Jump to content

User talk:Longestview

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome Longestview!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 41,971,188 registered editors!
Hello Longestview. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:
  Introduction to Wikipedia
  The five pillars of Wikipedia
  Editing tutorial
  How to edit a page
  Simplified Manual of Style
  The basics of Wikicode
  How to develop an article
  How to create an article
  Help pages
  What Wikipedia is not
Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
  Do be bold
  Do assume good faith
  Do be civil
  Do keep cool!
  Do maintain a neutral point of view
  Don't spam
  Don't infringe copyright
  Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest
  Don't commit vandalism
  Don't get blocked
If you need further help, you can:
  Ask a question
or you can:
  Get help at the Teahouse
or even:
  Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
  Fight vandalism
  Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome
  Help contribute to articles
  Perform maintenance tasks
           
  Become a member of a project that interests you
  Help design new templates
  Subscribe and contribute to The Signpost
  Translate articles from Wikipedias in other languages

To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your userpage.

Please remember to:

  • Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
  • Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

Sincerely, S0091 (talk) 19:11, 1 August 2021 (UTC)   (Leave me a message)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:South Dakota Senate districts indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 01:25, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may delete it. I recently created Category:South Dakota legislative districts, which renders it obsolete. Longestview (talk) 01:34, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2024 Republican Party presidential candidates, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:23, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Results of the 2024 Republican Party presidential primaries

[edit]

I actually meant the talk page of Talk:2024 Republican Party presidential primaries in my restoration of Binkley. But it would seem its more contested on that talk page than I originally thought regarding whether to label him a "major" candidate. Regardless, I don't think this matters in regards to including him in this results page. It makes no sense to include Asa Hutchinson who received less than a third of the votes and vote share of Binkley on this results page but not include Binkley. Either we remove both Hutchinson and Binkley or have them both. But to include a withdrawn candidate who received far less votes and not include a relatively much better voted candidate that is still in the race doesn't make sense. Helper201 (talk) 09:03, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about 2023 Tucker municipal elections

[edit]

Hello Longestview, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, 2023 Tucker municipal elections, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Tucker municipal elections.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Grahaml35}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Grahaml35 (talk) 18:21, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Plagerism

[edit]

Ok, so I am a little confused on why you replaced my work with your own work that is literally the exact same. I even updated mine to remove the state abbreviations. Did you plagerize me? Petjayso (talk) 02:52, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nope! Hope this clears things up. Longestview (talk) 02:55, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok thank you Petjayso (talk) 16:35, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2012 Democratic Party presidential candidates into Results of the 2012 Democratic Party presidential primaries. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 23:27, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 February newsletter

[edit]

The 2024 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with 135 participants. This is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2017.

Our current leader is newcomer Generalissima (submissions), who has one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher) and 10 GAs and 12 DYKs mostly on New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:

As a reminder, competitors may submit work for the first round until 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February, and the second round starts 1 March. Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round; currently, competitors need at least 15 points to progress. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 March newsletter

[edit]

The first round of the 2024 WikiCup ended at 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February. Everyone with at least 30 points moved on to Round 2, the highest number of points required to advance to the second round since 2014. Due to a six-way tie for the 64th-place spot, 67 contestants have qualified for Round 2.

The following scorers in Round 1 all scored more than 300 points:

In this newsletter, the judges would like to pay a special tribute to Vami_IV (submissions), who unfortunately passed away this February. At the time of his death, he was the second-highest-scoring competitor. Outside the WikiCup, he had eight other featured articles, five A-class articles, eight other good articles, and two Four Awards. Vami also wrote an essay on completionism, a philosophy in which he deeply believed. If you can, please join us in honoring his memory by improving one of the articles on his to-do list.

Remember that any content promoted after 27 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 North Dakota Democratic presidential primary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jason Palmer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Third party and independent candidates for the 2020 United States presidential election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2020 United States presidential election in Washington.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 April newsletter

[edit]

We are approaching the end of the 2024 WikiCup's second round, with a little over two weeks remaining. Currently, contestants must score at least 105 points to progress to the third round.

Our current top scorers are as follows:

Competitors may submit work for the second round until the end of 28 April, and the third round starts 1 May. Remember that only competitors with the top 32 scores will make it through to the third round. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs. As a reminder, competitors are strictly prohibited from gaming Wikipedia policies or processes to receive more points.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please read Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of political parties in the United States Virgin Islands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Modern liberalism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:52, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Virgin Islands elections

[edit]

Hello. Regarding this edit, I think it may be best (more convenient for readers) to keep a single article on the elections, rather than having separate articles for the governor, delegate, legislature etc. It is unlikely that the articles will be very long and should be easily combined into a single one (which can be split if it gets too large). All the election articles on Puerto Rico aside from the current year ones have been merged in this way. Cheers, Number 57 23:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

👍 Longestview (talk) 00:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Longestview. Thank you for your work on 1964 United States Virgin Islands legislative election. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:07, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:United States Virgin Islands gubernatorial elections indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 04:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 May newsletter

[edit]

The second round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 April. This round was particularly competitive: each of the 32 contestants who advanced to Round 3 scored at least 141 points. This is the highest number of points required to advance to Round 3 since 2014.

The following scorers in Round 2 all scored more than 500 points:

The full scores for Round 2 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 18 featured articles, 22 featured lists, and 186 good articles, 76 in the news credits and at least 200 did you know credits. They have conducted 165 featured article reviews, as well as 399 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 21 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed during Round 3, which starts on 1 May at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RFK campaign ballot access map

[edit]

Thank you for updating the ballot access map! I wondering why Arizona, Georgia, Nevada and South Carolina are a different color than the other awaiting certification states? C. W. Edward (talk) 04:08, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because either the states' petition was rejected or restarted. Sources are typically located on the Third party and independent candidates for the 2024 United States presidential election page; I have a habit of only updating one page at a time. Longestview (talk) 04:12, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Longestview. Thank you for your work on 2024 Mississippi Democratic presidential primary. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 09:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Minor Party Nominations

[edit]

Hell Longestview. From the research you have done, are you aware of which of those political parties I listed in the "Talk:Third party and independent candidates for the 2024 United States presidential election" have nominated a presidential candidate before? That would be very useful information for me. Thecommander236 (talk) 04:09, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! Putting the list of those in that talk page. Longestview (talk) 04:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of political parties in the United States, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Independent and New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:55, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Longestview. Thank you for your work on List of third-party and independent performances in Louisiana state legislative elections. Another editor, Voorts, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

The candidate names in the first State house section should not be bolded.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Voorts}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

voorts (talk/contributions) 23:30, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1978 West Virginia judicial elections for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1978 West Virginia judicial elections is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1978 West Virginia judicial elections until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

voorts (talk/contributions) 05:14, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LNC Map

[edit]

Small note: I believe IL should be ter Maat/Oliver on first ballot as they received six votes each. Thank you so much for doing this by the way! Crazysportsdude1 (talk) 00:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch - fixed it. Refresh cache. Longestview (talk) 01:07, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:United States Virgin Islands legislative elections indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 03:05, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of political parties in Florida, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Socialist Worker's Party.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 July newsletter

[edit]

The third round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 June. As with Round 2, this round was competitive: each of the 16 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 256 points.

The following editors all scored more than 400 points in Round 3:

The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 28 featured articles, 38 featured lists, 240 good articles, 92 in the news credits, and at least 285 did you know credits. They have conducted 279 featured article reviews, as well as 492 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 22 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed during Round 4, which starts on 1 July at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Mayoral elections in Fargo, North Dakota indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 19:34, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Userbox

[edit]

Um, I do not think you have been on Wikipedia for 99 years. If that was unintentional, maybe you should fix that? Jayson (talk) 20:33, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Michele Reneau Article?

[edit]

Hi! You seem pretty good with wikipedia - is there anyway you can create a page for Michele Reneau? It'd be nice if we could try to have all the Tennessee House people with their own pages, since Reneau just won an election. Thank you! DrMcLego (talk) 17:52, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 Tennessee House of Representatives election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Justin Jones.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:18, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 August newsletter

[edit]

The fourth round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 29 August. Each of the 8 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 472 points, and the following contestants scored more than 700 points:

Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated. Contestants put in extraordinary amounts of effort during this round, and their scores can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 36 featured articles, 55 featured lists, 15 good articles, 93 in the news credits, and at least 333 did you know credits. They have conducted 357 featured content reviews, as well as 553 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 30 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed during Round 5, which starts on 1 September at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. If two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Remember to claim your points within 14 days of earning them, and importantly, before the deadline on 31 October.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:12, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for creating this article! Bearian (talk) 04:03, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A brownie for you!

[edit]
Hello,

Thank you for your contribution to presidential election. In my view, it will shape America and the world. Regarding the inforBox photo, I would like some feedback on when and how we can finialise the RfC. It started in April 2024, so it's been quite a while now, so I hope we can replace the photo. Goodtiming8871 (talk) 11:48, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to 2012 Guamanian local elections. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 18:20, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 November newsletter

[edit]

The 2024 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round being a very tight race. Our new champion is AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who scored 2,283 points mainly through 3 high-multiplier FAs and 3 GAs on military history topics. By a 1% margin, Airship beat out last year's champion, Delaware BeanieFan11 (submissions), who scored second with 2,264 points, mainly from an impressive 58 GAs about athletes. In third place, Generalissima (submissions) scored 1,528 points, primarily from two FAs on U.S. Librarians of Congress and 20 GAs about various historical topics. Our other finalists are: Sammi Brie (submissions) with 879 points, Canada Hey man im josh (submissions) with 533 points, BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 432 points, Arconning (submissions) with 244 points, and Christmas Island AryKun (submissions) with 15 points. Congratulations to our finalists and all who participated!

The final round was very productive, and contestants had 7 FAs, 9 FLs, 94 GAs, 73 FAC reviews, and 79 GAN reviews and peer reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2025 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2002 Wyoming Senate Maps

[edit]

@Longestview: Hello. I notice you've recently uploaded a map of the 2006 Wyoming Senate election. I wanted to ask where you got the district map. As you've seen, I've been making articles for Wyoming Senate districts, but in terms of historical district boundaries, I've only been able to find maps from the 2012 apportionment plan. If you could send me a link to a source for earlier district maps, I'd very much appreciate it. RoundSquare (talk) 21:35, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I found a link to the 2002 district shapefiles using the Wayback Machine (here.) The House files are there too. Cheers, LV 21:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Longestview: Oh wow, this is a good find. Thank you for sharing. I load the descriptions of the districts which is very nice, however, all the actual maps appear to be unarchived. Do you have a link to actual archived map? It would certainly be helpful in the process of making maps highlighting each specific district. If not, that's fine and I still thank you. I may still be able to use what's available. RoundSquare (talk) 22:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, I don't think I understand. What exactly do you mean by "actual map"? If you're wondering how I know which district is which number, and if that's what you're asking, there's a powerpoint from the redistricting committee (here.) LV 22:10, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Longestview: Yup, that was basically what I was asking. Thank you, so much! RoundSquare (talk) 22:16, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No problem! I also found a link to the 1992 district plans (here,) but unfortunately most of the links seem to be dead. Might still be useful. Cheers, LV 22:20, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Longestview: Thanks, but yeah, unfortunately all of the relevant links seem dead. It's kind of a bummer, if only one of those links worked we could have a complete history of all the current Wyoming state legislative districts. Oh well. I do have a very VAGUE idea of what the 1992 districts looked like because of this newspaper clip listing which counties they were in. Perhaps the information is still out there somewhere. RoundSquare (talk) 22:27, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@RoundSquare I found the shapefiles of maps for both legislative chambers (here,) used from 1992-2002, which I have used for the 2000 Wyoming Senate election page. LV 08:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Longestview: Oh wow! This is an incredible find. Thank you for sharing it with me. I do have one question however: How did you determine the numbers of the districts? Like how did you determine which district corresponds to each number? I don't really know how to work with those files on the site myself (I just know how to edit already existing SVGs), so I don't know if they contain the information already. It seems though we now have the complete legislative district history of Wyoming, which is very satisfying. RoundSquare (talk) 19:59, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@RoundSquare The information on the numbers of the districts is contained within the shapefiles themselves. The desktop version of Google Earth can be used to easily visualize them. LV 20:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Longestview: Hey, very sorry to keep bothering you, I hope you don't mind. I already had Google Earth Pro installed, but I'm having trouble visualizing the districts in the program. It seems Google Earth as a default will open KML files properly, but not XML. Is there a way to convert the files on the site to KML? Is there a way for Google Earth process them as is? Is there a video or text tutorial you could send to help me out? Very sorry, I've never messed around with mapping tools like this before. Like I said, I mostly just edit existing SVG files people make. RoundSquare (talk) 20:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@RoundSquare The .shp files are what I used. LV 20:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Longestview: Alright! That did the trick. Again, thank you, both for the map and for the additional help just then. RoundSquare (talk) 20:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Longestview. Thank you for your work on 68th Wyoming Legislature. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed day ahead!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]