Jump to content

User talk:Ligocsicnarf89

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ligocsicnarf89, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Ligocsicnarf89! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Lajas, Puerto Rico
added a link pointing to James
Patillas, Puerto Rico
added a link pointing to European
San Juan–Caguas–Guaynabo metropolitan area
added a link pointing to Condado

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits and edit summaries

[edit]

Please check out WP:MINOR. Many of your edits, that you marked minor, are not minor.--The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 23:16, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please add edit summaries. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 01:26, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Ligocsicnarf89, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 01:25, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

[edit]

Hi, thanks for your contributions. We don't link years, dates, centuries, or commonly known terms unless there's a very good reason. Tony (talk) 13:11, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Central Cortada (September 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 16:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
List of earthquakes in Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 17:49, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm FormalDude. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Aibonito, Puerto Rico, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ––FormalDude talk 05:24, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. ––FormalDude talk 05:24, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Your linking to one NRHP-listed place in Yauco showed up on my watchlist. There are more that can be linked: please see National Register of Historic Places listings in southern Puerto Rico#Yauco. Thank you for your contributions / keep up your good work! cheers, --Doncram (talk) 03:14, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
Creating missing articles and expanding existing ones is a brilliant idea. Thank you. The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 02:02, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cordillera Central (Puerto Rico), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hurricane season.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This tool is pretty cool

[edit]

NRHP tool - helps create article and talk page layout / outline / frame - I didn't know if you had this but I have found it useful in the past. Put in the NRH place ref. # and it creates infobox and other text, that you can then copy and paste and fill in... --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 23:35, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinates

[edit]

I just corrected the coordinates in your new article Puerto Mosquito, which were off by 30 km. It's no big deal, but I'm always curious about the genesis of such errors. Where did you obtain the incorrect coordinates? Abductive (reasoning) 13:14, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feliz Navidad, Feliz Navidad, Feliz Navidad, Prospero Año y Felicidad

[edit]
File:Feliz Navidad (José Feliciano album).jpeg Feliz Navidad, Feliz Navidad, Feliz Navidad, Prospero Año y Felicidad
I wanna wish you a Merry Christmas, I wanna wish you a Merry Christmas, I wanna wish you a Merry Christmas, from the bottom of my heart. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 00:07, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Teatro La Perla

[edit]

Hi. Here you added a link to NPS NRHP for Teatro La Perla that leads nowhere. Are you sure you have the correct link? For example, the Ponce City Hall displays the correct link, here, displays the PCH photos and submission forms, but not the link you added. Usually NRHP numbers start with the year the submission was made (86=1986 for the Ponce City Hall) but your number (100007054) either does not follow that pattern or is invalid. I suggest it is removed until the correct link is located. Thanks, Mercy11 (talk) 03:41, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Central Cortada

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Ligocsicnarf89. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Central Cortada, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Content fork at 2 list of earthquakes articles

[edit]

Hi there, I noted that List of earthquakes in Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands seems to be a WP:CONTENTFORK of List of earthquakes in Puerto Rico. Do settle on a name and merge the articles together. Thanks~! --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 07:07, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Saludos. This "article" should appear as a list article as it's actually of list of lists of protected areas. Just wanted to alert you I intend to move it to List of Protected areas of Puerto Rico if you didn't have any objection. So you know, a non0list article of this subject should not consist strictly of list of sites and instead should cover topics such as the history, management, laws, etc., relative to the protected areas as a group. Protected areas of the United States is an example of such non-list article. Regards, Mercy11 (talk) 02:30, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hola! That sounds good, I've got no objection - thanks for the help! Ligocsicnarf89 (talk) 03:29, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK, it's done. Also, didn't want to bombard you with this second matter then but, while the article appears sourced, it's not clear where the sourcing for each entry made is at. At a minimum, we should source for each section as a group if all the entries under such section can be supported by a single source. In this case, there should be at least 6+9=15 sources. However, there are only 4+3=8 sources (source #5 is referenced 3 times, thus the 3).
That said, I didn't want to place {{citation needed}} tags all over the 100(?) plus protected sites as that would not be fair to the article nor to you, as its main contributor, nor to readers whoi would then befaced with a bunch of tags getting in their way to the reading. So could you, perhaps, help me identify what source goes with which section(s)? Ideally we would want to add inline citations, but global per section cite would also be go, especially if the source lists them just like the article is listing them. I could help in this, but thought would first mention it to you since you wrote the article and are, thus, already best familiar with where you got the backup cites for each entry.
For example, your cite on the "Caguas Real Reserve" (<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|last=Municipio Autónomo de Caguas|date=12 June 2015|title=REVISIÓN INTEGRAL DEL PLAN TERRITORIAL DEL MUNICIPIO AUTÓNOMO DE CAGUAS|url=http://caguas.gov.pr/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Memorial-nuevo-doc-11-de-junio-de-2015.pdf|page=42}}</ref>) is excellent because it leaves no doubt as to the veracity of that entry. On the other hand, however, a reader would have no clue as to why "El Verde Farm", "Cerro Las Mesas" or the "Manatí Research Area" are on their respective lists because they have no cites. These are just 3 examples, but I could had chosen scores more; in fact, could had chosen all others except for the ones under the "State Forests" section because those are well documented in their respective articles (which you did wikilinked). So, I wouldn't bother with the state forests for now (like Toro Negro and the rest in the State Forests section), but we do need cites for the other 14 sections (plus the municipal ones). BTW, I believe Reserva Natural Punta Cucharas was missing from the section on Reservas Naturales, so I added it. Incidentally, Punta Cucharas would be a good example of what I mean: note that when I added Punta Cucharas, I also added a cite specific to it, so any reader would know from which WP:RS I got that information.
These are just some ideas. We are all volunteers here and so I am only making some suggestions. The article caught my attention because it's so excellently well written and also because I like the outdoors (as perhaps you do too). For example I wrote the article on Toro Negro State Forest (have been there a few times) as well as, I believe, the one on [{Cerrillos State Park]]. Maybe a few others I don't remember right now. Gracias por tu atención y siéntete libre de hacerme cualquier comentario pertinente! Mercy11 (talk) 02:00, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
These are great! Thank you so much!! - I particularly love the Toro Negro State Forest article, it's been a great template for these types of articles. Thank you again for all of these pointers, -I'm looking to improve this article a great deal, so I appreciate your response! Gracias miles :) -Fran Ligocsicnarf89 (talk) 02:39, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Ligocsicnarf89

Thank you for creating Isla Verde Reef.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:46, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Ligocsicnarf89

Thank you for creating Maricao Fish Hatchery.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:37, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Ligocsicnarf89

Thank you for creating De Luxe Florida.

User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article on the historic building

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 02:46, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I removed quite a lot of content from La Colectiva Tabacalera because your copy+paste from Puerto Rico's paperwork violates Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain_sources. It is intellectually dishonest to take someone else's words and pass them off as your own, even if you provided an in-line citation. Your edit summary "Page created. Additional sources needed. Thanks!" doesn't inspire me with confidence, either. You are not helping our community by stealing someone else's work, throwing it into an article you didn't bother to get a DYK for, and then walk away expecting us to clean this up. I see you've gotten in the habit of doing this with perhaps a dozen other articles. I provide you this warning because I just saw a Wikipedian who had been contributing since 2005 get blocked because they would not abide our copyright policy. I encourage you to do better. Chris Troutman (talk) 14:44, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Isabela, Puerto Rico into Hermitage of San Antonio de Padua de la Tuna. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:36, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

¡Felices Pascuas!

[edit]