User talk:LiquidGhoul

; Archives
	Archive 1 November 2005 - March 2006 ; Archive 2 March 2006 - May 2006 ; Archive 3 May 2006 - July 2006 ; Archive 4 July 2006 - November 2006 ;

Wikiproject Australian Fauna

Thanks for joining WP Australian Fauna your help is much appreciated. Please don't hesitate to do anything that may help the project and once again, welcome! Atlantis Hawk 09:45, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Damn, I forgot all about the move function. Oh well, thanks for alerting me and I'll remember about it next time I need to move a page. Atlantis Hawk 07:16, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Australian biota

I'm thinking I'll wait and see what others think before continuing the discussion there as I dont want people to think we are hijacking the project or those articles. Gnangarra 14:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, I think only about 12 hours to go. it suprising how quickly misinformation about snakes spreads only found 1 site out of 59 that said anything other than locals but its an incomplete list. I think its one those day in the library researching it on paper to resolve. Gnangarra 15:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

I would like to express my appreciation of the time you spent considering my successful RfA. Thankyou Gnangarra 12:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

User:Froggydarb/ausfroglist

Yep, I don't mind what you do with it (or anyone else), I made it just to keep a track on what articles have been done, but haven't got around to updating it. -- Froggydarb ^croak 20:27, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fauna, or Flora of the World

I claim no insight to the "answers to the problems". I worked on all the fauna flora avifauna/birds trees as of 20 days ago, turning into the Caribbean from Central America, then reversing and doing S. Amer. And I went back to the Caribbean, kind of going by island, now in the Greater Antilles looking at the links to the Jamaica page(there are 63, 50 item pages linked, so it takes some hours and looking at pages, putting things into categories). If I had been asked, I would have said I wouldn't have dared to try to do the Caribbean. But you will see some of the pages ended up as "by islands" to clear out the "Main" page, and then there can still be some "ambiquities". So, it has been a work in progress,. ....... I did start with the states of Western US, and then started the subcaategories, like: Category:Avifauna of Southwestern United States, or ...Category:Trees of Northwestern United States. Then i did all the Canadian Provinces, (and then put them in "by province", and I have been doing that for Mexico "by state". So, i am just trying to keep it all organized, and logical. I have no final answers. I do know one thing that happened in the US stuff, so I left it, for a couple of reasons. And I did start: Category:Trees of the Amazon. there is: plenty of work to continue doing. Michael, in the Sonoran Desert. --Mmcannis 04:08, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are overlooking a major item (and as i noted, Oceania, is Not a continent). If you look at Category:Fauna of South America by region, you will find the Guianas, the only "Land" subsection, at the moment for S. America. I originally had them s.Amer by country, then realized Tierra del Fuego, and then Falkland Islands, are the only two other logical items. So i put all the countries then under "by region". Chile and Tierra d Fue are listed together. Other items are listed together(in the Caribbean especially). The overlooked point is, "by Continent" doesn't mean everything just slides into "by Continent" because it is a continent. Eurasia, and Oceania(with a subset for East Indies?), then Caribbean, C. Amer. The only other area I think one could come up with is maybe the Mediterranean, to include Azores, and Canary Island. Michael in Arizona-(I have to go to work tomorrow, so it to bed with myself).(and thanks for listening at least)(after re-reading, so maybe "Mediterranean", and "east indies"/w/its countries therefore)--Mmcannis 04:31, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

::Methinks this issue we've been discussing elsewhere is cropping up all over the place all of a sudden! I wonder if there's an equivalent standard for fauna. Hesperian 04:38, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm hoping so. It may be of worth to invite Mmcannis to the discussion at Australian biota if we want to dramatically change how the Flora by continent will be done. (Sorry about replying here, but both of you are here). --liquidGhoul 04:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LiquidGhoul, thought you'ld be interested in newly discovered frogs and more. --LegitimateAndEvenCompelling 13:22, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And see this: http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.rss.html?pid=21532 --LegitimateAndEvenCompelling 16:44, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Admin revert

Regarding this revert, I'm not so sure that was vandalism. As far as I recall, the rule of thumb is to only use admin revert in cases of obvious vandalism, which this was not. Whether the addition was worth keeping or not is another story and I am not qualified to comment as to that, I just wanted to remind you to be careful with those admin tools. BigNate37_(T) 19:04, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Frog from Perth's outer northern suburbs

Hey Evan, was thinking of you when I saw this in a frog pond in Wanneroo (outer nthn suburb of Perth.) can you ID it and we can make a page?

cheers Cas Liber 00:04, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Dear LiquidGhoul,

I noticed that you have a lot of experience with getting articles to FA status. I have been working on the Ohio Wesleyan University page article and am trying to get it to FA status. I was wondering if you could provide some advice on how the article can be improved? Also, any contributions to it will be even more appreciated! Thank you so much for your time! I greatly appreciate it! WikiprojectOWU 01:48, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reward Board - $10 for each plant or animal FA................................

Hey Evan, have you seen this reward board? [[1]]

- I have just nominated Diplodocus as an FAC and Kangaroo is aussie collab of the fortnight. I did a couple of edits but the task looks too big. I asked Hesperian when to nominate Banksia epica (which must be on the cusp).....cheers Cas Liber 10:05, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am thinking that it may be in the 'too hard' basket for a fortnight and I must say my heart isn't really in it. I was keeping an eye on it to see how many others are editing it too. Cas Liber 06:40, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually a lot of people are starting to hoe into it. Maybe possible.... I just gave someone some advice on Snow leopard, which looks further along the way....Cas Liber 06:43, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ITN

Hello, LiquidGhoul.

I won't say this on Talk:MainPage (too public), but I have trouble justifying the strict enforcement of ITN guidelines at the same time when so many people are actively (the past few days) asking at Talk:ITN that the guidelines be changed. Ignoring guidelines is bad. Enforcing guidelines widely considered inadequate is also bad. I ain't arguing to keep the line. I simply decided that it's best to leave things as is. I hope you understand.

I didn't add the line about Ford onto ITN. And I don't have strong enough a reason to take it off. It should be there, but it's not a strong case. I'd rather displace it sooner with better ITN materials, e.g. the war in Somalia. --PFHLai 18:34, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: Dead frog

Earlier I had questions about my red eyed treefrog's death and you asked for more information. The frog was miscolored and he looked very much alive when he was actually dead. His eyes were closed and he was hanging upside down on a leaf. I spray the terrarium several times a day and came to do this and after I sprayed he fell from the the leaf to the ground. He had already been dead while on the leaf and was very stiff. I have no photos, as I try not to make a habit of photographing dead pets. His appetite seemed normal. In November we took him to the vet because of some unusual spots on his back. The vet said this was from humidity being too low, and we kept humidity extra high and the spots went away. As for the Green Treefrog, she is very active at night and seems to be in perfect health. I already cleaned the terrarium and she is living there. Thank you for your time and get back to me whenever you get the chance. BrandiniTheGreat 03:12, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure my frog had ranavirus? I did some reseach and most websites say that ranavirus, known as "red-leg" here in America, also show symptoms of swelling, bloating, and redness on the body in some species. And when I said he was discolored, I meant dark green not red. And he did not seem lethargic in any way. My frog, Jerry, showed none of these symptoms. And Janet, the green tree frog, seems healthier than ever. And if it was red-leg, if Jerry had it, although it takes a while to take hold, should have killed him a long time ago. He was fairly young. Could it be possible that it was just his time to go? Thanks again, BrandiniTheGreat 18:02, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Frogs

Sadly I only have pictures of motorbike frogs - I know we do have banjo frogs somewhere because I can hear them, but have never seen one (or if I have, haven't been able to distinguish it). Most of my pictures are pretty average though - all ours are babies. I've got a few unusual ones though like 9 newly-metamorphised ones scrambling for a place in the sun on a single reed, and of course the one I linked on Fred's page. Orderinchaos78 11:17, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Goes without saying that if you want to use my delinquent frog picture, feel free :) Orderinchaos78 11:23, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Two more that I'm genuinely not sure what species they are - [2] and [3] - desc *sounds* like a banjo frog but it could be a motorbike one. Orderinchaos78 11:46, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Found a way to upload it - it's at a link from my talk page Orderinchaos78 12:12, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WA frogs

Very glad I got your attention. I have been manually inserting the newly created cat;

Category:Amphibians of Western Australia

and populate it with unique (mostly!) West Australian inhabitants. Can I claim the overseas and WA frogs for the glory of the project!? :)

Everyone is welcome to join, or just visit, WikiProject Western Australia. Please look over my edits and I will try to track down photos. Pls leave requests for image experts at WP:WA. Non expert, just like frogs. Fred 12:00, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Precisely. It is a new project with many fine wikipedians active, some in image. Not me. I will have a go at adding to the commons when I can speak to non wiki reseachers.

Regarding your first point; I thought, probably mistakenly, that I read of a sp. that existed in Indonesia, NW Australia and QLD. I suppose it was a family if not species. Fred 12:49, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for info. I will return to this topic later. Sorry I don't have page name of sp. or more probably family. Be sure to let you know indo connection. I can send you a copy of my page history if you are able to search the pages. I may remember tomorrow and try this. Regards Fred 13:08, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here is ref: Northern Dwarf Tree Frog

(Litoria bicolor) is a small species of tree frog native to northern Australia, from the Kimberly region of Western Australia to Bowen, Queensland and Aru Islands of Indonesia. The population occurring in Indonesia may not be Litoria bicolor and research on call structure or genetics is needed to confirm its taxonomic status.

I sent an email - Will try to get something - and follow up soon! SatuSuro 14:05, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Green Tree Frog Care

I moved my article to another wiki. Do not worry because lots and lots of research has gone towards this. I am glad you are concerned about the well-being of these creatures. But if you hate my article so much go ahead and delete it if you really want to. BrandiniTheGreat 23:18, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Superb fairy wren

She is adorable--so much character for one little bird in a picture. Thanks for making it public domain, I'm printing and framing it. KP Botany 21:40, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Impressive photos

Oh my God, I was just astonished when I saw the quality of your photographs. They are simply gorgeous, good job!! Which hardware do you use? --Taraborn 09:19, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

corroboree pic

Yeah I'll upload it tonight.--Tnarg¹²³⁴⁵ 09:00, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here we go Image:Corroboree.jpg.--Tnarg¹²³⁴⁵ 11:33, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Amanita punctata....or vagninata

I will work on fungi stuff later - off ta tha flicks Cas Liber 01:40, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cool - if you upload the cymatoderma we can use it on fungi of australia page too. cheers Cas Liber 03:50, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Permission to use image

Hi Evan,

I am the author of The Quest for Right, a textbook for the schools. The work consists of seven volumes; the first three will be released late summer '07. Will you please allow us to use the following image in the textbook? Your permission will augument your exposure in the Wikipedia to millions of students who might not otherwise see and appreciate your work. Of course, we will give you credit for the image and you will retain the copyright. As a token of our appreciation, I will be happy to provide a signed complimentary copy of the volume in which your image appears. Note: Only the eyes of this image will be used; it will be in a composite photo showing a range of eyes from the human eye to a compound eye. Hence, the entire photo will not be used. You may contact me at questforright@aol.com

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Aus_soldier_Crab.jpg

Thank you in advance for use of the image.

Best regards, David Parsons The Quest for Right —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.224.13.22 (talk) 13:49, 26 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Nice image

at Northern Dwarf Tree Frog. And thanks for that interesting discussion regarding this.

Fred 09:59, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This one. Best regards. Fred

I should have asked you, where was it taken? Fred

Just happened to pass by your page

And I saw those cute pictures! I just feel I have to say how cute they are, and great quality as well! The bird is so cute... the frog is so green... and the crab is so different! =D Berserkerz Crit 09:08, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, I've added that thing in the Decline in amphibian population article. Berserkerz Crit 10:53, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New frog

Did you see this? --Peta 04:38, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rancid?

does Rancid Meat mean Raw Meat that's gone off?--I.W 19:29, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just cruising by, thought I'd say hello

Samsara (talk • contribs) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Samsara (talk • contribs) 09:15, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another cool fungus

Hi, I replied at the photo. Somewhere less than 5% of Aussie fungi can be IDed to species level but you're taking some ace photos. I am kicking myself as I've missed some good viewing round sydney (too busy). Keep me posted. cheers, Casliber | talk | contribs 11:14, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I'll try to get the usual mycological suspects to take a look too to see if an how we can verify..cheers, Casliber | talk | contribs 11:40, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Common names

Hi,
I will get around to photographing them, hunting for a good deal on a camera at the moment. Regarding naming; the scientific name is the most common name. It is certainly less ambiguous than some other biota names I've come across. Do you see a problem? Regards, ☻ Fred|☝ discussion|✍ contributions 11:34, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not convinced, do you mean it is the most frequently used or ordinary name or a inferior or vulgar one? You are the second person to recommend that compact camera series, I'm sold. I need one to carry all the time, but I prefer SLR otherwise. They (DSLRs) are getting cheaper and better. Regards, ☻ Fred|☝ discussion|✍ contributions 16:47, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I hope you didn't mind me paraphrasing the dictionary, I thought it would illustrate my point on definition. I don't know if you followed the discussion with Stemonitis, he suggested that I seek WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles#Names and titles which redirected to WP:TOL. The two most relevant lines, IMHO, are identification of formal common names and reiteration of the perennial rule. Thanks for discussing this with me, feel free to move that article and any future ones. I will let you know which compact I choose, your suggestion seems likely. Regards, ☻ Fred|☝ discussion|✍ contributions 08:23, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Newcastle Wikipedia Meetup

A few Newcastle Wikipedians are going to get together for dinner some time in June. We'd love you to come! Please click here for more details. --One Salient Oversight 13:17, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis.jpg

Hello LiquidGhoul, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis.jpg) was found at the following location: User:LiquidGhoul/Frog gallery experimenting. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:46, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis.jpg

Hello LiquidGhoul, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis.jpg) was found at the following location: User:LiquidGhoul/List of frog families table. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:46, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

For your supportive comments at my RfA. Let me know if you plan to work on some of the frog satellite articles. There is some nice public domain material on www.archive.org for herps of Indo Australia (deRooij?) and I can now help with SVG illustrations. Btw, we should get some imgs of Nasikabatrachus soon. Shyamal 03:49, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commas or parentheses for scientific name in opening sentence and elsewhere

(Now that was a long header wasn't it?) There's a debate here about commas versus parentheses for scientific names for organisms (well in this case birds). I'm not sure whether this has been raised elsewhere but would be good to establish once and for all here and could apply as MOS across all biology articles.cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:36, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Komodo dragon

Could you please drop by the FAC page and review this article? Also, I'd appreciate some help expanding the lead section, seeing that you have quite a few FA's. Cheers, bibliomaniac 15 ^{BUY NOW!} 03:30, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Amphibians and Reptiles Portal (P:AAR)

edit

The Amphibians and Reptiles Portal

I'm glad to announce that The Amphibians and reptiles portal (P:AAR) has been created and is ready for you to use. This portal covers any subjects related to amphibians, reptiles, herpetology, as well as WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles.

Purposes of the portal

to act as the "main page" for editors interested in amphibians and reptiles. The portal page should contain all the common and useful links to relevant articles, lists, categories, as well as the project tasklist. As this portal is your tool, please feel free to organize, modify, or expand the Topics, Categories, Lists, and Tasklist sections of the portal as you see fit.
to lead potential AAR editors to WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles as well as to educate general readers. Feel free to add more items for the "Did you know..." section.

Thank you for reading. If you have any questions, please leave them on the portal talk page or my user talk page. --Melanochromis

--Melanochromis 06:11, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image promoted on Commons

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Your image Image:Australia green tree frog (Litoria caerulea) crop.jpg nominated for Quality Image status was reviewed and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

grendel|khan 16:10, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Photo's

Hello Evan (user: LiquidGhoul)

I am writing on behalf of Paul Docherty, who would like to use your photograph of White’s Tree Frog in a wildlife book.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Australia green tree frog (Litoria caerulea) crop.jpg

Please can you contact him at PaulD@quarto.com as soon as possible.

Many thanks

Fabio Ribeiro

--Fabio^Talk 23:12, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Featured List of the Day Experiment

There have been a series of proposals to initiate a Featured List of the Day on the main page. Numerous proposals have been put forth. After the third one failed, I audited all WP:FL's in order to begin an experiment in my own user space that will hopefully get it going. Today, it commences at WP:LOTD. Afterwards I created my experimental page, a new proposal was set forth to do a featured list that is strikingly similar to my own which is to do a user page experimental featured list, but no format has been confirmed and mechanism set in place. I continue to be willing to do the experiment myself and with this posting it commences. Please submit any list that you would like to have considered for list of the day in the month of January 2008 by the end of this month to WP:LOTD and its subpages. You may submit multiple lists for consideration.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD) 17:45, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your pictures

Hi, I just saw your photo at bird, and some of your other work as well. I don't know what's kept you away from Wikipedia, but it's excellent and I hope you'll be back with more at some point. IronDuke 20:13, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Australia newsletter

WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 21:49, 11 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]

WikiProject Australia newsletter

WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 21:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Welcome back!

And may I say... what an entrance! :) Samsara (FA • FP) 13:18, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good plan. Haven't owned a telly for years. ;) Samsara (FA • FP) 13:24, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

.....and keep an eye out for fungi this coming summer and autumn...Sydney is so soggy that all sorts of things are popping up this summer...oh, and ditto/welcome :) cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:13, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not forgetting the north coast (nsw) mate - I do have photos of rain in murwillumbah if you need em - btw I owe from a long time ago - welcome back and remind me what i owe ya! Satu Suro 12:02, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it was catching sounds in the dark of what sounded like about 5 diff species making a noise outside my bedroom window - its down to about 2 or 3 at moment :0 Satu Suro 12:13, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ooops theres the rub - i never did it - will have to try- embarrassed Satu Suro 12:56, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Toad taxonomy

Could you add references for the taxonomic change and also mention the former names? It looks wierd when the IUCN link doesn't max the taxonomy. Ex: Canadian Toad -Ravedave (talk) 21:11, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Carpet Python

An image uploaded by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, Image:Morelia spilota head.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 12:16, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bufo

I appreciate the work you're doing on the article Bufo. But it would be a good idea to describe the changes Frost et al. (2006) have brought to this genus. And give a link in the section "references" to the publication of their research. Otherwise, others wil keep adding in good faith outdated names to this genus. JoJan (talk) 09:24, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Red-eyed Tree Frog

An image uploaded by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, Image:Red-eyed Tree Frog - Litoria chloris edit1.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 09:12, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oz amphibs

I have been very slowly but surely trying to tag the talk pages with the oz and biota projects of oz frogs - some arts look like they need more consistent cross amphib art refs and further readings - any ideas? Satu Suro 11:11, 25 February 2008 (UTC) My apols - I have been putting WP Australia tags on the discussion pages of the oz frog arts - and biota as well Satu Suro 12:11, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nah no rush - hey out of curiosity was trawling through them and tagging - i think there are few mistakes (on my tagging that is)- hey its all a learning process Satu Suro 12:44, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/New England Tree Frog

An image uploaded by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, Image:New England Tree Frog - Litoria subglandulosa.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 09:24, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bufo names

The Frost et al. paper is highly controversial and poorly supported, and there are several papers in press rejecting that taxonomy and retaining a much broader genus Bufo. Changing the names at this time is a big problem, and will simply result in greater confusion in the literature. The Pauly et al. study provides strong support for the monophyly of a much more traditional Bufo. It turns out that some of the sequences used by Frost et al. were not even from anurans, but rather represent parasites of frogs. In addition, the alignment of the genes was highly problematic. Ranapipiens (talk) 23:15, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Ranapipiens, 21:05, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thanks so much LiquidG, that is the very frog -- quick to populate garden ponds, appearance, call and all. And seeing your page, you are quite the frog one. : ) Julia Rossi (talk) 06:59, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Litoria gracilenta.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Litoria gracilenta.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Litoria gracilenta.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 21:42, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Saw this at the resort I just stayed at in Cairns.....

-anyt ideas? Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:16, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

Hi!

I work for Digital Dimensions, a production company in Townsville, Queensland, Australia. We are currently working on a children's programme about the Great Barrier Reef creatures, and we have a graphic-heavy recap section which includes pictures of the animals we talk about. We have tried to source as many as we can with our own HDV footage, but we do need some very clear high res shots of some of the animals. I saw the Soldier crab picture on Wiki and have read the agreements, but we cannot however place the whole project under GFDL license as it should be.

So i was wondering if you would be interested to sell your picture to us for use in the series (1 episode only), and what would be your price. If the latter was reasonable, and that you had any more marine shots (though I understand you are frog oriented) we would be keen to maybe buy more from you.

Thank you for your help, and congrats for all the stars you won!!

Hope to hear from you soon

Marie Roman Digital Dimensions 20 Cowley St Townsville QLD 4810

Email: marie@digitaldimensions.com.au —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.240.193.112 (talk) 03:19, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

POTD

Hi LiquidGhoul,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Morelia spilota head.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on August 12, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-08-12. howcheng {chat} 23:33, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:Day lily.jpg

Image:Day lily.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Hemerocallis Tom Collins1LiquidGhoul.jpg. Commons is a repository of free media that can be used on all MediaWiki wiki's. The image(s) will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Hemerocallis Tom Collins1LiquidGhoul.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:42, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures

Just curious, do you take the pictures you upload yourself? They're really good, and kudos -- Darth Mike _(Talk _{• Contribs)} 10:17, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Evan,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:New England Tree Frog - Litoria subglandulosa.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on September 17, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-09-17. howcheng {chat} 16:36, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles: Rollcall

At WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, we recently did a purge of the members list, which your name was on. Please re-add your username as well as your area of expertise at our list of participants if you plan to stay active in this Wikiproject. Also, a discussion is going on regarding the standardization of taxonomy in lizard articles, located in this section. We'd like to have some more voices in this matter. Thanks everyone! bibliomaniac 1 5 23:09, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Australia newsletter,December 2008

The December 2008 issue of the WikiProject Australia newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. This message was delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 07:33, 17 December 2008 (UTC) [reply]

commons:Commons:Valued image candidates/New England Tree Frog - Litoria subglandulosa.jpg

Hi LiquidGhoul,

One of you fine frog images has been nominated as a Valued image candidate on Commons. Unfortunately it does not fulfill the geocoding requirement for species. Do you recall the location of the photo? If so, could you geocode it? If you do not recall the exact location I would like to ask you to add at some regional information in the description. --Slaunger (talk) 22:08, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to inform you that, since the species is threatened, it is not required to give exact geolocation data, regional information is good enough. --Slaunger (talk) 22:11, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will renominate it now that the issues which caused a decline has been addressed. --Slaunger (talk) 11:57, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cane toad

I have nominated Cane toad for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 09:22, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rosella photograph

Thank you for contributing this parrot photograph some time ago which is now on commons at File:Crimson Rosella2.jpg. I would like to add to the image description where it was photographed. It has a lighter back than some other rosellas, and I am wondering which subspecies it it. Snowman (talk) 20:57, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

From the locality that you kindly provided, it could only be a Platycercus elegans elegans, I think. Is is a parrot that you have seen a lot in the locality. It is a female or a juvenile? Snowman (talk) 09:09, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of Anuran families at Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates

I have nominated List of Anuran families for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Tezkag72 (talk) 18:43, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:RipenLemonFix.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:RipenLemonFix.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cnilep (talk) 19:20, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FAR of Frog

I have nominated Frog for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Dana boomer (talk) 12:47, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed

Hello LiquidGhoud. Over the past few weeks, SunCreator and I have been trying to hash out all the Emydidae turtle articles. This template has been created and included on all of the species' articles:

We are having a devil of a time figuring out the most currrent/most accurate taxonomic classification of these turtles. See here, here, and here for full conversations. It would be wonderful if you could offer any advice as we continue to sort through this mess. Thank you, NYMFan69-86 (talk) 03:50, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Platypus

Hey, your opinion is requested at the talk page of the platypus article, to finally put this stupid capitalisation debate to rest. Cheers! Aaadddaaammm (talk) 11:08, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bearded dragons as pets for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bearded dragons as pets is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bearded dragons as pets until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:14, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suspension of admin privileges due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 21:48, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TINA2011

Wikimedia is at TINA. Come along any time today to participate in an interactive visual workshop about Wikis. Bring along your photographs and stories to participate in creation and editing of Wikipedia content. We're planning a meetup for dinner this evening, so signup and watchlist Wikipedia:Meetup/Newcastle/TINA2011. --John Vandenberg ^(chat) 21:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Science lovers wanted!

Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the Smithsonian Institution Archives until June! One of my goals as resident, is to work with Wikipedians and staff to improve content on Wikipedia about people who have collections held in the Archives - most of these are scientists who held roles within the Smithsonian and/or federal government. I thought you might like to participate since you are interested in the sciences! Sign up to participate here and dive into articles needing expansion and creation on our to-do list. Feel free to make a request for images or materials at the request page, and of course, if you share your successes at the outcomes page you will receive the SIA barnstar! Thanks for your interest, and I look forward to your participation! Sarah (talk) 20:07, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Photo usage

Hi, I've been working on a small game built around animal quizzes and I wanted to let you know I've used one of your pictures.

I found your picture here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Australia green tree frog (Litoria caerulea) crop.jpg

And I attributed the picture like this: LiquidGhoul with this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:LiquidGhoul and also added a link to the license: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/en:public_domain

I hope you're happy with it, please let me know if this is not the case. You can find the game here: http://apps.facebook.com/animalalbum Or through here: http://www.facebook.com/pages/AnimalAlbum/156339584490672

Kind regards, Garfunkel Jansen (talk) 08:08, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Thanks for taking the picture and making it available.

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RfC:Infobox Road proposal

WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to {{infobox road}}. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian Roads/RfC:Infobox Road proposal

You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:AUS

Nbound (talk) 22:41, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Australian green tree frog

I can see you're not around much but I have nominated Australian green tree frog for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. DrKiernan (talk) 08:51, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anura/version 2 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Anura/version 2. Since you had some involvement with the Anura/version 2 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Notecardforfree (talk) 22:46, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, LiquidGhoul. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use in Australia discussion

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, LiquidGhoul. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, LiquidGhoul. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Telmatobiinae

A tag has been placed on Category:Telmatobiinae requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:29, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Saddleback toads

A tag has been placed on Category:Saddleback toads indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:17, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]