User talk:Lanternix/Archive 2

Question

I saw your image of the coptic cross and I was wondering if you could tell me what the words say that surround the cross. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eastm002 (talk • contribs) 09:35, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Coptic Flag Edits

Hey, about the edits at the Coptic Flag page. Don't you think that if we are saying Arabization, manifested in the Egyptian pan-Arab flag, is the reason for alienation of Egyptian Coptic Christians, we should mention that Christians of other non-Arab ethnicities were, in the first place, the ones who formalized pan-Arabism. Seems related, especially that further down in the article we talk about other ethnicities within "Arab countries" who have their own flags. Tamer (talk) 23:45, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

question

Dear Lanternix, Can you email me at egytsagi@yahoo.com? I want to ask you about Coptic art pictures. Thank you, Mariam. 216.72.6.139 (talk) 05:52, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Lanternix, I'm a new wiki user and I'm really interested in the administrative boundaries of Egypt. I'm an italian student and I need the updated shapefile of the governorates of Egypt for a reasearch. I have a map, which doesn't include the last two governorates created in April 2008: Helwan and 6th of October. I would be very grateful if you could provide me with the data (my email address: mico_mao@hotmail.com) , in case you have.. Many many many thanks in advance!!! cheers Mico

Religion at Arab

I noticed you strongly interjected that "Copts and Maronites ARE not Arabs". I agree with you that most Copts and at least today most Maronites would not identify with an Arab identity. However, both ARE Arabized people. But the issue is not about WHO IS or WHO ISN'T an Arab, because there is no one single definition, and there will always be controversy.

At least on one level, I'm sure you cannot deny that an Egyptian Copt is no less or no more Arabized than an Egyptian Muslim, or a Lebanese Maronite is no less or no more Arabized than a Lebanese Muslim. That more Egyptian Copts and Lebanese Maronites don't identify as Arab compared to Egyptian Muslims and Lebanese Muslims is another thing, because on an ancestral level neither Egyptian Copts nor Egyptian Muslims are Arabs. They are the one and same people. The same is true of the Lebanese Maronites and Lebanese Muslims. You must also know that Lebanese Maronites were among the earliest and most prominent Pan-Arabists. Egyptians as a whole on the other hand, whether Muslims or Copt, were never Arabists as such, and the Arab identity in Egypt was thrust upon the country as state policy. Independent of this, Egyptians as a whole have been an Arabized people for quite some time.

If we are going to address the issue of religious observance of "Arabs" we have to acknowledge that one of the many definitions of "Arab" includes Arabized peoples. And in this respect, yes, Coptic Christianity and Maronite Christianity are among the many religions adhered to by "Arabs", in this case in the sense of Arabized peoples. For if they are not religions that are found among "Arabs", then neither is Islam. Most muslims, in effect, are not Arabs, but South and East Asians. Islamization is not a factor in Arabization. So while Copts need not be "Arabs" or identify as Arabs (as is the case for most of them, but also true for many Egyptian Muslims), "Arabs" may in fact include people who are Copts. It is on this premise that Coptic Christianity and Maronite Christianity were included. Al-Andalus 12:22, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Andalus, you sound like a reasonable person but for some reason you included Egyptians in the infobox of that article even though this is a very controversial view for the Egyptian people. The previous version is more neutral. What does Arabized peoples mean, is it language? Are Egyptians who speak only English or French as a mother tongue English and French? No, of course not. Culture? No, Egyptians have a completely different culture from the countries in the Arabian peninsula.

Lanternix, it's time to archive your talk page man, it's getting harder to load. Let me know if you don't know how to do it. :) Egyegy 23:51, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hey my Egyptian mate, I am a Christian Iraqi wikpedian majorly based at Arabic Wikipedia, and was wondering if you can help us get Arabic wikipedia growing faster that it is now, especially on articles that interest u (Copts, Egypt, and Saints, maybe more ?). I myself am a sysop on Arabic wikipedia, and the reason why I am asking is because of your proficiency in many languages which will prove to be an important asset should you decide to "translate" articles to Arabic rather that compose them from scratch.

Let me know on my AR WP talk page here.

Regards

--Lord Anubis 13:01, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Egyptian identity section just saw it!

If the Egyptians wanted to be known as a distant group. They have to mention the Arabs (ashraaf and Bedouins 30% of Egypt roughly 25 Million) and the Egyptians 70% roughly 55 Million the majority. And Arabic language as the official language. Masri Dialect? if you want to call Masri a language then their are 300 Arabic languages. I can see why they are not allowing you reverts, because you are doing the same thing to the Arabs in Egypt! Its a known fact that 30% of Egypt are Ahraaf (or claim to be Ashraaf) thats Arabs or self identified Arabs. If you dont recognize them. How do you expect Arabs to recognize the whole Egyptian identity that you are working against by including the Arabs in it?. Egyptian Arabic is not a language, you should revive your old language instead of claiming Arabic as Masri! You can't have it both ways, either go Egyptian all the way or not.

AbdulHalim Hafez is Arab, his songs are done in beautiful Arabic. You are hurtiung your cause by including writers, singers who spoke and identified as Arabs. You have to fix The Egyptian article and include the Arab big minority and the Arabic language (so people dont get confused when they read the population 77Million and see it again in Arab! automatically they will think..oh Egyptian Arab) You cant convince the Ashraaf that they are Egyptians. They look down at Egypts past and they identify or (claim an Arab identity) which makes them Arab.
70 % of 80 is about 55Million thats the population of Egyptians other wise you are just agreeing with the Arab article that includes all Egyptians as Arabs!--Skatewalk 23:41, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

17-30 million

See your talk page

Image source problem with Image:AlexMap2.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:AlexMap2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:17, 21 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jpatokal 10:17, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Saint Maurice

The IP is at it on the article above. I honestly think the only way to have a chance of resolving its continued attack of others is through RfC. If you agree, I think we should start one. John Carter 16:53, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Request for Comment is more or less the first step of moderation. John Carter 19:57, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings

Hello there, Lanternix. As you said before (about the Coptic edits & references), I believe it is something to be looked upon — especially since I myself am an Orthodox Copt.

I'm glad to have done what I did (mostly) and I look forward to help you out with any issues. : ) ~ Troy 00:52, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arab Christians

I removed the Egyptians from the list, its well known that the Egyptian Christians are 99%+ Non Arab. I added a section in the talk page. Add to it if you want --Skatewalk 03:53, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arab

Hi Lantemix. I have notice you along with other disagree with large subjects on Arab article. I wonder if you would like to join the re-writing group of Arab article, if you decide to join then please visit and add your name on the talk page. Thank you. Nancy usa 08:28, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fix the Egypt identity section!

So I can look at something, ad eferences. You have to do the research work on the Arab minority (that you define as invaders). Then if ts relevant we can add it.
You don't see the big flaw in the Egyptians page!? Its simply (Egyptian Arabs).
The claim that Egypt is dominated by 1% Bedouins living in the desert is more insulting than anything else! You have to mention the Ashraaf Islamic influence if you want the article to gain credibility. Once you identify the Ashraaf as the invaders (logical 30% dominating minority).
If you dont agree with me! please explain to me how 1-2% Bedouins herding camels in the desert are imposing the Arab republic, language, religion upon the Egyptians!. You see what I mean!--Skatewalk 22:36, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The entire identity section is referenced. If there is something you don't like there, ask me and I'll explain. The rest of my answer to you can be found on the Christian Arabs talk page. --Lanternix 00:34, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its your article, you already know whats missing. (the settlers/wafideen or "invaders" if thats what you prefer) should be mentioned (the bedouins of Sinai are not from Hijaz, most are from Nejd and some are ancient Semites)--Skatewalk 17:38, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're the one complaining not I. When you identify the reasons behind your comlaints I may consider taking a look at the article. --Lanternix 14:30, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Arab article

You will not find a good reference for the Copts because of the political situation, so I will make sure it stays in the article. (please dont quote POV/blogs) it only makes it look like a shaky claim, we removed alot of references/sources that didn't have ISBN or were POV/blog[1].
If someone asks on a citation on why the copts are not Arabs, then I will add a historic reference of the Arabs referring to the Copts as a seperate group. As of now its not needed because nobody is asking for a citatation and its accepted.--Skatewalk 17:38, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're making stuff up. None of the sources about Copts/Egypitians were blogs, they are news articles, one Arab nationalist site which admits that Egyptians are not Arabs, and a link to the Egypt article where a ton more references are available. Please don't delete them again, it's considered vandalism. Egyegy 19:05, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Egyegy,

The references are weak because as you said, ne from a nationalist website! and the second is a blog!. User Tiamut listed the bad references on the talk page and we agreed on removing the POV/blogs and unverified references. However,I didn't delete the facts that copts are not Arabs, so I am not sure why you are still reverting? unless you want to keep the article in constant vadalizing state and make readers think that copts are (maybe Arab or maybe not) instead of leaving it as it is (clearly not Arabs)--Skatewalk 03:46, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Race and ancient Egypt (controversies)

Hey you think you can join at the discussions here [2]? We need a reference for the Rameses the Great quote so we can include it in the article. thanks. Egyegy 20:48, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arab Arab world WikiProject

Hi Lanternix. Here is the link. -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up®} 05:43, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Announcement

Hi, and welcome to the newly started Arab world WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the Arab World.

The project birthday would be celebrated every August 24.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WPARAB Announcements}} there.
Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, and other tasks.

Important notice

We've developed a variety of guidelines for article structure and content, template use, categorization, and other issues that you may find useful. These guidelines can be subject of discussions at the project talkpage or simply WT:ARAB.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask User:FayssalF for the time being, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around!

Request for template comment

Hello, I just wanted to know what your opinion is on this template. It would be nice to have any input on it. ~ Troy 19:19, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Church of the Holy Virgin in Babylon Al-Darag

I require help for developing the article for this Church (located in Coptic Cairo). You can do so by editing my sandbox at User:Troy 07/Sandbox (the page which currently holds my little project). I have contacted all of the other Coptic Wikipedians I know of for help. Please remember that copyright infringement will have to be reduced, as I have got the information from an article. I have typed a hidden message mentioning that and other things worth mentioning.

This is a list of all the Coptic Wikipedians that I know of (including myself):

Thank-you for your participation.

~ Troy 18:55, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copts ARE NOT Arab Christians!!!

I need your input. It seems that the fact that we can't entirely convince some people who are possibly more lacking on the details of how Copts view their ethnicity. I have said it time and time again: Copts are not to be labelled as Arabs!!!

...I know that this all seems silly, but your input will be greatly appreciated (as you could help in finding sources, pointing things out; etc...).

You can post edits on this issue at the following link: Talk:Arab_Christians#UNACCEPTABLE_OMISSION_OF_COPTS.

I have informed others about this issue.

Thank-you, ~ Troy 01:06, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MATTA EL-MESKEEN

Please see this page. It is important that this is agreed upon.

Thank-you,

~ Troy 02:31, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CopticFlag007.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:CopticFlag007.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. OsamaK 18:18, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Egyptians

An article that you have been involved in editing, Egyptians, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Egyptians. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 10:14, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:CopticCoatOfArms007.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:CopticCoatOfArms007.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:CopticCoatOfArms007.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hennessey, Patrick (talk) 01:37, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:CopticCoatOfArmsSmallGreen.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:CopticCoatOfArmsSmallGreen.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:CopticCoatOfArmsSmallGreen.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hennessey, Patrick (talk) 01:38, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk: Copt

Please take a look at Talk:Copt, Thanks.--George (talk) 16:03, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm thinking of nominating the coptic flag article for deletion and I wanted to know what you think before nominating it (because you're the one who created it). Please tell me what you think on my talk page or on the coptic flag discussion page. --George (talk) 18:48, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated the Coptic flag article for deletion, discussion will take place here.--George (talk) 22:00, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you know anyone else who might be interested in this discussion, please invite them.--George (talk) 22:06, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:AlexFlag.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:AlexFlag.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:07, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ويكيبيديا مصرى

Hi, you might know this already,but I have put a proposal and started an active project for ويكيبيديا مصرى wikipedia Masri. If this may interest you , I would be very grateful for any help you can offer in this project, many thanks.--Ghaly (talk) 15:07, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Copts — constant rvs

Hello, there. I notice that we've both had to constantly rv edits by an IP address which doesn't even explain those edits. Just a heads up — these guys don't give up very easily. If you need anything, let me know. Later ;) ~ Troy (talk) 01:54, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Waiting

I'm still waiting for you to finish your comments on Talk:Coptic flag. George (talk) 04:00, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was reading your Cotributions page to see when was the last time you edited wikipedia (because I wanted to know wether you forgot about Talk:Coptic flag or you wasn't editing wikipedia at all) so I found three edits by User:Carmen22 that you reverted with the edit summary "rv vandalism", and I wanted to tell you that "vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia", and to assume good faith (BTW one of the edits was right, Khaled abol Naga was born in 1966 not 1976). George (talk) 22:01, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ⲉⲕⲑⲱⲛ?

ⲛⲟϥⲣⲓ ⲗⲁⲛⲧⲉⲣⲛⲓⲝ, ⲁⲣⲓ`ϩⲙⲟⲧ ⲭⲱ `ⲛ ⲡⲉⲕ.ⲉⲙⲏⲗ ϧⲉⲛ ⲛⲓ.ⲡⲣⲉϥⲣⲉⲛⲥⲉⲍ ⲛⲟⲩⲕ, ⲏ ⲟⲩⲱⲣⲡ ⲛⲁⲓ `ⲛ ⲟⲩⲉⲙⲏⲗ `ⲉ etsaba ⲁⲧ ⲅⲙⲁⲓⲗ.ⲕⲟⲙ. ϯⲟⲩⲱϣ `ⲉϫⲱ ⲛⲁⲕ `ⲛ ⲟⲩϩⲱⲃ. ⲟⲩϣⲉⲡ`ϩⲙⲟⲧ. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.88.36.192 (talk) 05:32, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

a2ool tani? matensash. ougai. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.88.36.192 (talk) 02:36, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I couldn't read what you wrote. The Coptic appears as squares. Any idea how I can get to read it? --Lanternix (talk) 02:42, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trial

ⲛⲟϥⲣⲓ ⲗⲁⲛⲧⲉⲣⲛⲓⲝ, ⲁⲣⲓ`ϩⲙⲟⲧ ⲭⲱ `ⲛ ⲡⲉⲕ.ⲉⲙⲏⲗ ϧⲉⲛ ⲛⲓ.ⲡⲣⲉϥⲣⲉⲛⲥⲉⲍ ⲛⲟⲩⲕ, ⲏ ⲟⲩⲱⲣⲡ ⲛⲁⲓ `ⲛ ⲟⲩⲉⲙⲏⲗ `ⲉ etsaba ⲁⲧ ⲅⲙⲁⲓⲗ.ⲕⲟⲙ. ϯⲟⲩⲱϣ `ⲉϫⲱ ⲛⲁⲕ `ⲛ ⲟⲩϩⲱⲃ. ⲟⲩϣⲉⲡ`ϩⲙⲟⲧ

Ok, now it works (make sure to write in the form of bla bla bla). Sure, I'll do it as soon as I'm done with exams. Probably in a week or two, if that's ok with you. Ougai. --Lanternix (talk) 02:51, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

la2 mesh ok. ̀ⲕ`ⲉⲙⲓ ⲉⲣⲟⲓ. yalla darouri. etsaba at gmail.com. 04:28, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Discussion on "Egyptian Australian"

Hey, Lanternix! Just letting you know about this. You can have your say here (it's also where the discussion started out in the first place). Thanks, ~ Troy (talk) 01:18, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Lanternix. I'll be there when you need me—just put in the links of the disputes, and I'll help fill in the gaps by commenting with my views. See ya! ~ Troy (talk) 01:59, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied.

Replied here. · AndonicO ^Engage. 13:33, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

حبيب جرجس

Hey Lanternix! Help would be appreciated if you can improve/expand "Habib Girgis" (and if you're willing to start an article in Arabic Wikipedia taken from here, then that would be great). I have put some sources as well (ie: I've read online that there's a book written by Habib Girgis called "between past and present"//"بين الماضي والحاضر", so if you have it, that would be great). You don't need to do any of this if you don't have time, but if you do, then I'll be there to help out. Thanks, ~ Troy (talk) 20:14, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coptic Bible

Hi, Lanternix.

I notice that there's no article for the Coptic Bible, and yet there's an article called Coptic versions of the Bible. Should we start a new article, redirect, or move the only available article to the non-existent page?

Also, on my 3rd Sandbox, I have used the New Athena Unicode font to decode the Coptic alphabet that's available in unicode (using that, you make words have overline or use Coptic numbers, etc.). However, the best way to type in Coptic using unicode without installing anything other than the font is:

Go to accessories
System tools
Character Map
Go to the "New Athena Unicode" font
Check off "advanced view"
Go to "group by" and click "Unicode subrange"
Click "Greek" (it's the closest thing to Coptic)

I have discovered that, by using this method, you can even use the seven "Coptic" (demotic) letters even as it is in the Greek group alphabet within this font. (Pretty sneaky, isn't it?)

One more thing. I have found a verse that's entirely in Sahidic Coptic text and can included in the aforementioned article. It was in this link.

Here's the English text:

These things took place in Bethany across the Jordan, where John was baptizing. (Jn 1:28)

...And here's the Coptic (it was already using unicode as I found it):

ⲚⲀⲒ ⲀⲨϢⲰⲠⲈ ϨⲚ ⲂⲎⲐⲀⲢⲀⲂⲀ ⲘⲠⲒⲔⲢⲞ ⲘⲠⲒⲞⲢⲆⲀⲚⲎⲤ ⲘⲠⲘⲀ ⲈⲚⲈⲢⲈ ⲒⲰϨⲀⲚⲚⲎⲤ ⲂⲀⲠⲦⲒⲌⲈ ⲚϨⲎⲦϤ. (Jn 1:28)

If you can help with anything relating to this or other Coptic texts on Wikipedia, that would be highly apprectiated.

~ Troy (talk) 19:16, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ⲛⲁⲛⲉ ⲣⲟⲩϩⲓ, Lanternix. First of all, I have responded as well on Talk:Copt, and as long as we try to cooperate, things should go smoothly enough.

Anyway, I have a better way for the Coptic font. The first one I told you was only for the Demotic Coptic letters.

Go add this website to your favourites.
Type in "New Athena Unicode" in the "Font Name" box, and click the refresh button.
For the letters borrowed from Greek in the Coptic-style, go to the "2CFF" subrange.
Open a new window/tab and follow steps 1-2.
Go to the "03FF" subrange for the Demotic Coptic letters.

As for the Coptic Bible, may be that was a bad question. We could probably redirect to the current article and also add links to and from Coptic literature.

I have worked on the original Coptic New Testament in the New Athena Unicode font, and I've done 1/3 of the Book of Mark in Coptic. The experiment can be found here. You can help me number the verses using the correct templates if you're interested. Ⲟⲩϫⲁⲓ, ~ Troy (talk) 00:27, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So, just to clarify, we should just make a redirect, right? Also, I've got several experiments in the Coptic language on my sandboxes linked from my user page (the Coptic Gospel of Matthew, II Maccabees, the Holy Psalmody {ten thino}, and the Coptic Orthodox Lord's Prayer). Ⲟⲩϫⲁⲓ, ~ Troy (talk) 02:29, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Hieracon.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Hieracon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:55, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coptic flag discussion

Nofri, Lanternix.

Just letting you know that there's discussion going on surrounding the Coptic flag here.

Things are getting along smoothly, but I'd still like you to add your input.

See you, ~ Troy (talk) 02:19, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

⳿ⲪⲂⲓⲕⲓⲡⲏ̇ⲋⲏ

Nofri Lanternix!!!

If you are interested in the Coptic Wikisource (⳿ⲪⲂⲓⲕⲓⲡⲏ̇ⲋⲏ) Proposal, please don't hesitate to help out. Regards, ~ Troy (talk) 23:35, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS: the project can be found on this page. Thanks, ~ Troy (talk) 22:57, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Qift.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Qift.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:56, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:56, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:LuxorMap.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:LuxorMap.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:58, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:58, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Qus.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Qus.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:58, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:58, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Qena.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Qena.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:58, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:58, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Naqada.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Naqada.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:58, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:58, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:NagHammadi.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:NagHammadi.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:58, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:58, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Esna.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Esna.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:59, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:59, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Armant.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Armant.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:59, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:59, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Tima.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Tima.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:59, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:59, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Tahta.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Tahta.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:00, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:00, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Maragha.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Maragha.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:00, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:00, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Abydos.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Abydos.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:00, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:00, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Egypt-region-map-cities2.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Egypt-region-map-cities2.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:00, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:00, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

img source problem messages

The problem is that we need to know where the base map came from. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:00, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:StMarkcoptic.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:StMarkcoptic.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:01, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:01, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Sohag.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Sohag.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:02, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:02, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Mansha.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Mansha.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:02, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:02, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Girga.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Girga.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:02, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:02, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Balyana.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Balyana.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:02, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:02, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Akhmim.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Akhmim.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:02, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:02, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Qusiya.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Qusiya.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:02, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:02, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Manfalut.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Manfalut.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:03, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:03, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Manfalut.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Manfalut.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:03, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:03, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:AlexCorniche1.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:AlexCorniche1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:03, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:03, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Dairut.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Dairut.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:03, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:03, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Abutig.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Abutig.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Abnub.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Abnub.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:CopticTheotokos7.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:CopticTheotokos7.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:CopticCrucifix.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:CopticCrucifix.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:CopticJonah.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:CopticJonah.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Nativity2.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Nativity2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:CopticCenser.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:CopticCenser.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:CopticDeacons.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:CopticDeacons.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Asyut.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Asyut.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:05, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:05, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:AlMinya.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:AlMinya.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:05, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:05, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:ElIdwa.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:ElIdwa.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:05, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:05, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:BeniMazar.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:BeniMazar.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:05, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:05, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:DeirMawas.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:DeirMawas.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:05, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:05, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Mallawi.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Mallawi.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:05, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:05, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Matai.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Matai.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:06, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:06, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Samalut.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Samalut.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:06, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:06, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:SaintMaurice001.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:SaintMaurice001.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:08, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:08, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:StMarcCoteD'Armes.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:StMarcCoteD'Armes.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:08, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:08, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:CopticCoatOfArms.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:CopticCoatOfArms.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:08, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:08, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:AbuQirqas.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:AbuQirqas.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:09, 29 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:09, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Egypt-region-map-cities2.gif

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Egypt-region-map-cities2.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kevin (talk) 23:23, 7 August 2008 (UTC) --Kevin (talk) 23:23, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

pics

Hi Lanternix, these can be restored, but first please tell me where you got the base maps from. That was the issue--clearly you added the overlay yourself, but there was no indication of where the base map came from and I couldn't find it in the commons. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:17, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

egyptians

Someone is messing with the Egyptians page [3] deleting useful information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.72.194.144 (talk) 23:08, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lanternix. You have new messages at Troy 07's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Blocked

72 hours for your disruptive editing at Egyptians. Moreschi (talk) 18:00, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am NOT a sock, I only reverted to ad hominem after other users did, and my changes are NOT disruptive! I am restoring referenced material! --Lanternix (talk) 18:22, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coptic Wikisource Project

Hello Lanternix. Are you interested in contributing to the Coptic Wikisource Project or commenting on the proposal? ~ Troy (talk) 02:44, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:WorldCopts.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:WorldCopts.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:46, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:CopteAmaj.png

Thanks for uploading Image:CopteAmaj.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:54, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:CopteAmin.png

Thanks for uploading Image:CopteAmin.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 08:55, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:CopteBmin.png

Thanks for uploading Image:CopteBmin.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:57, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:CopteBmaj.png

Thanks for uploading Image:CopteBmaj.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading.STBotI (talk) 08:58, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your uploads

Good day. I see that you have uploaded a number of images to Wikipedia. First off, thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, there are some guidelines that we need to follow with copyrighted images. Specifically, you need to add a source for the image (a link to a website will do), a copyright tag (there are some listed at WP:ICT), and a rationale explaining why we can use a copyrighted image (explained at WP:NFURG). I see that your images fail to include one of these. Please stop uploading images and address the concerns listed above. If you need assistance, you can ask at the help desk. If you do not fix these images, and you continue to make bad uploads, you will be blocked and your images will be deleted. Thanks for your contributions! STBotI (talk) 08:58, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:CopteCmaj.png

Thanks for uploading Image:CopteCmaj.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:01, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:CopteCmin.png

Thanks for uploading Image:CopteCmin.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:02, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:CopteDmaj.png

Thanks for uploading Image:CopteDmaj.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:04, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:CopteDmin.png

Thanks for uploading Image:CopteDmin.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:04, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:CopteEmaj.png

Thanks for uploading Image:CopteEmaj.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 09:05, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:CopteEmin.png

Thanks for uploading Image:CopteEmin.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:07, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Copte6.png

Image Copyright problem

Hi Lanternix!
We thank you for uploading Image:Copte6.png, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot.

--John Bot III (talk) 22:25, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:CopteZmin.png

Image Copyright problem

Hi Lanternix!
We thank you for uploading Image:CopteZmin.png, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot.

--John Bot III (talk) 22:28, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:CopteZmaj.png

Image Copyright problem

Hi Lanternix!
We thank you for uploading Image:CopteZmaj.png, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot.

--John Bot III (talk) 22:29, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for Image:WorldCopts.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:WorldCopts.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 01:25, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for Image:StMarcCote3.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:StMarcCote3.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 02:19, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for Image:CopticCross4.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:CopticCross4.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 02:37, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for Image:CopticCross3.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:CopticCross3.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 02:37, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for Image:CopticCross2.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:CopticCross2.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 02:38, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for Image:CopticCross1.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:CopticCross1.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 02:38, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for Image:Cross 8b.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Cross 8b.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 02:39, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for Image:Cross 8.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Cross 8.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 02:40, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

article

hey, the Arab Christians article is an all-encompassing article regardless of the enthnicity of the indigenous Christians of the Arab world; because your edit is highly subjective, other Egyptian Copts wether from Arab enthnicty (DNA) or not view themselves as Arabs; now the fact that you don't view yourself as an Arab that is your personal belief. Many from the same religious background as yourself don't agree with your beleief. this article is pretty contentious...but there's already the copt article, which elaberates more on this subject.George Al-Shami (talk) 18:08, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hey laternix, no I don't need references I know what the Copt religous authority think, however that article does not mention that Arab Christians are those who view themselves as Arab, the term Arab is very contentious itself and depends on what school of thought you belong to. There are those who call people by the language they speak, but some people obviously have issues with that. But the point is that Wikipedia is a plave where all scholarly viewpoints are placed, so your removal of egypt is not neutral because it erroneously assumes that all Copts reject the name "Arab", which you yourself have admitted is not true. Instead of removing the refernce to Egypt, why don't you write in the egypt section of the article, the coptic church's viewpoint about the "Arab" label?George Al-Shami (talk) 02:01, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Modern Coptic Art

Dear, Lanternix. I've receantly have visited Egypt where I was lucky to get acquanted with a coptic artist, who had ageed to make a picture for me using some elements of traditional coptic art. [Here it is http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Изображение:Coptic_picture.JPG]. Do you think, it can be used in Wikipedia as an example of modern coptic art?--paralingua (talk) 11:43, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request to move article Saint Menas incomplete

You recently filed a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves to move the page Saint Menas to a different title - however your proposal is either incomplete or has been contested as being controversial. As a result, it has been moved to the incomplete and contested proposals section. Requests that remain incomplete after five days will be removed.

Please make sure you have completed all three of the following:

Added {{move|NewName}} at the top of the talk page of the page you want moved, replacing "NewName" with the new name for the article. This creates the required template for you there.
Added a place for discussion at the bottom of the talk page of the page you want to be moved. This can easily be accomplished by adding {{subst:RMtalk|NewName|reason for move}} to the bottom of the page, which will automatically create a discussion section there.
Added {{subst:RMlink|PageName|NewName|reason for move}} to the top of today's section here.

If you need any further guidance, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Requested moves or contact me on my talk page. - JPG-GR (talk) 01:36, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Muslim invasion of Egypt

Hello Lanternix! I would like to move the article Muslim conquest of Egypt to Muslim invasion of Egypt. I believe this is a more neutral title, and it's in accordance with the names of other articles concerning the history of Egypt, such as French invasion of Egypt, Byzantine alliance and invasion of Egypt, French Invasion of Egypt (1798), Crusader invasions of Egypt etc. What do you think? --Bomba999 (talk) 04:29, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I reverted your moves, primarily because "invasion" implies a non-permanent result, while "conquest" is what actually happened, i.e. the Muslims conquered these areas from the Byzantines. Regards, Constantine ✍ 10:01, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, I should have phrased it better: an invasion may or may not be successful, while the term "conquest" denotes a successful invasion, i.e. that the invader established control over the invaded country. For example, the Persian invasion of Greece or the French invasion of Egypt failed, while the Norman invasion of England succeeded, which is why it is most often known as the "Norman Conquest". It is the same story with the Muslim conquests. There is no discernible reason to change the old-established "conquest" for "invasion". "Conquest" is more accurate and concise, as it also informs the reader about the result, and I don't really see anything NPOV or offensive about it... In a more specific context, when one speaks of the "Muslim Conquest(s)", one knows which period of world history is referred to, while "Muslim invasions" can mean any number of thing, from the raids into France or the Byz. Empire or India (a Google search ought to give you a clearer picture of this). Regards, Constantine ✍ 23:15, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Editing rampage

It appears that you are on a POV editing rampage judging on the slew of edits you have made, all of which express your hostility towards Arabs. STOP! I don't have the time to follow you around and revert your ass on each edit. Also, YOU ARE NOT AN AUTHORITY ON THE COPT COMMUNITY!! You need to calm down as you are only getting other people angry. Falastine fee Qalby (talk) 01:40, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Watch out??? No you don't tell me to watch out. Your recent POV edits are offensive and are intended to incite. I am not going to be silent about this shit. Continue this and I will have to report your disruptive editing. -Falastine fee Qalby (talk) 01:55, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Muslim conquest of Egypt

hi, please check the discussion fourm of Muslim conquest of Egypt before reverting my edits. This is an encyclopedia and according to Wikipedia:Editing policy one should discuss before making any serious changes, earlier in April when you made these changes i gave a detail report in the discussion fourm, you may have never read it, so, read it first to avoid WP:EW which may result in your blocking from editing wikipedia. also check Wikipedia:Three-revert rule.

regards. Mohammad Adil (talk) 15:19, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your quick response, please check my reply [4]

Mohammad Adil (talk) 15:29, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, check discussion fourm of Muslim conquest of Egypt.

Mohammad Adil (talk) 07:47, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Azazilsgoat

Note that I have blocked User;Azazilsgoat as a sock of you, per AN3 William M. Connolley (talk) 09:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

where are you ?

Where are you man, i am waiting ....... check the discussion forum.

Mohammad Adil (talk) 14:52, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Civility warning

If you persist in using inflammatory edit comments accusing other good-faith editors of vandalism [5], I will block you for incivilty William M. Connolley (talk) 12:13, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Socks

Identifying socks is not really about IP addresses. I suggest you stop using them soon. --BozMo talk 09:15, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I invite you to visit Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lanternix/Archive. You may want to apologize to me after you read it, for accusing me of using sockpuppets! --Lanternix (talk) 19:52, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree I should apologize to you since no link between you and various sock accounts has been shown. However I also should warn you about personal attacks on other editors, please desist. --BozMo talk 20:55, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This edit [6] caught my eye as outside normal courtesy. If you use this kind of language against someone you will find you tend to generate more support for him than anything else. --BozMo talk 22:06, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

However I see in fact that you were quoting back at FfQ on the "hateful" bit, which was probably the worst bit. --BozMo talk 22:09, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay you win, we are all human and I make mistakes. Yes I agree your language was not as bad as FfG, but I wasn't reviewing the dispute just looking at your contribution (and him being worst doesn't mean you are right to say "pro-Arab POV" etc.. See you around--BozMo talk 05:15, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:2006 Cup of Nations in Cairo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:2006 Cup of Nations in Cairo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:06, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

warning for edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Library of Alexandria. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --Akhilleus (talk) 01:32, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lanternix, you are mistaken about Wikipedia's definition of vandalism. To quote the policy: "Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism." Kauffner's edits, even if you disagree with them, are obviously part of an attempt to improve the encyclopedia. If you continue to call Kauffner's edits vandalism, that will not reflect well on you. As for the talk page, I'm glad to see that you're using it; what you need to do now is continue discussion with Kauffner, rather than edit warring with him. If you continue to disagree about what the article should say, pursue dispute resolution rather than edit warring. --Akhilleus (talk) 01:58, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

Thanks very much for the barnstar. I'm glad I got started using inkscape, this program got me started in drawing. Jeff Dahl (Talk • contribs) 18:13, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moves

I have moved Lanternix/Governorates of Egypt to User:Lanternix/Governorates of Egypt. This talk page is ridiculously long - please archive immediately. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 05:54, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hello

I read this: "After what he has witnessed in both virtual and real life, this user has become a firm supporter of the state of Israel"

Would you like to explain why?--Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 21:48, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arab

Any further edit warring on the above page will be met with a block. Please take your concerns to the articles talk page. Tiptoety ^talk 05:48, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Sheikh Abd al-Aziz ibn Abd Allah ibn Baaz.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sheikh Abd al-Aziz ibn Abd Allah ibn Baaz.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. -Falastine fee Qalby (talk) 16:16, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

honorifics

Hi Lanternix, the Manual of Style states that Wikipedia should not have honorifics in its narrative voice. I understand that you may feel strongly about this, but this is the standard practice and would appreciate not having to edit-war over it. Thanks, Nableezy (talk) 16:20, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They actually dont, what you cited was in the name of a book. Take a look at Muhammad and see if there are any honorifics. Nableezy (talk) 16:29, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I am not exactly the most patient guy, but patience isnt really an Egyptian trait. Nableezy (talk) 16:36, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

not Egyptian? How do you figure? Nableezy (talk) 16:43, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ahh, I see. That is actually a quote from Tariq Ali (who is also not a Palestinian) reflecting on a passage in a Shakespeare play. Just a quote I like. If you look at my userboxes you will see I am indeed an Egyptian. Nableezy (talk) 16:47, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, an Egyptian. Both parents trace back their lines in Egypt, my father fought in 73 and much of my family is still there. Those edits were mostly minor, I did some work on the templates and needed to fix the articles that those templates were on. But never have lived in Egypt, my parents came to the US and I have lived my life here, but have spent much time there with family. Really, how many non-Egyptians would identify this as their favorite place in Egypt? Nableezy (talk) 17:06, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever, you dont want to believe me I dont really care, your perception of what I am doesnt affect me. Bye, Nableezy (talk) 17:49, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you very much for the barnstar. Ghaly (talk) 18:16, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User notice: temporary 3RR block

Regarding reversions[7] made on June 13 2009 to Arab

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

The duration of the block is 48 hours. William M. Connolley (talk) 18:21, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Coptic Flag Edits

question

Religion at Arab

Hello

The Egyptian identity section just saw it!

17-30 million

Image source problem with Image:AlexMap2.jpg

Saint Maurice

Greetings

Arab Christians

Arab

Fix the Egypt identity section!

The Arab article

Race and ancient Egypt (controversies)

Arab Arab world WikiProject

Announcement

Request for template comment

Church of the Holy Virgin in Babylon Al-Darag

Copts ARE NOT Arab Christians!!!

MATTA EL-MESKEEN

Image:CopticFlag007.jpg listed for deletion

AfD nomination of Egyptians

Speedy deletion of Image:CopticCoatOfArms007.jpg

Speedy deletion of Image:CopticCoatOfArmsSmallGreen.jpg

Talk: Copt

Orphaned non-free media (Image:AlexFlag.gif)

ويكيبيديا مصرى

Template:Copts — constant rvs

Waiting

.mw-parser-output .script-coptic{font-family:"Sophia Nubian","Noto Sans Coptic","FreeSerif","Quivira","Segoe UI Historic","Segoe UI Symbol","New Athena Unicode","MPH 2B Damase","Arial Coptic","Analecta","Antinoou"}ⲉⲕⲑⲱⲛ?

Discussion on "Egyptian Australian"

Replied.

حبيب جرجس

Coptic Bible

Possibly unfree Image:Hieracon.jpg

Coptic flag discussion

⳿ⲪⲂⲓⲕⲓⲡⲏ̇ⲋⲏ

Image source problem with Image:Qift.jpg

Image source problem with Image:LuxorMap.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Qus.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Qena.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Naqada.jpg

Image source problem with Image:NagHammadi.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Esna.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Armant.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Tima.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Tahta.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Maragha.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Abydos.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Egypt-region-map-cities2.gif

img source problem messages

Image source problem with Image:StMarkcoptic.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Sohag.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Mansha.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Girga.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Balyana.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Akhmim.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Qusiya.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Manfalut.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Manfalut.jpg

Image source problem with Image:AlexCorniche1.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Dairut.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Abutig.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Abnub.jpg

Image source problem with Image:CopticTheotokos7.jpg

Image source problem with Image:CopticCrucifix.jpg

Image source problem with Image:CopticJonah.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Nativity2.jpg

Image source problem with Image:CopticCenser.jpg

Image source problem with Image:CopticDeacons.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Asyut.jpg

Image source problem with Image:AlMinya.jpg

Image source problem with Image:ElIdwa.jpg

Image source problem with Image:BeniMazar.jpg

Image source problem with Image:DeirMawas.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Mallawi.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Matai.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Samalut.jpg

Image source problem with Image:SaintMaurice001.jpg

ⲉⲕⲑⲱⲛ?