User talk:Lihaas/Archive 12
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Lihaas. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
January 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Congress Manifesto (2014 Lok Sabha) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- The mere mention of the manifesto and its release date with link can go on the main election page ][[Indian general election, 2014]]}}
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:32, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Central African Republic conflict under the Djotodia administration may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- including religious conflict. This occurred during the presidency of [[Michel Djotodia]], the [[Muslim] leader<ref name=Fort02>Patrick Fort, [http://www.chinapost.com.tw/international/africa/
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:31, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Catherine Samba-Panza may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- |birth_place = [[N'Djamena|Fort Lamy]], [[French Equatorial Africa|French Equatorial
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:37, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Freedom and Unity Front
Hello! Your submission of Freedom and Unity Front at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 16:11, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thai general election, 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page In absentia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Catherine Samba-Panza
I saw you reverted my edit on Catherine Samba-Panza yet again. Did you see my response to your post on my talk page? Rockhead126 (talk) 20:07, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
2013–14 Thai political crisis
Subject : your edit on 3 February 2014
Dear Lihaas,
Explanation on why I added "criticised" to the 2007 constitution can be found here 2007 constitution section "Criticism of the drafting process" "Junta campaigning" "Criticisms of the referendum" to mention a few. I omit to give more details as it will overload the article. If you wish to write a full paragraph or can find a "light" way to explain the fact that the 2007 constitution was heavily criticized, go ahead. Note that prior to this editing I mentioned on the main article talk page weeks ago my intention to add "criticised", it reach a consensus.
Please also take note that assertion I made on wikipedia article are always factual and properly referenced.
Best Regards, Fredtham59 (talk) 16:39, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
White Bull
I have reverted this move again per WP:BRD. If you wish to have it moved please open a discussion at the WP:RM page. Tassedethe (talk) 20:04, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Election heading
Please, please stop adding this to articles. In the past you have reverted content multiple times on the basis that there is "no consensus" because the matter has never been discussed. As far as I am aware, there is no consensus for the use of the "election" heading, as you seem to be the only one using it, so I ask that you respect your own behavioural guidelines and stop adding it to articles.
Now, it may well be the case that I am the only one using "conduct", but what I will say is that in psephology, "conduct" is the main term for describing how elections are carried out and any incidents relating to them (in trying to write this sentence, it was very difficult to do so without using that word again). It is used in electoral law (see e.g. here, here) and by official governmental bodies (e.g. here, here, here), as well as the media."Alex Salmond Aberdeen by-election conduct cleared", "Woolas defends election conduct at court hearing", "Monitoring groups disagreed over the conduct of the election.", "The election's conduct and outcome..., "The OSCE noted apparent manipulations in the conduct of the election".
In line with the above, conduct seems to me the obvious choice for the heading for the section covering this sort of thing. "Election" is totally inappropriate, as the whole article is about the election, which renders it completely meaningless as a sub-heading. I am not going to continue to change the Salvadoran article, but what I do want is a constructive discussion. So, after considering the above evidence, why do you not consider "conduct" to be an appropriate heading, and what do you propose as a compromise/alternative? Number 57 21:46, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Foreign rebel fighters in the Syrian Civil War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Blowback and Scott Morrison
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks
I just wanted to thank you for the support you gave me with my article. Also, I noticed that you would love to visit Bosnia - a good choice although now is not the time :D
If you ever do, remember that I am willing to host you in Zenica :) Thanks again --BiH (talk) 18:28, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
2014 Winter Olympic Games
These time the medal table ins´t was official,now is !De Boni 2007 (talk) 21:23, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
2014 Chemins de Fer de Provence derailment
Would you please consider withdrawing your nomination for deletion of the 2014 Chemins de Fer de Provence derailment article? Mjroots (talk) 20:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply. Would you please state you are withdrawing the nomination on the AfD page, then we can put this to bed. Mjroots (talk) 07:21, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:21, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
February 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Luge at the 2014 Winter Olympics – Men's singles may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- |align=left| {{Nowrap|flagIOC|IOP|2014 Winter}}}}
- |}
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:13, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
ITN credit
On 12 February 2014, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2014 Algeria Lockheed C-130 Hercules crash, which you recently nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. |
Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 07:24, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Proposed merge
Your template links here. However, you are proposing a merge of a disambiguation page. There were two separate storms and there needs to be a distinction between them. I have actually already done what you suggested, but only because I created one article without being aware of the other.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 18:40, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Indian general election, 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DMK (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Reference Errors on 16 February
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Template:Lebanese Government Cabinet, April 2013 page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:37, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Ukraine
Hey, what's the point of this edit. Your edit summary shows you disapprove of some removal, yet removed reliably sourced information. I guess it was a mistake? --Lokalkosmopolit (talk) 16:07, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Freedom and Unity Front
On 21 February 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Freedom and Unity Front, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the leaders of the new Ugandan opposition political party Freedom and Unity Front include David Sejusa, a former Ugandan general and parliament member who left the country in 2013? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Freedom and Unity Front. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Memorial Gymnasium (Virginia), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University Hall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
egypt
Panam2014 made a move request here. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 13:34, 25 February 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Panam2014 (talk • contribs)
Egyptian Revolution of 2013
Partisan sources? → The New York Times FrontPage Mag Jadaliyya ChicagoNow DW The Guardian Der Spiegel Voice of America Financial Times Time World Al Monitor openDemocracy
Those "partisan sources" call this a revolution, while other sources call the coup d'état a coup d'état. You abandoned the discussion in Talk:2013 Egyptian coup d'état, but i remember you saying that it is "logically impossible" to have a revolution and a coup at the same time.[1] Carnation Revolution, Saur Revolution, Revolución Libertadora, Brazilian Revolution of 1930, Young Turk Revolution and Egyptian Revolution of 1952 were all military coups.
Care to point out/discuss an example of POV in the article? I'll be glad to remove or change it but you can't just say there is a neutrality issue without starting a discussion about it. And i'm trying to improve the article so i would be grateful if you showed me an instance. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 21:08, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- You can also help writing the "Coup d'état and aftermath" section of the article if you're interested. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 23:06, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- It appears Lihaas that you like to neglect discussions and you also fail to specify where is this POV, but you seem to think it's easy to tag an article and leave the editors wondering what could possibly be wrong. If you don't participate in the discussion i will remove this tag because it appears you're the one who's POVishly and flagrantly opposing the word "revolution" without any good reason and with poor arguments. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 12:44, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
My talk page
For some bizarre reason, I have been having huge trouble loading wikipedia after dinner for the last few days, and because of that haven't been checking talk. I saw your comment, but at this point I don't remember what it refers to. Please don't think I was being intentionally rude--whatever it was we were disagreeing on I would have explained better if I could. μηδείς (talk) 21:38, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Is it possible to merge this page with the existing Indian general election, 2014#Opinion polls section. I still don't think we should unnecessarily increase the number of pages, while we are discussing the same thing over different pages. Need some more opinion. Thanks. Logical1004 (talk) 06:51, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Agree Please move it and make sure that newcomers or ip people couldn't vandalize. Thanks--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 16:40, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- User:25 Cents FC User:Lihaas If we are agree on this, can you give your opinion on the page Talk:Opinion polling for the Indian general election, 2014#Necessity, where I have raised the same question there. Need more opinions, then we can proceed with the merge, if decided. And like User:25 Cents FC said, we can make the page semi-protected or protected as this event is a future related important event, and to ensure the neutrality, its necessary. Indian general election, 2014 is already a semi-protected page. Logical1004 (talk) 16:51, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- Mobile user are attacking page day by day. They are swapping party's position without understanding the fact. What to do with that ? --25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 18:18, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 18:37, 10 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hi, I've respond. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 18:37, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Central African Republic conflict under the Djotodia administration, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jorge Castaneda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:51, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Kiran Sankhla Speedy deletion nomination
I have declined your speedy deletion nomination of Kiran Sankhla. To begin with "not-notable, unreferenced" is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. A valid criterion would be no "credible claim of significance or importance". Looking at the article as you tagged it, that would have been a valid tagging of the article. You should always look at the article history and see if something happened to the article. In this case over a year ago the whole "Career & Public Life" section was removed without any explanation. In this section there is a credible claim to significance so A7 would not apply. Please in the future look at the history and see if something has happened to the article to put it into the current state before nominating for speedy deletion. If you feel the article should be deleted please use the WP:AFD process. GB fan 17:53, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
rename
[2] --Panam2014 (talk) 14:06, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Re: Talk:Sino-Japanese relations Restructuring Jan 2014
I noticed your comment from January about including a section or at least a mention of the spread of Buddhism to Japan. Do you think that would fit better in a historical background section toward the beginning of the article, or a mention right in the lead-in itself up above all the sections? The spread of Buddhism to Japan from China earlier in history already has a short mention here and a more in-depth article here. Zenvalharo (talk) 12:38, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Indian general election, 2014, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ajit Singh and Ghaziabad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
March 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Meera Sanyal may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- }</ref> She contested as an independent candidate in the [[2009 Lok Sabha elections]] following [[26/11] from the [[Mumbai South (Lok Sabha constituency)|Mumbai South constituency]] and lost. She
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:55, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Opinion polling for the Indian general election, 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ajit Singh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Need some help on a few AfDs
I inputted my opinion on the first one. I am hoping for someone more familiar with this project. Correct me if I'm wrong, according to Porn RS AVN, AIN, and Xbiz are reliable since all three are cited they pass GNG and RS if I am correct? Thanks! Valoem talk 23:03, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
ITNR suggestions
Hi Lihaas! I supported your NATO suggestion for ITNR. Perhaps you could also support my request for Driehaus Archit. Prize, since I'm aware most people at Wiki would certainly only vote in favour of the modernist Pritzker and won't accept an alternative. But maybe you could have a look at it. :) Thanks and all the best, Horst-schlaemma (talk) 18:12, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Indian general election, 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Azam Khan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Lead section#WP:BOLDTITLE and election articles
I have started a discussion that may interest you at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Lead section#WP:BOLDTITLE and election articles. Anomalocaris (talk) 08:28, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
I did notify David Levy; you can see the list of Wikipedians I notified. —Anomalocaris (talk) 21:26, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Adopt a user
Hi, I saw you on the Adopt A User page, and was wondering if you could teach me the ropes. Thanks! The Dracommunist (talk) 17:32, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Links section on articles' talk pages
Hi, I noticed that you've been actively adding a "Links" section to various articles' talk pages. If I may ask, what is it good for? If you think that those links are worth reading, then why not add them as references inside the articles? Regards, —capmo (talk) 21:20, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
2014 Afghan Presidential Election
Hi Lihaas. I noticed you removed the table giving the breakdown of the candidates. Whilst I recognise that the candidates are listed elsewhere, the table still provides a means of quickly and clearly summing up each individual "ticket" - stating the various groups supporting the candidates, their running mates, background, and general policy orientation. I'm by no means arguing that it's complete, however given quite a bit of the information isn't mentioned elsewhere (e.g. running mates, or supporting groups), I think keeping it makes sense. If information has to be removed for redundancies sake, I think a better route would be to remove the other, more basic, final listing of the candidates. Many thanks. MrPenguin20 (talk) 01:25, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
2014 election
Thanks for appreciation. I am adding relevant refs soon in JMM. :)
Can users interested in 2014 election form a task force as a part of Wikiproject India as there will be a large amount of work related to election and updating hundreds of articles in upcoming month. It will ease collaboration. What you say? I am editing from mobile so its difficult to use talk pages. Thanks and regards -Nizil (talk) 19:28, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- Ok. I will propose talk force but can you manage it? Its difficult to edit talk pages/projects in mobile mode. Regards -Nizil (talk) 19:50, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- [3] ref link for JMM-INC alliance. I cant add it as google chrome crashes. Can you add it? Regards -Nizil (talk) 20:22, 6 April 2014 (UTC)