volume Two) to Template:Yes (band). I found Wikipedia:Navigation template, and it states that we should consider writing articles first before adding links to them to navigation templates. Would you please consider making the article so the template does not have a red link? I am not sure how much information you can find, however. The album didn't chart and being one of their more obscure compilation albums probably doesn't have a lot of album reviews in rock publications. 1.43.124.103 (talk) 14:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Stamets

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Paul Stamets. Thank you.

I think it's important to repeat that you need to be using edit summaries. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 16:54, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Night Mail

With this edit you added details about the narration but the beginning is not a complete sentence. That has now been tagged for clarification, so perhaps you can review and clarify. Thanks ww2censor (talk) 22:32, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello, I'm Aloha27. I noticed that you recently removed content from Rush (band) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Aloha27 talk 20:55, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WikiProject Cue sports

Hi LowSelfEstidle! You are receiving this message because we've noticed your excellent edits on cue sports-related articles. We need your help at the cue sports WikiProject! There is much work to do, so please head over to the project page and help us enhance and increase the coverage of cue sports related articles on Wikipedia! We also have a project specifically for Snooker articles!

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sergei Rachmaninoff

@LowSelfEstidle: Greetings! I fully understand if you are busy, but there is a new effort to get Sergei Rachmaninoff to GA status (hopefully even FA). We have raised the points on the talk page. This is fully up to you and I'm telling you this because you are a major contributor on that article. Wretchskull (talk) 00:37, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Last Domino Tour Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Last Domino Tour Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:11, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Themes from Calmi Cuori Appassionati cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Themes from Calmi Cuori Appassionati cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Joe Rogan Experience logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Joe Rogan Experience logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Genesis - BBC Broadcasts (2023) Cover.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Genesis - BBC Broadcasts (2023) Cover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Higgins

Hi LowSelfEstidle. You've added references for "Burrows 2002" to Alex Higgins, but no such work if defined in the article. Could you add the required cite to the Bibliography section, or let me know what work this refers to? -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 18:43, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned images

Please note that I have tagged the following five images that you uploaded for deletion as orphaned non-free images. You added these images to Howard Stern videography and discography. However, per WP:NFC#UUI #2, we do not allow per-album covers for non-free images on discography type articles, which this is. The images are as follows:

If you have questions about this, let me know. Simply restoring them to the discography is not the way forward. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 22:55, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Flying Scotsman

Hello, sorry to trouble you but this edit you made in April is causing a problem. You have added a couple of short references to "McIntosh 2010" but there is no long reference for them to link to. I was wondering if you could supply the full ref entry. Many thanks. Keith D (talk) 16:52, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Guy Protheroe

The article Guy Protheroe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The only source on this page is an obituary of another person which doesn't even mention Protheroe, and the only sources I could find which did only had passing mentions. I'm surprised to find so little, especially for an article this extensive, but I do not see evidence of notability here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 00:25, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Guy Protheroe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Guy Protheroe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guy Protheroe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QuietHere (talk | contributions) 03:41, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Night Mail

Back in 2018 you made this edit to the article Night Mail and the very last paragraph you added refers to the copyright of the W.H. Auden poem for which you did not provide a reference. I know it is quite a few years ago but do you have a suitable citation to add to the article? Otherwise it should be removed as unverified. Thanks and have a happy holiday. ww2censor (talk) 20:38, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Surrender of Silence

Hello, LowSelfEstidle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Surrender of Silence, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:05, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Surrender of Silence

Hello, LowSelfEstidle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Surrender of Silence".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:49, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]