User talk:Lady3mlnm
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Lady3mlnm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Senescence. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! N2e (talk) 15:23, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Timeline of senescence research
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Timeline of senescence research requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of senescence research. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:57, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 9
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of senescence research, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cell. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]My IP is block for unclear to me reason
[edit]Lady3mlnm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 109.110.91.5. That is my IP that is given to me by provider. I don't use any tool to change IP. --Lady3mlnm (talk) 03:55, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
We cannot unblock as there is no direct block on this account. In cases like these where your IP has been blocked for this reason, which does not reflect on your edits, I suggest that you go to WP:IPECPROXY and follow the instructions there to get IP block exemption. — Daniel Case (talk) 01:55, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Orphaned non-free image File:International Longevity Alliance logo.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:International Longevity Alliance logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:34, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Lady3mlnm
Thank you for creating List of African countries by life expectancy.
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for your work!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 11:35, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
List of federal subjects of Russia by life expectancy
[edit]Thank you for your work on List of federal subjects of Russia by life expectancy. There are four issues to which I'd like to draw your attention:
- table cells with opening but no closing bold markup, for example
'''83.40
- table cells with closing but no opening bold markup, for example
80.52'''
- hyphens (-) used everywhere a minus (−) is needed, for example: -3.6 where it should be −3.6
- hyphens (-) used to to indicate missing data, where an em dash (—) would be better
To help find the unbalanced bold markup, I encourage you to install lintHint, which you can read about at WP:Linter#User Javascript tool: lintHint.
Since you seem to care a lot about this article, I encourage you to take it to the next level by implementing these fixes. Cheers! —Anomalocaris (talk) 06:19, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- Anomalocaris, thank you! My program for generating this table had a bug. Corrected. I also improved formatting. I appreciate help advices. --Lady3mlnm (talk) 07:47, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Unblock request
[edit]- Lady3mlnm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 91.215.251.195 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
This IP address has been blocked from editing Wikipedia: The IP address or range 91.215.248.0/22 has been blocked (disabled) by ST47 for the following reason(s): The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be a web host provider or colocation provider. To prevent abuse, web hosts and colocation providers may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Decline reason: You need to fill in the fields if you wish us to investigate the block. Yamla (talk) 20:03, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Yamla, I'm sorry for incorrect design of my request. I had trouble to understand the instructions, and English is not my native language. I filled in the template above with information that, as I believe, is required. I'm ready to give additional information if it is needed. So I ask to inverstigate the block. --Lady3mlnm (talk) 09:57, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- You'll need to disable your VPN/proxy and wait a full 24 hours for the block to clear. If that does not work, please file a new request and give your exact IP address. --Yamla (talk) 09:59, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Unblock request (repeated)
[edit]- Lady3mlnm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 91.215.251.195 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
This IP address has been blocked from editing Wikipedia: The IP address or range 91.215.248.0/22 has been blocked (disabled) by ST47 for the following reason(s): The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be a web host provider or colocation provider. To prevent abuse, web hosts and colocation providers may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Accept reason: While the IP address range is still blocked, I have granted this account the IP block exemption right, which this user had previously but it expired at the end of 2021. This time it's permanent. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:12, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
- Alas, after my previous request my access for editing of Wikipedia did not begin to work. So I file a new request. My IP adress is 91.215.251.195. That is direct IP from my provider, I did not use VPN here. Before I have another IP, since recently I moved to new apartment. I did not have possibility to use another IP conveniently. --Lady3mlnm (talk) 09:10, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Anachronist, thank you very much! I appreciate this! -- Lady3mlnm (talk) 19:39, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
[edit]Hello Lady3mlnm! Your additions to List of Spanish provinces by life expectancy have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. The preamble duplicated the wording of the Eurostat report exactly. I rewrote it to fix the problem and make it more salient to the article. Remember that even when the text conveys such simple information, if you can write it in an original way, you must. Thank you. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 15:12, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Compassionate727, The text has been retold closed to the original, only listing of regions and life expectancy in them were copied (part of sentences), since I prefer to be exact with naming. But I don't mind the change of text. — Lady3mlnm (talk) 15:55, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know that I understand the reply. You can change the provinces back to their Spanish names if you like, that doesn't matter. The point was more that you should change ordinary words and syntax when you can; for example, I tightened the sentence about the regions of Europe with the highest life expectancies for men to include only information that was relevant to the article (about Spanish autonomous regions), which also allowed me to reduce the extent to which that sentence exactly copied the sentence in the Eurostat report. Does that make sense? —Compassionate727 (T·C) 16:05, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Compassionate727, I hope that I have understood you. So, though I changed some words and syntax, I changed them not strong. My sentences were still noticeably similar to the original, and they contained information redundant for the topic of the article. So I should to retold them more cardinally. OK, thanks! — Lady3mlnm (talk) 16:29, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know that I understand the reply. You can change the provinces back to their Spanish names if you like, that doesn't matter. The point was more that you should change ordinary words and syntax when you can; for example, I tightened the sentence about the regions of Europe with the highest life expectancies for men to include only information that was relevant to the article (about Spanish autonomous regions), which also allowed me to reduce the extent to which that sentence exactly copied the sentence in the Eurostat report. Does that make sense? —Compassionate727 (T·C) 16:05, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Hey! I am wondering if you can incorporate this from INEGI. Thank you so much! Horizon Sunset (talk) 05:11, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Horizon Sunset, Thank you very much!
- I've already tried quickly to find database about life expectancy in Mexican states but did not find qualitative database in English. I'm interesting to handle this info but now I'm very busy with my work, so I don't promise anything. — Lady3mlnm (talk) 06:44, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Horizon Sunset, I placed data from INEGI to the page about life expectancy in Mexico. I don't placed data for 2024 since that is rough preliminary estimate.
- Maps are placed to Wikipedia Commons.
- Thank you for the link one more time! — Lady3mlnm (talk) 06:49, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Do you want to further split the countries in the section "regions of countries" based on the continent? I currently have the subdivision data for a lot of countries and I plan on adding them to Wikipedia. Thanks again for incorporating the data I provided for Mexico!! Horizon Sunset (talk) 12:06, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Horizon Sunset! No, I don't have such a plan. Frankly, I'm now in a difficult life situation (I should search gradually for a new country of residence and a new job), so I don't have plan to do pages for new countries. I'm going only to improve maps of life expectancy for some countries with already existing pages and make a page for regions of the world based on estimation of the Global Data Lab (but this is not a promise). — Lady3mlnm (talk) 07:34, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Lady3mlnm
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Goldsztajn, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, List of North American regions by life expectancy, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to contest the deletion:
- Edit the page
- Remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
- Click the button.
If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Goldsztajn}}
. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Goldsztajn (talk) 00:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Goldsztajn: Hi, thank you for your attention to my article. But I can't agree with you proposal to delete it. I didn't understand what exactly wrong with the article, and accordingly, what can be done to improve it. I consider this article as important since it contains evaluation of life expectancy in regions of many countries that does not have their separate pages about this topic.
- I created a discussion at the article's talk page. I ask you to state your argument there in more detail, and let's think how the article can be improved. — Lady3mlnm (talk) 06:39, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi - I've replied to you on the talk page. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 06:44, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
[edit]Happy First Edit Day! Hi Lady3mlnm! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 11:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC) |
Nomination of List of North American regions by life expectancy for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of North American regions by life expectancy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.