Jump to content

User talk:Lgcsmasamiya/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing Unkl347, Lgcsmasamiya.

Unfortunately Mkdw has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

No assertion of notability. Please review WP:CORP before marking company pages as reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment on Mkdw's talk page.

Please learn more before continuing to curate articles

stop I came to this page after seeing that you had marked as reviewed an article which most people would have flagged at once as Speedy Delete. I noticed the welter of "I have marked an article you marked as reviewed as unreviewed" comments, and it appears that you are not engaging with people over this. I am asking you now to stop reviewing articles until you understand with precision what the status of 'reviewed' means. At present I see good intentions but an imperfect understanding of the process. I am sure you have the right intentions and just need to take a step back and learn how to work better. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 14:15, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013

Hello, I'm Timtrent. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Troy High School (New York) because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! You are misusing your power in Curation and are tagging articles as unreferenced when they contain references. Yu have done this type of thing sufficiently often for me to view it as vandalism Fiddle Faddle (talk) 14:41, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2012–13 Football Superleague of Kosovo. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. again you have marked an article with references as unreferenced. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 14:43, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Alexandru Ionescu (socialist militant), you may be blocked from editing. Yet another article that you have flagged as unreferenced. This must stop. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 14:46, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kostas Giotas, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Yet again you have tagged an article as being without references. You are causing work for others. This behaviour must cease. This is the final warning for vandalism. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 14:50, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

OK

I i'm trying to do my best reviewing, pleasae be patient, i'm learning here --Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 18:42, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

See a complaint about your edits at WP:ANI

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Page curation reviewer rights regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 15:46, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Lgcmasamiya, you seem to be unwilling to discuss your edits, even when you've made obvious mistakes, as when you added the 'unreferenced' tag to the Alexandru Ionescu article which had many references. Several people have complained here on your talk page, but you have never responded. An administrator has proposed in the WP:ANI discussion that you should be blocked in order to get your attention. You can avoid this if you are willing to reply at ANI. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:39, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Response

I'm new here and i'm trying to do my best reviewing new articles, i do'nt understand why i will be blocked by "Vanndalism".

You should stop curating new pages until you have more experience on Wikipedia. At present you aren't doing it right. See the complaint at WP:ANI mentioned above. Please sign your posts on talk pages like this one. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 21:45, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Blocked

I'm sorry, but I have blocked you from editing for a period of 24 hours. Your enthusiasm for page curation is admirable, but you are making too many errors and creating too much work for other people to do in cleaning them up. You have been informed of many errors here on this talk page, and you have been asked to stop reviewing new pages - but you have failed to stop. You must heed the community's request and stop reviewing new pages - at least temporarily until you have learned enough to do it with far fewer errors. If you agree to stop reviewing new pages, you can be unblocked right away. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 05:36, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Please, when the block expires, or you show that you understand and ask for it to be lifted, please work with an experienced editor to learn what is good practice and what is not. Among your bad choices of edits there are some excellent choices, wholly excellent choices. I would like to see you stay and grow as a wikipedia editor. It upsets me that you are not engaging in conversations with people, all of whom want to help you. We absolutely value enthusiasm like yours. Please accept help. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 13:10, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
This is to welcome you back from your short period of being blocked. I'm glad you're back. Please enjoy using WIkipedia and editing here. As you do, please use great care when choosing to tag an article. No-one wanted to block you. The discussion at AN/I shows that. But people felt there was no alternative. Please don't trip and fall. We want you here, working with enthusiasm, and working well. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 09:12, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Now you are back

I'm really pleased to see that you have taken on board the strong advice to wait until you have more experience before reviewing and curating articles. Thank you. A number of experienced editors are available to help and mentor you. I know you are learning and trying to learn. They are happy to help and enjoy helping editors who want to learn. Would you like an introduction to one or more of them? Fiddle Faddle (talk) 08:11, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Tentinator. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Paul Pholeros, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. ♦ Tentinator ♦ 21:22, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing O Singapore!: Stories in Celebration, Lgcsmasamiya.

Unfortunately Randykitty has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Totally unsourced (Infopedia is a wiki and not a reliable source).

To reply, leave a comment on Randykitty's talk page.

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing They Do Return...But Gently Lead Them Back, Lgcsmasamiya.

Unfortunately Randykitty has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Unsourced (Infopedia is a wiki...)

To reply, leave a comment on Randykitty's talk page.

I need to grab your attention again, please

First I am concerned about the messages regarding your reviewing articles. There are several examples where it shows you reviewed the article today. You have been asked to give it up and blocked briefly to try to get your attention. I hope you realise that you do not yet have the competence to review articles. The major errors you are making are evidence of that.

Second I am concerned that you have a welter of edits with no edit summary.. This is against custom and practice. Other editors need to know what we are doing. Please do not make a single edit, even to your own talk page, without an edit summary.

I am worried that you do not communicate with anyone. I have held out so many overtures of help, guidance and hints and tips that I do not understand why you insist on ploughing your own furrow in your own way.

Let me be clear. The path you are on is likely to get you blocked for increasing lengths of time, eventually indefinitely. I am not an administrator. I can't block you, but I am severely tempted to ask that you be blocked.

Please take advice, and take it now.

If you want an unbiased administrator's view, place {{adminhelpme}} on this page and ask for help below that. One will come by and offer you help very shortly afterwards. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 20:04, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Response 2

OK — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lgcsmasamiya (talkcontribs)

I am reading into your response that you are going to take notice of my message to you. Good. I thank you for that. I see you as having huge energy and I do not want to see you discouuraged. Two things, please:
  1. Please sign your own messages on your talk page by adding ~~~~ which translates to a signature automatically
  2. You forgot the edit summary, despite agreeing to heed my advice. Please use edit summaries at all times
Please slow down and get it right. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 20:14, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Lgcsmasamiya, I'm the admin who blocked you last time - I didn't really want to, but I felt I needed to. And I will block you again if needed - though I sincerely hope it will not come to that. Now, communication is a key part of working here at Wikipedia, and that's something you don't seem to do much of. So, what I would like to see is some further explanation of your "OK" answer above - please explain exactly what you mean and exactly what you will do differently. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:32, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
  • I've seen such great results for the editors who join in that I would positively encourage it. I wish it had been around properly when I joined. I made a whole slew of errors and I would have found it very useful. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 22:16, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Now stop reviewing and unreviewing

stop

This edit shows me that you do not understand the meaning of stopping having anything whatsoever to do with the reviewing of articles. Yes, I will be checking to see if you made a mistake or not, and no, I will not retract this warning if you happened to be correct. You have agreed to leave this area alone. Others judge you to be lacking WP:COMPETENCE in this area. It is not just my judgment.

You agreed to stop and you have not stopped.

Among the good edits you create havoc. Your havoc is most unwelcome here. I am not the one to block you but I can tell you that you are in danger of a lengthy block if you persist in this behaviour. You are not helping the project at all. Please take this as a final warning. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 08:35, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Siam Shade discography, Lgcsmasamiya!

Wikipedia editor Meeeeeeee39 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Listing what the references are (such as the websites name/the content) next to the reference list would make the references easier to understand.

To reply, leave a comment on Meeeeeeee39's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Epifanio Jiménez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Popular Democratic Party and New Progressive Party
Pedro Piqueras (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Antena 3

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:50, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Nice work on the Hilario Pino page!

Sulfurboy (talk) 10:36, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks :D Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 18:22, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Thank you for your recent work to List of journalists killed in Honduras and the creation of Ángel Alfredo Villatoro! Crtew (talk) 16:24, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you

Oh, thanks :D Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 16:32, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Barnstar

The Original Barnstar
For your frequent and helpful contributions to the wiki in general. ReconditeRodent (talk) 20:41, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alberto Terrones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to El viejo doctor
Javier Estupiñán (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Forward
La Secta del trébol (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to María Cristina
Novio, marido y amante (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Tito Gómez
Pasaporte a Río (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Francisco de Paula

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for reviewing the article of Virechana. It was very important. Abhijeet Safai (talk) 04:49, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thanks for reviewing the article Gambang kromong and Radya Pustaka Museum!--Rochelimit (talk) 17:12, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Request to review Neonatal bowel obstruction

I saw that you reviewed Neonatal bowel obstruction, the article I have created. In the meantime, I have significantly contributed to it. I would insist you to re-review it. The article requires further improvements and you can definitely contribute to it as well. DiptanshuTalk 03:39, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Suggesting archival of your talk page

Your talk page has grown long. I insist that you to archive it and also set up automatic archival by adding the following code:

{{Archives |search= yes |bot= MiszaBot I |age= 90}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 2
|algo = old(90d)
|archive = Talk:Lgcsmasamiya/Archive %(counter)d
}}

DiptanshuTalk 03:45, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Olga Gorokhova, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. — MusikAnimal talk 02:39, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Panorama Porno (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to J-Rock
∠ Trigger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to J-Rock

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:29, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

The article Benita Puértolas has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. (Note that IMDB is not considered a reliable source - see WP:RS/IMDB)

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. An optimist on the run!   19:50, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

What?

But she died in 1968, why are they trying to delete it for a living person?

Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 20:02, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

(c/e) My bad, I misread the article and assumed it was a BLP. However, please add reliable sources (not IMDB), otherwise it's likely to be deleted anyway. An optimist on the run!   20:04, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Ok, no problem Lgcsmasamiya (talk) 20:06, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of members of the National Congress of Honduras, 2010–14, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages La Paz department and Colón department (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Patrolling my articles

Lgcsmasamiya,

I have noticed you have been patrolling my newly created pages. I appreciate you doing that. Would you be able to patrol the talkpages as well? I'll have more articles and talkpages to come. Once again, I appreciate what you've done. Adamdaley (talk) 00:04, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Breakfast television may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * ''[[Telediario|Telediario Matinal]]'' — [[TVE1]
  • * ''[[Raňajojky]]'' (discontinued August 2009; will launch new project in cooperation with [[Fun Radio (Slovakia)|Fun

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:32, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of television presenters may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {{columns-list|4|

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:20, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

The article 16 dobles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DThomsen8 (talk) 02:12, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

The article Un pecado por mes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Uberaccount (talk) 03:09, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove deletion tags on pages without providing a reason. Uberaccount (talk) 03:38, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Un pecado por mes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Un pecado por mes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Un pecado por mes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Uberaccount (talk) 03:40, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Reviewed Annie Oakley (1894 film)

I see you reviewed Annie Oakley (1894 film), but the history does not show it. Tell me how you did it, so I can, too. --DThomsen8 (talk) 11:32, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Sander.v.Ginkel. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, List of Angry Birds Toons episodes, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 08:51, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Lgcsmasamiya. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Lourdes Guerrero, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. EzPz (talk) 08:54, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

4º sen ascensor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Galicia
Pedro Erquicia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Basque Country

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Your review of Zoey 101 (season 5)

Hi, I have requested speed deletion for an article you have reviewed. The article is a hoax, please check the pages log before reviewing [1]. --Ben Ben (talk) 16:05, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Here's a cookie for a treat! It's been good to have you review almost all of my pages recently. You deserve a treat for a job well done! Thanks and see you around ^^ 001Jrm (talk) 05:28, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carlos Sobera, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Antena 3, La 2 and ¿Quién quiere ser millonario? (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Hola Lgcsmasamiya, I would like to thank you for the help you gave me in this page! Muchas gracias, hasta luego.

Rei Momo (talk) 05:43, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Vilma Cecilia Morales. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:12, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ángel Darío Banegas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Heraldo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Cheers! Dear friend, I just realized you had reviewed my article. Thank you very much for your help!

Recién me doy cuenta que sos hondureño... te podia haber escrito en castellano... si sere boludo!

--Gustavo Szwedowski de Korwin 03:09, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Reviewer Appreciation

Thank you for reviewing my Article. --(B)~(ー.ー)~(Z) (talk) 12:35, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Andrés Parra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Colombian and Casados con hijos
Modesto Rodas Alvarado (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Sabanagrande and Choluteca
Aldo Calderón van Dyke (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Honduran

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5