Jump to content

User talk:Lar/Archive 79

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 79

I recognize that this user page belongs to the Wikipedia project and not to me personally. As such, I recognize that I am expected to respectfully abide by community standards as to the presentation and content of this page, and that if I do not like these guidelines, I am welcome either to engage in reasonable discussion about it, to publish my material elsewhere, or to leave the project.


This is an archive of User talk:Lar from about 1 December 2012 through about 1 December 2013. Please do not comment here, use my current talk page for that, thanks. It is part of a series of archives, see the box at right for the list and to navigate to others.

An index to all my talk page archives, automatically maintained by User:HBC Archive Indexerbot can be found at User:Lar/TalkArchiveIndex.

Talk Page Archives
My post 2012 archived talk
Archive 79 1 December 2012 through 1 December 2013
Archive 80 1 December 2013 through 1 December 2016
Archive 81 1 December 2016 through 1 December 2018
Archive 82 1 December 2018 through 1 January 2021
Archive 83 1 January 2021 through 1 January 2023
Archive 84 1 January 2023 through 1 January 2025 ??
RfA Thank Yous
RFA Archive Howcheng (27 Dec 2005) through present
All dates approximate, conversations organised by thread start date


Notice of change

[edit]

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free file File:Flag of the African Union.svg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Flag of the African Union.svg. The file is currently tagged as non-free and has been identified as possibly not being in compliance with the non-free content policy. For specific information on the problems with the file and how they can be fixed, please check the message at File:Flag of the African Union.svg. For further questions and comments, please use the non-free content review page. Thank you. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 12:49, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability notification

[edit]

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Pghbridges.com, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: "Pghbridges.com" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 02:32, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If someone else wants to do something about this, they are more than welcome. I'm not convinced it's notable any more. ++Lar: t/c 17:37, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You back?

[edit]

Are you really back? Or just stopping by to check the mail and take out the trash? Montanabw(talk) 21:13, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe. I saw some people were making edits to my user page that needed reverting. We'll see. Are you an admin yet? ++Lar: t/c 22:41, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not that mad, yet. Montanabw(talk) 21:22, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back. :-) Nothing has changed since you left. ;-) --MZMcBride (talk) 08:30, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm shocked to hear that. ++Lar: t/c 15:33, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am glad to see you back, too. You were one of the best. :) A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 00:23, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Larryyyyyyyyy! Whatever possessed you to jump off the wagon? --SB_Johnny | talk✌ 22:57, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RFA. As in, it's still nightmarish, I gather. ++Lar: t/c 14:46, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to see you back here! Kevin (talk) 00:33, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you all for your well wishes. ++Lar: t/c 14:46, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 20:57, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


New article: Back contamination concerns for a Mars sample return

[edit]

Hi Lar, I have just received a book I ordered from the National Research Council "Assessment of Planetary Protection Requirements for Mars Sample Return Missions". So I want to read through that first and then will edit the article some more and will probably refer to the book in it. It is a good book with a lot of material in it.

Thanks for offering to look over this article when it is ready. It is still at an early stage, but if you want to see what it is like now, it is here: User:Robertinventor/sandbox I expect it to remain more or less the same,just with some more supporting references and possibly new information after I finish this book.

The aim is to write an article that shows the concerns, shows what Nasa is doing to address them, and to explain why some scientists think that Nasa is not going far enough, and to go through the legal situation, and the alternative options to a Mars sample return. I want it to be neutral in tone, of course, and to mention all the different views in the debate. The main thing I am likely to miss are, first that I may make statements that are not referenced, because of familiarity with the material. Also it is easy for me to veer away from neutrality because my own POV is with the view that a Mars sample return is not appropriate at this stage. I want that view to be clearly represented but the other ones also represented as well.

Discussion is best done on the talk page for Mars sample return so everyone can see it. It might be an idea to wait until I finish the next edit of it, in a day or two from now, when I will also announce it on the Mars sample return talk page and invite discussion there.

Thanks!

I will give it a look. Don't forget to sign your posts to talk pages with four tildes ~~~~ so it automatically inserts a signature. ++Lar: t/c 21:41, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, forgot. Robert Walker (talk) 21:56, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Okay here is my best shot so far, User:Robertinventor/Back_contamination_concerns_for_a_Mars_sample_return. Please discuss it on the talk page Talk:Mars_sample_return_mission#Back_contamination_concerns_for_a_Mars_sample_return so that everyone can join in the same discussion. Thanks for your help! Robert Walker (talk) 02:09, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the WikiProject Spaceflight task force

[edit]

Hi Larry, seeing that you are rather active on a certain spaceflight forum (;)), I think that you expertise on Wikipedia articles editing may be of pretty good use on many articles about spaceflight. Therefore I am inviting you to add your name to Wikipedia:WikiProject Spaceflight/Members and assist the improvement of many articles across the group's area.

Thanks for attention! Galactic Penguin SST (talk) 04:18, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invite, GP... I've way way cut back on my editing and I only fix typos these days as I spot them... I was in several WikiProjects in the past and they work. If you have people who are motivated to edit. Maybe at some point? ++Lar: t/c 04:02, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day 2013

[edit]
Happy First Edit Day, Lar, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Vatsan34 (talk) 08:09, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FOUR RFC

[edit]

There are two WP:RFCs at WP:FOUR. The first is to conflate issues so as to keep people from expressing meaningful opinions. The second, by me, is claimed to be less than neutral by proponents of the first. Please look at the second one, which I think is much better.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 07:03, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I no longer get involved in these sorts of things much, sorry. Mostly I just fix typos. ++Lar: t/c 02:34, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lar/Archive_79&oldid=1141114076"