User talk:KingsmanOPS

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gauranshi Sharma (May 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a dictionary. We cannot accept articles that are little more than definitions of words or abbreviations as entries. A good article should begin with a good definition, but expand on the subject. You might try creating a definition for this instead at Wiktionary, which is a dictionary. Please only do so if it meets that sister project's criteria for inclusion. These require among others, attestation for the word or phrase, as verified through clear widespread use, or its use in permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gauranshi Sharma and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gauranshi Sharma, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be tagged for G13 deletion.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 13:51, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KingsmanOPS! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 13:51, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Govind Kanda

Hello, KingsmanOPS. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Govind Kanda, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:05, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Govind Kanda

Hello, KingsmanOPS. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Govind Kanda".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:00, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gauranshi Sharma

Hello, KingsmanOPS. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gauranshi Sharma, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:34, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

An article you recently created, Prakash Gandhi, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thanks. Silikonz💬 17:18, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Muskan Jindal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muskan Jindal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muskan Jindal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 19:59, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Muskan Jindal is an Official Indian Foreign Service (IFS). Even Muskan Jindal calls on CM - http://himachalpr.gov.in/OnePressRelease.aspx?Language=1&ID=18504 KingsmanOPS (talk) 04:10, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Parth Gupta moved to draftspace

Unfortunately, an article you recently created Parth Gupta, is not ready as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage with citations from reliable and independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. I've moved your article to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's WP:GNG guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 18:39, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Diler Kharkiya moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Diler Kharkiya, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Razer(talk) 16:08, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok, he is popular Haryanvi singer KingsmanOPS (talk) 16:19, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Diler Kharkiya

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Diler Kharkiya has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appeared to be about a real person or group of people that did not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:28, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sapna Choudhary (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sapna Choudhary and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 17:20, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

She is already popular and notable. She already have hindi Wikipedia https://hi.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%AA%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%BE_%E0%A4%9A%E0%A5%8C%E0%A4%A7%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%80 KingsmanOPS (talk) 03:02, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chaupal (OTT) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chaupal (OTT), is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the Submit the draft for review! button atop the article. Silikonz💬 14:38, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fazilpuria moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Fazilpuria, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:25, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Stage (OTT)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Stage (OTT), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:20, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Spike 'em (talk) 07:47, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hello, I'm Mr.weedle. I noticed that in this edit to Patrika TV, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mr.weedle (talk) 05:09, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Yuva Portal has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Yuva Portal. Thanks! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:06, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yuva Portal (May 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Blaze Wolf was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Spamming various references unrelated to the subject won't demonstrate notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yuva Portal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:19, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrika TV

Your input here is certainly required as to why you hijacked this television network article towards some SEO-packed blog. This is something you never do on Wikipedia, and your games stop now. Nate • (chatter) 23:36, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've also done this with another couple articles, so just right to final warning now. We have no patience for your trash and it won't stay here. Nate • (chatter) 23:43, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, For Everything, You can Disable my Account if Possible. Otherwise No more Stuff Like this KingsmanOPS (talk) 09:07, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And Please Change Back the wiki Article to Default One. KingsmanOPS (talk) 09:08, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, No more Trash type Stuff. KingsmanOPS (talk) 09:11, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Again and Will not do anything like this. KingsmanOPS (talk) 12:40, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FINAL WARNING

Any further disruptive editing on your part will result in an indefinite block. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:02, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks KingsmanOPS (talk) 16:57, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Parth Gupta

Hello, KingsmanOPS. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Parth Gupta, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Parth Gupta

Hello, KingsmanOPS. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Parth Gupta".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:35, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Outlaw (2023 film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Outlaw (2023 film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. –––ÀvîRâm7^(talk) 05:44, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Will add more resources. KingsmanOPS (talk) 07:05, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Fazilpuria

Hello, KingsmanOPS. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fazilpuria, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fazilpuria

Hello, KingsmanOPS. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fazilpuria".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:44, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

After everything you have been through here, and with all the reassurances you have offered after many warnings, now you have started copying text from another website and pasting it into Wikipedia. I am blocking you indefinitely. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 16:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 16:22, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Yuva Portal

Hello, KingsmanOPS. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yuva Portal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Yuva Portal

Hello, KingsmanOPS. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yuva Portal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:31, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Outlaw (2023 film)

Hello, KingsmanOPS. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Outlaw (2023 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:06, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Outlaw (2023 film)

Hello, KingsmanOPS. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Outlaw".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:37, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Prakash Gandhi

Hello, KingsmanOPS. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Prakash Gandhi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:08, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Prakash Gandhi

Hello, KingsmanOPS. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Prakash Gandhi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:47, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pranjal Dahiya

The article Pranjal Dahiya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional article; no evidence of passing WP:GNG, WP:NBIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:22, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pranjal Dahiya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pranjal Dahiya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pranjal Dahiya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:55, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]