User talk:Lallienzuol hmar

Welcome!

Hello, Lallienzuol hmar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 17:40, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToonLucas22 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Lallienzuol hmar/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TL22 (talk) 20:37, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TL22 (talk) 20:37, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Origamite was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Lallienzuol hmar/sandbox/ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Origamite^ⓣⓒ 14:13, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

Wikipedia may be a gazetteer, but we need an article to publish. This is not one, yet. Please look at it and make to work

You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Lallienzuol hmar/sandbox/ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 17:40, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Retzawl, Assam has been accepted

Retzawl, Assam, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

—Anne Delong (talk) 00:26, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retzawl or Retzol listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Retzawl or Retzol. Since you had some involvement with the Retzawl or Retzol redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Fiddle Faddle 09:51, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retzawl, Assam

Please stop moving this about. I have tidied up behind you. The village is now at a decent name, and redirects have been set up so the alternative names may be found. Moving things around a lot causes chaos. Please, next time, have a plan in mind before starting out. We can fix anything, but it just creates work. Fiddle Faddle 09:54, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retzol or Retzawl, Assam listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Retzol or Retzawl, Assam. Since you had some involvement with the Retzol or Retzawl, Assam redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Fiddle Faddle 10:02, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

This is your only warning; if you move a page maliciously again, as you did at Retzawl, Assam, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Fiddle Faddle 10:07, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I really hope I have your attention now. You must stop moving this article about. You must stop now, please. You are causing work for other people, and your moves are incorrect. Please leave this alone. Fiddle Faddle 10:09, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I wish you would engage in conversation

I have reverted your removal of maintenance tags on Retzawl, Assam. These must remain until the work is done. When it is done they may be removed. Fiddle Faddle 10:30, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Retzawl, Assam, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Please also read WP:OWN Fiddle Faddle 10:35, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please have the good judgement to stop removing maintenance templates. At some point this means that you will be blocked from editing to prevent your doing this. Your removal is vandalism. It would be a great shame to walk into a block from these actions. This is not your article, it is ours. We have standards to maintain and we will maintain them. We would prefer it to be with your help. Fiddle Faddle 10:38, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Retzawl, Assam. You must stop this behaviour please. Fiddle Faddle 10:44, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your latest action after being warned means that you have volunteered to be blocked for a short period. I have assailed one of our administration team to consider the matter and to determine the course of action. I have warned you and warned you that your actions are not appropriate and tried very hard to seek to ensure that you have understood me. Fiddle Faddle 10:51, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Lallienzuol hmar. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Retzawl, Assam, you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Your user name shows that you were the second headmaster of a school there. It is time for you to stop editing this article Fiddle Faddle 10:57, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of "Chieftain-ship"

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on "Chieftain-ship" requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ya sh ! 12:03, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of "Gaon Bura"

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on "Gaon Bura" requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fiddle Faddle 12:46, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of "Sekhnuoipha L P School"

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on "Sekhnuoipha L P School" requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fiddle Faddle 12:47, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Thank you for your recent contributions. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle 12:48, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please talk to me

There are mistakes that you are making that are made by every new editor. I am willing to guide you. It will be a pleasure to guide you. You need to talk to me, please, or to another editor whom you trust. We want you to have a good experience here. Right now you are having a difficult time. Fiddle Faddle 12:58, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I know this is hard. Are you fluent in English? I only speak English. We can find someone who speaks another language to help you, but it may take time. Fiddle Faddle 13:10, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have already asked at the relevant noticeboard that an administrator considers your actions. Talking to me or others is unlikely to prevent any decision that they may make, but it may assist them in coming to a decision.

Unfortunately you seem to have decided to carry on against almost all the advice you have been given. There comes a point when even the most relaxed giver of advice thinks about giving up. I am very close to that point with you.

Please think carefully about what you want to happen next. You are choosing to make an admin prevent you from making edits because they are likely to consider your edits to be troublesome. Do you want that to happen? Fiddle Faddle 13:42, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of "Retzawl L P School"

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on "Retzawl L P School" requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Norvoid (talk) 13:36, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Retzol or Retzawl, Assam

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Retzol or Retzawl, Assam, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fiddle Faddle 17:36, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for continued disruption and complete disregard for requests to stop and discuss your edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:20, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Lallienzuol hmar (talk) 16:34, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please actually talk to one of us. You have some misunderstanding on how to work here and we would like to help you. Fiddle Faddle 17:28, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Doiheng

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Doiheng requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 16:03, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015 yet again

This is way past your only warning; you have moved a page maliciously again, at Retzawl, Assam, and have only just been unblocked so you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This is truly enough. You are heading towards another block. You have made no effort to engage with anyone despite multiple efforts. You may not continue to move pages to the titles you consider to be correct. Your titles are against page naming conventions are these moves are considered to be vandalism after you have received the number of warnings that you have. Fiddle Faddle 17:00, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You must engage in conversation with editors here. Failure to do so is not considered helpful. I have tried, and tried and tried to get your attention and to get you to co-operate. Please understand that Wikipedia is a place of collaboration. Your duty is to collaborate. Fiddle Faddle 17:13, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The thing you will face is longer and longer blocks from editing. These will be to prevent your edits from causing disruption. At present, whether you mean to or not, they are disruptive. It is an accepted principle of Wikipedia that we try very hard to talk to new editors to help them to understand how we work. The problem happens when the editor refuses to talk to us. You are, so far, refusing to talk to us.

Eventually your right to edit Wikipedia will be revoked. This is because we require editors to demonstrate competence, not just in editing, but in being a true part of the community. Failure to do this means that, with regret, your invitation to the party will be withdrawn. This will be 100% your choice.

Please talk to us. You can do that here, now, on your own talk page. Please start to talk. Fiddle Faddle 17:37, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm Boing! said Zebedee, an admin here at the English Wikipedia, and I see you have been having a few problems following various policies and conventions here, and you seem to have got into a few scrapes. Your intentions clearly appear to be constructive, but you keep doing things in ways that are contrary to Wikipedia's standards (like the Manual of Style, for example, and our minimum standards for the creation of articles). If such problems continue, you might even find yourself blocked from editing, and I wouldn't like that to happen to you. So please, if someone gives you a message or warning that you do not understand, please ask them to explain further (or pop over to my talk page and ask me - I'm always happy to help), but do not just ignore them and carry on with the same actions that caused the problem in the first place. Fiddle Faddle is very helpful with new editors, and he would be happy to help you. And, as I say, I'm here to help too, so please do not hesitate to come and ask one of us for help when you need it. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:01, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'd just like to add that I've had a read of the Retzawl, Assam article you created, and it's pretty good - it's way better than most of our articles about villages in India. Early versions of articles almost always need a bit more work to get them up to Wikipedia conventions, so I hope you can regard those maintenance tags as suggestions for how to make it even better rather than as any kind of criticism, because that is how they are intended. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:12, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A few words of advice

I suggest that until you have much more experience of editing it would be a good idea not to move any pages, and not to create any redirects. I am sure that you have been trying to do constructive things, but I'm afraid you haven't yet really understood what is suitable. I hope that after you have been editing for a while you will have a better idea of what is acceptable. We all make mistakes at first; when I started editing I made some mistakes which now look ridiculous to me. Also, titles of articles should not be in quotes: for example, we have an article Africa, not an article "Africa". The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 22:03, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

30 November 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:05, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A number of us have been trying to help you to understand what you have been doing wrong, but you have ignored us and continued to make problematic moves to incorrect titles, and you are creating an increasing workload for those cleaning up after you. This is a short block to prevent the disruption you are causing, and I will lift it as soon as you start talking and agree to stop your page moves. But please be aware that if you continue with the same problematic actions once the block expires, I (or another admin) will block this account again. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Let me explain to you, Lallienzuol hmar, what happens in cases like this.

When an editor does the same thing again as soon as their block expires, We, the folk who try very hard to help, get exasperated. Not angry, but exasperated. We wonder why they are not hearing us; we wonder why they are not communicating with us.

Sometimes we wonder if English is the right language to use. But we speak English. This is the English Language Wikipedia. Business here is conducted in English

We know that you are an editor who is intelligent. You added Lallienzuol Hmar as the name of the second headmaster of a school in Retzawl. Headmasters are intelligent people. But they are also used to being obeyed without question.

In Wikipedia that does not happen.

In Wikipedia you and I are equals. I will not obey you, you will not obey me. Instead we discuss things and reach agreement, often with the input of others. We call this consensus.

There is already a consensus on article titles. You did not know this at first. You know this now. You must obey that consensus. This is not because I say so, or because another editor says so. It is because we all say so, even if there are a few exceptions.

So what happens now?

You have a choice:

Talk to us, and learn from us. Learn about consensus, and enjoy being an editor here.
Ignore us and continue as you have started.

Choose number 1 and you have an absorbing hobby, you get the chance to enjoy Wikipedia

Choose number 2 and, very shortly, the block to prevent the messes you are causing will become very long, perhaps indefinite. Indefinite means "without defined end" though it may end if you agree to work properly here as colleague, and to obey the rules.

Please choose number 1 Fiddle Faddle 19:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What a shame. I see you have chosen route number 2, and I am pinging Boing! said Zebedee to alert them to your persistent vandalism. Be aware that we are not stupid, and that we watch what people do here. I'm sorry you have decided not to participate in editing Wikipedia for the moment, and I am certain administrators will be here quite soon to implement your decision. Fiddle Faddle 13:27, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:29, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry that you have chosen not to listen, but your continued disruption can not be tolerated any longer. Please note that an indefinite block need not be for ever, and if you do finally start communicating with us and listen to those who are only trying to help you, the block can still be lifted. But as it stands, you cannot be allowed to continue to edit in the way you are doing. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:36, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want to be able to edit Wikipedia again?

Under very controlled circumstances you may. But do not be tempted to try to circumvent this block by any means. We are wise to all those mechanisms and that will result in there being very little hope of this block ever being lifted.

If you want to edit here you may appeal the block. You have to make a binding commitment not to do the things you have been blocked for. I am not going to tell you what those are. You need to acknowledge what they are.

This block is not a punishment. It is to prevent your doing again what you have done so often in the past. Fiddle Faddle 13:39, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And clearing up behind your undiscussed moves, where you have moved the same article again and again against consensus, has taken up far too much time. Emotionally I would leave you blocked for a long time. Intellectually, if you will commit to working here correctly I will support your being unblocked Fiddle Faddle 13:58, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Lallienzuol hmar. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DOIHENG VILLAGE

Doiheng one of the oldest village in the district of Dima Hasao (N C Hills), Assam, India.

DOIHENG VILLAGE

DOIHENG, one of the oldest villages in the district of dima Hasao, Assam, India

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Lallienzuol hmar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21732 was submitted on Jun 05, 2018 10:43:18. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 10:43, 5 June 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Lallienzuol hmar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21769 was submitted on Jun 09, 2018 06:44:39. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 06:44, 9 June 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Lallienzuol hmar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21893 was submitted on Jun 23, 2018 06:36:42. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 06:36, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone considering an unblock should see User:Hmar lallienzuol, an obvious sock from 2016 that I've just found and blocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:20, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And there's User:Zuollienlal hmar, active up until April 2018. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:33, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]