Same-sex marriage legislation in the United States
Part of the LGBTQ rights series |
LGBTQ portal |
In response to court action in a number of states, the United States federal government and a number of state legislatures passed or attempted to pass legislation either prohibiting or allowing same-sex marriage or other types of same-sex unions.
On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in the case of Obergefell v. Hodges that a fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by the Fourteenth Amendment, and that states must allow same-sex marriage.
Federal level
[edit]In 1996, the United States Congress passed and President Bill Clinton signed Public Law 104–199, the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). Section 3 of DOMA defines "marriage" and "spouse" for purposes of both federal law and any ruling, regulation, or interpretation by an administrative bureau or agency of the United States government.[1] The impact of Section 2 of DOMA, which relieves jurisdictions within the United States of any obligation to recognize same-sex relationships legally established in any other jurisdiction, is less clear.[2]
In United States v. Windsor, the Supreme Court was asked to determine the constitutionality of Section 3 of DOMA, which defines marriage for federal purposes as the union of a man and a woman.[3] On June 26, 2013, the Supreme Court ruled by a 5–4 vote that the Section 3 of DOMA is unconstitutional.[4]
The State Marriage Defense Act, introduced in the House of Representatives on January 9, 2014, would require the federal government to recognize the validity of a marriage based on a person's legal residence (place of domicile), rather than on the validity of the marriage when and where it was solemnized (place of celebration). The Obama administration has generally used the latter standard. Its sponsors described it as a way to clarify the federal government's response to Windsor and restore the ability of the a state to control the definition of marriage within its borders.[5][6]
In Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court was asked to determine the constitutionality of state bans on same-sex marriage licenses as well as state bans on recognition of same-sex marriages from other states. On June 26, 2015, the court ruled by a 5–4 vote that the Fourteenth Amendment obliges states to license same-sex marriages and to recognize same-sex marriages from other states.[7]
In the 111th, 112th, 113th, 114th, and 117th Congresses, the Respect for Marriage Act (RFMA) was introduced by House and Senate Democrats to repeal DOMA.[8] These efforts eventually prevailed in 2022, with the bill passing the House 267–157 and the Senate 61–36. President Joe Biden signed the bill into law on December 13, 2022.[9]
State level
[edit]Efforts to enable same-sex unions
[edit]Votes by state legislatures to recognize various types of same-sex unions, sorted by date:
State | Date | Type of same-sex union | Upper house | Lower house | Governor | Final outcome | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes | No | Yes | No | |||||
District of Columbia | June 1992 | Domestic partnership[10] | — | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
California | September 1994 | Domestic partnership[11][12] | 21 | 17 | 41 | 26 | Vetoed | No |
Hawaii | March 1996 | Domestic partnership[13] | 14 | 11 | Failed | — | No | |
Hawaii | June 1997 | Reciprocal beneficiary relationship[14] | 24 | 7 | 43 | 27 | Signed | Yes |
California | September 1998 | Domestic partnership[15] | 21 | 17 | 41 | 36 | Vetoed | No |
California | October 1999 | Domestic partnership[16] | 23 | 13 | 41 | 38 | Vetoed | No |
California | October 1999 | Domestic partnership[17] | 22 | 14 | 41 | 36 | Signed | Yes |
Vermont | April 2000 | Civil union[18] | 19 | 11 | 79 | 68 | Signed | Yes |
Rhode Island | July 2001 | Domestic partnership[19] | Passed | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
California | August 2001 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[20] | 22 | 12 | 41 | 27 | Signed | Yes |
California | October 2001 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[21] | 23 | 11 | 41 | 32 | Signed | Yes |
New York | August 2002 | Domestic partnership[22] | Passed | 147 | 0 | Signed | Yes | |
New York | August 2002 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[23] | Passed | 147 | 0 | Signed | Yes | |
California | September 2002 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[24] | 26 | 11 | 41 | 31 | Signed | Yes |
California | September 2002 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[25] | 23 | 13 | 43 | 27 | Signed | Yes |
District of Columbia | April 2003 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[26] | — | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
California | September 2003 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[27] | 23 | 14 | 41 | 33 | Signed | Yes |
New Jersey | January 2004 | Domestic partnership[28] | 23 | 9 | 41 | 28 | Signed | Yes |
Maine | April 2004 | Domestic partnership[29] | 18 | 14 | 84 | 58 | Signed | Yes |
District of Columbia | May 2004 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[30] | — | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
California | September 2004 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[31] | 23 | 12 | 46 | 29 | Signed | Yes |
New York | September 2004 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[32] | Passed | 141 | 1 | Signed | Yes | |
District of Columbia | December 2004 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[33] | — | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
District of Columbia | January 2005 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[34] | — | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
Connecticut | April 2005 | Civil union[35] | 27 | 9 | 85 | 63 | Signed | Yes |
Maryland | May 2005 | Domestic partnership[36] | 31 | 16 | 83 | 50 | Vetoed | No |
California | June 2005 | Marriage[37] | — | — | Failed | — | No | |
Rhode Island | June 2005 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[38][39] | Passed | — | — | — | No | |
Rhode Island | July 2005 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[40][41] | Passed | — | — | — | No | |
California | September 2005 | Marriage[42] | 21 | 15 | 41 | 35 | Vetoed | No |
California | September 2005 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[43] | 23 | 15 | 47 | 28 | Signed | Yes |
California | September 2005 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[44] | 21 | 14 | 47 | 32 | Signed | Yes |
District of Columbia | December 2005 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[45] | — | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
New Jersey | January 2006 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[46] | 39 | 0 | 67 | 8 | Signed | Yes |
District of Columbia | January 2006 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[47] | — | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
New York | March 2006 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[48] | Passed | 96 | 25 | Signed | Yes | |
Maine | April 2006 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[49] | Passed | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
New York | June 2006 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[50] | — | — | 114 | 27 | — | No |
New York | June 2006 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[51] | — | — | 116 | 27 | — | No |
Rhode Island | June 2006 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[52][53] | Passed | Passed | —4 | Yes | ||
Rhode Island | June 2006 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[54][53] | Passed | Passed | —4 | Yes | ||
Rhode Island | July 2006 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[55][56] | Passed | Passed | —4 | Yes | ||
Rhode Island | July 2006 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[57][56] | Passed | Passed | —4 | Yes | ||
Rhode Island | July 2006 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[58][59] | Passed | Passed | —4 | Yes | ||
California | September 2006 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[60] | 24 | 15 | 46 | 29 | Signed | Yes |
California | September 2006 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[61] | 23 | 15 | 47 | 31 | Signed | Yes |
New Jersey | December 2006 | Civil union[62] | 23 | 12 | 56 | 19 | Signed | Yes |
District of Columbia | December 2006 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[63] | — | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
New Hampshire | April 2007 | Civil union[64] | — | — | Failed | — | No | |
Washington | April 2007 | Registered domestic partnership[65] | 28 | 19 | 63 | 35 | Signed | Yes |
Oregon | May 2007 | Domestic partnership[66] | 21 | 9 | 34 | 26 | Signed | Yes |
Maine | May 2007 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[67] | Passed | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
New Hampshire | May 2007 | Civil union[68] | 14 | 10 | 243 | 129 | Signed | Yes |
Maine | June 2007 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[69] | Passed | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
Maine | June 2007 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[70] | Passed | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
New York | June 2007 | Marriage[71] | — | — | 85 | 61 | — | No |
Rhode Island | July 2007 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[72][73] | Passed | Passed | —4 | Yes | ||
California | September 2007 | Marriage[74] | 22 | 15 | 42 | 34 | Vetoed | No |
California | October 2007 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[75] | Passed | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
Rhode Island | October 2007 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[76][73] | Passed | Passed | Vetoed 1 | Yes | ||
New Hampshire | January 2008 | Contractual cohabitation[77] | Failed | — | — | — | No | |
New York | January 2008 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[78] | Passed | — | — | — | No | |
New Mexico | February 2008 | Domestic partnership[79] | — | — | 33 | 31 | — | No |
Washington | March 2008 | Registered domestic partnership (expansion)[80][81]' | 29 | 20 | 62 | 32 | Signed | Yes |
Maine | March 2008 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[82] | Passed | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
Maryland | April 2008 | Domestic partnership[83] | — | — | 86 | 51 | — | No |
Maryland | May 2008 | Domestic partnership[84] | 30 | 17 | 88 | 46 | Signed | Yes |
Maryland | May 2008 | Domestic partnership[85] | 27 | 20 | 86 | 47 | Signed | Yes |
District of Columbia | May 2008 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[86] | — | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
New Mexico | February 2009 | Domestic partnership[87] | 17 | 25 | — | — | — | No |
Vermont | April 2009 | Marriage[88] | 23 | 5 | 100 | 49 | Vetoed 1 | Yes |
Colorado | April 2009 | Designated beneficiary agreement[89] | 23 | 10 | 41 | 24 | Signed | Yes |
Connecticut | April 2009 | Marriage (codification)[90] | 28 | 7 | 100 | 44 | Signed | Yes |
Maine | May 2009 | Marriage[91] | 21 | 14 | 89 | 58 | Signed | No2 |
District of Columbia | May 2009 | Marriage (recognition only)[92][93] | — | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
Washington | May 2009 | Registered domestic partnership (expansion)[94] | 30 | 18 | 62 | 35 | Signed | Yes3 |
District of Columbia | May 2009 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[95] | — | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
Maine | May 2009 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[96] | Passed | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
Nevada | May 2009 | Domestic partnership[97][98] | 14 | 7 | 28 | 14 | Vetoed1 | Yes |
New Hampshire | June 2009 | Marriage[99] | 14 | 10 | 198 | 176 | Signed | Yes |
Oregon | June 2009 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[100] | 27 | 0 | 41 | 8 | Signed | Yes |
Wisconsin | June 2009 | Domestic partnership | 17 | 16 | 50 | 48 | Signed | Yes |
New York | August 2009 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[101] | Passed | 142 | 0 | Signed | Yes | |
California | October 2009 | Out-of-state pre-proposition 8 marriage recognition[102] | 24 | 14 | 44 | 27 | Signed | Yes |
New York | December 2009 | Marriage[103] | 24 | 38 | 89 | 52 | — | No |
District of Columbia | December 2009 | Marriage[104] | — | 11 | 2 | Signed | Yes | |
Rhode Island | January 2010 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[105][106] | Passed | Passed | Vetoed 1 | Yes | ||
Rhode Island | January 2010 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[107][108] | Passed | Passed | Vetoed 1 | Yes | ||
New York | January 2010 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[109][110] | 61 | 0 | 142 | 0 | Signed | Yes |
New Jersey | January 2010 | Marriage[111] | 14 | 20 | — | — | — | No |
New York | March 2010 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[112] | — | — | 119 | 20 | — | No |
New York | March 2010 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[113][114] | Passed | 137 | 5 | Signed | Yes | |
New York | April 2010 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[115][116] | — | — | 132 | 9 | — | No |
Minnesota | May 2010 | Domestic partnership (only 1 entitlement)[117] | 41 | 24 | 78 | 55 | Vetoed | No |
Hawaii | July 2010 | Civil union[118] | 18 | 7 | 31 | 20 | Vetoed | No |
New York | August 2010 | Committed partnership[119][120] | 50 | 11 | 107 | 26 | Signed | Yes |
California | September 2010 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[121] | 23 | 12 | 53 | 24 | Signed | Yes |
Illinois | January 2011 | Civil union[122][123][124] | 32 | 24 | 61 | 52 | Signed | Yes |
Hawaii | February 2011 | Civil union[125] | 18 | 5 | 31 | 19 | Signed | Yes |
New Hampshire | March 2011 | Domestic union[126] | — | — | Failed | — | No | |
Maryland | March 2011 | Marriage[127][128] | 25 | 21 | — | — | — | No |
Colorado | March 2011 | Civil union[129][130] | 23 | 12 | — | — | — | No |
Washington | April 2011 | Recognition of out-of-state union as registered domestic partnership[131] | 28 | 19 | 58 | 39 | Signed | Yes |
Nevada | May 2011 | Recognition of out-of-state union as domestic partnership[132] | 21 | 0 | 41 | 0 | Signed | Yes |
Washington | May 2011 | Registered domestic partnership (expansion)[133] | 27 | 21 | 57 | 40 | Signed | Yes |
Delaware | May 2011 | Civil union[134] | 13 | 6 | 26 | 15 | Signed | Yes |
Nevada | May 2011 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[135] | 11 | 10 | — | — | — | No |
New York | June 2011 | Marriage[136] | 33 | 29 | 80 | 63 | Signed | Yes |
Rhode Island | July 2011 | Civil union[137] | 21 | 16 | 62 | 11 | Signed | Yes |
California | September 2011 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[138] | 22 | 13 | 52 | 25 | Signed | Yes |
California | October 2011 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[139] | 25 | 15 | Passed | Signed | Yes | |
California | October 2011 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[140] | 24 | 13 | Passed | Signed | Yes | |
Washington | February 2012 | Marriage[141] | 28 | 21 | 55 | 43 | Signed | Yes3 |
New Jersey | February 2012 | Marriage[142] | 24 | 16 | 42 | 33 | Vetoed | No |
Maryland | March 2012 | Marriage[143] | 25 | 22 | 72 | 67 | Signed | Yes3 |
New York | April 2012 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[144] | — | — | 129 | 10 | — | No |
Colorado | May 2012 | Civil union[145] | 23 | 12 | — | — | — | No |
New Jersey | August 2012 | Civil union and domestic partnership (expansion: surrogacy)[146] | 21 | 11 | 41 | 33 | Vetoed | No |
Wyoming | January 2013 | Domestic partnership[147] | — | — | 24 | 35 | — | No |
Colorado | March 2013 | Civil union[148] | 21 | 14 | 39 | 26 | Signed | Yes |
Rhode Island | May 2013 | Marriage[149][150] | 26 | 12 | 56 | 15 | Signed | Yes |
Delaware | May 2013 | Marriage[151] | 12 | 9 | 23 | 18 | Signed | Yes |
Minnesota | May 2013 | Marriage[152] | 37 | 30 | 75 | 59 | Signed | Yes |
Nevada | June 2013 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[153] | 21 | 0 | 41 | 0 | Signed | Yes |
Hawaii | November 2013 | Marriage[154] | 19 | 4 | 30 | 19 | Signed | Yes |
Illinois | November 2013 | Marriage[155][156] | 32 | 21 | 61 | 54 | Signed | Yes |
New York | February 2014 | Marriage (codification)[157][158] | — | — | 125 | 10 | — | No |
Wyoming | February 2014 | Marriage[159] | — | — | 17 | 41 | — | No |
New York | April 2014 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[160][161] | — | — | 124 | 14 | — | No |
California | July 2014 | Marriage (statutory codification)[162][163][164] | 25 | 10 | 51 | 11 | Signed | Yes |
Virginia | February 2015 | Marriage (statutory codification)[165][166][167] | 20 | 18 | — | — | — | No |
Utah | March 2015 | Marriage (partial statutory codification)[168] | 26 | 0 | 39 | 30 | Signed | Yes |
New Mexico | April 2015 | Marriage (partial codification)[169][170] | 35 | 5 | 37 | 10 | Signed | Yes |
Nevada | June 2015 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[171] | 21 | 0 | 42 | 0 | Signed | Yes |
Nevada | June 2015 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[172] | 19 | 0 | 41 | 1 | Signed | Yes |
New Jersey | June 2015 | Marriage, civil union and domestic partnership (expansion: surrogacy)[173] | 21 | 13 | 43 | 25 | Vetoed | No |
Maine | June 2015 | Marriage (expansion)[174] | 35 | 0 | 141 | 0 | Vetoed1 | Yes |
Oregon | July 2015 | Marriage (statutory codification)[175] | 18 | 11 | 40 | 18 | Signed | Yes |
Guam | August 2015 | Marriage (codification)[176][177][178] | — | 13 | 2 | —4 | Yes | |
New York | September 2015 | Marriage (codification)[179][180] | 60 | 0 | 146 | 1 | Signed | Yes |
District of Columbia | December 2015 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[181] | — | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
Oregon | March 2016 | Marriage (statutory codification)[182][183] | 18 | 11 | 43 | 13 | Signed | Yes |
New York | March 2016 | Marriage (codification)[184][185] | — | — | 129 | 12 | — | No |
New York | April 2016 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[186] | — | — | 120 | 15 | — | No |
Colorado | June 2016 | Conversion of civil union into marriage[187][188] | 34 | 0 | 52 | 13 | Signed | Yes |
North Carolina | June 2016 | Marriage (partial statutory codification)[189] | — | — | Passed | — | No | |
California | July 2016 | Marriage and domestic partnership (statutory codification)[190][191] | 34 | 0 | 63 | 1 | Signed | Yes |
North Dakota | January 2017 | Marriage (statutory codification)[192][193] | 15 | 31 | — | — | — | No |
New Mexico | February 2017 | Marriage (partial codification)[194][195] | — | — | 63 | 0 | — | No |
Utah | March 2017 | Marriage (partial statutory codification)[196] | 26 | 0 | 74 | 0 | Signed | Yes |
Utah | March 2017 | Marriage (partial statutory codification)[197] | 29 | 0 | 69 | 3 | Signed | Yes |
Utah | March 2017 | Marriage (partial statutory codification)[198] | 27 | 0 | 68 | 0 | Signed | Yes |
Maryland | May 2017 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[199] | 138 | 2 | 45 | 0 | Signed | Yes |
Nevada | May 2017 | Marriage (statutory codification)[200] | 20 | 1 | 28 | 10 | Signed | Yes |
Nevada | June 2017 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[201] | 21 | 0 | 41 | 0 | Signed | Yes |
New York | June 2017 | Marriage (codification)[202] | 62 | 0 | 139 | 0 | Signed | Yes |
New Jersey | June 2017 | Marriage, civil union and domestic partnership (expansion: surrogacy)[203] | 22 | 15 | — | — | — | No |
North Carolina | July 2017 | Marriage (partial statutory codification)[204] | Passed | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
Maine | July 2017 | Marriage (codification)[205] | Passed | Passed | —4 | Yes | ||
Maryland | January 2018 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[206] | 135 | 2 | 45 | 1 | Vetoed | No |
New Mexico | February 2018 | Marriage (partial codification)[207] | — | — | 60 | 2 | — | No |
New York | March 2018 | Marriage (codification)[208] | — | — | 129 | 6 | — | No |
Utah | March 2018 | Marriage (partial statutory codification)[209] | 27 | 0 | 70 | 0 | Signed | Yes |
Utah | March 2018 | Marriage (partial statutory codification)[210] | 23 | 0 | 73 | 0 | Signed | Yes |
Utah | March 2018 | Marriage (partial statutory codification)[211] | 23 | 4 | 44 | 24 | Signed | Yes |
Utah | March 2018 | Marriage (partial statutory codification)[212] | 25 | 3 | 45 | 26 | Signed | Yes |
New York | April 2018 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[213] | — | — | 114 | 17 | — | No |
Minnesota | May 2018 | Marriage (codification)[214] | 34 | 33 | 78 | 50 | Vetoed | No |
New Jersey | May 2018 | Marriage, civil union and domestic partnership (expansion: surrogacy)[215] | Passed | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
New York | June 2018 | Marriage (codification)[216] | 57 | 4 | — | — | — | No |
New Hampshire | June 2018 | Marriage (equalization of marriageable age)[217] | Passed | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
Arkansas | March 2019 | Marriage (partial statutory codification)[218] | 35 | 0 | 96 | 0 | Signed | Yes |
Nebraska | March 2019 | Marriage (partial statutory codification)[219] | — | 38 | 6 | Signed | Yes | |
New Mexico | March 2019 | Marriage (partial codification)[220] | — | — | 53 | 2 | — | No |
Virginia | March 2019 | Marriage (expansion: surrogacy)[221] | 28 | 12 | 63 | 36 | Signed | Yes |
New Mexico | March 2019 | Marriage (partial codification)[222] | 32 | 8 | 40 | 25 | Signed | Yes |
Nebraska | March 2019 | Marriage (partial statutory codification)[223] | — | 45 | 0 | Signed | Yes | |
Utah | March 2019 | Marriage (partial statutory codification)[224] | 22 | 2 | 55 | 6 | Signed | Yes |
Utah | March 2019 | Marriage (partial statutory codification)[225] | 29 | 0 | 69 | 4 | Signed | Yes |
New Mexico | April 2019 | Marriage (partial codification)[226] | 39 | 0 | 62 | 0 | Signed | Yes |
Maryland | May 2019 | Marriage (expansion)[227] | 34 | 10 | 121 | 15 | Signed | Yes |
Maryland | May 2019 | Marriage (expansion)[228] | 31 | 14 | 133 | 6 | Signed | Yes |
Oklahoma | May 2019 | Marriage (expansion: surrogacy)[229] | 33 | 10 | 84 | 6 | Signed | Yes |
Nebraska | May 2019 | Marriage (partial statutory codification)[230] | — | 40 | 3 | Signed | Yes | |
Nebraska | May 2019 | Marriage (partial statutory codification)[231] | — | 33 | 8 | Vetoed | No | |
Minnesota | May 2019 | Marriage (codification)[232][233] | 52 | 15 | 74 | 50 | Signed | Yes |
Rhode Island | June 2019 | Marriage (expansion)[234] | 35 | 0 | — | — | — | No |
Maine | June 2019 | Marriage (codification)[235] | Passed | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
Delaware | July 2019 | Marriage (codification)[236] | 20 | 1 | 37 | 4 | Signed | Yes |
New York | October 2019 | Marriage (codification)[237] | 61 | 0 | 121 | 23 | Signed | Yes |
Hawaii | December 2019 | Marriage and civil union (codification)[238] | — | — | Passed | — | No | |
New York | December 2019 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[239][240] | 59 | 0 | 122 | 24 | Signed | Yes |
New Hampshire | January 2020 | Marriage (codification)[241] | — | — | Failed | — | No | |
New Mexico | February 2020 | Marriage (partial codification)[242] | 42 | 0 | 64 | 0 | Signed | Yes |
Nebraska | February 2020 | Marriage (partial statutory codification)[243] | — | 47 | 0 | Signed | Yes | |
New Mexico | February 2020 | Marriage (partial codification)[244] | 40 | 0 | 67 | 0 | Signed | Yes |
Virginia | March 2020 | Marriage (partial statutory codification)[245] | 28 | 12 | 63 | 34 | Signed | Yes |
Virginia | March 2020 | Marriage (partial statutory codification)[246] | 25 | 13 | 62 | 38 | Signed | Yes |
Virginia | March 2020 | Marriage (partial statutory codification)[247] | 33 | 6 | 58 | 42 | Signed | Yes |
Utah | March 2020 | Marriage (partial statutory codification)[248] | 24 | 1 | 70 | 0 | Signed | Yes |
Utah | March 2020 | Marriage (partial statutory codification)[249] | 27 | 0 | 71 | 0 | Signed | Yes |
Virginia | April 2020 | Marriage (partial statutory codification)[250] | 39 | 1 | 91 | 6 | Signed | Yes |
New York | April 2020 | Marriage (expansion)[251][252] | Passed | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
Virginia | April 2020 | Marriage (statutory codification)[253] | 24 | 16 | 53 | 43 | Signed | Yes |
New York | April 2020 | Domestic partnership (expansion)[254][255] | 62 | 0 | 131 | 11 | Signed | Yes |
Puerto Rico | June 2020 | Marriage (codification)[256][257] | Passed | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
North Carolina | June 2020 | Marriage (partial statutory codification)[258] | 47 | 0 | Passed | Signed | Yes | |
New Hampshire | July 2020 | Marriage (codification)[259] | Passed | 209 | 119 | Signed | Yes | |
Rhode Island | July 2020 | Marriage (expansion)[260] | 34 | 1 | 64 | 1 | Signed | Yes |
Rhode Island | July 2020 | Marriage (expansion)[261] | 36 | 1 | 67 | 1 | Signed | Yes |
North Carolina | 2023 | Marriage (partial statutory codification)[262] | 50 | 0 | — | — | — | No |
Virginia | 2024 | Marriage (expansion) | 22 | 17 | 54 | 40 | Signed | Yes |
22 | 18 | 58 | 42 | Signed | Yes |
Notes:
- 1Veto overridden
- 2People's veto (Maine Question 1, 2009)
- 3People's veto failed (Washington Referendum 71, Washington Referendum 74, Maryland Question 6)
- 4The bill was allowed to lapse into law.
Efforts to prohibit same-sex unions
[edit]Votes by state legislatures to prohibit recognition of various types of same-sex unions, sorted by date:
State | Date | Type of same-sex union | Upper House | Lower house | Governor | Final outcome1 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes | No | Yes | No | |||||
Maryland | May 1973 | Marriage[263] | Passed | Passed | Signed | Yes2 | ||
Texas | June 1973 | Marriage[264][265][266][267][268] | 30 | 1 | 113 | 17 | Signed | Yes |
Oklahoma | February 1975 | Marriage[269] | Passed | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
Arizona | April 1975 | Marriage[270] | Passed | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
Virginia | August 1975 | Marriage[271] | Passed | Passed | Signed | Yes2 | ||
Utah | April 1977 | Marriage[272] | Passed | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
Florida | June 1977 | Marriage[273][274][275] | 37 | 0 | 101 | 11 | Signed | Yes |
Illinois | June 1977 | Marriage[276] | Passed | Passed | Signed | Yes2 | ||
California | August 1977 | Marriage[277] | 23 | 5 | 68 | 2 | Signed | Yes2 |
Wyoming | October 1977 | Marriage[278] | Passed | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
Wisconsin | July 1979 | Marriage[279] | Passed | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
New Hampshire | July 1987 | Marriage[280][281] | Passed | Passed | Signed | Yes2 | ||
Louisiana | 1987 | Marriage | Passed | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
New Hampshire | March 1994 | Recognition of out-of-state marriage[282] | 11 | 12 | — | — | — | No |
Guam | May 1994 | Marriage[283] | — | Passed | Signed | Yes2 | ||
Hawaii | June 1994 | Marriage[284] | Passed | Passed | Signed | Yes2 | ||
Utah | March 1995 | Recognition of out-of-state marriage[285] | Passed | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
South Dakota | January 1996 | Marriage[286][287][288] | 26 | 8 | 49 | 18 | Signed | Yes |
Idaho | February 1996 | Marriage[287][289] | 24 | 6 | 66 | 4 | Signed | Yes |
Idaho | March 1996 | Recognition of out-of-state marriage[290] | 28 | 4 | 59 | 6 | Signed | Yes |
Colorado | March 1996 | Marriage[291] | Passed | Passed | Vetoed | No | ||
Kansas | April 1996 | Marriage[287][292] | 39 | 1 | 87 | 38 | Signed | Yes |
Georgia | April 1996 | Marriage[286][287][293] | 47 | 0 | 135 | 10 | Signed | Yes |
Arizona | May 1996 | Marriage[286][287][294] | 21 | 9 | 50 | 5 | Signed | Yes |
Alaska | May 1996 | Marriage and civil union[287][295][296] | 16 | 3 | 31 | 9 | —3 | Yes |
Illinois | May 1996 | Marriage[297][298] | 42 | 9 | 87 | 17 | Signed | Yes2 |
Tennessee | May 1996 | Marriage[286][287] | 31 | 0 | 90 | 1 | Signed | Yes |
South Carolina | May 1996 | Marriage[299][300] | 45 | 0 | 82 | 0 | Signed | Yes |
Michigan | June 1996 | Marriage[301][302] | 31 | 2 | 88 | 14 | Signed | Yes |
Michigan | June 1996 | Recognition of out-of-state marriage[301][302] | 32 | 2 | 74 | 28 | Signed | Yes |
Delaware | June 1996 | Marriage[303] | 17 | 3 | 39 | 0 | Signed | Yes2 |
North Carolina | June 1996 | Marriage and recognition of out-of-state marriage[304][305][306] | 41 | 4 | 98 | 10 | Signed | Yes |
Missouri | July 1996 | Marriage[307][308] | 29 | 2 | 131 | 10 | Signed | Yes |
California | August 1996 | Marriage[309] | 20 | 21 | Passed | — | No | |
Oklahoma | September 1996 | Marriage[286][287] | 42 | 2 | 99 | 0 | Signed | Yes |
Pennsylvania | October 1996 | Marriage[310][311] | 43 | 5 | 189 | 13 | Signed | Yes |
Mississippi | February 1997 | Marriage[312] | 50 | 0 | 118 | 3 | Signed | Yes |
Arkansas | February 1997 | Marriage[286][313] | 34 | 0 | 92 | 2 | Signed | Yes |
North Dakota | February 1997 | Marriage[286][314] | 43 | 6 | 73 | 18 | Signed | Yes |
Texas | February 1997 | Marriage[312][315][316][317] | 31 | 0 | 143 | 0 | Signed | Yes |
Washington | February 1997 | Marriage[318] | 33 | 15 | 63 | 35 | Vetoed | No |
Virginia | March 1997 | Recognition of out-of-state marriage[286][319] | 40 | 0 | 87 | 9 | Signed | Yes2 |
Maine | March 1997 | Marriage[320] | 24 | 10 | 106 | 39 | —3 | Yes2 |
Indiana | April 1997 | Marriage[321][322] | 38 | 10 | 85 | 9 | Signed | Yes |
Montana | April 1997 | Marriage and civil union[286][323] | 45 | 5 | 73 | 23 | Signed | Yes |
Florida | May 1997 | Recognition of out-of-state marriage[286][324] | 33 | 5 | 97 | 19 | —3 | Yes |
Minnesota | June 1997 | Marriage[287][325] | 64 | 0 | 108 | 20 | Signed | Yes2 |
Colorado | June 1997 | Marriage[326] | Passed | Passed | Vetoed | No | ||
Washington | February 1998 | Marriage[327][328] | 34 | 11 | 65 | 28 | Vetoed 4 | Yes2 |
Kentucky | April 1998 | Marriage and recognition out-of-state marriage[287][329] | 32 | 2 | 84 | 9 | Signed | Yes |
Alabama | May 1998 | Marriage[330] | 30 | 0 | 79 | 12 | Signed | Yes |
Hawaii | November 1998 | Marriage[286] | Passed | Passed | Signed | Yes2 | ||
Puerto Rico | March 1999 | Marriage[331] | Passed | Passed | Signed | Yes | ||
Louisiana | July 1999 | Marriage and recognition of out-of-state marriage[332] | 32 | 0 | 95 | 0 | Signed | Yes |
West Virginia | March 2000 | Marriage[333] | Passed | 96 | 3 | Signed | Yes | |
New Hampshire | March 2000 | Recognition of out-of-state marriage[334] | — | — | 128 | 232 | — | No |
Vermont | April 2000 | Marriage[18] | 19 | 11 | 79 | 68 | Signed | Yes |
Connecticut | April / May 2000 | Marriage[335][336] | 31 | 5 | 96 | 51 | Signed | Yes |
Colorado | May 2000 | Marriage[337] | 33 | 32 | 37 | 28 | Signed | Yes |
New Hampshire | March 2001 | Recognition of out-of-state civil union[338] | — | — | 88 | 276 | — | No |
Missouri | July 2001 | Marriage[339][340] | 31 | 0 | 124 | 20 | Signed | Yes |
American Samoa | March 2003 | Marriage[341] | Failed | — | — | — | No | |
Texas | May 2003 | Recognition of out-of-state same-sex marriage and civil union[342][343][344] | 22 | 9 | 118 | 9 | Signed | Yes |
Wisconsin | November 2003 | Marriage[345][346] | 22 | 10 | 68 | 29 | Vetoed | No |
Ohio | February 2004 | Marriage, recognition of out-of-state marriage, and civil union[286][347] | 18 | 15 | 72 | 22 | Signed | Yes |
Utah | March 2004 | Civil union[286] | 24 | 4 | 62 | 12 | Signed | Yes |
Virginia | April 2004 | Civil union[286][348] | 27 | 12 | 69 | 30 | —3 | Yes2 |
New Hampshire | May 2004 | Recognition of out-of-state marriage[349] | 16 | 7 | 215 | 137 | Signed | Yes2 |
Connecticut | April 2005 | Marriage[350] | 27 | 9 | 85 | 63 | Signed | Yes |
Wyoming | February 2007 | Recognition of out-of-state marriage[351] | 21 | 8 | — | — | — | No |
New Hampshire | March 2009 | Civil union[352] | — | — | 136 | 205 | — | No |
New Hampshire | February 2010 | Marriage[353] | — | — | 109 | 210 | — | No |
Wyoming | March 2011 | Recognition of out-of-state marriage[354] | 14 | 16 | 31 | 28 | — | No |
New Hampshire | March 2012 | Marriage[355] | — | — | 116 | 211 | — | No |
Wyoming | February 2014 | Recognition of out-of-state marriage[159] | — | — | 29 | 31 | — | No |
Notes:
- 1 On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in the case of Obergefell v. Hodges that a fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by the Fourteenth Amendment, and that states must allow same-sex marriage.
- 2 Subsequently, repealed.
- 3 The bill was allowed to lapse into law.
- 4 Veto overridden.
Attempts to establish same-sex unions via initiative or statewide referendum
[edit]State | Intended date | Same-sex union | Description | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|
Maine | November 2012 | Marriage | Initiative to establish same-sex marriage.[356] | Yes |
Efforts to enable ban amendment
[edit]State | Date | Type of same-sex union | State senate | Lower house | % of legislative vote required | Final outcome | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes | No | Yes | No | |||||||||
Vote | % | Vote | % | Vote | % | Vote | % | |||||
Hawaii | 1997 | Marriage ban permitted | Passed | 66.67% | Advanced | |||||||
1998 | 50.01% | Constitutional Amendment 2 placed on the ballot | ||||||||||
Alaska | May 12, 1998[357] | Same-sex marriage | 14 | 70% | 6 | 30% | 28 | 70% | 12 | 30% | 66.67% | Measure 2 placed on the ballot |
Indiana | February 3, 2004[358] | Same-sex marriage | 42 | 84% | 7 | 14% | — | 50.01% | Died in committee | |||
Georgia | February 16, 2004[359]
February 26, 2004 March 31, 2004 |
Same-sex marriage and civil unions | 40 | 71.43% | 14 | 25% | 117 | 65% | 50 | 27.78% | 66.67% | Constitutional Amendment 1 placed on the ballot |
122 | 67.78% | 52 | 28.89% | |||||||||
Mississippi | March 1, 2004[360][361]
April 7, 2004 |
Same-sex marriage | 51 | 98.08% | 0 | 0% | 97 | 79.51% | 17 | 13.93% | 66.67% | Amendment 1 placed on the ballot |
Missouri | March 1, 2004[362]
May 14, 2004 |
Same-sex marriage | 26 | 76.47% | 6 | 17.65% | 130 | 79.75% | 26 | 15.95% | 50.01% | Constitutional Amendment 2 placed on ballot |
Wisconsin | March 3, 2004[363]
March 11, 2004 |
Same-sex marriage and civil unions | 20 | 60.61% | 13 | 39.39% | 68 | 68.69% | 27 | 27.27% | 50.01% | Advanced |
December 6, 2005[364]
February 28, 2006 |
19 | 57.56% | 14 | 42.42% | 62 | 62.63% | 31 | 31.31% | Referendum 1 placed on ballot | |||
Utah | March 3, 2004[365] | Same-sex marriage and civil unions | 20 | 68.97% | 7 | 24.14% | 58 | 77.33% | 14 | 18.67% | 66.67% | Constitutional Amendment 3 placed on ballot |
Kansas | March 5, 2004[366]
March 25, 2004[367] |
Same-sex marriage and civil unions | — | 88 | 70.4% | 36 | 28.8% | 66.67% | Bill was amended | |||
March 25, 2004[368] |
Same-sex marriage | 17 | 42.5% | 16 | 40% | — | Rejected | |||||
Kentucky | April 12, 2004[369]
April 13, 2004 |
Same-sex marriage and civil unions | 33 | 86.84% | 5 | 13.16% | 85 | 85% | 11 | 11% | 60% | Constitutional Amendment 1 placed on ballot |
Oklahoma | April 15, 2004[370]
April 22, 2004 |
Same-sex marriage and civil unions | 26 | 54.17% | 19 | 39.58% | 92 | 91.09% | 4 | 3.96% | 50.01% | State Question 711 placed on ballot |
Kansas | May 1, 2004[371]
May 4, 2004 |
Same-sex marriage and civil unions | 27 | 67.5% | 13 | 32.5% | 79 | 63.2% | 45 | 36% | 66.67% | Rejected |
Tennessee | May 6, 2004[372]
May 19, 2004 |
Same-sex marriage | 28 | 84.85% | 1 | 3.03% | 85 | 85.86% | 5 | 5.05% | 50.01% | Advanced |
February 28, 2005[373]
March 17, 2005 |
29 | 87.88% | 3 | 9.09% | 88 | 88.89% | 7 | 7.07% | 66.67% | Constitutional Amendment 1 placed on ballot | ||
Louisiana | June 6, 2004[374]
June 15, 2004 |
Same-sex marriage and civil unions | 31 | 79.49% | 6 | 15.38% | 88 | 83.81% | 13 | 12.38% | 66.67% | Constitutional Amendment 1 placed on ballot |
Kansas | January 13, 2005[375][376]
February 2, 2005 |
Same-sex marriage and civil unions | 28 | 70% | 11 | 27.5% | 86 | 68.8% | 37 | 29.6% | 66.67% | Amendment 1 placed on ballot |
South Dakota | February 3, 2005[377]
February 28, 2005 |
Same-sex marriage and civil unions | 20 | 57.14% | 14 | 40% | 55 | 78.57% | 14 | 20% | 50.01% | Amendment C placed on ballot |
Virginia | February 26, 2005[378] | All types of same-sex unions | 30 | 75% | 10 | 25% | 79 | 79% | 17 | 17% | 50.01% | Advanced |
January 15, 2006[379]
March 7, 2006 |
28 | 70% | 11 | 27.5% | 85 | 85% | 12 | 12% | Question 1 placed on ballot | |||
South Carolina | March 1, 2005[380]
April 14, 2005 |
Same-sex marriage and civil unions | 42 | 91.3% | 1 | 2.17% | 96 | 77.42% | 3 | 2.42% | 66.67% | Amendment 1 placed on ballot |
January 25, 2007[381]
February 27, 2007 |
41 | 89.13% | 1 | 2.17% | 92 | 74.19% | 7 | 5.65% | Amendment 1 ratified | |||
Alabama | March 8, 2005[382]
March 10, 2005 |
Same-sex marriage and civil unions | 30 | 85.71% | 0 | 0% | 85 | 80.95% | 7 | 6.67% | 60% | Amendment 774 placed on ballot |
Texas | April 25, 2005[383]
May 21, 2005 |
Same-sex marriage and civil unions | 21 | 67.74% | 8 | 25.81% | 101 | 67.33% | 29 | 19.33% | 66.67% | Proposition 2 placed on ballot |
Idaho | February 6, 2006[384]
February 15, 2006 |
Same-sex marriage and civil unions | 26 | 74.29% | 9 | 25.71% | 53 | 75.71% | 17 | 24.29% | 66.67% | Constitutional Amendment 2 placed on ballot |
Pennsylvania | June 6, 2006[385] | Same-sex marriage and civil unions | — | 136 | 66.97% | 61 | 30.05% | 66.67% | Died in committee | |||
June 21, 2006[385] | Same-sex marriage | 38 | 76% | 12 | 24% | — | ||||||
Arizona | May 12, 2008[386]
June 27, 2008 |
Same-sex marriage | 16 | 53.33% | 4 | 13.33% | 35 | 55% | 25 | 41.67% | 50.01% | Proposition 102 placed on ballot |
Wyoming | February 6, 2009[387] | Same-sex marriage | — | 25 | 40.32% | 35 | 56.45% | 66.67% | Died in committee | |||
West Virginia | March 30, 2009[388] | Same-sex marriage | — | 30 | 30% | 67 | 67% | 66.67% | ||||
Indiana | January 28, 2010[389] | Same-sex marriage and civil unions | 38 | 76% | 10 | 20% | — | 50.01% | ||||
New Hampshire | February 17, 2010[390] | Same-sex marriage | — | 135 | 33.75% | 201 | 50.25% | 60% | ||||
Wyoming | January 27, 2011[391] | Same-sex marriage | 20 | 64.52% | 10 | 32.26% | — | 66.67% | ||||
Iowa | February 1, 2011[392] | Same-sex marriage | — | 62 | 62% | 37 | 37% | 50.01% | ||||
Indiana | February 15, 2011[393]
March 29, 2011 |
Same-sex marriage and civil unions | 40 | 80% | 10 | 20% | 70 | 70% | 26 | 26% | 50.01% | Advanced, but bill was amended |
January 28, 2014[394]
February 17, 2014 |
Same-sex marriage | 32 | 64% | 17 | 34% | 57 | 57% | 40 | 40% | Advanced | ||
2015/2016 | — | Not reintroduced in General Assembly | ||||||||||
Minnesota | May 11, 2011[397]
May 21, 2011 |
Same-sex marriage | 37 | 55.22% | 27 | 40.3% | 70 | 52.24% | 62 | 46.27% | 50.01% | Constitutional Amendment 1 placed on ballot |
North Carolina | September 12, 2011[398]
September 13, 2011 |
Same-sex marriage and civil unions | 30 | 60% | 16 | 32% | 75 | 62.5% | 42 | 35% | 60% | Constitutional Amendment 1 placed on ballot |
Efforts to ban same-sex unions by constitutional amendment
[edit]The following table shows all popular vote results regarding state constitutional amendments concerning same-sex marriage, and in some cases civil unions and domestic partnerships. The Hawaii amendment is different in that it granted the legislature authority to "reserve marriage to opposite-sex couples" (which the legislature had already done).
State | Initiated or legislatively referred ballot measure | Ban on | Date | Yes vote | No vote | Total votes | Voter turnout | Electorate | Final outcome | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Votes | % | Votes | % | ||||||||
Alaska | Measure 2 | Marriage | November 3, 1998 | 152,965[399] | 68.11% | 71,631 | 31.89% | 224,596 | 49.54% | 453,332 | Yes |
Hawaii | Constitutional Amendment 2 | Marriage ban permitted |
285,384[400] | 69.18% | 117,827 | 28.56% | 412,520 | 67.19% | 601,404 | Yes | |
Nebraska | Initiative Measure 416 | All types of same-sex unions | November 7, 2000 | 477,571[401] | 70.1% | 203,667 | 29.9% | 681,238 | 62.77% | 1,085,217 | Yes |
Nevada | Ballot Question 2 | Marriage | 412,688[402] | 69.62% | 180,077 | 30.38% | 592,765 | 67.8% | 874,304 | Yes | |
November 5, 2002 | 337,197[403] | 67.2% | 164,573 | 32.8% | 501,770 | 57.68% | 869,859 | Yes | |||
Missouri | Constitutional Amendment 2 | August 3, 2004 | 1,055,771[404][405] | 70.61% | 439,529 | 29.39% | 1,495,300 | 42.93% | 3,483,481 | Yes | |
Louisiana | Constitutional Amendment 1 | Marriage and civil union |
September 18, 2004 | 619,908[406][407] | 77.78% | 177,067 | 22.22% | 796,975 | 27.91% | 2,855,561 | Yes |
Kentucky | Constitutional Amendment 1 | Marriage and civil union |
November 2, 2004 | 1,222,125[408][409] | 74.56% | 417,097 | 25.44% | 1,639,222 | 58.7% | 2,794,286 | Yes |
Georgia | Constitutional Amendment 1 | Marriage and civil union |
2,454,930[410][411][409] | 76.15% | 768,716 | 23.85% | 3,223,646 | 75.87% | 4,248,837 | Yes | |
Ohio | State Issue 1 | Marriage and civil union |
3,329,335[412] | 61.71% | 2,065,462 | 38.29% | 5,394,797 | 67.66% | 7,972,826 | Yes | |
Mississippi | Amendment 1 | Marriage | 957,104[413][414][409] | 86.01% | 155,648 | 13.99% | 1,112,752 | 53.78% | 2,068,766 | Yes | |
Oklahoma | State Question 711 | Marriage and civil union |
1,075,216[415][416] | 75.59% | 347,303 | 24.41% | 1,422,519 | 66.35% | 2,143,978 | Yes | |
Arkansas | Constitutional Amendment 3 | Marriage and civil union |
753,770[417][418] | 74.95% | 251,914 | 25.05% | 1,053,399 | 62.47% | 1,686,124 | Yes | |
Michigan | State Proposal - 04-2 | All types of same-sex unions | 2,698,077[419][420] | 58.62% | 1,904,319 | 41.38% | 4,602,396 | 64.24% | 7,164,047 | Yes | |
Montana | Constitutional Initiative 96 | Marriage | 295,070[421] | 66.56% | 148,263 | 33.44% | 443,333 | 69.44% | 638,474 | Yes | |
Utah | Constitutional Amendment 3 | Marriage and civil union |
593,297[422] | 65.86% | 307,488 | 34.14% | 900,785 | 70.47% | 1,278,251 | Yes | |
North Dakota | Constitutional Measure 1 | Marriage and civil union |
223,538[423] | 73.23% | 81,708 | 26.77% | 305,246 | 62.68% | 487,010 | Yes | |
Oregon | State Measure 36 | Marriage | 1,028,546[424][425] | 56.63% | 787,556 | 43.37% | 1,816,102 | 84.82% | 2,141,249 | Yes | |
Kansas | Amendment 1 | Marriage and civil union |
April 5, 2005 | 417,627[426][427] | 69.95% | 179,432 | 30.05% | 597,059 | 35.35% | 1,688,926 | Yes |
Texas | Proposition 2 | Marriage and civil union |
November 8, 2005 | 1,723,782[428][429] | 76.25% | 536,913 | 23.75% | 2,260,695 | 17.97% | 12,577,545 | Yes |
Alabama | Amendment 774 | Marriage and civil union |
June 6, 2006 | 697,591[430][431] | 81.18% | 161,694 | 18.82% | 859,285 | 35.61% | 2,413,279 | Yes |
South Carolina | Amendment 1 | Marriage and civil union |
November 7, 2006 | 829,360[432][433] | 77.97% | 234,316 | 22.03% | 1,063,676 | 43.37% | 2,452,714 | Yes |
Virginia | Question 1 | All types of same-sex unions | 1,328,537[434][435] | 57.06% | 999,687 | 42.94% | 2,328,224 | 51.12% | 4,554,683 | Yes | |
Tennessee | Constitutional Amendment 1 | Marriage | 1,419,434[436][437] | 81.25% | 327,536 | 18.75% | 1,746,970 | 46.73% | 3,738,703 | Yes | |
Wisconsin | Referendum 1 | Marriage and civil union |
1,264,310[438][439] | 59.43% | 862,924 | 40.57% | 2,127,234 | 49.97% | 4,256,721 | Yes | |
South Dakota | Amendment C | All types of same-sex unions | 172,305[440][441][442] | 51.83% | 160,152 | 48.17% | 332,457 | 65.56% | 507,132 | Yes | |
Colorado | Amendment 43 | Marriage | 855,206[443] | 55.02% | 699,030 | 44.98% | 1,554,236 | 62.6% | 2,533,058 | Yes | |
Arizona | Proposition 107 | Marriage and civil union |
721,789[444] | 48.21% | 775,498 | 51.79% | 1,496,987 | 58.28% | 2,568,401 | No | |
Idaho | Constitutional Amendment 2 | Marriage and civil union |
282,386[445] | 63.35% | 163,384 | 36.65% | 445,770 | 58.27% | 764,880 | Yes | |
Florida | Constitutional Amendment 2 | Marriage and civil union |
November 4, 2008 | 4,890,883[446][447] | 61.92% | 3,008,026 | 38.08% | 8,456,329 | 75.18% | 11,247,634 | Yes |
Arizona | Proposition 102 | Marriage | 1,258,355[448] | 56.2% | 980,753 | 43.8% | 2,239,078 | 74.95% | 2,987,451 | Yes | |
California | Proposition 8 | 7,001,084[449][450] | 52.24% | 6,401,482 | 47.76% | 13,743,177 | 79.42% | 17,304,091 | Yes | ||
North Carolina | Constitutional Amendment 1 | Marriage and civil union |
May 8, 2012 | 1,317,178[451][452] | 61.04% | 840,802 | 38.96% | 2,157,980 | 34.27% | 6,296,759 | Yes |
Minnesota | Constitutional Amendment 1 | Marriage | November 6, 2012 | 1,399,916[453][454] | 47.44% | 1,510,434 | 51.19% | 2,950,780 | 76.42% | 3,861,043 | No |
Post-Obergefell attempts to repeal constitutional amendments banning same-sex unions
[edit]State | Date | Type of same-sex union | Upper House | Lower house | Final outcome | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes | No | Yes | No | ||||
Nevada | 2017 | Same-sex marriage | 19 | 2 | 27 | 14 | Advanced |
March/May 2019 | 19 | 2 | 37 | 2 | Placed on Ballot | ||
November 2020 | Referendum (62.4%) | Yes | |||||
Virginia | February 2021 | Same-sex marriage, civil union and any marriage-like contract between unmarried persons | 24 | 12 | 60 | 33 | Advanced |
2022 | 25 | 14 | - | - | No | ||
California | 2023 | Same-sex marriage | 31 | 0 | 67 | 0 | Placed on Ballot |
Referendum | Pending | ||||||
November 2024 | |||||||
Hawaii | March/April 2024 | Legislative authority to enact same-sex marriage ban | 24 | 1 | 43 | 6 | Placed on Ballot |
November 2024 | Referendum | Pending | |||||
Colorado | April/May 2024 | Same-sex marriage | 29 | 5 | 46 | 14 | Placed on Ballot |
November 2024 | Referendum | Pending | |||||
Virginia | 2025 | Same-sex marriage, civil union and any marriage-like contract between unmarried persons | Pending |
Proposed attempts to constitutionally block same-sex unions
[edit]State | 2000s | 2010s | Details | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Delaware | 2009 | A proposed constitutional amendment, Senate Bill 27, to ban same-sex marriage failed.[455] | Failed | |
Indiana | 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 |
2010 2011 2014 |
On February 15, 2011, the Indiana House approved a ban on civil unions and marriage (70–26). The bill passed the Indiana Senate by a 40–10 vote. According to state law, the bill must now be approved by the next, separately elected legislature before voters will see the measure on the 2014 ballot.[456] On January 27, 2014, the Indiana House voted 52–43 to remove the ban on civil unions from the proposed measure.[457] On January 28, 2014, the Indiana House voted 57–40 in favor of the amended measure.[458] On February 17, 2014, the Indiana Senate voted 32–17 approving the House-amended version of the ban on gay marriage. The measure will now need to be approved by the next, separately elected legislature before voters are allowed to decide its fate in 2016.[459] | Failed |
Iowa | 2004 2005 |
2010 2011 |
After the Iowa Supreme Court made same-sex marriage legal in 2009, a backlash quickly developed that resulted in three of the justices losing their seats in the 2010 election. Additionally, Republicans took control of the House and fell one seat short of taking over the Senate. For a proposed constitutional amendment to come before Iowa voters, it has to be approved in exactly the same form by two consecutive general assemblies.[460] | Failed |
Minnesota | 2004 2005 2006 2007 2009 |
2011 | A bill was sponsored in 2009 but failed to be brought up for a vote. An amendment was introduced again in 2011. The House and Senate bills passed.[461][462] Both are referred to other area.[clarification needed] The bill would have been approved by majority by both the Senate and house by May 23, 2011.[clarification needed] On May 11, 2011, the Senate passed the bill 38–27.[463] On May 22, 2011, an amendment was passed in the house by a vote of 70–62, and was placed on the ballot in the November 2012 election.[464] | Failed |
New Hampshire | 2006 2007 |
2010 | On February 17, 2010, a proposed constitutional amendment failed in the house by a 201–135 margin.[465][466] Constitutional amendments in New Hampshire require two-thirds approval from voters. | Failed |
New Jersey | 2006 2007 2008 |
2010 | Bills to place an amendment on the ballot have all failed in the House or Senate Judiciary Committee. | Failed |
New Mexico | 2007 2008 2009 |
2010 2011 2013 2014 |
A joint resolution was prefiled in the New Mexico legislature for the 2014 session.[467] The resolution would define marriage as one man and one woman for the state of New Mexico.[468] | Failed |
Pennsylvania | 2006 2008 2009 |
2010 2011 2013 |
A joint resolution was introduced in the house of representatives with record low sponsorship on May 8, 2013. The bill would ban same-sex marriages and civil unions. Pennsylvania would become the first northeastern state with a marriage amendment. According to state law, the amendment must receive a majority vote from both chambers of the legislature in two consecutive sessions before voters are allowed to decide its fate. The soonest voters could see the measure is in 2015.[469][470] | Failed |
West Virginia | 2009 | 2010 2011 |
West Virginia senators proposed a constitutional amendment for the 2010 ballot that would have defined marriage as "a union between and man and a woman". The amendment was defeated.[471][472] Another proposition was introduced in January 2011[473] but failed to advance. | Failed |
Wyoming | 2009 | 2011 | In 2009, the house of representatives considered an amendment to the state constitution, House Joint Resolution 17 (also known as the "Defense of Marriage" resolution), defining marriage as a union between a man and a woman. The measure was defeated in the house on February 6, with 35 votes against and 25 in favor. On January 27, 2011, the Senate approved an amendment,[474] but it died in the house.[475] | Failed |
Efforts to ban same-sex unions by statute
[edit]The following consists of votes by statutory initiatives that ban same-sex marriage and/or civil unions and domestic partnerships:
State | Date | Yes vote | No vote | Description | Final outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
California | March 2000 | 61% (4,618,673) | 39% (2,909,370) | Proposition 22. Amend the Family Code to say: Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.[476]1 | Yes2 3 |
Notes:
- 1 There is a debate as to whether the adoption of Prop 22 only prohibited California from recognizing same-sex marriages performed in other states.
- 2 In March 2005, Judge Richard Kramer ruled there appeared to be no rational state compelling interest in limiting marriage to heterosexual couples. His ruling was appealed to the California Court of Appeal for the 1st District, which upheld Proposition 22 on October 5, 2006. The Supreme Court of California ruled on May 15, 2008, that Proposition 22 is unconstitutional and it was struck down by the state's highest court.
- 3 Subsequently, repealed by state legislature.
Lawsuits seeking to overturn statutory bans
[edit]This article may be confusing or unclear to readers. (October 2009) |
The following lists cases seeking to overturn marriage bans:
State | Case | Date | Vote for | Vote against | Description | Restrictions unconstitutional? | Final outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minnesota | Richard John Baker v. Gerald R. Nelson | October 15, 1971 | 0 | 7 | Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that Minnesota's marriage statute applied only to opposite-sex couples.[477] The case was appealed to the United States Supreme Court, but dismissed on October 10, 1972.[478] | No | No |
Kentucky | Jones v. Callahan | November 9, 1973 | 0 | 7 | Kentucky Court of Appeals ruled that Kentucky's marriage statute applied only to opposite-sex couples.[479] | No | No |
Washington | Singer v. Hara | October 1974 | Failed | Washington Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal of same-sex couple who were denied a marriage license by their county clerk. Washington Court of Appeals's decision stating that state marriage statutes only applied to opposite-sex couples upheld.[480] | No | No | |
District of Columbia | Dean v. District of Columbia' | January 1995 | 0 | 9 | District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled that District's marriage statute applied only to opposite-sex couples.[481][482] | No | No |
Hawaii | Baehr v. Miike | December 9, 1999 | 0 | 5 | Hawaii Supreme Court ruled on May 5, 1993, in a 3 in favor to 1 against decision, that state must provide a compelling interest to restricting marriage to opposite-sex couples. Remanded case to lower courts for trial on the subject. On December 3, 1996, Judge Chang ruled that the state had not established any compelling interest in denying same-sex couples the ability to marry and that, even if it had, it failed to prove that the Hawaii statute was narrowly tailored to avoid unnecessary abridgement of constitutional rights. He enjoined the state from refusing to issue marriage licenses to otherwise-qualified same-sex couples.[483] The following day Chang stayed his ruling, acknowledging the "legally untenable" position couples would be in should the Supreme Court reverse him on appeal.[484] Hawaii Supreme Court ruled that plaintiffs' arguments were moot in light of 1998 state constitutional amendment.[485] | No | No |
Vermont | Baker v. Vermont | December 20, 1999 | 5 | 0 | Vermont Supreme Court rules that same-sex marriage or something similar must be implemented in 100 days.[486] | Yes | Legalized civil unions in Vermont by Vermont General Assembly |
Alaska | Brause v. Alaska Dept of Health & Social Services | April 17, 2001 | 0 | 5 | Alaska Supreme Court ruled that plaintiffs' arguments were moot in light of 1998 state constitutional amendment.[487] | No | No |
Massachusetts | Goodridge v. Department of Public Health | November 18, 2003 | 4 | 3 | Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court rules that same-sex marriages must be legal in 180 days.[488] | Yes | Legalized same-sex marriage in Massachusetts on May 17, 2004 |
Arizona | Harold Donald Standhardt and Tod Alan Keltner v. State of Arizona | May 25, 2004 | Failed | Arizona Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal of a unanimous Arizona Appellate Court ruling upholding statutory marriage ban.[489][490] | No | No | |
Louisiana | Forum for Equality v McKeithen | January 19, 2005 | 0 | 7 | District Judge William Morvant of Baton Rouge struck down the constitutional amendment on the grounds that it violated a provision of the state constitution requiring that an amendment cover only one subject. The Louisiana Supreme Court, however, upheld the constitutional amendment.[491] | No | No |
Oregon | Mary Li and Rebecca Kennedy et al. v. State of Oregon et al. | April 2005 | 0 | 7 | Oregon Supreme Court ruled that plaintiffs' arguments were moot in light of 2004 state constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.[492] | No | No |
New York | Hernandez v. Robles | July 6, 2006 | 2 | 4 | New York Court of Appeals upheld New York's marriage statute did not allow same-sex marriage, and that there is no constitutional right to same-sex marriage.[493] | No | No |
Georgia | Perdue v. O'Kelley | July 7, 2006 | 0 | 7 | On May 16, 2006, Constance C. Russell of Fulton County Superior Court struck down the constitutional amendment on the grounds that it violated a provision of the state constitution requiring that an amendment cover only one subject. The Georgia Supreme Court, however, upheld the constitutional amendment.[494] | No | No |
Washington | Andersen v. King County | July 26, 2006 | 4 | 5 | Washington Supreme Court upholds Washington's statute banning same-sex marriage.[495] | No | No |
New Jersey | Lewis v. Harris | October 25, 2006 | 7 | 0 | New Jersey Supreme Court rules that same-sex marriage or something similar must be implemented in 100 days.[496] | Yes | Legalized civil unions in New Jersey by New Jersey General Assembly |
Maryland | Conaway v. Deane & Polyak | September 2007 | 3 | 4 | Maryland Court of Appeals upholds Maryland's statute banning same-sex marriage.[497] | No | No |
Michigan | Pride at Work v. Granholm | May 7, 2008 | 5 | 2 | Michigan Supreme Court ruled that Michigan's constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage and civil unions also applies to domestic partner benefits.[498][499] | No | Constitution of Michigan prohibits domestic partner benefits for same-sex couples |
California | In re Marriage Cases | May 15, 2008 | 4 | 3 | California Supreme Court overturns Proposition 22 and rules that in 30 days, same-sex marriages must be legal.[500] | Yes | Same-sex marriage licenses issued in California from June 17, 2008, to November 5, 2008 On November 5, 2008, Proposition 8 goes into effect banning same-sex marriage in the Constitution of California |
Connecticut | Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public Health | October 10, 2008 | 4 | 3 | Connecticut Supreme Court rules that same-sex marriages must be legal in 30 days.[501] | Yes | Legalized same-sex marriage in Connecticut on November 12, 2008 |
Iowa | Varnum v. Brien | April 2009 | 7 | 0 | Iowa Supreme Court rules that same-sex marriages must be legal in 27 days.[502] | Yes | Legalized same-sex marriage in Iowa on April 27, 2009 |
California | Strauss v. Horton | May 26, 2009 | 1 | 6 | California Supreme Court upholds Proposition 8; however, same-sex marriages performed before November 5, 2008, are also upheld.[503] | No | California Supreme Court upholds Proposition 8; however, same-sex marriages performed before November 5, 2008, are also upheld. |
New York | Lewis v. New York State Department of Civil Service | November 2009 | 3 | 2 | The case challenging the recognition of same-sex marriages in the state of New York was heard by New York Court of Appeals and upheld the rights that came with the recognition of same-sex marriages.[504] | Recognition upheld | Continuing the recognition of same-sex marriages abroad. |
Wisconsin | McConkey v. Van Hollen | June 30, 2010 | 0 | 7 | Wisconsin Supreme Court upholds constitutional amendment.[505] | No | No |
Wyoming | Christiansen v. Christiansen | June 2011 | Allowed | Wyoming Supreme Court allows two Wyoming residents to dissolve a legal relationship created under the laws of Canada.[506] | Yes | Couple can divorce in Wyoming | |
Maryland | McConkey v. Van Hollen | May 18, 2012 | 7 | 0 | Maryland Court of Appeals upholds Maryland's recognition of out-of-state same-sex marriages.[507] | Recognition upheld | Continuing the recognition of same-sex marriages abroad. |
Wisconsin | Appling v. Doyle | July 31, 2014 | 7 | 0 | On November 4, 2009, Wisconsin Supreme Court declined to hear the challenge to Wisconsin's domestic partnership.[508] On June 20, 2011, the Circuit court Judge Dan Moeser ruled that the domestic partnership registry does not violate the state constitution, finding that the state "does not recognize domestic partnership in a way that even remotely resembles how the state recognizes marriage".[509] On December 21, 2012, District 4 Court of Appeals affirms Judge Moeser's decision in a unanimous ruling.[510] On July 31, 2014, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the domestic partnership law does not violate the state's constitutional ban on same-sex marriage.[511] | Recognition upheld | Wisconsin's domestic partnership law is upheld. |
Montana | Donaldson and Guggenheim v. State of Montana | December 2012 | 3 | 4 | Montana Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's dismissal of this case because the plaintiffs had not identified specific state statutes in their complaint. They did not seek the right to marry, but equal treatment for same-sex couples with respect to inheritance rights, health care decisions, and parenting. The Court invited the plaintiffs to file an amended complaint citing specific statutes,[512] which the plaintiffs, did on April 16, 2013.[513] | No | Pending (Lewis and Clark County District Court) |
New Mexico | Griego v. Oliver | December 19, 2013 | 5 | 0 | On March 21, 2013, ACLU filed a lawsuit in the Albuquerque District court on behalf of two New Mexico couples who are seeking the right to marry. On December 19, 2013, New Mexico's Supreme Court declared that denying marriage to same-sex couples is unconstitutional in the state.[514] | Yes | Legalized same-sex marriage in New Mexico on December 19, 2013 |
Texas | In Re Marriage of J.B. and H.B. | June 19, 2015 | n/a | n/a | County judge ruled statutory and constitutional ban on same-sex marriage in violation of the US constitution; appealed to 5th Texas Court of Appeals. The court says Texas's same-sex marriage ban is constitutional.[515] The Fifth Circuit denied en banc review. J.B. sought review from the Texas Supreme Court in February 2011 and that court requested briefs in October.[516] On July 3, 2013, the Texas Supreme Court sua sponte ordered supplemental merits briefing in light of United States v. Windsor.[517] | Case dismissed on June 19, 2015, because a Petitioner died. | |
Texas | Texas v. Naylor | June 19, 2015 | 5 | 3 | On January 7, 2011, the Third Court of Appeals in Austin in the case of State of Texas v. Angelique S. Naylor and Sabina Daly rejected, on procedural grounds, the Texas attorney general's appeal of a divorce granted by a lower court to a same-sex couple married in Massachusetts.[518][519] The appeal was still pending in December 2012.[520] | Third Court of Appeals upheld in a 5-3 decision on June 19, 2015. The Court ruled that the Texas government had no standing to intervene in the divorce. |
See also
[edit]- Same-sex marriage in the United States
- Same-sex marriage status in the United States by state
- Same-sex marriage law in the United States by state
- Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States
- Same-sex union legislation
- Divorce of same-sex couples
References
[edit]- ^ 1 U.S.C. § 7
- ^ 28 U.S.C. § 1738C
- ^ Petition for Certiorari (No 12-307). Retrieved December 8, 2012
- ^ Liptak, Adam (June 26, 2013). "Supreme Court Bolsters Gay Marriage With Two Major Rulings". New York Times. Retrieved June 26, 2013.
- ^ "Weber Introduces "State Marriage Defense Act of 2014"". Press Releases. US House of Representatives. Retrieved January 16, 2014.
- ^ Bradley, Gerard V. (January 10, 2014). "The State Marriage Defense Act, January 10, 2014". Witherspoon Institute. Retrieved January 16, 2014.
- ^ Liptak, Adam (June 26, 2015). "Supreme Court Ruling Makes Same-Sex Marriage a Right Nationwide". New York Times. Retrieved June 28, 2015.
- ^ Foley, Elise (March 16, 2011). "Democrats Aim For DOMA Repeal". Huffington Post.
- ^ Shear, Michael D. (December 13, 2022). "Biden Signs Bill to Protect Same-Sex Marriage Rights". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved December 13, 2022.
- ^ "HRC Talking Points on DC Domestic Partnership Program". www.glaa.org.
- ^ Ingram, Carl (August 24, 1994). "Senate OKs Bill on Rights for Unwed Couples". The Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on January 11, 2012. Retrieved September 9, 2009.
- ^ "Wilson: no to domestic partnership bill". The Sacramento Bee. September 12, 1994. p. A1. Retrieved September 9, 2009.
- ^ "Gay marriages get thumps up in state senate". The Deseret News. March 6, 1996. p. A2. Retrieved September 9, 2009.
- ^ "Partners Task Force - Hawaii: Civil Unions". buddybuddy.com.
- ^ "Bill List". www.leginfo.ca.gov.
- ^ "Bill List". www.leginfo.ca.gov.
- ^ "Bill List". www.leginfo.ca.gov.
- ^ a b "The Vermont Legislative Bill Tracking System". www.leg.state.vt.us.
- ^ "Public Law 110". webserver.rilin.state.ri.us.
- ^ "Bill List". www.leginfo.ca.gov.
- ^ "Bill List". www.leginfo.ca.gov.
- ^ "Bill Search and Legislative Information | New York State Assembly". assembly.state.ny.us.
- ^ "Bill Search and Legislative Information | New York State Assembly". assembly.state.ny.us.
- ^ "Bill List". www.leginfo.ca.gov.
- ^ "Bill List". www.leginfo.ca.gov.
- ^ "D.C. Law Library - D.C. Law 15-17. Health-Care Decisions Act of 2003". code.dccouncil.us. Archived from the original on December 1, 2018. Retrieved November 30, 2018.
- ^ "Bill List". www.leginfo.ca.gov.
- ^ "New Jersey Domestic Partnership Act".
- ^ "Summary". www.mainelegislature.org.
- ^ "D.C. Law Library - D.C. Law 15-176. Deed Recordation Tax and Related Amendments Amendment Act of 2004". code.dccouncil.us. Archived from the original on November 23, 2018. Retrieved November 30, 2018.
- ^ "Bill List". www.leginfo.ca.gov.
- ^ "Bill Search and Legislative Information | New York State Assembly". assembly.state.ny.us.
- ^ "D.C. Law Library - D.C. Law 15-307. Department of Motor Vehicles Reform Amendment Act of 2004". code.dccouncil.us. Archived from the original on November 30, 2018. Retrieved November 30, 2018.
- ^ "D.C. Law Library - D.C. Law 15-309. Domestic Partnership Protection Amendment Act of 2004". code.dccouncil.us. Archived from the original on November 30, 2018. Retrieved November 30, 2018.
- ^ "Civil unions in Connecticut". www.religioustolerance.org.
- ^ Wagner, John (May 21, 2005). "Ehrlich Vetoes Bill Extending Rights to Gay Couples". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ "AB 19 Assembly Bill - History". www.leginfo.ca.gov.
- ^ "S0146". webserver.rilin.state.ri.us.
- ^ "2005 Bill Status: Senate Bills 1-299" (PDF).
- ^ "S 1209" (PDF).
- ^ "2005 Bill Status: Senate Bills 1200 - 1237" (PDF).
- ^ "AB 849 Assembly Bill - History". www.leginfo.ca.gov.
- ^ "Bill List". www.leginfo.ca.gov.
- ^ "Bill List". www.leginfo.ca.gov.
- ^ "D.C. Law Library - D.C. Law 16-59. DOMESTIC PARTNER HEALTH CARE BENEFITS TAX EXEMPTION ACT OF 2005". code.dccouncil.us. Archived from the original on December 1, 2018. Retrieved November 30, 2018.
- ^ "P.L. 2005, CHAPTER 331" (PDF).
- ^ "D.C. Law Library - D.C. Law 16-79. Domestic Partnership Equality Amendment Act of 2006". code.dccouncil.us. Archived from the original on November 30, 2018. Retrieved November 30, 2018.
- ^ "Bill Search and Legislative Information | New York State Assembly". assembly.state.ny.us.
- ^ "Summary". legislature.maine.gov.
- ^ "Bill Search and Legislative Information | New York State Assembly". assembly.state.ny.us.
- ^ "Bill Search and Legislative Information | New York State Assembly". assembly.state.ny.us.
- ^ "Chapter 157". webserver.rilin.state.ri.us.
- ^ a b "2006 Bill Status: House Bills 7600 - 7899" (PDF).
- ^ "Chapter 189". webserver.rilin.state.ri.us.
- ^ "Chapter-316". webserver.rilin.state.ri.us.
- ^ a b "2006 Bill Status: Senate Bills 2601 - 2900" (PDF).
- ^ "Chapter 06-631". webserver.rilin.state.ri.us.
- ^ "Chapter 06-645". webserver.rilin.state.ri.us.
- ^ "2006 Bill Status: Senate Bills 2001 - 2300" (PDF).
- ^ "Bill List". www.leginfo.ca.gov.
- ^ "Bill List". www.leginfo.ca.gov.
- ^ Cloyd, Wendy (December 15, 2006). "New Jersey Legislature Adopts Civil Unions". Citizen Link. Retrieved November 4, 2009.
- ^ "D.C. Law Library - D.C. Law 16-292. Domestic Partnerships Joint Filing Act of 2006". code.dccouncil.us. Archived from the original on November 30, 2018. Retrieved November 30, 2018.
- ^ "Bill_Status". www.gencourt.state.nh.us.
- ^ "Washington State Legislature". apps.leg.wa.gov.
- ^ Sklar, Roberta (May 2, 2007). "Task Force hails Oregon Senate passage of domestic partnership legislation covering same-sex couples". The Task Force. Archived from the original on November 4, 2009. Retrieved November 4, 2009.
- ^ "Summary". legislature.maine.gov.
- ^ "Bill_Status". www.gencourt.state.nh.us.
- ^ "Summary". legislature.maine.gov.
- ^ "Summary". legislature.maine.gov.
- ^ "New York governor to propose legalizing same-sex marriage". CNN. April 14, 2009. Retrieved November 4, 2009.
- ^ "Chapter 07-476". webserver.rilin.state.ri.us.
- ^ a b "2007 Bill Status: Senate Bills 600 - 899" (PDF).
- ^ "AB 43 Assembly Bill - History". www.leginfo.ca.gov.
- ^ "AB 102 Assembly Bill - CHAPTERED". www.leginfo.ca.gov.
- ^ "Chapter 07-510". webserver.rilin.state.ri.us.
- ^ "Bill_Status". www.gencourt.state.nh.us.
- ^ "Bill Search and Legislative Information | New York State Assembly". assembly.state.ny.us.
- ^ Sklar, Roberta (February 21, 2008). "Task Force Action Fund denounces New Mexico Senate's rejection of comprehensive domestic partnership bill". The Task Force. Archived from the original on November 6, 2009. Retrieved November 4, 2009.
- ^ Luna, Brad (March 13, 2008). "WA domestic partnership expansion bill signed into law". Free Press. Retrieved November 4, 2009.
- ^ "Washington State Legislature". apps.leg.wa.gov.
- ^ "Summary". legislature.maine.gov.
- ^ "BILL INFO-2008 Regular Session-HB 746". mlis.state.md.us.
- ^ "BILL INFO-2008 Regular Session-SB 566". mlis.state.md.us.
- ^ "BILL INFO-2008 Regular Session-SB 597". mlis.state.md.us.
- ^ Jantzen, M. V. (May 16, 2008). "D.C. Council Passes Domestic Partner Law Expansion". DCist. Archived from the original on February 19, 2010. Retrieved November 4, 2009.
- ^ Terrell, Steven (February 26, 2009). "Domestic partnership bill fails in Senate". Santa Fe New Mexican. Archived from the original on May 23, 2011. Retrieved November 4, 2009.
- ^ Abel, David (April 8, 2009). "Vermont legalizes same-sex marriage". The Boston Globe. Retrieved November 4, 2009.
- ^ "Ritter signs bill that will help gay couples". Associated Press. April 9, 2009.
- ^ Matthews, Chase (April 23, 2009). "Connecticut Gov. signs gay marriage into law". Chicago Pride. Retrieved November 4, 2009.
- ^ Goodnough, Abby (May 5, 2009). "Gay Marriage Advances in Maine". New York Times. Retrieved November 4, 2009.
- ^ Craig, Tim (May 5, 2009). "Uproar in D.C. as Same-Sex Marriage Gains". Washington Post. Retrieved November 4, 2009.
- ^ "D.C. Law Library - D.C. Law 18-9. Jury and Marriage Amendment Act of 2009". code.dccouncil.us. Archived from the original on December 1, 2018. Retrieved November 30, 2018.
- ^ "Washington Expands Domestic Partnerships, Offers Almost-Marriage". Family Fairness. April 16, 2009. Archived from the original on February 12, 2011. Retrieved November 4, 2009.
- ^ "D.C. Law Library - D.C. Law 18-33. Domestic Partnership Judicial Determination of Parentage Amendment Act of 2009". code.dccouncil.us. Archived from the original on November 30, 2018. Retrieved November 30, 2018.
- ^ "Summary". legislature.maine.gov.
- ^ "Nevada legalizing domestic partnerships". CNN. May 31, 2009. Retrieved November 4, 2009.
- ^ "SB283". www.leg.state.nv.us.
- ^ Love, Norma (June 3, 2009). "Gay Marriage: New Hampshire Makes Same-Sex Marriage Legal". Huffington Post. Retrieved November 4, 2009.
- ^ "Tracking House Bill 2839 in the Oregon Legislature". Your Government :: The Oregonian.
- ^ "Bill Search and Legislative Information | New York State Assembly". assembly.state.ny.us.
- ^ Brigham, Roger (October 12, 2009). "Schwarzenegger signs Milk Day, marriage recognition into law". Edge Media Network. Archived from the original on January 19, 2012. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ Honan, Edith (December 2, 2009). "NY Senate votes down gay marriage bill 38-24". Reuters.
- ^ "Washington, D.C. Mayor Signs Law Legalizing Same-Sex Marriage". RTTNews. December 18, 2009.
- ^ "Chapter 09-369". webserver.rilin.state.ri.us.
- ^ "2009 Bill Status: Senate Bills 1-299" (PDF).
- ^ "Chapter 09-385". webserver.rilin.state.ri.us.
- ^ "2009 Bill Status: House Bills 5000-5299" (PDF).
- ^ "New York S07773 | 2009-2010 | General Assembly". LegiScan.
- ^ "Bill Search and Legislative Information | New York State Assembly". assembly.state.ny.us.
- ^ "Gay marriage bill up for vote in NJ next week". Google. Associated Press. December 3, 2009.[dead link ]
- ^ "Bill Search and Legislative Information | New York State Assembly". assembly.state.ny.us.
- ^ "Bill Search and Legislative Information | New York State Assembly". assembly.state.ny.us.
- ^ "New York A07729 | 2009-2010 | General Assembly". LegiScan.
- ^ "Bill Search and Legislative Information | New York State Assembly". assembly.state.ny.us.
- ^ "New York A04089 | 2009-2010 | General Assembly". LegiScan.
- ^ "Citing Marriage, Tim Pawlenty Rejects Gay Rights Bill". On Top Magazine.
- ^ Niesse, Mark (January 22, 2010). "Hawaii Senate Passes Civil Unions Bill". Newsday. Archived from the original on July 24, 2021. Retrieved July 24, 2021.
- ^ "Bill Search and Legislative Information | New York State Assembly". assembly.state.ny.us.
- ^ "New York A02563 | 2021-2022 | General Assembly". LegiScan.
- ^ "California Assembly Bill 2055, 2010".
- ^ Wayne, Kevin (November 30, 2010). "Illinois House passes civil unions legislation in historic vote". Go Pride. Retrieved July 24, 2021.
- ^ Santoscoy, Carlos (December 1, 2010). "Illinois Senate OK's Civil Unions For Gay & Lesbian Couples". On Top. Retrieved July 24, 2021.
- ^ "Illinois Governor Signs Historic Law, Extends a Measure of Fairness to All Couples". CISION PR Newswire. January 31, 2011. Retrieved July 24, 2021.
- ^ "Hawaii State Legislature 2011 Regular Session SB232 SD1".
- ^ "Bill_Status". www.gencourt.state.nh.us.
- ^ Wagner, John (February 24, 2011). "Senate approves gay marriage; House passage not assured". The WAshington Post. Archived from the original on May 1, 2011. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ Lobianco, Tom (March 11, 2011). "Maryland gay marriage bill dies with no final vote". The San Diego Union-Tribune. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ "Colorado Senate Passes Civil Unions Bill". www.advocate.com. March 24, 2011. Archived from the original on July 20, 2012. Retrieved July 25, 2021.
- ^ "House panel kills Colorado civil unions bill on 6-5 party-line vote".
- ^ "Washington State Legislature". apps.leg.wa.gov.
- ^ "Nevada AB464 | 2011 | 76th Legislature". LegiScan.
- ^ "Washington State Legislature". apps.leg.wa.gov.
- ^ "Bill Detail - Delaware General Assembly". legis.delaware.gov.
- ^ "Nevada SB391 | 2011 | 76th Legislature". LegiScan.
- ^ Confessore, Nicholas; Barbaro, Michael (June 25, 2011). "New York Allows Same-Sex Marriage, Becoming Largest State to Pass Law". The New York Times.
- ^ McGowan, Dan. "BREAKING NEWS: House Passes Controversial Civil Unions Bill". GoLocalProv.
- ^ "Bill List". www.leginfo.ca.gov.
- ^ "Bill List". www.leginfo.ca.gov.
- ^ "Bill List". www.leginfo.ca.gov.
- ^ "Washington becomes seventh state to recognize same-sex marriages". Thegavoice.com. February 13, 2012. Retrieved January 6, 2014.
- ^ "Same-Sex Marriage On New Jersey Senate Agenda". January 24, 2012.
- ^ "Kennebec Journal and Morning Sentinel". Kennebec Journal and Morning Sentinel.
- ^ "Bill Search and Legislative Information | New York State Assembly". assembly.state.ny.us.
- ^ "Archived". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on January 11, 2019. Retrieved June 9, 2023.
- ^ "New Jersey S1599 | 2012-2013 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "H.B. No 0168". wyoleg.gov.
- ^ "Votes for SB13-011" (PDF).
- ^ "R.I. Senate committee to consider gay marriage, referendum bills next Thursday". Metro Weekly. March 15, 2013. Archived from the original on March 21, 2013.
- ^ House Bill 5015 and Senate Bill 38.
- ^ "Bill Detail - Delaware General Assembly". legis.delaware.gov.
- ^ Bill Status for HF 1054.
- ^ "Nevada AB99 | 2013 | 77th Legislature". LegiScan.
- ^ "Measure Status". www.capitol.hawaii.gov.
- ^ "Illinois General Assembly - Bill Status for SB0010". www.ilga.gov.
- ^ Long, Ray; Rafael Guerrero (February 14, 2013). "Illinois Senate approves gay marriage - chicagotribune.com". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved February 14, 2013.
- ^ "Bill Search and Legislative Information | New York State Assembly". assembly.state.ny.us.
- ^ "New York A07100 | 2013-2014 | General Assembly". LegiScan.
- ^ a b "Wyoming House defeats bills on both sides of same-sex marriage issue". LGBTQ Nation. Associated Press. February 13, 2014.
- ^ "Bill Search and Legislative Information | New York State Assembly". assembly.state.ny.us.
- ^ "New York A04024 | 2013-2014 | General Assembly". LegiScan.
- ^ "Calif. Senate advances bill to remove 'man and woman' from marriage laws". LGBTQ Nation. May 1, 2014.
- ^ "Legislation updates California marriage laws". The Sacramento Bee. June 30, 2014. Archived from the original on July 14, 2014.
- ^ "New law updates state code to use gender-neutral marriage terms". Los Angeles Times. July 7, 2014.
- ^ "LIS > Bill Tracking > SB1211 > 2015 session". lis.virginia.gov.
- ^ KUTNER [e]GayRVA.com[m, BRAD (February 3, 2015). "Rare win for LGBTQ Virginians as two equality bills pass full Senate vote". LGBTQ Nation.
- ^ RVA, Gay (February 14, 2015). "Va. Delegate speaks out on discrimination as last two LGBT bills are killed". LGBTQ Nation.
- ^ "Utah SB0269 | 2015 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "New Mexico SB279 | 2015 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "Legislation - New Mexico Legislature". www.nmlegis.gov.
- ^ "Nevada SB307 | 2015 | 78th Legislature". LegiScan.
- ^ "Nevada SB406 | 2015 | 78th Legislature". LegiScan.
- ^ "New Jersey S866 | 2014-2015 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "Actions". legislature.maine.gov.
- ^ "Oregon HB2478 | 2015 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "Guam passes marriage equality and employment nondiscrimination acts". Metro Weekly. August 12, 2015.
- ^ Staff reports (August 12, 2015). "Guam lawmakers pass LGBT bills". Washington Blade: LGBTQ News, Politics, LGBTQ Rights, Gay News.
- ^ Raymundo, Shawn (August 12, 2015). "Legislature passes Marriage Equality Act". guampdn.com.
- ^ "New York A07645 | 2015-2016 | General Assembly". LegiScan.
- ^ "Bill Search and Legislative Information | New York State Assembly". assembly.state.ny.us.
- ^ "D.C. Law Library - D.C. Law 21-105. Domestic Partnership Termination Recognition Amendment Act of 2015". code.dccouncil.us. Archived from the original on December 1, 2018. Retrieved November 30, 2018.
- ^ "Legislature reinforces same-sex marriage". Statesman Journal. February 25, 2016.
- ^ "Oregon HB4127 | 2016 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "Bill Search and Legislative Information | New York State Assembly". assembly.state.ny.us.
- ^ "New York A05476 | 2015-2016 | General Assembly". LegiScan.
- ^ "Bill Search and Legislative Information | New York State Assembly". assembly.state.ny.us.
- ^ "Colorado SB150 | 2016 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "Governor signs raft of bills | The Pueblo Chieftain". August 9, 2016. Archived from the original on August 9, 2016.
- ^ "North Carolina H1061 | 2015-2016 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "Bill Status". leginfo.legislature.ca.gov.
- ^ "SB 1005: Modernizing Code Language to Reflect Marriage Equality". April 22, 2016.
- ^ "North Dakota Bill Actions: SB 2043". www.legis.nd.gov. Archived from the original on December 8, 2021. Retrieved July 25, 2021.
- ^ "North Dakota Rejects Changes to Reflect Gay Marriage Ruling". ABC News. Archived from the original on January 11, 2017.
- ^ "New Mexico HB412 | 2017 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "Legislation - New Mexico Legislature". www.nmlegis.gov.
- ^ "Utah HB0150 | 2017 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "Utah SB0147 | 2017 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "Utah SB0237 | 2017 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "Maryland HB1104 | 2017 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "AB229". www.leg.state.nv.us.
- ^ "Nevada SB79 | 2017 | 79th Legislature". LegiScan.
- ^ "New York S04407 | 2017-2018 | General Assembly". LegiScan.
- ^ "New Jersey S1238 | 2016-2017 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "North Carolina H229 | 2017-2018 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "Summary". legislature.maine.gov.
- ^ "Maryland SB276 | 2017 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "New Mexico HB201 | 2018 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "Bill Search and Legislative Information | New York State Assembly". assembly.state.ny.us.
- ^ "Utah SB0027 | 2018 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "Utah SB0221 | 2018 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "Utah SB0054 | 2018 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "Utah HB0293 | 2018 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "Bill Search and Legislative Information | New York State Assembly". assembly.state.ny.us.
- ^ "Minnesota HF4385 | 2017-2018 | 90th Legislature". LegiScan.
- ^ "New Jersey S482 | 2018-2019 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "New York S05858 | 2017-2018 | General Assembly". LegiScan.
- ^ "Bill_Status". www.gencourt.state.nh.us.
- ^ "Arkansas SB366 | 2019 | 92nd General Assembly". LegiScan.
- ^ "Nebraska LB111 | 2019-2020 | 106th Legislature". LegiScan.
- ^ "New Mexico HB419 | 2019 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "LIS > Bill Tracking > HB1979 > 2019 session". lis.virginia.gov.
- ^ "New Mexico HB6 | 2019 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "Nebraska LB127 | 2019-2020 | 106th Legislature". LegiScan.
- ^ "Utah HB0234 | 2019 | General Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "Utah HB0422 | 2019 | General Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "Legislation - New Mexico Legislature". www.nmlegis.gov.
- ^ "Maryland SB697 | 2019 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "Maryland HB519 | 2019 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "Oklahoma HB2468 | 2020 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "Nebraska LB427 | 2019-2020 | 106th Legislature". LegiScan.
- ^ "Nebraska LB533 | 2019-2020 | 106th Legislature". LegiScan.
- ^ "HF 5 Status in the House for the 91st Legislature, 2019 1st Special Session (2019 - 2020)". www.revisor.mn.gov.
- ^ "Minnesota HF5 | 2019 | 91st Legislature 1st Special Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "Rhode Island S0789 | 2019 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "LD 1803, HP 1284, Text and Status, 129th Legislature, First Regular Session". www.mainelegislature.org.
- ^ "Delaware SB94 | 2019-2020 | 150th General Assembly". LegiScan.
- ^ "New York S00300 | 2019-2020 | General Assembly". LegiScan.
- ^ "Hawaii HB979 | 2020 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "Bill Search and Legislative Information | New York State Assembly". assembly.state.ny.us.
- ^ "New York A02566 | 2019-2020 | General Assembly". LegiScan.
- ^ "New Hampshire HB686 | 2020 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "New Mexico HB158 | 2020 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "Nebraska LB387 | 2019-2020 | 106th Legislature". LegiScan.
- ^ "New Mexico HB146 | 2020 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "LIS > Bill Tracking > HB1490 > 2020 session". lis.virginia.gov.
- ^ "LIS > Bill Tracking > SB17 > 2020 session". lis.virginia.gov.
- ^ "LIS > Bill Tracking > SB247 > 2020 session". lis.virginia.gov.
- ^ "Utah HB0234 | 2020 | General Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "Utah SB0065 | 2020 | General Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "LIS > Bill Tracking > HB1580 > 2020 session". lis.virginia.gov.
- ^ "New York S07506 | 2019-2020 | General Assembly". LegiScan.
- ^ Staff, G. W. K. "Gestational Surrogacy Legalized in New York State". www.gayswithkids.com. Archived from the original on July 25, 2021. Retrieved July 25, 2021.
- ^ "LIS > Bill Tracking > HB623 > 2020 session". lis.virginia.gov.
- ^ "Bill Search and Legislative Information | New York State Assembly". assembly.state.ny.us.
- ^ "New York S07168 | 2019-2020 | General Assembly". LegiScan.
- ^ Lopez, Oscar (May 15, 2020). "Puerto Rico approves new civil code, sparking fears over LGBT+ rights". Reuters – via www.reuters.com.
- ^ "Wanda Vázquez convirtió en ley el Código Civil". El Nuevo Día. June 2, 2020.
- ^ "North Carolina S595 | 2019-2020 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "Bill_Status". gencourt.state.nh.us.
- ^ "Rhode Island S2136 | 2020 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "Rhode Island H7541 | 2020 | Regular Session". LegiScan.
- ^ "North Carolina SB112; 2023-2024". LegiScan.
- ^ "Maryland". Marriage-law.laws.com. Retrieved January 6, 2014.
- ^ "Legislative Reference Library | Legislation | Search results". lrl.texas.gov.
- ^ "Texas' First Anti-Marriage Law". October 13, 2015.
- ^ SEVENTY-NINTH DAY SATURDAY, MAY 19, 1973
- ^ SEVENTY-EIGHTH DAY (Continued) SATURDAY, MAY 19, 1973
- ^ EIGHTY-SECOND DAY (Friday, May 25, 1973)
- ^ "SAME-SEX MARRIAGE LAWS IN THE UNITED STATES (Current as of December 31, 2013)". Archived from the original on April 16, 2014.
- ^ "Legal Marriage Court Cases". Partners Task Force for Gay and Lesbian Couples. July 10, 2011. Retrieved April 11, 2014.
- ^ "Ban on gay marriage passes". Fredericksburg.com. November 7, 2006. Archived from the original on April 11, 2013. Retrieved January 6, 2014.
- ^ Leger, Donna Leinwand. "Utah will ask Supreme Court to stop gay marriage during appeal". USA TODAY.
- ^ "Pittsburgh Post-Gazette - Google News Archive Search". Google News.
- ^ "Sarasota Herald-Tribune - Google News Archive Search". Google News.
- ^ "Boca Raton News - Google News Archive Search". Google News.
- ^ Baim, Tracy (2010). Obama and the Gays: A Political Marriage. Create Space. p. 8.
- ^ "Sarasota Herald-Tribune - Google News Archive Search". Google News.
- ^ "Overview of Gay Marriage". Lgbt-vmmlegal.com. Archived from the original on April 16, 2013. Retrieved January 6, 2014.
- ^ "This Is Where Marriage Equality Stands on Its 10th Birthday". Archived from the original on June 6, 2014. Retrieved June 3, 2014.
- ^ "New Hampshire". Lambda Legal.
- ^ "Section 457:1 Purpose and Intent". www.gencourt.state.nh.us.
- ^ "Bill_Status". gencourt.state.nh.us.
- ^ "Welcome to nginx!". Archived from the original on April 16, 2015. Retrieved April 16, 2015.
- ^ "Hawaii bans same-sex marriages". The Dallas Morning News. June 24, 1994. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ "Utah may ignore gay unions". The Salt Lake Tribune. March 17, 1995. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n "State Laws Prohibiting Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships" (PDF).
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j "DEFINITION OR DISCRIMINATION? STATE MARRIAGE RECOGNITION STATUTES IN THE "SAME-SEX MARRIAGE" DEBATE" (PDF).
- ^ "House Bill 1143". January 19, 1996. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO" (PDF).
- ^ "Lewiston Morning Tribune - Google News Archive Search". Google News.
- ^ "The Union Democrat - Google News Archive Search".
- ^ "Daily Union - Google News Archive Search". Google News.
- ^ "Georgia General Assembly". www.legis.ga.gov.
- ^ "BILL STATUS OVERVIEW SB1038". Archived from the original on January 18, 2016. Retrieved January 6, 2016.
- ^ "Daily News - Google News Archive Search". Google News.
- ^ "1996 Alaska Statutes :: TITLE 25 MARITAL AND DOMESTIC RELATIONS :: Chapter 25.05. ALASKA MARRIAGE CODE :: Article 01 REQUIREMENTS FOR MARRIAGE :: Sec. 25.05.013. Same-sex marriages". Justia Law.
- ^ "Same-Sex Marriage Ban OK'd". The Pantagraph. April 26, 1996. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ Davis, Jon (May 25, 1996). "Governor Signs Bill Prohibiting Same-Sex Marriages". Daily Herald. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ "Herald-Journal - Google News Archive Search". Google News.
- ^ "Governor signs ban on same-sex unions". May 7, 2013.
- ^ a b "Toledo Blade - Google News Archive Search". Google News.
- ^ a b "Toledo Blade - Google News Archive Search". Google News.
- ^ "The Tuscaloosa News - Google News Archive Search". Google News.
- ^ "The Bill" (PDF).
- ^ "The Dispatch - Google News Archive Search". Google News.
- ^ "Senate Bill 1487 (1995-1996 Session) - North Carolina General Assembly". www.ncleg.gov.
- ^ "Gay Marriage Ban Becomes Law State of Missouri Will Recognize Only Male-Female Unions". The Kansas City Star. July 4, 1996. Archived from the original on January 11, 2012.
- ^ SB 0768
- ^ Katches, Mark (August 21, 1996). "Setback for Same-Sex Marriage Ban". The Washingtom Times. Archived from the original on January 11, 2012. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ "State Senate Votes to Ban Homosexual Marriages in PA". Erie Times-News. October 2, 1996. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ "Legislature passes Same-Sex Marriage Ban Gov. Ridge said He Will Sign the Measure". The York Daily Record. October 8, 1996. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ a b "Rome News-Tribune - Google News Archive Search". Google News.
- ^ "Bill Information - Arkansas State Legislature". www.arkleg.state.ar.us.
- ^ "PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO SENATE BILL NO. 2230" (PDF).
- ^ "75(R) SB 334 Introduced version - Bill Analysis". capitol.texas.gov.
- ^ FORTY-FOURTH DAY — THURSDAY, APRIL 3, 1997
- ^ THURSDAY, MARCH 13, 1997
- ^ "The Spokesman-Review - Google News Archive Search". Google News.
- ^ "LIS > Bill Tracking > HB1589 > 1997 session". lis.virginia.gov.
- ^ "Gay-marriage ban called irrelevant". Boston Globe. April 1, 1997.
- ^ "New Law Bars Same-Sex Unions' Legal Recognition in Indiana". News-Sentinel. May 14, 1997. Archived from the original on January 6, 2014.
- ^ "HB 1265 Passes Indiana House & Senate". April 26, 1997. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ "HOUSE JOURNAL". leg.mt.gov.
- ^ "Boca Raton News - Google News Archive Search". Google News.
- ^ "Resources on Minnesota Issues Same-Sex Marriage in Minnesota".
- ^ "The Telegraph-Herald - Google News Archive Search". Google News.
- ^ "Washington Bans Gay Marriage". Chicago Tribune. February 8, 1998. Archived from the original on November 6, 2012. Retrieved July 7, 2017.
- ^ "Washington State Legislature". apps.leg.wa.gov.
- ^ "Kentucky 1998 Regular Session; HB13". Archived from the original on May 6, 2016. Retrieved May 12, 2016.
- ^ "The Tuscaloosa News - Google News Archive Search".
- ^ "Puerto Rico House Bill 1013, 1999" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on October 2, 2018. Retrieved November 22, 2012.
- ^ "HB1450". www.legis.la.gov.
- ^ "Portsmouth Daily Times - Google News Archive Search". Google News.
- ^ "Bill_Status". gencourt.state.nh.us.
- ^ HB 5830
- ^ SUMMARY OF 2000 PUBLIC ACTS
- ^ "The Freedom to Marry in Colorado". Freedom to Marry. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ "Bill_Status". gencourt.state.nh.us.
- ^ "The Vindicator - Google News Archive Search". Google News.
- ^ HB 157
- ^ "RNZ Pacific". RNZ.
- ^ "The Victoria Advocate - Google News Archive Search". Google News.
- ^ (Tuesday, April 15, 2003)
- ^ FIFTY-NINTH DAY —WEDNESDAY,APRIL30,2003
- ^ "Doyle's Veto of Marriage Bill Stands, Assembly Fails by One Vote to Override It". Saint Paul Pioneer Press. November 14, 2003. Archived from the original on January 11, 2012. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ "The Freedom to Marry in Wisconsin". Freedom to Marry. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ Bill status of HB172 Archived September 29, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "LIS > Bill Tracking > HB751 > 2004 session". April 8, 2010. Archived from the original on April 8, 2010.
- ^ "New Hampshire Senate Bill 427, 2004".
- ^ "Civil unions in Connecticut". www.religioustolerance.org.
- ^ "S". wyoleg.gov.
- ^ "Bill_Status". gencourt.state.nh.us.
- ^ "New Hampshire House Overwhelmingly Rejects Attempt to Repeal Marriage Rights". Outword Magazine. Archived from the original on September 5, 2012. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ LeClair, Aaron (March 3, 2011). "Anti-gay marriage bill defeated in Senate". laramiboomerang. Archived from the original on March 11, 2011. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ Geiger, Kim (March 21, 2012). "New Hampshire House kills repeal of gay marriage law". Nation & World. Archived from the original on March 22, 2012. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ Maine Question 1, 2012
- ^ SJR 42
- ^ Joint Resolution 0007
- ^ SR 595
- ^ "PROTECTING LIFE: ADHERENCE TO THE RULE OF LAW AND JUDICIAL RESTRAINT IN MISSISSIPPI" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on September 23, 2015. Retrieved November 26, 2014.
- ^ House Concurrent Resolution 56
- ^ SJR 029 Amends Constitution to state that only marriages between a man and a woman will be valid in this state
- ^ Assembly Joint Resolution 66
- ^ Senate Joint Resolution 53
- ^ H.J.R. 25 Joint Resolution on Marriage
- ^ House forwards gay marriage ban to Senate
- ^ Senate defeats gay marriage ban
- ^ Senate defeats gay marriage ban
- ^ "SB 245". Lrc.ky.gov. Retrieved January 6, 2014.
- ^ HB2259 2004
- ^ Gay marriage ban proposal fails
- ^ Equality from State to State: Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Americans and State Legislation in 2004
- ^ Equality from State to State: Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Americans and State Legislation in 2005
- ^ HB61 by Representative Steve Scalise
- ^ Kansas house ready to approve amendment to ban same-sex marriage
- ^ Kansas senate backs state same-sex marriage amendment
- ^ House Joint Resolution 1001
- ^ HJ 586 Constitutional amendment; marriage may exist only between a man and woman (first reference).
- ^ SJ 92 Constitutional amendment (second resolution); marriage.
- ^ H*3133
- ^ H*3063
- ^ SB109 - Regular Session 2005
- ^ HJR 6 2005
- ^ HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 2
- ^ a b Regular Session 2005-2006 House Bill 2381
- ^ Bill History for SCR1042
- ^ HJ0017 - Defense of marriage.
- ^ House Joint Resolution 5
- ^ Joint Resolution 0013
- ^ Docket of CACR28
- ^ SJ0005 - Defense of marriage-constitutional amendment.
- ^ IA HJR6 | 2011-2012
- ^ Joint Resolution 0006
- ^ House Bill 1153
- ^ Bills for 2015 Session
- ^ Bills for 2016 Session
- ^ SF 1308
- ^ S514
- ^ Election Summary Report State of Alaska 1998 General Election OFFICIAL RESULTS
- ^ General/OHA - STATE OF HAWAII - Statewide November 03, 1998 ** Summary Report **
- ^ Official report of the Board of State Canvassers of the state of Nebraska General Election November 7, 2000
- ^ 2000 General Election Coverage and Reports
- ^ 2002 General Election Coverage and Reports
- ^ Official Election Returns State of Missouri Primary Election Tuesday, August 03, 2004
- ^ Blunt Predicts 37 Percent Turnout for August 3 Primary Election
- ^ CA No. 1 (Act 926-2004) -- Marriage in LA - union of 1 man and 1 woman
- ^ STATE WIDE POST ELECTION STATISTICAL REPORT FOR ELECTION OF 09/18/2004 * (ACTIVE & INACTIVE)
- ^ KENTUCKY STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS REPORT OF "OFFICIAL" ELECTION NIGHT TALLY RESULTS TIME OF REPORT: 09:16:22 DATE OF REPORT: 11/24/04
- ^ a b c OFFICIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS FOR UNITED STATES PRESIDENT NOVEMBER 2, 2004
- ^ Georgia Election Results Official Results of the November 2, 2004 General Election
- ^ Voter Turnout by Demographics
- ^ 2004 Elections Results
- ^ 2004 General Election Mississippi
- ^ 2004 General Election Turnout Rates
- ^ OKLAHOMA STATE ELECTION BOARD ELECTION RESULTS 2004
- ^ VOTER REGISTRATION As of November 1, 2004
- ^ Proposed Constitutional Amendment No. 3 - Certified
- ^ 2004 General Election and Non-Partisan Judicial Runoff Voter Turnout
- ^ 2004 Michigan Election Results
- ^ 2004 Voter Registration Totals
- ^ 2004 STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS ~ NOVEMBER 2nd, 2004
- ^ 2004 election Utah
- ^ Official 2004 General Election Results North Dakota
- ^ Oregon Official Results 2004 Election
- ^ Statistical Summery 2004 General Election Oregon
- ^ 2005 Constitutional Amendment results by county
- ^ Official Turnout for the Constitutional Amendment Election, April 5, 2005
- ^ 2005 Constitutional Amendment Election
- ^ 2005 - Special, November (Constitutional)
- ^ Certification of Constitutional Amendment Election Reults
- ^ Primary June 6, 2006
- ^ 1996-2006 General Election and Primary Results for Multi-County & Statewide Offices
- ^ Voter Participation History (1998-2024)
- ^ 2006 - Statewide - Question 1 Marriage
- ^ Registration/Turnout Reports Summary of Virginia Registration & Turnout Statistics
- ^ Constitutional Amendment Questions
- ^ Statistical Analysis of Voter Turnout for the November 7, 2006 Election
- ^ 2006-11-07_FallElection_Referendum_CountyReturns
- ^ General Election Voter Registration and Absentee Statistics 1984-2022.xlsx
- ^ 2006 South Dakota General Election Data - Official Returns for Ballot Questions
- ^ Voter Registration Tracking
- ^ Voter Registration/Turnout Statistics 1988-2010
- ^ Official Publication of the Abstract of Votes Cast for the 005 Coordinated 2006 Primary 2006 General
- ^ 2006 General Election - November 7, 2006 Arizona
- ^ 2006 General Results statewide
- ^ Florida Department of State Division of Elections November 4, 2008 General Election
- ^ November 4, 2008 General Election Official Results Voter Registration and Turnout
- ^ 2008 General Election - November 4, 2008 Arizona
- ^ 2008 Election in California
- ^ VOTER PARTICIPATION STATISTICS BY COUNTY
- ^ 05/08/2012 OFFICIAL PRIMARY ELECTION RESULTS - STATEWIDE
- ^ Voter Turnout
- ^ Results for Constitutional Amendments 2012 Minnesota
- ^ Historical Voter Turnout Statistics
- ^ "Delaware Senate Defeats Gay Marriage Ban". WBOC. March 26, 2009. Archived from the original on September 26, 2018. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ "Indiana House Passes Gay Marriage Ban". CBN news. February 16, 2011. Archived from the original on February 20, 2011. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ "Indiana House amends marriage ban language". Post-Tribune. January 27, 2014. Archived from the original on February 2, 2014. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ "Indiana House approves constitutional amendment to ban gay marriages". Fox News. January 28, 2014. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ LoBianco, Tom (February 17, 2014). "Indiana Senate approves diluted gay marriage ban". Seattle PI. Archived from the original on February 21, 2014. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ "Iowa's governor-elect wants vote to ban gay marriage, criticizes senate leader". LGBTQ Nation. December 6, 2010. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ "Minnesota Gay Marriage Ban Amendment Clears First Hurdle". On Top Magazine. April 30, 2011. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ "Minnesota Gay Marriage Ban Amendment Clears House Panel". On Top Magazine. May 4, 2011. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ "Minn. Senate OKs Vote on Gay-Marriage Ban". The Wall Street Journal. May 11, 2011. Archived from the original on May 17, 2011.
- ^ "House sends same-sex marriage ban to 2012 ballot". Minnesota Public Radio. May 22, 2011.
- ^ "NH House rejects two anti-gay marriage measures". Freedin to Marry. February 17, 2010. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ Garcia, Michelle (February 17, 2010). "NH House Rejects Gay Marriage Ban". The Advocate. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ Clausing, Jeri (December 20, 2013). "New Mexico Clerk Quits Over Gay Marriage Ruling". Seattle PI. Archived from the original on January 4, 2014. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ "SJR06". Nmlegis.gov. Retrieved January 6, 2014.
- ^ "Bill Information (History) - House Bill 1349; Regular Session 2013-2014 - PA General Assembly". Legis.state.pa.us. May 8, 2013. Retrieved January 6, 2014.
- ^ Middleton, Josh (January 14, 2013). "Bigot Watch: Read Darryl Metcalfe's Anti-Gay Memo". Philadelphia Magazine. Retrieved July 24, 2021.
- ^ "Lawmakers Study Amendment Banning Gay Marriage". Archived from the original on May 16, 2011.
- ^ "W.Va. Gay Marriage Ban Fails in House". Archived from the original on December 21, 2011.
- ^ "West Virginia Senators David Nohe, Donna Boley Back Gay Marriage Ban". On Top Magazine. January 16, 2011. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ Fankhauser, Chris (January 27, 2011). "(Wyo.)-House Now Gets Chance At Gay Marriage Bill". Chadrad. Archived from the original on July 8, 2011. Retrieved July 24, 2021.
- ^ "Same-Sex Marriage Amendment Dies in Wyoming House". Equally Wed. February 28, 2011. Retrieved July 24, 2021.
- ^ "Full Results" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on October 11, 2009.
- ^ 291 Minn. 310 (Minn. 1971), 409 U.S. 810 (1972).
- ^ Baker v. Nelson, 409 810 (U.S. 1972) ("The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.").
- ^ Cantor, Donald J.; et al. (2006). Same-Sex Marriage: The Legal and Psychological Evolution in America. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press. pp. 117–8. ISBN 9780819568120. Kentucky Court of Appeals: Jones v. Callahan, November 9, 1973
- ^ "Gay Marriage’s Jewish Pioneer", Eli Sanders, The Tablet, June 6, 2012 Archived July 3, 2013, at the Wayback Machine.
- ^ "Dean v. District of Columbia". Archived from the original on June 21, 2010.
- ^ "Dean v. District of Columbia" (PDF).
- ^ Baehr v. Miike, Circuit Court for the First Circuit, Hawaii No. 91-1394
- ^ Oshiro, Sandra (December 6, 1996). "Hawaiian judge puts same-sex marriage ruling on hold". The Nation. Thailand: Reuter. p. A12. Retrieved August 18, 2010.
- ^ Baehr v. Lewin, 74 Haw. 530, 852 P.2d 44 (1993), reconsideration and clarification granted in part, 74 Haw. 645, 852 P.2d 74 (1993).
- ^ "Baker v. Vermont, 744 A.2d 864". Archived from the original on March 3, 2012.
- ^ "Brause v Alaska Dept of Health & Social Services (04/17/2001) sp-5392". www.touchngo.com.
- ^ Boston Globe: Decision: Hillary Goodridge & others vs. Department of Public Health & another, November 18, 2003, accessed March 19, 2011
- ^ Kiritsky, Laura (October 16, 2003). "Gay marriage setback in Arizona". Bay Windows. Retrieved July 9, 2013.
- ^ "Arizona high court upholds same-sex marriage ban". The Advocate. May 27, 2004. Retrieved July 9, 2013.
- ^ "Same-Sex Marriage in Louisiana". Archived from the original on February 19, 2012. Retrieved May 7, 2013.
- ^ "April 14, 2005". September 29, 2011. Archived from the original on September 29, 2011.
- ^ "Hernandez v Robles (2006 NY Slip Op 05239)". Courts.state.ny.us. Retrieved January 6, 2014.
- ^ "Perdue v. O'Kelley, 280 Ga. 732 (2006)" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on March 27, 2009.
- ^ "Microsoft Word - 759341opn.doc" (PDF). Washington Courts. Retrieved June 25, 2023.
- ^ "Lewis v. Harris". Lambda Legal Legacy.
- ^ Rich, Eric; Wagner, John (September 18, 2007). "Maryland High Court Upholds Same-Sex Marriage Ban". Washington Post. Archived from the original on July 22, 2012. Retrieved March 3, 2013.
- ^ "Public Employers in Michigan May Not Offer Same-Sex Domestic Partner Benefits, Michigan Supreme Court Rules". benefitslink.com.
- ^ "Michigan high court says gay partners can't get health benefits". Michigan Live. May 7, 2008. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ "Text of the decision" (PDF).
- ^ "Majority opinion" (PDF).
- ^ Iowa Supreme Court decision Archived March 17, 2012, at the Wayback Machine, page 15.
- ^ "The court's ruling in Strauss" (PDF).
- ^ Grossman, Joanna L. (November 24, 2009). "New York's Highest Court Upholds Benefits for Same-Sex Spouses in Narrow Ruling".
- ^ "William C. McConkey v J. B. Van Hollen" (PDF). Supreme Court of Wisconsin. November 3, 2009. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ Jones, Ashby (June 7, 2011). "Wyoming High Court Grants Divorce to Same-Sex Couple". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
- ^ Belczyk, Jaclyn (May 18, 2012). "Maryland high court grants same-sex divorce". The Jurist. Retrieved March 1, 2015.
- ^ "Domestic partnership registry lawsuit rejected", Green Bay Press Gazette Accessed November 8, 2009.
- ^ "Judge rules Wisconsin same sex registry is constitutional". Reuters. June 21, 2011 – via www.reuters.com.
- ^ Marley, Patrick (December 21, 2012). "Wisconsin appeals court upholds domestic partner registry". Jsonline.com. Retrieved January 6, 2014.
- ^ "Wisconsin Supreme Court upholds state's domestic partner registry". jsonline.com. July 31, 2014. Retrieved July 31, 2014.
- ^ "Montana Supreme Court rejects equal benefits for gay couples". Missoulian. December 18, 2012. Retrieved July 17, 2013.
- ^ "ACLU sues state of Montana over benefits for gay couples". Missoulian. July 16, 2013. Retrieved July 17, 2013.
- ^ "Griego v Oliver". NCLR. Archived from the original on March 23, 2013. Retrieved February 19, 2016.
- ^ Dwyer Arce (September 1, 2010). "Texas appeals court upholds same-sex marriage ban". JURIST - Paper Chase.
- ^ Wright, John (October 20, 2011). "Gay divorce cases before Texas Supreme Court". Dallas Voice. Archived from the original on August 20, 2012. Retrieved January 18, 2013.
- ^ Order for Supplementary Briefing by Texas Supreme Court July 3, 2013 Accessed July 8, 2013
- ^ Kreytak, Steven (January 7, 2011). "Same-sex divorce stands under appellate ruling: Attorney general did not have standing to intervene in case, court declares". Austin American-Statesman. Retrieved January 19, 2013.
- ^ Rozen, Miriam (December 17, 2012). "Tex Parte Blog: Lawyer in two same-sex divorce cases awaits Texas Supreme Court decision on petitions for review". Texas Lawyer. Archived from the original on October 20, 2013. Retrieved January 19, 2013.
- ^ Rozen, Miriam (December 17, 2012). "Lawyer in two same-sex divorce cases awaits Texas Supreme Court decision on petitions for review". Texas Lawyer. Archived from the original on October 20, 2013. Retrieved January 18, 2013.