User talk:Lalmohanlal

This is Lalmohanlal's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Divleafcorporation (October 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Divleafcorporation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:07, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lalmohanlal! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 08:07, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stiven Mikhail (October 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stiven Mikhail and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 22:53, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Divleafcorporation

Hello, Lalmohanlal. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Divleafcorporation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

A page you created has been deleted as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:22, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent post

You recently posted at the Article Wizard about an unblock, which is not the appropriate location to do so. Never mind, of course, the fact that you are not blocked.

Could you please explain what you are trying to accomplish? Primefac (talk) 18:11, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not able to visual edit any articles and as template production sign is showing on my Wikipedia account.

I want visual edit. Lalmohanlal (talk) 18:18, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not able to visual edit of any articles and template protection sign is showing on my Wikipedia account.

I want visual edit Lalmohanlal (talk) 18:20, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i want visual edit of article Lalmohanlal (talk) 18:20, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:VisualEditor for information on how to enable VE. Primefac (talk) 12:07, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Hello Lalmohanlal. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Lalmohanlal. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Lalmohanlal|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.

As all of your recent edits have been to articles with a history of WP:UPE, please make the required declarations prior to editing further.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:26, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not being compensated in any way directly or indirectly for my edits. so please unblock me. Lalmohanlal (talk) 07:16, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not being compensated in any way directly or indirectly for my edits. I had created an article of a person named Stiven Mikhail, but you changed that article to Draft. Please send that draft to article space. Lalmohanlal (talk) 07:25, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not being compensated in any way directly or indirectly for my edits. so please unblock me. I need edit a article. Lalmohanlal (talk) 07:28, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not being compensated in any way directly or indirectly for my edits. so please unblock me from editing. Lalmohanlal (talk) 10:24, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not being compensated in any way directly or indirectly for my edits. so please unblock me from edit of article. Lalmohanlal (talk) 10:24, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not being compensated in any way directly or indirectly for my edits. so please unblock me. i need visual edit of article. Lalmohanlal (talk) 10:25, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are not blocked? Theroadislong (talk) 10:29, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why i am unable to visual editing of any article? Lalmohanlal (talk) 10:38, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why i am unable to visual editing of any article? Lalmohanlal (talk) 10:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am blocked in visual edit. Lalmohanlal (talk) 10:39, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why i am unable to visual editing of any article? Lalmohanlal (talk) 10:51, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The draft I have created have not yet been reviewed. I created a draft a long time ago. Please review the draft. Lalmohanlal (talk) 07:36, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I note that you created Adel Rahman. It is assumed that you are paid for this as well. Des[ite you denials I see you have made a {{Paid}} declaration on your user page. Transparency is vital on Wikipedia 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:14, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have not been paid in any way for making Adel Rahman. I do not get paid for creating Wikipedia pages. I do not charge anything for creating Wikipedia pages. Lalmohanlal (talk) 12:44, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not being compensated in any way directly or indirectly for my edits. Lalmohanlal (talk) 10:01, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stiven Mikhail (July 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stiven Mikhail and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:26, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hell sir, please review of draft of Stiven Mikhail. Lalmohanlal (talk) 05:59, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry sir, for spelling mistake Lalmohanlal (talk) 06:14, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello sir, please review of draft of Stiven Mikhail. Lalmohanlal (talk) 06:09, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stiven Mikhail (August 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is insufficient sourcing. I see you are declared paid editor, so we assume that you know the rules. The picture you have decorated the article with is of dubious copyright ownership.That is being handled on Wikimedia Commons where you have a history of being blocked.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stiven Mikhail and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:10, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have not been paid in any way for making Adel Rahman. I do not get paid for creating Wikipedia pages. I do not charge anything for creating Wikipedia pages. Lalmohanlal (talk) 12:45, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have not been paid in any way for making Stiven Mikhail. I do not get paid for creating Wikipedia pages. I do not charge anything for creating Wikipedia pages. I have not used any copyright file. I do not used any copyright file. Lalmohanlal (talk) 13:17, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not being compensated in any way directly or indirectly for my edits. Lalmohanlal (talk) 10:02, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ildivino1010. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 08:34, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Adel Rahman

Hello, Lalmohanlal

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username IceBergYYC, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Adel Rahman, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|IceBergYYC}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

IceBergYYC (talk) 03:19, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adel Rahman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adel Rahman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adel Rahman (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

IceBergYYC (talk) 17:16, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Wikipedia account

Hello Sir,

I promise you. In future, no such editing will be done which violates the privacy and policy of Wikipedia.

Nor will this Wikipedia account be misused in any way in the future.Please allow me to edit.And please unblock my Wikipedia account. Lalmohanlal (talk) 10:13, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock from editing

I will not make any edits in the future that violate Wikipedia's privacy policies, so please allow me to edit . Please unblock me from editing. Lalmohanlal (talk) 11:52, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock from editing

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lalmohanlal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not make any edits in the future that violate Wikipedia's privacy policies, so please allow me to edit . Please unblock me from editing.

Decline reason:

Please describe concisely and clearly how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:31, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock from editing

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lalmohanlal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes sir, I maintain more than one Wikipedia account.But I have not misused any Wikipedia account.I have used my Wikipedia account to create drafts or edit articles.I used my Wikipedia account to edit the article but I was blocked from editing.So I had to create a new Wikipedia account.But my new Wikipedia account was also blocked.I request you please unblock my Wikipedia account and give me permission to editing. 🙏

Decline reason:

You're not going to be unblocked simply because you want to be. You are violating Wikiped's policies regarding multiple accounts. If you want to pursue an unblock, your only option is the standard offer and, due to your repeated violation of WP:SOCK, this is considered a community ban.Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:26, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.