User talk:Lesli Strong

Lesli Strong, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Lesli Strong! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Daily Mail reference at Skyrora

Hi. Please do not use the Daily Mail as you did at Skyrora. It is not a reliable source. See WP:DAILYMAIL. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 18:24, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for your remark, I will be more attentive next time!--Lesli Strong (talk) 09:44, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MGI Entertainment moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, MGI Entertainment, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 09:36, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: MGI Entertainment (July 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MGI Entertainment and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:MGI Entertainment, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 09:46, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TheBirdsShedTears, hey. I just translated another one Hotel Imperial (Croatia). Is it okay? Only one reference found. Or should I or you move to draft as there is also no significant coverage at ll. Hm.. --Lesli Strong (talk) 09:53, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It appears not suitable for mainspace as this article has only source. Single source is not sufficient to demonstrate notability. It requires multiple independent reliable sources. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:00, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may consider sending it back to draftspace. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:01, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TheBirdsShedTears I found many many articles with no reliable sources but they are in mainspace. Is there any rules on that? For example, if it's a company, then there should be 10 sources, if it is a building - no one cares too much? That confuses me. Lesli Strong (talk) 10:06, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you find such articles, kindly nominate for deletion. However, before doing so, please make sure you try to search for sources. In case, there are no reliable sources, please take such articles to WP:AFD. See CAT:AFD/O to under better how AfD works. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:23, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hotel Imperial (Croatia) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hotel Imperial (Croatia) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hotel Imperial (Croatia) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:32, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of lunar features, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Catena. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hoffmann Propeller, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Çelebicihan, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Spencer^T•C 00:40, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Lesli Strong

A tag has been placed on User:Lesli Strong requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hayleez (talk) 03:23, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Catena Sumner

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Catena Sumner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hayleez (talk) 23:16, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Pravo (publishing house)

A tag has been placed on Draft:Pravo (publishing house), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hayleez (talk) 23:21, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]